VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Girl Next Door *FS* *SVCD* - DVD SCR - SCREAM (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=42423)

quote:

---

Originally posted by pHo
at the end of the day, it doesn't matter what its filmed in, this movie was filmed with guideframes for 1.85:1 and thats the AR that its supposed to be watched in. at least with open matte films the FS version doesn't chop stuff off

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by pHo
and yes, boom mics crop up all the time in unmatted movies, and almost all CG is rendered in the final AR even if its open matte anyway.

---

Man, this is a tough choice. Widescreen vs boob scene!

Fellas? Help me out here

hehe yeah mate I wonder what most of us will pick

Video - Video aint bad now, could be a lot worse and the purple at the bottom

Audio - Dunno if its just me, but the audio sometimes seems a little "tin" like, hard to describe

Movie - Love the movie, E. Cuthbert is bl00dy amazing!

8/7/9

__________________
Hullo Hullo, We Are The Rangers Boys!

NICE FS DVDSCR

occasional black and white.... much better than cam i had LOL


great rls but i'll get the WS always thanx but no thanx enjoy...



8/8.5/9

was nice rls i wish it had been in widescreen but any way pic was nice and sound was very good. 8/8/7

quote:

---

Originally posted by crAzym0f0
and at the end of the day you are a fucking bullshiter! Just yesturday u were taking a dump on *FS* in Shrek 2 *FS* - DVDRIP - Centropy topic, just like the idiots on the first page of this topic. While Shrek 2 *FS* is framed very much like The Girl Next Door *FS*.

---

quote:

---

(re me claiming CG is rendered in the final AR) ohh STFU! Every time some asshole mentions this urban legend, they never seem to have any good, worth mentioning examples of this BS. duh, I wonder why?

---

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

quote:

---

Originally posted by pHo
how fucking stupid are you? do you have ANY idea about ANYTHING? are you related to zangano cos you appear to be about as monumentally thick as he is...

yes, i was taking a dump on the FS print of shrek. and i took a dump on this too. if you honeslty don't know the difference between filming in fullframe with 1.85:1 guidelines and a P&S FS print then i'm not going to bother explaining it to you. did i watch either the FS print of shrek or girl next door? no. i grabbed the WS prints. why? because FS prints are shit. the fact it might've been filmed open matte doesnt change that fact, i want to see what i'm SUPPOSED to see, not less than (with a standard ws>p&s fs conversion) or more than (with an open matte fs print). i want to see what the director wants me to see.. are you capable of understanding that very easy fact?



ok, how about Blade 2? there you go. there's your example. you can even check up on it, as the centropy print was open matte and all the CG sequences were in 1.85:1

happy now you fucking moron?

---

numbnuts does have a point... the fight continues...

I do have to say... If you compare the releases FS and WS in this case (might not be all) then you do notice that both versions have extras... FS has more at the top/bottom but less at the sides than WS, and WS has less at top/bottom but more on the sides.

This does work though... if you think about it, it says it was recorded in 1.83:1 on imdb (reliable source), this just means both WS and FS are cropped in different ways.

But anyway as pHo says, the director does want you to see it in WS... so thats the way to go.

Hey, in response to all this FS/WS flaming; just get the version you want and enjoy it, instead of dumping over each other how good one aspect ratio is compared to the other...

GROW UP. There's more important things to argue about than aspect ratios'...

-M

quote:

---

Originally posted by crAzym0f0
Your two fathers are fucking morons, ask them.

---

quote:

---

Thanks for reinforcing that u are shitting all over *FS* before even checking if it is P&S or not, just like the assholes on first page of this topic. While you are at it, might as well start makeing-up other bullshit.

---

quote:

---

Ohh wait, u did; Blade 2 by Centropy is a TS and no FS dvd print of Blade 2 exists u dum bullshitting fuck. Whats next, u gona give me some other workprint as an example?

---

quote:

---

yeah, lets all shit over stuff we don't even check, shit over it just cause dumass pHo thinks thats the way it; "SUPPOSED". [/B]

---

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

hey Mr pistoffHomo, instead of breaking-up quotes like a faget and fliping over something u can't prove, DUH!! obviosly give example of a retail, unmatted print, with those bullshit flaws of yours, otherwise stick that example up your ass! WTF u giving some shit quality, workprint, that ain't and never will be available to the public on vhs and/or dvd, as FS Blade 2 is matted from WS, get that through your empty fucking head of yours. and I don't give a flying fuck if u have a hard-on for theatrical ar or so called "OAR"! Don't bullshit others as if something is pan scanned to hell, when u didn't even bother to check, learn that!

Outside of a few watermarks the quality is okay for a DVD screener. No black and whites that I can remember.

7/9/8

__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you work for UPS? I thougt I saw you checking out my package.