VCDQuality Forums Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 52 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Road To Perdition *PROPER* - TELESYNC - UTi (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=4912)


Posted by IamJackBlack on 07-16-2002 01:44 PM:

do i smoke too much crack, or did UTi used to be an MP3 group?


Posted by cofferscuffs on 07-16-2002 02:47 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by IamJackBlack
do i smoke too much crack, or did UTi used to be an MP3 group?


crack prolly...

__________________
cC.


Posted by ABlix0 on 07-16-2002 07:40 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by PaulAAtreides
Guess no one bothered to mention the about 20 fucking audio glitches in first 4 minutes of film?

Do you all judge by sample? GEEZE!!!!



First 4 minutes. Big deal.

Small price to pay for a great release.


Posted by killfxp on 07-16-2002 08:52 PM:

these people need to stop smoking crack!


Posted by VcdGahds on 07-17-2002 04:59 PM:

This is an excellent re-encode. The quality of the picture is head and shoulders above the previous release. I would give it a 7 for video and a 6 for sound, because even though it is only the first 4 minutes, you do miss a couple of important things...like the year the show was in since it cut out right as the kid was saying what year it was But seriously, the sound is fine. This one is definitely worth watching...and the movie was outstanding...a 9.

As far as SVCD vs. VCD...if you guys want to do an SVCD encode then go ahead. If you decide to do ONLY SVCD like the other guys did, then people may start to have a problem. Me, I don't give a rat's ass. My Pioneer will play almost anything I put in it


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 07-18-2002 02:39 AM:

Fuckin' ay! Nice, tidy lil rls.


Posted by Starscreamer on 07-18-2002 07:13 AM:

OK, well, I'm getting the VCD version right now, can someone tell me if this version is as good as the SVCD version but one disc less, or should I stop right now and go for the SVCD? Please let me know, I hate when there's 2 rls's of movies at the same time. From the same group....makes it more difficult to decide.


Posted by jedi420 on 07-19-2002 11:52 AM:

man i cant find a sample of this anywhere. what s the difference in the internal and proper? just mpg1 and mpeg2? has anyone seen both the releases yet that can comment on the differences quality wise?


Posted by Mitzelplick on 07-21-2002 07:40 AM:

The audio does have fuckups in the first few minutes of the film, But it clears up and is a nice release, if you really have a problem with it..get a fucking job and buy a ticket..Props uti


Posted by TheDiggler on 07-21-2002 08:04 AM:

Just finished watching....

Spent the whole damn day watching ALL of the new shit and finally got a chance to watch this one. First off, big thanks to UTI for this and all other releases.

Well worth the d/l time if your not to anal about quality, in addition to being an excellent flick. Good points; the whole movie is intact with no logos, not cropped to high hell, does not contain a shit load of macro blocks, synced audio and did not notice any video glitches. It does have the audio drops in the first few minutes and does give a few audio cracks here and there throughout the film. The only other dislike was the brightness, especially at the end where you find it difficult to see what is happening, but like the audio issues it is brief.

Just a side not related to this release:
1. Could we please stop comparing the groups? ANYBODY who takes the time to release deserves some form of appreciation, even if you think the release sucked. Offering praise to a release in fear of a group halting releases just goes against the point in even posting a review. Or worse, flaming others for giving a proper review!

2. I just wish that people would STOP posting messages that have not even taken the time to d/l and watch a movie in it’s entirety. If you want to bitch about someone’s comments then post a review then gripe and try to be civil. We have people giving there opinion on what? A jpeg or some 2 min. clip? Get it, burn-it, watch it and then post. Or worse yet, the individual who just gives you a movie review! Worse then that, the movie review with spoilers!! Without any mention of the quality of the release. Take the time and read through the posts, how many are actual reviews? I wish that every release had a double thread, 1 for actual reviews and the other for anything else.

If you actually read this whole thing thanks for reading! If you want to flame me for MY opinions could you do so with a proper review of this release?

Thanks!


Posted by renegade on 07-29-2002 07:22 AM:

No better than the first release. Props for the effort.


Posted by jonywinf on 08-12-2002 11:35 PM:

still looking for this version...if the jpeg's are any indication then it is sweet.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:44 AM. Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 52 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.