VCDQuality Forums - Four Brothers *SVCD* - TELESYNC

Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 59 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Four Brothers *SVCD* - TELESYNC - PreVail (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=65606)

Posted by Kick on 08-16-2005 08:04 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by deathdawg
no comment...

0/0/?

no comment...

0/0/?

:: What's more worthless than saying "No Comment" and posting 0s? QUOTING THE SAME THING. -K::

Posted by mojodude on 08-16-2005 08:40 PM:

I thought Stn's releases were bad but Prevail makes them look like Saosin

Posted by crapper on 08-16-2005 09:14 PM:

i have seen the light

or was there something more then a muffled moving blur

pic crap
sound donno couldnt find it

movie was there one?? seemed to been lost somewhere

in other words.. please DONT DO THIS EVER AGAIN!!!

Posted by 115641 on 08-16-2005 10:19 PM:

OMG!!! Audio and video are getting a big fat ONE... This is addressed to the guys of PreVail: QUIT, it isn't worth it!

Posted by PiMpZta on 08-17-2005 01:35 AM:

if u d.loaded it, i feel sorry 4 u

0.05/0.1/?

__________________
HOLLA AT YO BOY!

Posted by Airhead on 08-17-2005 06:32 AM:

I dunno if VCDQuality.com will post this being internal ... so:

Four.Brothers.InTeRNal.REPACK.CAM.SVCD-PreVail

FROM THEIR NFO:
Note: We're truly sorry about that last release.
We feel this 1 really is ts type quality but
you can decide for yourselves. Hopefully
you'll get a chance to see how this release really looks.

From their REPACK Sample: Picture is a bit bright , colors are faded , has a slight flicker on the screen. Sound is still hollow as its a CAM and sounds like the speakers are 10 feet away.

Overall i think from this thread , the flack they got from other groups and everyone who touched their sample/movie of their "SVCD TS" they realised they messed up. They still need a few slaps though as they dont realise its the audio, not the video that makes the difference between a CAM & TS , and this clearly sounds like a CAM. (Refering to their notes in nfo We feel this 1 really is ts type quality )

This is how it should have been labeled and encoded in the first place , iNTERNAL CAM .... which they encoded to make it watchable.

Most watchable copy out as of this post.

Posted by bYtEsMaCk on 08-17-2005 07:52 AM:

OMG! If I was deaf and blind I might have enjoyed this release. I wish I had my bandwidth back I wasted on this POS. PreVail - a word of advice, please stop using your camera phone to record movies.

Posted by Grifty on 08-17-2005 09:27 AM:

Mmmmm I'd rather have a colostomy bag than watch this...............Hey it's crap. But at least we didn't pay....Well i hope you didn't.

Posted by fluffinator on 08-17-2005 05:21 PM:

I've figured it out. I know their secret.

The cammer has a tiny spy cam shoved up his nose to film it, and a micro phone shoved up his ass to record the sound.

Then, when they "encoded" it, they added a layer mask of shit being thrown against a wall and sliding down. Set the opacity on that to 60% then released.

I'm surprised that I didn't see any

"be thankfull for the release and rate it high anyways" posts.

But this is utter & udder CRAP.

-50
-50
7 - good flick, would almost consider paying for it, maybe, if i had a nice joint and bottle of jack.

Biting my tongue, but.... the fucking cam was better than this, to the point i might edit my post on the cam and give it a higher rating

AVOID!!!!! unless you wanna puke all over your pc desk

__________________
And it appears Burt Reynolds has changed his name to Turd Furgeson.

That's right, it's a funny name

Posted by sungsu on 08-18-2005 05:45 AM:

It makes me say, wtf

Posted by morco on 08-18-2005 05:15 PM:

wow FTF like quality!

2/2/X

Posted by RaZor Ramon on 08-18-2005 05:41 PM:

The repack looks like a decent cam and better than the previous cam. I didn't even bother looking at this one

Posted by giannisKM on 08-20-2005 01:43 AM:

sucks 1/1/7

Posted by Methadon on 08-20-2005 08:01 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Airhead
(Refering to their notes in nfo We feel this 1 really is ts type quality )
[/B]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't a TS just denote that they used a different source for the audio (ie, cam the video, and record the audio from a hearing-aid jack or something)? Meaning to say TS is more of an audio reference than video reference?

Posted by wI-OSMAN- on 08-21-2005 01:53 AM:

Four.Brothers.InTeRNal.REPACK.CAM.SVCD-PreVail

auido- 5(cam)
video-5(flickerning a bit)
movie- about to watch tonight.

5/5/?

Posted by mattmatt02 on 08-21-2005 02:28 PM:

errrm.....NO!

this is the shittest of the shit,

i had to download the sample just to see how bad it was and it looked awful!!

v 1.5 (so blurry its like an underwater cinema)

a 1.5 (cammer might aswel have put the mic in the cinemas toilets and recorded it, would have been better than this!)

m ? (well, how am i supposed 2 know from this)

arrgh, go away!

Posted by buffy on 08-21-2005 02:50 PM:

5/5/7

Well, too bad the quality wasn't as good as the movie!

The video is blurred and watery (like the prevail version of Dark Water) and the audio is really bad. The actual film's okay though.

Posted by Suplyndmnd on 08-22-2005 04:46 PM:

Just My Two Cents...

Short and bitter..

Audio - 1
Video - 1
Movie - ? (Maybe i'll find out, I got about 7 minutes in)

I know i'm just dropping an elbow on an already beaten horse but... why the hell not?

Please dont do this again PreVail.

Thank you.

Posted by rcx on 12-10-2005 11:42 PM:

at least it's widescreen

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14 AM.

Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 59 posts from this thread on one page