VCDQuality Forums - Saw 2 *XViD* - TELESYNC

Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »
Show all 90 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Saw 2 *XViD* - TELESYNC - maVen (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=66982)

Posted by Iammyself on 11-01-2005 06:43 AM:

SAME VIDEO

this is the same video as WUF just filtered. sorry spae a|\|d other keys died... the krop is esaktly the same.. sorry for the skrewed keyoard

I HOPE \/ is |\|ot talkig aout me... |\|ot rekode still same video worked a|\|d filtered, same silver dvd sourse tho

let me add the audio is |\|ot as good as Wuf good though

Posted by Neomic2005 on 11-01-2005 06:55 AM:

For all the people who are saying this is a re-encode, learn what the word means first. This is not a re-encode, this is the original. A re-encode is taking media, and changing it to another format. There are no other formats of this release, therefor it is not a re-encode.

A Re-ecode would be like Maven releaseing an SVCD and then another group releasing the same source in Xvid.

Anyways... After checking out a few rars and a the sample...

V: 8 - SUPERB for a TS!
A: 8 - A bit bassy, but it'll do...
M: n/a - Will watch all of it later

Posted by directv on 11-01-2005 08:30 AM:

all this talk about re-encodes makes me wanna head over to tmd and download a 200mb avi file that looks like garbage and has the tmd-moviez tag across the bottom ruining the release. just kidding, i wouldn't waste my time

__________________
http://www.myfilehut.com - myFileHut.com is #1 for Free File and Image Hosting

Posted by vission on 11-01-2005 01:14 PM:

Well I purchased my replacement standalone like 3 or 4 months ago and paid a little extra for it because of DivX playback capability. So far I've had success with one DivX/Xvid format disc playing on it w/o big blocks everywhere and the color/image being extremely distorted (Philips DVP-642 I believe).

So I was reluctant to get this copy at first, I had planned to convert it. I didn't think the WUF svcd was gonna be worth it. To my surprise, this copy works on my standalone AND looks/sounds good. At least good enough for me. It is a little discolored in dark spots for me, could just be my player. Minor motion blur, not distracting though.

Sound seems good for me as well, I don't have the volume up very high at all and I'm hearing everything clear, the parts where they play the cassette player need some additonal volume.

Decent, fast work maVen.

Posted by ando on 11-01-2005 01:24 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pmcx9
this is how to convert xvid to dvd format very very easily.
grab a piece of software called vso divxtodvd converter.
load up the xvid and click convert.
it produces a VIDEO_TS folder after about an hour. this can be burnt using nero as a dvd movie or i like to convert this to iso format using imgtools and keep it stored on my hard disk.

ack, 1hour?

[imghttp://homepage.eircom.net/~magnycours1999/misc/nice1.gif[/img]

my pc aint slow either, 1.5gigs ram

Posted by Avenue_2 on 11-01-2005 02:38 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Neomic2005
For all the people who are saying this is a re-encode, learn what the word means first. This is not a re-encode, this is the original. A re-encode is taking media, and changing it to another format. There are no other formats of this release, therefor it is not a re-encode.

A Re-ecode would be like Maven releaseing an SVCD and then another group releasing the same source in Xvid.

This is the original... so maven used an xvid camcorder to capture this?

__________________

Woof Woof CandyMan

"she ain't nothin' but a Hound Dog..."

Posted by cirr0 on 11-01-2005 03:52 PM:

v-8 a-7 m-8
xvid = smaller filesize and thats enough for me.
im sure everyone loves having ten million svcds laying around.

__________________
"but i choose to die, on a steady diet of booze and lies"

Posted by coldconfessio on 11-01-2005 05:17 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ando
ack, 1hour?

[imghttp://homepage.eircom.net/~magnycours1999/misc/nice1.gif[/img]

my pc aint slow either, 1.5gigs ram

im on a 1.4ghz with 512mb and it took me about 2hrs to convert xvid to dvd with that program, the time on that thing isnt exact.

Posted by Roger on 11-01-2005 05:25 PM:

Re: SAME VIDEO

quote:
Originally posted by Iammyself
this is the same video as WUF just filtered. sorry spae a|\|d other keys died... the krop is esaktly the same.. sorry for the skrewed keyoard

I HOPE \/ is |\|ot talkig aout me... |\|ot rekode still same video worked a|\|d filtered, same silver dvd sourse tho

let me add the audio is |\|ot as good as Wuf good though

This you actualy watch this release ? or even WUF release ?
Please bro compare it and stop talking shit about what you don't know

Posted by BiggD23 on 11-01-2005 05:34 PM:

9/8/8

Overall, the quality is great...best of the releases for this movie without a doubt. However, I have my doubts as to whether the audio is direct. I swear I hear coughing a few times throughout the movie...take for example the very beginning when the TV comes on and the puppet says, "Hello Michael, I want to play a game." Listen carefully in the pause between "Michael" and "I want..." and you will hear someone coughing.

No big deal, as I said quality is still great, just warrants mentioning.

Posted by sweetray on 11-01-2005 06:35 PM:

This release is awesome. I sure hope maven gets the movie "Get rich or die tryin". keep up the good work maven your the best

Posted by sdotty313 on 11-01-2005 07:33 PM:

v-7.5 a bit bluured at times
a-7-kinda hollow
m-watching as i type

burned to dvd and lookin good so far, good job guys

Posted by Calicuzn on 11-01-2005 08:04 PM:

best ts i've ever seen maven....

9/8/8

Posted by Muzak on 11-01-2005 08:58 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by cra-xxx
Oh noo XViD isn't what the majority want!

I believe there'll be dubbed XViD > SVCD reencodes here in our country, just to satisfy the majority :/

But reencodes aren't what we really want.

Please encode in SVCD-format again.

XViD is for pr0n on PC-screen, always used SVCD for TV, because it's the best, and supported by ALL standalone-players.

Btw. have seen the sample .. nice job, as usual

Regards, cx

EDiT

".. XViD, to better suit our supreme quality .."

But TSs are always a little bit blurry, so SVCD is OK ;D
Make a SVCD-rls, too. And let the ppl decide what's best ..

Traffic doesn't matter ..

Anyway - when the movie starts here in cinema (06/feb/09) there will be a DVDRip in SVCD-format

ahh, poor baby not gonna be able to sell this as easy?

in any case, i think this is a good copy, but not worth all the praise its getting. best out, sure. appreciated, definately. but these 9's and 10's are just dumb.

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
ok, well in future when you join a community that is very anti-sellers, you really should choose a username that isn't going to cause confusion and annoyance. its like joinin an arabic forum with the name BUSHRULES because you like the australian outback.

Posted by protekt0r on 11-01-2005 09:13 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Avenue_2
This is the original... so maven used an xvid camcorder to capture this?

Buahahaha. Now that's funny

Release:

Video: 8 Awesome! Best TS in a while. I'm glad for the xvid... maVen will certainly pave the way for other groups to rls in xvid.

Audio: 7 A little low and hollowy, but otherwise excellent. But it still doesn't sound direct...

Movie: 6 eh.... i thought the 1st one was better

-protekt0r

__________________
"Signatures Suck"

Posted by protekt0r on 11-01-2005 09:29 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by tobycoaster
hmmm anyone else notice that
the release title is Saw 2 *XViD* - TELESYNC - maVen

yet the nfo says
"Here is another great TC for you to enjoy, "

and " when we're making our
great Telecines "

lol

They were being smartasses. Prodigy keeps making claims that their TC's are really TC. But in reality half of them turn out to be TS's. :-)

-protekt0r

__________________
"Signatures Suck"

Posted by horizonstar on 11-01-2005 10:10 PM:

Thank you, maVen, for leading the charge to abandon the older MPEG formats in the pre-retail universe. The scene needed a high-profile group to take this big step, and I didn't think it would happen so soon. You have my support. (No more nukes for XviD TS! )

__________________

Scrobble all you want, we'll make more!

Posted by chateau on 11-01-2005 10:30 PM:

quote:
xvid is the easiest conversion ever for a dvd. Just use Winavi, or dvd santa, they convert xvids real easy and real fast.

well, if you're going to use crap programs to convert, that kind of defeats the purpose of having xvid instead of SVCD.

Anyway, I prefer SVCD because I can burn to DVD without converting. I prefer xvid's when they have surround sound.

If people move to xvid for the negligible quality improvement, though, so be it. I'll spend 70 or 80 bucks on an additional player. Complaining about it is just not right.

8/7/?

Posted by DtM2000 on 11-01-2005 10:58 PM:

I think peeps are being generous on this one.

V = 7 - OK but too blurry for an 8
A = 6 - Not that good. The bass is high and quite often drowns out the dialogue.
M = ? - Got pissed off with the bass and decided to wait for a better release (If one comes along!).

Thanks for the release maVen and who gives a fuck what format it's in? Keep up the good work!

<<<<<Come back SAOSiN>>>>>

Posted by scottish nutt on 11-02-2005 01:51 AM:

is this copy missing some of the film? it seemed to end suddenly and im sure there is a scene with a woman either cutting her finger off or getting them cut off that i never seen

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:34 PM.

Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »
Show all 90 posts from this thread on one page