VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- King Kong *XViD* - DVDRIP - GOD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=68556)

quote:

---

Originally posted by sendcrap1
[ NUKE ] [ King Kong DVDRiP XViD GOD ] [ oversized(2cd.max.per.runtime.rules) ]


let's all hope for a repack

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by White Rabbit
i couldnt give a wank about oversizing, if you burn/convert xvid movies to dvd like me then the more oversizing the better.

v 10 (retail or not, why the fuck am i gonna bother upgrading an unmarked screener to the real retail rip? answer: im not. this is a perfect xvid imo and nothing less)

a 10 (5.1, whats wrong with that)

m 9.5 (it dragged a bit at parts but what 3 hour film doesnt? this is an excellent flick)


thanks GOD for this clean rip, and the best yet. and the 'more to come' comment in your NFO sounds very interesting!

---

__________________
my wifes a sex object..when i say sex she objects

YEs to say thx to the group.It loos sweet and is sweet as a movie.Been waiting for this for a long time now.

Movie9
Vid9
Audio9

Scoot

__________________
||| Amd 64 3500+ ||| Dfi Ultra SLi Mobo ||| 7800GTX ||| 2x80gigs WD ||| 1gig ocz 4200 |||

Well, its a compressed file in xvid format anyway. So who really cares if its not retail, cause it wont be any better if this is not it

scene rules should be revised to allow for 3 disc rips of movies this length - 2 discs with this sound, and it'd be macroblock city.

9/9/8

this is a keeper

Wow, it's taking an age for that retail DVDR.

quote:

---

Originally posted by chiv
its an unmarked dvdscr...

---

great rip... It took me a minute to watch this, as i really dont like the movie, although having this copy over a week, i didnt want to waste 2 1/2 hrs again...

I finally took a look and Its damn decent, If not a retail, its more like Shrek 2 DVDrip that got an early rls, like a WP of a DVD or sumthing...

The video is a bit, umm... i guess pixelated is right, but its not quite what I see, there is something wrong with it being a DVD rip, its just not as clear, maybe a dvdscr unmarked (to the naked eye) either way its the best out and def not a cropped dvdscr, some guy posted some pics earlier in the thread, and you could see scr msg over the tv, but this didnt have it even though slightly smaller than dvdscr pic... oversized is no problem although I think a 2cd rls woulda did good, and woulda had no nuke (or sheepish ones)... The sound is great...

now to the bad parts.. this just wasnt my taste of a movie, it starts slow, speeds up, and then lasts too long, and ends, well, too long of what it should, given that its not much diff than the original, this woulda been a decent flick with 30 mins shaved from it...

oh well i got an opinion which really doesnt like oscar flicks that are drawn out too long... so for this flick (the CGI isnt that great really, but its the movie i care about) i rate it 8/8.5/6

Its a DVDScr unmarked...

If you were to put this on 2disc it would be crap... 3disc makes this one very good.

BUT... You could get the SoT release instead.

The image below is GoD at the top and SoT at the bottom... I played these at the same time side by side and frame matched for the screen grab.

http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/4548/kong20052up.jpg

As you can see GoD release is faded compared to SoT release... Both are 3disc.

I can vouch for the King.Kong.2005.iNTERNAL.DVDRip.XviD.AC3.SoT 3CD release as well. Very nice!

how does this compare to the NUKEE release?

quote:

---

Originally posted by rahzel
how does this compare to the NUKEE release?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by tycho55
SoT's is definitely the best by far.

---