VCDQuality Forums - El Diablo - WORKPRINT

Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »
Show all 68 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- El Diablo - WORKPRINT - VideoCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=7140)

Posted by Ripper on 08-27-2002 05:33 PM:

I've just had a look @the first cd its light and for some reason its called Diablo and not el diablo and there are 3 diffrent transparent marks 1 of them im sure is a running clock..

What some people dont realise is the jpeg uploaders dont have axx to every pre site hense they dont get every 0 sec film samples first.. but as a rule this is a good site and i noticed that iso**** dont report that much on the film side anymore and this is the site to come to for movie releases
so give the guys a break

__________________
I was never caught!

Posted by Urkman on 08-27-2002 06:09 PM:

Not bad for PRE...

watchable Workprint 7/6/??

Posted by Azrael626 on 08-27-2002 06:13 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Ripper
I've just had a look @the first cd its light and for some reason its called Diablo and not el diablo and there are 3 diffrent transparent marks 1 of them im sure is a running clock..

What some people dont realise is the jpeg uploaders dont have axx to every pre site hense they dont get every 0 sec film samples first.. but as a rule this is a good site and i noticed that iso**** dont report that much on the film side anymore and this is the site to come to for movie releases
so give the guys a break

The reason for that is that the title is not for sure yet, originally it was called Diablo, then El Diablo, and now they are changing the name again, so for the WP it simply says Diablo.

Posted by Rep- on 08-27-2002 06:39 PM:

ok. Some of them may have looked at the sample, because yes I know it is released before VCDQuality hsa em, seeing as though I've seen Ops request the NFO and Sample to put on the main page. BUt when I see 1/1/1 and a 10/10/10, It doesn't seem to me that someone viewed the whole movie, to see how good the movie was. I don't think VCDQuality is THAT slow to have someone able to download the whole movie and watch it before they post it though...

Posted by AngelDeath on 08-27-2002 06:58 PM:

Just watched the Sample, its watchable, a little blocky at times near the top, sound is not bad, but the video is a bit washed out, but still overall nice rls for a pre. great rls.

__________________
AngelDeath is Here
Stupidity is Universal, Wisdon is from Within.

Posted by gallonFREAK on 08-27-2002 07:01 PM:

like i said

videoCAM is back

Posted by pHo on 08-27-2002 07:38 PM:

looks like another unfilitered silver bin/cue. fair nuff i guess, but personally i would've done some simple colour correction / gamma fixes etc on it myself.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Posted by Bud-man on 08-27-2002 11:43 PM:

Studio: New Line Cinema
Genre: Crime Drama
Release Date: Spring 2003

Cast: Vin Diesel, Steve Eastin, Timothy Olyphant, Larenz Tate, Jacqueline Obradors, Geno Silva, Juan Fernadez, Jeff Kober, Mike Moroff, Emilio Rivera, Marco Rodriguez, George Sharperson

Premise: A mysterious man known only as Diablo takes over a powerful drug cartel when the former boss goes to prison. That former drug lord then teams up with a DEA agent and his partner to try to take down Diablo.

Posted by azenxtacee on 08-28-2002 02:36 AM:

This movie is awesome

I just saw the sample of this movie and teh video quality is soo good for a pre-release and the sound is good also. I just wish they fixed the contrast and gamma for this movie becuase its a little too bright but im not complaining GOOD release keep it up

Posted by CraZY8 on 08-28-2002 01:13 PM:

help

say i wanted to make it better
what can i do
run it tho tmpeg or somtine?

in order to make this worth my 2 cds
anyone have any suggestions on a new aspect ratio and a
new sound settings
thx
pz

Posted by CraZY8 on 08-28-2002 02:01 PM:

werd

ye thx for tha help
but i was looking more into like the viewing part
liek maybe run it thorugh tmpeg or somtine

Posted by Bria James on 08-28-2002 06:32 PM:

el diablo

This release is watchable, but like everyone else, of course I would like to see a better one. Im not complaining at all, because for a pre-release of a movie that no one has even heard of, it's the bomb!

Also, Ive been checking this site out for a while, but this is the first time that I posted. It always amazes me how many people complain about some of these releases. If you guys can do a better job, why not do it instead of talking shit about the next guys work?

but like I said, I am new to this stuff, so maybe Im the one whos tripping....(not)

props to VCDQUALITY for keeping us up on all the new shit!
One love in Cali!

Posted by renegade on 08-29-2002 01:42 AM:

just got the time to check out this flick. the quality of this workprint is very watchable. the pic is a little grainy but nothing really bad, and the audio is ok. I did notice during cd2 a couple minor glitches but nothing that took away from watching it. As for the movie, it was actually pretty good I thought. thanks for the pre release, video cd.

Posted by gallonFREAK on 08-29-2002 01:44 AM:

remember all, stating an opinion doesmt mean your complaining!
dont be scared tovoice your opinion, this sites not just for ass kissing jokes!!

im not complaining when i say this quality sux!!

im just viewing from my 20/20 vision!!

Posted by ThEgAmE on 08-29-2002 02:54 PM:

How come xXx screener and el diablo have the same rating, i think xXx screener has a good rating but this should have a lowere rating (just a little) cause it is not video quality, the audio is the same though but videoCD rules 4 getting this super pre-release b4 anyone and those lamers the a-team suck for trying to steal videoCDs copy of el diablo.

Posted by Azrael626 on 08-29-2002 04:39 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ThEgAmE
How come xXx screener and el diablo have the same rating, i think xXx screener has a good rating but this should have a lowere rating (just a little) cause it is not video quality, the audio is the same though but videoCD rules 4 getting this super pre-release b4 anyone and those lamers the a-team suck for trying to steal videoCDs copy of el diablo.

Because it's being graded on it's quality as a Workprint, not as a Screener, each type of release is rated upon it's quality for that type of release, not 10's for svcd and 3's for ts..you rate the level of each type of rls from ts to svcd...

Posted by MacMall88 on 08-30-2002 01:35 AM:

quote:
say i wanted to make it better what can i do run it tho tmpeg or somtine?

I re-encoded this rls with the following settings, which, IMO, looks hella better than the original:
Go into TMPGEnc
Click on Settings
Go To Advanced
Click on Simple Color Correction
Adjust the following:
Brightness: -34
Contrast: 3
Gamma: 31
Red: 88
Blue: 58

All of these make for a more watchable release

P.S.: I also used clip frame to cut off those goddamn blurred serials at the top ( ifound them annoying as hell)

Posted by Urkman on 08-31-2002 11:03 PM:

Blurry Pic and Scratchy sound

Just keep trying VideoCD...

6/5/7

Posted by Azrael626 on 09-01-2002 01:49 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Urkman
Blurry Pic and Scratchy sound

Just keep trying VideoCD...

6/5/7

There's a reason it's called a workprint and out 6 months prior to theater release dude. Respect the fact that you never would have been able to see it for months if not for that rls.

Posted by Dr. Poo PhD on 09-01-2002 06:00 PM:

Quite watchable for being out so early. Props to VideoCD for their efforts. Some of us do, in fact, appreciate the effort put into this stuff. I'd rate this one a 7/6/8.

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:08 AM.

Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »
Show all 68 posts from this thread on one page