VCDQuality Forums - The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers *PROPER* - TELESYNC

Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »
Show all 99 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers *PROPER* - TELESYNC - FTF (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=12494)

Posted by Evisu on 12-20-2002 05:51 AM:

Re: Re: ftf should not be allowed to rls

quote:
Originally posted by JcM AkA ViPER

This is an excellent example of why groups get pissed off so much, every release is a good thing, who gives a shit if the quality is shit or if it is a dvd screener, ya gota give credit to any group who risk thier ass to rls this stuff, without them you would have no releases at all, then WTF would u do..... all im saying is, if you keep flaming these guys on every single release that they do, they wont even bother anymore, they'll just release internal i dont think they give a shit or not, to what you think of thier release, releases are for it members and peeps who support the group. i reckon u shud cut these guys sum fucking slack here, they aint done nuttin wrong, infact they probably doing u a favour, cos you'll prob end up gettin this anyway, so say what ya like, they really dont give a shit, they'll just rls thier shit internal and hardly anyone will get hold of it, that aint to good for the peeps who like the ftf releases and give them credit for releasing.

allthou i aint a big fan of ftf release and think they put speed before quality, i agree with everything in above quote.
these guys and all other groups do take a BIG risk for the likes of YOU!!! the very people who flame them.
if u think u can do better then go do it.
if u dont like the quality, then dont dl it
but like he said u know ur gonna dl it n e way coz it's the only way u cheap arse fucks r gonna see it , so why even bother fucking bitching about it

go ahead tell me to stfu see what i care
if it makes u lame arse fools feel big flaming ppl down the other end of a wire then it just shows u should have been 1 of the little sperms ur father wanked away

give these groups some credit for what they do

all but NEWFXP that is

Posted by a1catraz on 12-20-2002 07:19 AM:

Re: ftf should not be allowed to rls

quote:
Originally posted by dizzyD
another lame ass attempt from a shitty group. tcf's internal cam is 100x better than this peice of trash. ftf go away! we don't want you in the scene. and for those of you who say "fuck off, it's free..blah blah..or what do you do for the scene??" i'll say to you FUCK OFF ....these releases should not be put out...and dont bother saying "u dont like it, dont leech it"...my point is that this shit shouldn't be released in the first place, it's a waste of space on all sites. THE END

take out all the "shitty" unwatchable shit..

what would oyu have?

who produces good ts's anymore?

you wanna wait 2 months for a fukin screener?

thats what i thought

this is better then the tcf version.. just acuse hte sample is in a dark area, you gotta prejudge and shit..

if you don't like ftf's shit.. ITS EASY DONT FUKIN LEECH EM.

what does sites space have anything to do with you
u supplying the drives? u payin the money for hte drives?

the scene don't revolve around you.

i rather have choices rather then havin NO choices..

fuck... people like you..

gooooooooo awayyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by a1catraz on 12-20-2002 07:20 AM:

Re: Re: why u slamming ftf?

quote:
Originally posted by dizzyD

firs off: i will see this movie at the theatre, so saying "they spend hours to bring it to me cuz i dont wanna go to the theatre" is pointless cuz i wouldnt download a ts of this movie. and second, take the complaining somewhere else? lol, i don't know if you know this..but umm...this is where people post their opinions about the releases, these forums are here for flames and complaints, along with other things..

and by the way tcf's release is also bad, i just said it's better than this cuz this really blows..and i don't care how many countless hours ftf encoders put into this or other releases but they aren't doing a good job. get a good fucking source, then encode and rls. that's that

you make it sound so easy.

"get a good fucking source, then encode and rls. that's that "

i don't see your sorry ass doin it.

Posted by nicci on 12-20-2002 07:55 AM:

8/8/4

FTF ur the kings....

now plz do ur masterpiece with a real movie...we expect Gangs of New York from u....only from u !

thx

Posted by dizzyD on 12-20-2002 08:42 AM:

Re: Re: Re: why u slamming ftf?

quote:
Originally posted by a1catraz

you make it sound so easy.

"get a good fucking source, then encode and rls. that's that "

i don't see your sorry ass doin it.

how the fuck do you know what i do or not? exactly, now stfu.

quote:
Originally posted by JcM AkA ViPER

This is an excellent example of why groups get pissed off so much, every release is a good thing, who gives a shit if the quality is shit or if it is a dvd screener, ya gota give credit to any group who risk thier ass to rls this stuff, without them you would have no releases at all, then WTF would u do..... all im saying is, if you keep flaming these guys on every single release that they do, they wont even bother anymore, they'll just release internal i dont think they give a shit or not, to what you think of thier release, releases are for it members and peeps who support the group. i reckon u shud cut these guys sum fucking slack here, they aint done nuttin wrong, infact they probably doing u a favour, cos you'll prob end up gettin this anyway, so say what ya like, they really dont give a shit, they'll just rls thier shit internal and hardly anyone will get hold of it, that aint to good for the peeps who like the ftf releases and give them credit for releasing.

"without them you would have no releases at all, then WTF would u do..... " lol..i wouldn't give 2 shits, cuz i wouldn't get this.

"all im saying is, if you keep flaming these guys on every single release that they do, they wont even bother anymore, they'll just release internal i dont think they give a shit or not, to what you think of thier release, releases are for it members and peeps who support the group." LOL....GOOD!!!!!! i hope they dont BOTHER anymore..jesus this is my initial point...let em rls internal, who gives a fuck...anwyay this is getting already way too off topic..my point was simple, rls something that is at least DECENT..not even GREAT just fucking decent...if not, then don't bother at all..it ain't worth the "RISK" as u put it..

Posted by Phantasmical on 12-20-2002 10:32 AM:

What makes me chuckle on these boards, is the massive assumption that a DVD screener of TT will be relased in the next few weeks as Felllowship was.

As much as I want a DVD screener, it would also be funny if only these two releases were released until the proper screener is released.

Posted by FatalException on 12-20-2002 01:32 PM:

All i know half of these jerkoffs who voted from the jpeg just voted on LOTR:FOTR TS-FTF ahahahah Fucking N00bs

Posted by TroLL417 on 12-20-2002 02:15 PM:

think im goin to wait for a dvdscreener

Posted by jelydonut on 12-20-2002 02:40 PM:

HOLY FUCK..

I can't believe i just read all these posts by you stupid fucks bitching about propers so i could find out if all the movie was there.. I don't give a fuck what you people have to say about a ftf release.. It's a fucking given.. It will be slightly burry and scrachy audio.. we all know that! Is the whole fucking movie there or not?

Jelydonut

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-20-2002 03:17 PM:

If you don't atleast have one of the 3 cds of each rls, then you shouldn't say a freakin word about which is better! I for one have cd1 of the TCF rls, and am in queue for cd2 and 3. I'm also in queue for the FTF rls, both cd1 and 2, plus the full rar, so I will not know myself until I have compared them both! Then I will post my vote and my humble opinion.

So far, I give TCF, based off the first cd, a 6/6/9. Well see about the FTF rls.

__________________

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-20-2002 03:34 PM:

Has anyone seen the UTi rls yet? Seen it up on irc, trying to dld cd1 of it now.

I'm pretty sure its not as good as TCF or FTF, but then again, it is a cam and in avi format rather than tar or rar, which means it could conceivable take up more than 3 cds.

Just wondering if anyone has it yet.

__________________

Posted by FatalException on 12-20-2002 03:47 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by The CandyMan
If you don't atleast have one of the 3 cds of each rls, then you shouldn't say a freakin word about which is better! I for one have cd1 of the TCF rls, and am in queue for cd2 and 3. I'm also in queue for the FTF rls, both cd1 and 2, plus the full rar, so I will not know myself until I have compared them both! Then I will post my vote and my humble opinion.

So far, I give TCF, based off the first cd, a 6/6/9. Well see about the FTF rls.

haha there will be a dvdscr of it by the time you get the shitty cam of it hahahah N00bs you got to love them

Posted by motabus on 12-20-2002 04:19 PM:

CAN WE TALK ABOUT THE QUALITY OF MOVIES???? I feel like i am back in highschool with all you children.... i loved it when pc's were expensive and all you little pricks could not get on one

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-20-2002 04:36 PM:

@fatalexception,

You're proably trying to bait me which is fine, but here is proof as of 10:28 a.m. today you corn-fed redneck cracker:

*REMOVED*

Yeah, it might take a little while, but I've got cd 1 of the TCF rls, and I'm in queue for cd3, so . . . eat it bitch!

The reason my dld are slower, is I'm also dlding harry.potter.2.divx.cd2-dominion.avi, 11.22.02.Triple.X.DVDrip.SVCD-TDC-CD1.rar and Halloween.Resurrection.DVDRip.DivX-iNiQUiTY.avi which are also pulling some of my bandwidth.

Enough said, be quiet, I win, you lose.

__________________

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-20-2002 04:37 PM:

Got another queue for FTF and Uti bitch!

__________________

Posted by Enzomatrx on 12-20-2002 04:52 PM:

To a mod:

can we please clean up the TTT threads? It's really hard to figure anything out with what is going on in them. I personally really am curious about these two releases and all I am reading is the typical "do more for me" comments on both threads.
I have no way of knowing who in these forums does what relating to these releases, so I will not critique individuals...
but can we please clean these threads up and stick to ones that rate the quality?

I appreciate FTF's constant releases and the speed of them, but I think people are kidding themselves if they say that FTF's releases are always great quality. They typically tend to be tinted, and the sound could always use a run through some filters. Like I said, I appreciate their speed, and the releases are at least watchable in most cases.

How about with each movie that is releases we have two threads that start? One can be Quality Comments Only and the other can be General Flaming of Eachother Over and Over Because of the Release.

Just a suggestion.

Posted by The CandyMan on 12-20-2002 04:57 PM:

Well, you can see that fatalexception has nothing better to do on this thread than flame. I didn't say a word to him, but calling me a n00b gets me started. So had to prove him wrong with my second and third post. Sorry if I made it tougher on the rest, but I'm going to defend myself, though it seems a waste for an ass like fatalexception.

'The Candyman decides that fatalexception is "persona non gratia" '

__________________

Posted by flipp0r on 12-20-2002 05:33 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by The CandyMan
@fatalexception,

You're proably trying to bait me which is fine, but here is proof as of 10:28 a.m. today you corn-fed redneck cracker:

<snip>
xdcc? gross!
xdcc really is ruining the scene. there is no skill in copy + paste
im suprised that post wasn't edited. a trained monkey could come and find u w/ that screenshot.

__________________
They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."

Posted by dank! on 12-20-2002 07:35 PM:

w0w, those are some l337 screen captures!

Posted by melon on 12-20-2002 07:50 PM:

Shit quality once again from FTF...
I thought FTF was getting a little better, I guess I thought wrong.

Why even release this? Just because it's an early release doesn't mean you can just do it and give crappy quality, I'd rather get a released later and get best quality...

2/3/9

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:06 PM.

Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »
Show all 99 posts from this thread on one page