VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Finding Nemo *SVCD* - TELESYNC - Centropy (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=21397)

I was a little shocked
Lot of people been saying "best rls ever"


lot of camera motion...not like CTP to adjust so much after the start...

Think Spider-man was better....

but still a K A Rls....

7v
9a

8m

DeathsPal

wasnt going to grab a version of this fliuck but wanted to see what the buzz was about. Video is great, color is amazing and very sharp, sound started out a tiny amount over driven but is corrected early on. Great release but i'm not going to watch the rest of it.

9/8/?

I was thinking the same. I checked the release and there was constantly camera movement! That's not exactly what I'd call a super ts.

Also, sound isn't really that good. I've seen far better svcd ts from ctp.

If I were to judge this without knowing where it came form, I'd have labeled it CAM. A good cam, but a cam nevertheless.

7.5/7/9

there is some camera movement and the usual slight bleeching in the video. Also, Ive noticed a drop in Centropy audio quality from previous releases, wonder why that is, just didnt seem as clean as some of the older rls.
Still a great TS and way better than even some groups screeners so keep up the great work guys !! (I appreciate it heaps)

quote:

---

Originally posted by jacobtf
I was thinking the same. I checked the release and there was constantly camera movement! That's not exactly what I'd call a super ts.

Also, sound isn't really that good. I've seen far better svcd ts from ctp.

If I were to judge this without knowing where it came form, I'd have labeled it CAM. A good cam, but a cam nevertheless.

---

having the password as "heh" was kinda pointless. it would take a bruteforce cracker about 20secs to find the password out of a 3 character pass

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

The video was great, but the sound had a slight buzz. So I'll rate this 9/7/8.

The movie was pretty good (as judged by my four year old daughter).

I watched this release tonight.

This is quite possibly the best TS release I've ever seen.

Centropy is just out of control these days.

video: 9.5
sound: 8.5
movie: 8

-frak

just burned it to cd and tested it out on my bigscreen.

it looks like ass, colors are very washed out. 4.0

sounds is your typical CTP quality(too much bass, not DVD clear) 6.0

movie?



it looks good on the pc but not on tv for some reason.

it's probably not "dvd clear" cause it's NOT FROM A DVD...

looked fine on my TV too, not sure what the hell you were watching...

other than the slight camera movement, most fantastic indeed.

pretty funny movie, too...my only complaint is that pixar spends so much time & effort on making thier characters act human, but make thier human characters as cartoony as possible...

8/9/7

__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?

quote:

---

Originally posted by AceOvArts
7.5/7/9

there is some camera movement and the usual slight bleeching in the video. Also, Ive noticed a drop in Centropy audio quality from previous releases, wonder why that is, just didnt seem as clean as some of the older rls.
Still a great TS and way better than even some groups screeners so keep up the great work guys !! (I appreciate it heaps)

---

is this a CLASSIC example where the JPG's make the release look alot better than it really is or what?

7.5/7/x

alot of colors, so that's nice. motion blur is really bad and any and everything on the screen is pretty damn blurry. even the sample looks alot better than it does when it's burned and playing on the 'tube.

i've seen much better from CTP.

The centropy rls is MUCH better than the ftf--the only way I can see it being any better is the DVD. The first release was watchable, but you lost all of the finer nuances in facial expression and backgrounds that were visable here. There was only ONE camera movement that I saw toward the beginning and only one appreciable glitch in the sound, also early on in the movie. Not at all as bad as some of you are saying--did you watch the whole movie? And, if you think the colors are bleached out, than perhaps you are used to the many darker rlses and you need to adjust your tv back? And let's face it--if you're watching ANYTHING on a bigger screen, it's going to lose a bit of clarity--that's the nature of it. I just wish that more rlses were this good.
9/9/9

quote:

---

Originally posted by lolobo21


About 3 or 4 people mention camera movement. Let's be a little more specific to vq readers.

This release contains a on old pixar film created back in 1989 called "Knick Knack" (which is quite amusing). During this short film (could be the way I burned the CD) I noticed a slight glich that lasted for about 1/2 second. No biggie.

The so-called "camera movement" that keeps getting brought up.... OCCURRED ONCE. This happend at the beginning of the film and lasted for about 1 second. It just looks like someone bumped the camera, however, the picture did not suffer because of it afterwards.

If you're going to take the time to post at this forum, might as well read what you write afterwards, see how it makes the release sound. No point in being vague and just saying there was "camera movement" when it makes the release sound like the person in charge of the camera (which would be on a tripod anyways) was going through heroin withdrawls during the film.

Oh, and I didn't notice any "sound quality drops". Compared to the shit audio of some of the other group's releases, ctp has no issues there, with this flick or any of it's last couple. The audio is fine, no hollowness and easy to understand. WTF? Drop in audio quality? Whatever, no reason to nit-pic a good release just because most of their releases are superior to that of other groups. Other groups are coming up, they are taking note. Quality over quickness.

---

nice colors
pixelation on fast motion
bleh

lolobo21

quote:

---

If you're going to take the time to post at this forum, might as well read what you write afterwards, see how it makes the release sound. No point in being vague and just saying there was "camera movement" when it makes the release sound like the person in charge of the camera (which would be on a tripod anyways) was going through heroin withdrawls during the film.

Oh, and I didn't notice any "sound quality drops". Compared to the shit audio of some of the other group's releases, ctp has no issues there, with this flick or any of it's last couple. The audio is fine, no hollowness and easy to understand. WTF? Drop in audio quality? Whatever, no reason to nit-pic a good release just because most of their releases are superior to that of other groups. Other groups are coming up, they are taking note. Quality over quickness.

---

Movie OWNED! Don't hate, I enjoyed it and I'm not 5 years old. The release was good but quality was way overhyped by alot of you. Nice colorful image BUT OMG! the constant camcorder movement was really getting to me, it didn't just happen at the start. It happens everytime I think it's about to go away! Sound was sweet though, kind of loud at times but good. This is nowhere near the best TS though. 7/8/9

Gotta agree with psyche ...."quality was way overhyped by alot of you". Very true it's no where near as good as the jpg looks! Picture was just as good as ftf and they were both TS but yet ftf got a lower rating. Some of you idiots need to watch the movie before you give it a rating. I'm not in any way saying I could do any were near as good as Centropy with all the good releases they have out there but come on you guys be fair to the other rls out there. Centropy ownz for TS.... hands down!

It's not the best TS ever, it just translates better from the cam because it's not a traditional film. It's a good one, but yeah there was some focusing and jittering and crap. CTP still owns anyway.

8/8/9