VCDQuality Forums Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »
Show all 85 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- xXx - SCREENER - VideoCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=7085)


Posted by Fire_Sokar on 08-28-2002 06:01 AM:

REPLY TO ALL

I have been a member of this forum for a while. I stopped posting after a bit do to bashing \ bickering... The fact of this release haveing a counter. b\w and or property signs are not a proven indication as to if this is a REAL Screener or not. I have released movies in the past and know a bit. I do know for fact you can add All of those settings plus more. If it were maybe a UTI quality cam i would see it being able to be misslabeld the stuart little 2 cam looked better. The aspect ratio is far off. IMO I do not believe this is a legi screener. If it is props to VideoCD on the fixing the tape it must of been garbled first. Oh well a DVD Rip is gonna be out eventually lets all just drop this issue.


Posted by CraZY8 on 08-28-2002 12:25 PM:

FIXING IT

say i wanted to make it better
what can i do
run it tho tmpeg or somtine?

in order to make this worth my 2 cds
anyone have any suggestions on a new aspect ratio and a
new sound settings
thx
pz


Posted by ThEgAmE on 08-28-2002 06:40 PM:

This release is pretty good, Sound is better than the other releases and picture too, only problem is the timer, i can put up with it but it would be better if it was a black bar, maybe they can release it again like that, nice job though

Sound=7 Video=7 ( maybe could of been 8 if it wasent 4 the timer) Movie=10 (wicked movie)


Posted by m-drew on 08-28-2002 11:20 PM:

I dont think this is a screener.

Whatever, ill wait for the SVCD


Posted by gallonFREAK on 08-29-2002 01:51 AM:

Re: FIXING IT

quote:
Originally posted by CraZY8
say i wanted to make it better
what can i do
run it tho tmpeg or somtine?

in order to make this worth my 2 cds
anyone have any suggestions on a new aspect ratio and a
new sound settings
thx
pz




there isnt a god in this world that could make this junk better!!

dont waste your effort


Posted by CraZY8 on 08-29-2002 02:21 AM:

hahha

ok man i wont

so is this worth my time
anyoen?


Posted by SumBastard on 08-29-2002 05:40 AM:

nice rls

but the encoding is poor. i will crop the movie to remove the timer. i'm not bitchy. Nice Job!

*But the color goes into Black/White when the "Property Of" comes on, then goes to back into color when teh "Property Of" goes off.


Posted by lo.pro on 08-29-2002 09:53 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by ^Om3n
Propers are 'supposed' to only be let through if the previous release had some sort of technical flaw. You cannot release a proper on the basis of bitrates/settings, subs, counter/no counter, because its higher quality etc. If it gets through, then the nukers are not doing there job properly.

At least this is how i understand it to be after reading the scene guidlines.

unsubbed after subbed is generally not considered a dupe.

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.


Posted by Higgi on 08-29-2002 11:32 AM:

Im getting this 2day and I will tell you all - how it is, look out for this space


Posted by frak on 08-29-2002 01:58 PM:

I just got finished watching this version.

The quality is damn good and so's the audio.

If you want to see this movie, this is the copy to get.


Posted by ThEgAmE on 08-29-2002 02:49 PM:

This is definatly a screener and definatly the best release, the audio is great and picture too, only minor problem is the counter clock, but many screeners have them but this is the best release i think were gonna have for a long time until a dvd screener or dvd rip, so for those who are not sure of what to get, u should get this one.


Posted by Nocturno on 08-30-2002 01:02 AM:

Seems to me that when a release is made that is not up to standard (from what i read a bad Aspect ratio/Cropping) it should be nuked in order to let other groups have a crack at it.

In a Perfect world there would be only ONE release.. The first (GOOD!) release .. the rest should be nuked.. so people don't download a 2 disc from different releasegroups

They should use the Divx scene as an example.. there rulez where made and the same rulez should count for VCD/SVCD


Posted by gallonFREAK on 08-30-2002 02:07 AM:

Re: Crazy

quote:
Originally posted by MYYZTIK
are you guys kiding me i dont make many post but i have to when i see shit like this.First easy to add timer 2)this is no screener 3)learn what the fuck a aspect ratio is Video CD.Now there lots of room for a great proper of this but ill wait for a REAL SCR.

So Says THE MYYZTIKAL ONE




finaly someone who knows wtf he's talking about, all these other lamers kissing ass saying oohh eee ahhh a free movie, this looks amazing, are retards!


i agree with you


Posted by Azrael626 on 08-30-2002 08:19 AM:

Re: Re: Crazy

quote:
Originally posted by gallonFREAK



finaly someone who knows wtf he's talking about, all these other lamers kissing ass saying oohh eee ahhh a free movie, this looks amazing, are retards!


i agree with you



Actually neither you or him has any idea what your talking about.


Posted by Dr. Poo PhD on 09-01-2002 06:11 PM:

I second that notion Azrael. Anyway, this rls was just fine to watch. Better than the previous. If you wanna see this film this will definitely suffice. Pic is fine, audio is fine. Just d/l , sit back, watch and stfu. If you wanna complain some more, get your own hands on the real screener and please, for the love of God, encode it and make it soooooooo much better than the groups releasing shit for all us peons right now.

Thanks VideoCD. I'm quite sure I said this in another thread as well, but some of us do appreciate your work. We're not here to nitpick and say what's good and bad. Sure there are some groups that do do a better job than others, but that's not what I am here for at least. I am definitely not pro this group or anti that group. I just like to sit back, watch movies for free and keep my goddam mouth shut whether the movie sucked or if the quality sucked. I will post on the orum to let others know what's the deal with the quality, but that's where I hope the line begins to be drawn on this forum. I am tired of reading 8,000,000 posts on a topic only to fine 3 of them tell me about the quality of the release. But anyway, just starting to babble on here. Thanks again guys.


Posted by RUiN on 09-02-2002 03:32 AM:

Firt off I dont care if this is not a true screener . The quality is the best so far ( I have d/l'ed two other versions) . I rate this one a 6/7/4 didnt like the movie


Posted by Rep- on 09-02-2002 08:51 AM:

Wow. Just looked at Rappa's screenshots -
http://inimical5.bsdlink.net/comparison.jpg

Those ones on the site really do the release bad. So many people looked at the jpg's and judged. How can you hate this release? So fucking what if it might not be a screener. Its 10 times better than the other releases...


Posted by desertboy on 09-04-2002 04:29 PM:

piss poor, maybe it's my TV out, or the dvd player but this seems worse than the much earlier release's. Shit film as well or maybe that's just 'cos I find Vin Diesel about as appealing as Van Damme, and half as smart.


Posted by Bynemz on 09-05-2002 07:14 PM:

SCR???

This is way better than the first release but it is pretty low qual for a scr. I was thinking more of TS Proper.


Posted by Angkor Wat on 09-06-2002 05:28 AM:

I believe this is a screener but it is shitty as hell. I think TCF could come through with a good release pretty soon.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:35 PM. Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »
Show all 85 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.