VCDQuality Forums Pages (9): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 »
Show all 161 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DVDR (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=24)
-- The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers - DVD SCR - iND (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=13382)


Posted by PaulAAtreides on 01-11-2003 06:04 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Jc100
I know this release is a dvdr, is it any better than the svcd? is the sound corrected and is it true stereo not that shit that sounds so low u gotta amp your stereos to max to hear? Im wondering, if this is a better download and worth a re-encode to svcd myself. I love the pic on svcd sound was to low though.


Of course it is, it is a HIGHER bitrate than the SVCD, and true
5.1 DD sound...... what do you think?


Posted by Devnull on 01-11-2003 07:52 AM:

Has it been determined whether or not this is just the SVCD re-encoded? And how about the audio? is it better in this release?


Posted by Jejje on 01-11-2003 08:42 AM:

think it´s great

This release is a hell lot of better than the 4cd SVCD release.. compared some scenes with water.. and it´s alot more clear in this version.. you can really see the difference there.. i was happy about the SVCD release but hell.. this is MUCH better and no cd-changes..

will buy the retail when it comes out.. but until then this is just as good.. or better even. because this is NOW!!!


Posted by DonOlsen on 01-11-2003 10:35 AM:

Jesus how hard can it be to read the other post in this tread? Stop asking ifs its the same as svcd and if the sound is better...its already been confirmed a few post back, if ya borthered to look.
Oh and by the way to put my vote in the discussion ...no it dos'nt need a 2 dvd version. Be happy that its here at all.


Posted by pcjerk on 01-11-2003 10:49 AM:

Well from all the info above I would have to say yes, this is a true DVDrip with the bitrate downsampled. The quality is superb for what it is. Only a picky spoiled pir8 would cry about this release.
The audio is TRUE 5.1 DD. This is not a svcd re-encode.


Posted by dotmusik on 01-11-2003 11:44 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Devnull
Has it been determined whether or not this is just the SVCD re-encoded? And how about the audio? is it better in this release?


No its most definetely not Better than SVCD.

Btw Devnull I gather ur the same dude from w****net? (DM here )


Posted by Sonikku on 01-11-2003 12:06 PM:

No, this is not the SVCD re-encoded. This was a direct copy of the screener DVD, with a lower bitrate to accomodate the consumer (4.7GB DVDR) instead of the pressed (9GB DVD9) the original was on.

Yes, the picture is better than the SVCD, and the sound is AC3 5.1 surround.

And why would you download the DVDR just to re-encode it to SVCD? That makes about 0 sense as you would just end up with...the SVCD release. Just get that and don't add the extra step.


Posted by PaulAAtreides on 01-11-2003 01:03 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Devnull
Has it been determined whether or not this is just the SVCD re-encoded? And how about the audio? is it better in this release?



For the 100th FUCKING time, this is NOT, NOT, NOT, a SVCD re-encode!


Posted by Araknofobia on 01-11-2003 04:14 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by PaulAAtreides



For the 100th FUCKING time, this is NOT, NOT, NOT, a SVCD re-encode!



Hey smartass,

Take a chillpill dude

several other people have replied to his question, no need to diss him even more...


Posted by Devnull on 01-11-2003 09:07 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by PaulAAtreides



For the 100th FUCKING time, this is NOT, NOT, NOT, a SVCD re-encode!



wow, you're cool! I want to be like you.


Posted by Jc100 on 01-11-2003 09:52 PM:

Ok, I have a question, and it may sound stupid but can someone explain. If all other groups have no problems ripping their releases, IE Gangs of NY V4f sounds great and so do tcf's svcds, then why the hell does the svcd of this sound so low. My question on re-encode was maybe grabbing this and rencoded to svcd and keeping the good audio as obviously TDI rushed it out for props and not quality.


Posted by Hypnos on 01-11-2003 10:42 PM:

This is the saddest fucking thread I've ever seen Why do people try to post authoritatively on something they seem to know nothing about?

Let's just clear up some basics:

1. Production and screener DVDs are pressed using the DVD-9 format -- a dual layer format that can hold 8.54 billion BYTES (7.95 GB). That was the original format of this screener.

2. Group releases for DVD-R come in the form of DVD-5 -- a single layer format that can hold 4.7 billion bytes (4.35 GB)

3. The DVD specification was designed so that approximately 2 hours of high quality 720x480 29.97 fps video and audio could be fit on a DVD-5. This means the video would be encoded at approximately 5 Mbps. Studios usually make use of the extra space on the DVD-9 and encode their movies at significantly higher bitrates (generally between (6-7 Mbps). This higher bitrate produces noticably superior quality in home theater systems (HDTV's, etc)

4. At a little over 5 Mbps, a DVD-9 can just comfortably hold about 180 minutes of video with a 5.1 AC3 audio track and a 2ch AC3 track. This is why there was NOTHING else execpt a menu included on disc 1 of the original FOTR retail. You will also notice that there is a distinct improvement between the original FOTR and the extended edition which was encoded at a higher bitrate and split onto two DVD-9's.

5. Putting a 180 min movie (with 5.1 ac3, no less) on a DVD-5 requires encoding at approx 2.5 - 3 Mbps -- this is HALF what is recommended for good video and a THIRD of what most studios usually use for their releases. This bitrate is at the absolute bottom end of the MPEG-2 quality spectrum for 720x480 video -- in fact, you have to use special quantization matrices and a very good encoder to get a halfway decent result.

6. DVD video uses a 3:2 aspect ratio -- this is between 4:3 (traditional) and 16:9 (widescreen). When you play widescreen video on a display device that uses 4:3, the hardware has to stretch the video along the x axis using an interpolation algorithm to approximate the 16:9 aspect ratio. This means you are artifically increasing the resolution and it will actually tend to magnify any artifacts in the video.

7. SVCD video is encoded at 480x480 -- this is called half-D1 and is an approximation of standard NTSC resolution. This means that a well encoded SVCD will not look much worse than a DVD when viewed with a smaller, traditional TV.

------------------------------

Hopefully that clears up some of the confusion about whether a CD can hold more than a DVD

Anyway, nice release! Although I definately agree that since this is such a popular movie, it might be nice to release an original quality internal so people who knew what they were doing could either split it or downsample it according to their own tastes.

:: agreed on all counts, except that half-D1 is 352x240/288 i thought, rather than SVCD spec of 480x480/576.. i might be wrong as i dont deal in DVDR, but thats what im lead to believe.. -pHo


Posted by furturtle on 01-11-2003 10:46 PM:

help with svcd-dvd

I downloaded the svcd 4 cd dvd screener and i wanted to put it on a DVD+R. I copied the mpeg from disc one and burned it using Ulead. I played it and the video quality is amazing but the sound is completely out of sync. This only occurs on the DVD not at all on the SVCD.
I am sure I am completely doing it wrong because I have never done it before, but I would really appreciate any help that anyone may be generous enough to give.
please feel free to send me a response via PM.

many thanks

sorry if this isnt the appropriate forum.


Posted by pcjerk on 01-11-2003 10:52 PM:

Thats the problem with the alot of the groups in the scene. NO PRIDE IN THE WORK! Props to who & what? other humans? LOL!


Posted by ScabbyDoo on 01-11-2003 11:24 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Jc100
Ok, I have a question, and it may sound stupid but can someone explain. If all other groups have no problems ripping their releases, IE Gangs of NY V4f sounds great and so do tcf's svcds, then why the hell does the svcd of this sound so low. My question on re-encode was maybe grabbing this and rencoded to svcd and keeping the good audio as obviously TDI rushed it out for props and not quality.


they rushed it out to Please the little pligrams like you. and the sound isnt all that bad. only for those with amps. and to be honest if you have enough money to buy big fat sound systems you have enough money to see it in the theatre a few more times now stop whining its FREE for gods sake.


Posted by territory on 01-11-2003 11:58 PM:

the quality is amazing, anybody complaining about this release just stfu, go watch the cam if u dont like it ;P by far the best yet


Posted by PaulAAtreides on 01-12-2003 12:22 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Araknofobia


Hey smartass,

Take a chillpill dude

several other people have replied to his question, no need to diss him even more...




Hey dumbass.... when I replied (on the board, NO OTHER replies were here), but some how they are now magically inserted between his question and my first reply. Get lost creep!


Posted by PaulAAtreides on 01-12-2003 12:28 AM:

Re: help with svcd-dvd

quote:
Originally posted by furturtle
I downloaded the svcd 4 cd dvd screener and i wanted to put it on a DVD+R. I copied the mpeg from disc one and burned it using Ulead. I played it and the video quality is amazing but the sound is completely out of sync. This only occurs on the DVD not at all on the SVCD.
I am sure I am completely doing it wrong because I have never done it before, but I would really appreciate any help that anyone may be generous enough to give.
please feel free to send me a response via PM.

many thanks

sorry if this isnt the appropriate forum.




Don't use Ulead to to any type of encoding... Run the SVCD Mpegs through TMPGE for DVD Video (at the proper settings), put them back together in TMPGE, then take the resulting mpegs into Ulead Movie Factory (w/chapters separating the files), or into Ulead DVD Workshop (w/no chapters, and instruction to play back to back so it is seemless).

I had same issue as you when I converted Vanilla Sky SVCD mpegs to DVD Video using Ulead as encoder, which sux, and was completely out of sync. Use TMPGE, and just give Ulead the finished DVD-Video compliant mpegs.


Posted by TK7381 on 01-12-2003 12:41 AM:

Hi
I will download this ntsc-version and the region fix. Thanks for it. But is it possible that there is a Pal-DvD-Screener with german-ac3 5.1 surround out?

Greetings

TK7381


Posted by SilentRAGE on 01-12-2003 01:24 AM:

Reign is releasing a 2 dvd-r version, in fact it's out, should be on here soon, seems people can have a choice now...

DVD-R The Lord Of The Rings Two Towers (2002) 166x50 MB REIGN


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:03 PM. Pages (9): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 »
Show all 161 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.