VCDQuality Forums - Dumb And Dumberer - SCREENER

Pages (7): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 »
Show all 127 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Dumb And Dumberer - SCREENER - VideoCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=21457)

Posted by upur0 on 06-14-2003 01:17 AM:

great release here, i just got done watching it. this movie was A LOT better than i thought, at first i thought that it would make the original suck, but turned out that it got a few good laughs, still not as good as the first one, which was exptected.
7/8/7

Posted by thugtillidie732 on 06-14-2003 01:34 AM:

looks pretty good

it looks good from the picture sample.

good job guys hope to see some others screeners.....

8-8-??

::LOL dont do that shit again -FuzZ::

Posted by Starlord on 06-14-2003 01:35 AM:

movie ain't that good but my kids loved it... anything that keeps them quiet for over an hour is ok by me

8/8/9 <-- from the kids

Starlord

Posted by nine-volt on 06-14-2003 02:40 AM:

quality is what I expect from a vhs. I want to say better than a telesync but the quality of telesyncs today are bad ass. It has a counter and a property of lable. also a blurred out serial in the top right. This could have been ripped as SVCD because of the small size. Overall it would of turned out better and its still only using 2 CDs. Only 25 megs too big and it could of been a 1 CD release. sigh.

7/8/8

Posted by Tweezer on 06-14-2003 03:19 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Stabbe
Something weird about the Watermark saying Property of....
it seems to be reaaallly steady unlike the counter that jumps up and down , it´s almost like they put the watermark by them self.
I mean the picture is a little jumpy , that´s normal for a vhs, but the watermark doesn´t move at all.
Im not sure if im making myself clear , just a thought.It could be a workprint with the counter and then they put the watermark on themself , to make it look like a screener.

i dont know why any group would add that annoying of a property of message just to try to pass it off as a screener. There are screeners that have a counter and no property messages

Posted by lvliniMe on 06-14-2003 03:33 AM:

the picture looked good and sound was good too, i wish all of the first releases could look like this one, but the movie SUCKED. don't waste your time downloading it.. i've seen the first one so many times and i love it, i'm sure everyone has watched it a lotta times, i knew they couldn't match that one, no chance in hell. the fart scenes in his dream and taking the pic of the special class were just gay, it was so stupid and when i saw that in the previews i knew it would suck but i was hoping it would be alright. some of the scenes were good but bob saget, i don't see how you guys liked his stuff, it was stupid, him yellin and all.. it was very awkward watching this movie with my parents, all the talk about sex and the cussin from saget.. nothin like laughin my azz off when watchin the first one..

8/8/3

__________________
http://rip.dre3k.net/matt/sig.jpg

Posted by BigShrimp on 06-14-2003 04:14 AM:

I thought this movie was just funny not as good as the first one but right up there, the comedy is only understoof by few apparently im sure a few flamers will have something to say. I think they did an excellent job finding people to match up so closely to the cast from the original movie. Good film worth the download def worth seeing in theaters.

8/8/9

Posted by _cappA_ on 06-14-2003 04:19 AM:

*after seeing MOVIE(MOST OF CD1 anywayz)*

I have to say that VideoCD did a Great job to bring this movie out

so early and of great quality TOO!!!

My Rating: 8/7/2

THE MOVIE WAS TERRIBALE AND I LITERALLY FELL ASLEEP DURING CD1, IT'S A SHAME THAT THE MOVIE WAS NOT GOOD BEACUSE I'M SURE LIKE MY SELF, MANY OF US WERE ANXIOUS to see this..... well what can you do.. thankx again VideoCD for ur efforts in the rls of this movie.

ps: the Blur and text on the bottem are not at all irritable as that of the movie it self.

Posted by altimas on 06-14-2003 05:23 AM:

I say a 7/8/6. Movie was kinda boring, but had some very funny parts. It left me wanting more!! I guess that's what they set to do.

Posted by sup444 on 06-14-2003 07:04 AM:

I had a chance to grab it off my site before it got nuked.

Props out to VideoCD for the quality of these release

Based on the movie I give it a: 8/8/x

Posted by sirghost on 06-14-2003 08:01 AM:

descent quality vid and sound , but i got one thing to say..its not a screenr..come on guys, stop mislableing shit...this is a workprint..

__________________
Signup today at www.citywidehost.com, and Use the Discount Code: "SG50" (without quotes) for:
50% OFF YOUR FIRST MONTH

Posted by tha_realist_one on 06-14-2003 09:27 AM:

/me takes a deep breath
This movie was not terrible and like BigShrimp said apperently the comedy is only understood by some. Too many people formed an opinion of this movie before they even seen a preview let alone the movie. The movie is decent quality should've jus made it one disc though as small as it is it's kinda a waste on two. And as far as all you people doing the complaining about Jim Carey not being in this one....well DUH!!! This is set in there High School years Jim Carey's too old to play a high shcool kid use your heads. Worse movie ever released!? Your an idiot jus because you have some obsession with Jim Carey doesn't mean "it's the worse movie ever released" or you've never seen House of 1000 Corpses. A lot of you people need to learn how to form your own opinion.

There I said it!!

7.5/7.5/8

Posted by CrazY4MoVyZ on 06-14-2003 10:43 AM:

very good copy, very watchable... movie was not that good.. only part that made me laugh was that shit dude fuck ahhhh shits everywhere.

give it a 8/7/5

Posted by beat_surrender on 06-14-2003 11:17 AM:

Pretty nice release.

7/7/1

One of the least funny, boring films I've seen this year, no where near as good and funny as dumb & dumber, will appeal to americans.

Posted by Z-Gouki on 06-14-2003 01:44 PM:

Someone has American penis envy...

Excellent pre and a great job across the board, VideoCD.

Movie was entertaining.

7/8/8

Posted by Vai on 06-14-2003 02:11 PM:

Good video and sound, shame about the blur on the top right, and the logo/run time at the bottom, sound is also clear and good.

7/9/?

Posted by sleeper0 on 06-14-2003 02:59 PM:

nice pre, i didnt see any evidence of it being a workprint, I think you're just assuming because you havent seen screeners pre-release day. If it's a workprint, what do you think it was missing? I doubt a wp would have a bunch of out takes at the end?

Looked and sounded fine for a screener but i've definately seen sharper. movie was funny at times but nothing special 7/8/5

Posted by knweedo on 06-14-2003 03:26 PM:

Great quality, props on the speed, but awful movie. 7/8/1 All the writing and stuff on the screen gets in the way a bit... but still very nice.

Posted by zunger on 06-14-2003 05:23 PM:

quote:
And as far as all you people doing the complaining about Jim Carey not being in this one....well DUH!!!

Jim Carey turned down the role, and since he did the other guy that played his friend in the first one did also..

The movie had some good parts, i didnt think it was nearly as bad as i figured it would be. Good release letters lineup with the 'ownership dealy' so its not like its blocking too much, i forgot about it after about 10 min into the movie..

8/8/8

Posted by DX-WWE on 06-14-2003 08:36 PM:

good release movie sucks tho

7/6/3

__________________
Flamers No Point Its All FREE Just Stick 2 What Yur Good At Sweet FA

Those Who Flame Will Be Flamed By Others (HehE)

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:17 PM.

Pages (7): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 »
Show all 127 posts from this thread on one page