VCDQuality Forums Pages (9): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 »
Show all 166 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- SpiderMan *SVCD* - TELESYNC - Centropy (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=2637)


Posted by PepperKorn on 05-05-2002 09:52 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by philly b
read the fucking nfo for christs sake, its an svcd for a reason. personally i dig it, whats so wrong? ohhhh ohhhh standards. take your fucking standards and throw em up your ass, this is a fucking warez scene, there are no standards.


Ahhhhh the voice of reason......

Yes there are standards and very strict ones for SVCD, CTP have been releasing XVCD's for ages now and they seem to be having trouble understanding SVCD too.

Movie looks good and sounds good, aspect ratio (another place CPT always screws up) is up and down again, looks better on a TV than a large (18.1" LCD) monitor. No problem with PAL as it is the standard here.

Nice release but time to read up on those standards or people will be pulling *proper*'s and *repack*'s before you know it.


Posted by PaulAllen on 05-05-2002 09:57 PM:

[STFU! -Pazzi]


Posted by PaulAllen on 05-05-2002 10:01 PM:

And CTP, I'm no techfreak, but

if you try to move the camera sligthly *away* from the screen, maybe you'll get the *whole* picture,

and not just the center part of it


Posted by koreylaw on 05-05-2002 10:36 PM:

Might be workprint

I saw this one in the theatre and this release seems to be the same without any noticeable scene changes. The only thing that makes me think workprint is the fact that (I read most of the other post and I didn't see any mention) several times thoroughout the movie you can see a boom microphone sticking down from the top into the scene. I did not see that in the theatre. Anyone else notice that ???? You see that a lot in workprints and I've seen several and that seems to be in a lot of them. Anyone else have a comment on this ????


Posted by NIN on 05-06-2002 12:36 AM:

I am in the USA and am wondering. Is there a way to convert it from a PAL to a NTSC? I think it is great that it is in SVCD, thank you centropy. The only problem I am having is lines going up the screen therefore its not viewable. Audio is OK. I suspect this is because it's a PAL. So how do I convert it to view here in the USA? Please advice.


Posted by M_J on 05-06-2002 01:33 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by pill


Burn the svcd as a vcd, i know in nero you can do this. most dvd players can play mpeg2 (svcd) but they look in the wrong dir for some reason. If it still wont work find a file called mpeg2codec_installer.zip and do bin -> mpg and then burn that as an vcd, garaunteed to work.

And cerial i for one think the hulk preview was worth ripping also, relevant and the only movie with it currently i think.




thanks pill, ill try that.


Posted by pennst26 on 05-06-2002 01:37 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by skunkyhydro


haha you can only get better quality if its good to begin with, making it on a svcd wont increase quality automatically.



I assume that means you don't think the quality of this release is better???? Whatever, it isn't worth the effort to explain this. We must have different versions cause this is the best release so far.

I truly feel bad for those with problems playing it, but as for those who don't like swapping disks, get out your video camera and record it yourself. Or record the CTP release to a tape/ reencode it at a lower bitrate, and you'll see why they used three cds.

Typically, (note typically) SVCDs 90 min or under use 2cds, anything higher should use three. I ripped "Eyes Wide Shut", and used 4cds just because of quality.


Posted by acid^rain on 05-06-2002 01:44 AM:

NIN convert it to a mpg and load it into the svcd option in NERO and make sure its set to NTSC in the compilation info option then burn and it should be fine


Posted by Cerial on 05-06-2002 03:02 AM:

i guess im just an odd person, but if im watching an action/adventure movie, which i assume this is, i dont pay attenetion to boom mikes randomly showing up... i watched this release all the way through and other than the black bars changing sizes every once-in-a-while i didnt notice the boom mikes. i believe taht they are there, but come on, who cares


Posted by yvo on 05-06-2002 03:12 AM:

I think it's quite obvious that this is an open matte of a movie with a 1.85:1 aspect ratio. This is why boom mics show up and why the special effect sequences have a different aspect ratio. If the top and bottom had been cropped the way they were supposed to be you wouldn't notice these things.

The question is how come a movie theater is showing a movie open matte? It doesn't make sense.


Posted by PhAnToMs on 05-06-2002 03:28 AM:

GREAT

Wouldnt expect better this is a great release and its fare to say that ctp ownz the TS seen because they are releasing more and more movies every week its great to see them back to what they used to be like

__________________
Jesus fucking christ my sig was huge so Dwaggy replaced it with this message


Posted by NIN on 05-06-2002 03:52 AM:

acid_rain I already tried that and still wont play. I am getting very frustrated.


Posted by dumwaldo on 05-06-2002 03:57 AM:

this thread is currently at 90 posts. i just couldnt let it get to 100 without mentioning to all of you this is NOT a SVCD. this is a XSVCD with a NON-STANDARD resolution of 768x567 as opposed to a standard SVCD resolution of 480x567. i am surprised nobody picked that up from the jpg's even.

if it was encoded as a SVCD it most likley would have fit on 2 CD's but since it is a XSVCD with a much higher than standard resolution it had to be stretched across 3 CD's.

and by the way i am inclined to go along with the workprint theory because the AR does indeed change throughout the movie and at some points you even see a boom mic fall into the frame.

despite these things that some people consider short comings this is a very good looking release.

__________________
what the hell do i know, i watch my movies on a 2.2" screen.

"pho est wonderful!" "pho est wonderful!" really, he is


Posted by hpv on 05-06-2002 04:05 AM:

Apex is hardly the best DVD player for playing SVCD. But I agree, kids need to buy a decent player and stfu.

quote:
Originally posted by Cerial
um... i dont mean to be an asshole, but to all the peolpe who replied to this thread "i think im going to reencode to 2 cd vcd". DOES ANYONE GIVE A FUCK. no gives a FUCK what u r going to do with tmpeg and a few hours of ur time. you dont need to come on here and say "svcd is stupid because im too cheap to buy a apex dvd player" and then think u r cool that ur going to re-encode the release... i really doubt if Centropy cares whether or not ur going to encode it to vcd or asf of divx or whatever format u feel like pulling out of ur ass.


Posted by K-FurY on 05-06-2002 04:23 AM:

At first I thought all the ppl saying it was a wp were idiots, but after watching the whole movie i did notice the boom mic, so that totally changed my oppinion. I do not have any problems with that, but if it is a wp why doesnt ctp just label it that? Anyways Im not having any problems playing this (i have a Hitachi DVP-415U) and i thought it was an excellent rls. The whole disc swapping thing does not bother me and the switching AR isnt that bad either. Like Dumwaldo said I think it may be a XSVCD, that may be why there is so many compliance problems. Anyways great rls 9/9/8.5


Posted by devilbeast on 05-06-2002 04:23 AM:

Well i dunno wtf is wrong w/ u ppl.....but ppl praise ctp because they are a really good rls group....all you that bitch and complain you go fucken find this and rls it better than them, or go see it in theatres....its fucking FREE SO STFU BE HAPPY WITH ANYTHING YOU CAN GET fucken retards. And id like to see that this IS a good rls and im not going by the jpg's like some ppl


Posted by Gurpinder on 05-06-2002 04:25 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by dumwaldo
this thread is currently at 90 posts. i just couldnt let it get to 100 without mentioning to all of you this is NOT a SVCD. this is a XSVCD with a NON-STANDARD resolution of 768x567 as opposed to a standard SVCD resolution of 480x567. i am surprised nobody picked that up from the jpg's even.


i just checked out that claim by opening the sample in tmpgs demux tool (witch gives properties aswell and here is what it said :

video_stream 0x00 MPEG-2 Video 480x576 25fps 2500kbps
audio_stream 0x00 MPEG-1 Audio Layer 2 44100Hz 224kbps

that seems pretty much like a PAL svcd and not an xsvcd to me.


Posted by devilbeast on 05-06-2002 04:34 AM:

Well guys i dunno what is wrong w/ u but you have no reason to complain the slightest bit...there is nothing wrong w/ this..ppl praise ctp because they are a xtremely good rls group. If you dont like how something is done i would RLY RLY like to see u go out and fucken get this and rls it.....or you can not download it and go see it at the fuckin movies...it rly doesnt matter its FUCKIN FREE, DONT COMPLAIN ABOUT SOMETHING FREE be happy with any thing god damn. And it is a very good rls, very quick and for the speed very nice qual id like to thank any one who helps w/ rls's.


Posted by TheHolyOne on 05-06-2002 04:50 AM:

Great release. Hella good job fellas


Posted by moviebootlegger on 05-06-2002 05:22 AM:

u people who keep sayin "its fucking free so dont bitch," thi is a forum. PEOPLE GIVE THEIR COMMENTS ON A FORUM. WE GIVE OUR INPUT ON WHAT WE THINK. SO IF ITS A SHITTY BOOTLEG WOULD YOU LIKE US TO SAY GREAT RELEASE FOR EFFORT. NO! WE TELL IT LIKE IT IS. IF SOMETHIN FUCKEd UP WE WILL CRITIQUE IT. I UNDERSTAND WE GET THIS FOR FREE BUT WE GOT A RIGTH TO SAY THIS RELEASE SUCKS ASS. THATS THE POINT OF THE FORUM. TO TELL IT LIKE IT IS WITH NO SUGAR COATING. GROUPS ENTER THE SCENE AND THEY KNOW PEOPLE WILL GIVE INPUT ON IT GOOD OR BAD. THAT HELPS THEM GET BETTER ALSO. dammit i hate people who constantly preach that gay ass saying every rls on this damn forum. PEOPLE MAKE BAD COMMENTS ON THE BOOTLEGS SO LIVE WITH IT!

this rls sounds nice but as i said b4 SVCD IS POINTLESS FOR A TS. REALLY GUYS. ONCE sOMEONE PROPERS THIS INTO VCD AND U GUYS WHO SUCKIN CTP's NUTS FOR THE QUALITY ON THIS SVCD WILL FEEL RETARDED FOR SAYIN SVCD WAS BETTER FOR THIS MOVIE. ITS THE SAME SHIT! AND YOU WILL C THAT AND THEN ITLL B ONE LESS CD. IM SURE THE QUALITY WILL B EXCELLENT AS ALWAYS FOR CTP BUT VCD SUITS THEIR TS's BETTER. THATS HOW IT IS AND THOSE WHO OPPOSE GIME ONE GOOD REASON WHY SVCD WAS BETTER FOR THIS MOVIE!


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:55 PM. Pages (9): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 »
Show all 166 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.