VCDQuality Forums Pages (7): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 »
Show all 125 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire *XviD* - TELESYNC - maVen (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=67266)


Posted by Danton on 11-20-2005 11:29 PM:

I think this is the best Telesync I have ever seen!!!!

The video quality is fantastic, audio is understandable, but give maven a break!!! They have released this 1 DAY after the the release!!!!! And if you still think I am rong because of the audio, get creative, wait till an other release (or if there already is one), and add the audio from that one into the maven video. And plus, its not like anybody here can do a better job!!!! Thanks maven.


Posted by Roger on 11-20-2005 11:30 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by sourojuro
There ARE sync issues with this release, they are not too bad but they are there non the less.


i think your hard drive canot handle the stream of 900kbit/sec to have sync issue on this one.

peace


Posted by scousethief on 11-20-2005 11:36 PM:

there are definately some small sync issues

8/6/8


Posted by protekt0r on 11-20-2005 11:49 PM:

Wow... I guess hardly anyone noticed the fact that someone gets up and walks across the screen when Harry's taking a bath. Or the fact that they spliced in CAM audio (I think) when Harry is in the library. These 2 things combined don't ruin the movie or anything, but it makes the release less than perfect.

Video: 8. Besides the dude walking across, it's very good. Tough one cause this movie has very bright parts and very dark parts. It's a little overcropped. For instance, when the Champions are picking dragons out of the bad, you can't see what some of them pick.

Audio: 9. Would have been perfect were it not for the 3-4 second wierd audio when Harry's in the library. I didn't notice a single sync issue- not even for a second. It must be a codec thing for some people.

Movie: 6. Not impressed w/ this one. Esp. the end. There was almost no closure to the story. Prisoner of Azarkban was much better IMO.

-protekt0r

__________________
"Signatures Suck"


Posted by magnet on 11-21-2005 12:15 AM:

As a quick aside about the ball scene and the Quidditch World Cup, those scenes are not missing. The movie has a very hectic sense of cutting straight from scene to scene. You don't get to see any quidditch playing at the cup in the movie, that's just the way Newell made it. If it seems like a scene ends too abruptly, just remember it's the first Potter film directed by a Brit


Posted by fakeout on 11-21-2005 12:50 AM:

Well I can say for sure that no one (apart from Melanie Murtle) walks across the screen when Harry is taking a bath, but there is about 2 seconds of cam audio at that point.


Posted by b_3 on 11-21-2005 12:59 AM:

Harrys glasses don't look as round as they should. 640x272=the normal 2.35 cinemascope aspect ratio, however I think this one was shot in the 2.55 cinemascope ratio (that or they have cropped vertically and forgot to change the aspect ratio in accordance, I am unsure which). Only a very small AR fault, but I am pretty sure it is there, so those encoding to DVD may wish to correct the aspect ratio to 2.55 before encoding.

Anyway...

Video: 9 - Besides AR problem, pretty perfect for a TS.

Audio: 7 - Sounded pretty good to me, a little hollow, but very easy to understand so I am happy.

Movie: Lost interest after the second one, never watched the 3rd, doubt I will watch this.


Posted by Dwaggy on 11-21-2005 02:07 AM:

V:7, Flickers a bit and dark scenes are a bit too dark.
A:8, a few errors here and there but overall really great
M:7.5, Defo the best potter film, good fun really

__________________



i have sigs off


Posted by beemo on 11-21-2005 02:48 AM:

Great release in such short of a time. But when did Telesyncs have cigarette burns in them?

http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/8605/hp4b1xt.jpg
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/2461/hp4a5cf.jpg

Hard to say what this is, cause there was that one part where some shadow popped onto the screen. As far as sync issues, I didn't notice any while watching the movie. Regardless, release is still very good.

V- 7
A-6
M-6 (not as great as the other Potter movies, and it seemed very rushed to me.)

:: INTERNET EXPERT BEEMO HAS SOLVED THE CASE.
::(Telesyncs are just cams with a direct audio source)
:: - Dwoggy


Posted by PiMpZta on 11-21-2005 02:53 AM:

horrible quality

v: 6
a: 7
m: went last nite to watch it, was 2 crowded so left......so i am hopin to watch it soon cuz dis quality aint worth dis film

__________________
HOLLA AT YO BOY!


Posted by swampdogk on 11-21-2005 10:28 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by fluffykiwi
very watchable release but definately some scenes missing. A couple of times the movie jumps a bit.

Most noticeable for me was during the ball. We didnt get to see what Ron did to upset Hermione 10:03 file 2. There were a couple of other sharp cuts where bits were missing as well. Still able to enjoy the movie though.

Still there was no sync issues IMO and the video wasn't that dark either. I was watching on my standalone player though and i always adjust my picture brightness and colour when watching a movie.

7/7/? I don't like rating movies, although I really enjoyed it.



I didn't notice any others but I definately think that there is something missing at the 1 hour 21 mins mark as you describe. Ron confronting Hermoine's date I assume. When she says to Harry "Where have you been?" it just doesn't make sense at all considering she'd been sitting with them 20 secs earlier.

V-8 Dark but watchable. A couple of flickers, cropped a little @ the top but clear.

A-9 No sync issues at all, clear.

M-7 OK, but nothing spectacular. But then again I'm not a 13 y/o kid.

Cheers


Posted by jbennett1974 on 11-21-2005 04:11 PM:

wtached this film last night and for a ts this film is great quality well done maven for releasing this film is such time and quality

V : 8

A : 8

M : 8


Posted by pkrmajick on 11-21-2005 05:04 PM:

Great quality release. a few issues with the audio sync but nothing huge, and the video is a little pixellated on darker scenes, but what do you expect from a new released movie?

A great job from Maven here - congrats + thanks are in order.

V-9
A-7
M-4

Sorry for the crappy movie rating - the kids love it but I can't stand Potter. That said I reckoned this as the best of the HP films to date.


Posted by mrjohnnice on 11-21-2005 11:18 PM:

Great quality, Just what you'd expect from maVen


Posted by cheatingatmath on 11-21-2005 11:31 PM:

the problems that most people are listing with audio syncs or choppy video are problems with either their pc or their codecs. if you think differently, YOU ARE WRONG. IT IS YOUR PC.

my specs: p4 3.4ghz HT, 1gb pc3200 ram, 7200 rpm hard drive, 128mb 9200se video card

the video isn't dvd quality, but it's amazing for the time of release. i burned it to dvd and watched it on my DLP projector on an 8 foot screen. if ANYTHING will show flaws, magnifying video to 3 times or greater the size of the average television will. IT WAS VERY VERY WATCHABLE. much, much better than anything i anticipated to find.

i ASSURE you there are no sync issues with the audio. matter of fact, it almost seems to be in surround sound. i definitely got back surround to front flybys during the dragon scene on my older 5.1 system in a non-simulated dolby surround mode. dialogue was produced from my center channel and the rest of the audio was distributed correctly. i think this very well may be in surround.

i made an elaborate professional menu for the dvd. i may post a torrent of my dvd release soon.

regards,
cheatingatmath


Posted by Danton on 11-22-2005 12:00 AM:

Unhappy

Does ANYBODY know that password for the .rar file?




::EDIT:: Next time, why not just say "Hi world, I'm a fucking idiot!" - Neversoft::


Posted by protekt0r on 11-22-2005 02:13 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by beemo
Great release in such short of a time. But when did Telesyncs have cigarette burns in them?


LOL.

Google how telesyncs are made.

-protekt0r

__________________
"Signatures Suck"


Posted by skidebeop on 11-22-2005 02:33 AM:

In my opinion there are too many scenes in which the dark video is unwatchable. However, I don't think this is the fault of maven since the bright scenes look very good. The movie is dark in theatres as well, but not that dark.

As for audio, I really think that some people have a keener sense of sync problems than others (I'm very picky and there's nothing worse to me than a release out of sync). There's definitely a SLIGHT sync issue, but I think it's so minor that most of you can't even see it.

Also, am I the only one to notice that the audio channels are reversed? It was even most noticeable in the sample scene, so I'm surprised no one has mentioned it.

7/5/8


Posted by beemo on 11-22-2005 03:10 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by protekt0r
LOL.

Google how telesyncs are made.

-protekt0r



From VCDQuality.com's description:

"A telesync is the same spec as a CAM except it uses an external audio source (most likely an audio jack in the chair for hard of hearing people). A direct audio source does not ensure a good quality audio source, as a lot of background noise can interfere. A lot of the times a telesync is filmed in an empty cinema or from the projection booth with a professional camera, giving a better picture quality. Quality ranges drastically, check the sample before downloading the full release. A high percentage of Telesyncs are CAMs that have been mislabeled."

So basically a Cam with a direct audio source, correct? As far as I know, Telecines usually have the "ciggy" burns. Unless I'm missing something, how are Telesyncs made then?


Posted by beemo on 11-22-2005 03:57 AM:

:: INTERNET EXPERT BEEMO HAS SOLVED THE CASE.
::(Telesyncs are just cams with a direct audio source)
:: - Dwoggy [/B][/QUOTE]

Uh, okay. Internet expert? Hardly. Thanks for the sarcasm though, hope you feel better now. I was just wondering if this release was a played down TC, nothing more. I guess you missed that point, eh?


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:07 AM. Pages (7): « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 »
Show all 125 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.