VCDQuality Forums Pages (6): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Show all 110 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Blade Trinity - TELESYNC - POT (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=51095)


Posted by Bravo on 12-12-2004 09:38 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by TuSmoove
We know its not a DVDRip. Obviously you dont know the real term of TELESYNC! if you do a search you mite see this:-

Meaning of TELESYNC:

"Telesync means a copy which was shot in an empty cinema or from the projection booth with a PROFESSIONAL camera, directly connected to the sound source."

POT has definitely not used a professional cam to produce this movie compared to other groups out there. This movie video is definitely a 4-5 max could b much better in my opinion.



The term is used so loosely in here. I respect the effort by Pot, but they don't put out a true ts. They've learned how to mux/jack the audio, but they have never had a picture over 7. Most are 5.5 to 6. This falls in the 5.5 range. To anyone who rated this an "8"(or higher) I have to ask you, WTF were you watching.? The mods should check into this as this is starting to make this site not trustworthy for an honest opinion when it comes to quality. It is obvious some people are on Pots nutz if not directly working with them.


Posted by Chewie UK on 12-13-2004 02:34 AM:

Video - 6
Audio - 9
Movie - 8

Obviously the previously mentoned "twat factor", the little jitters at times early on, and VCD limitations all detract from video quality, but this is very watchable on the TV even with slightly washed out colours.
Audio sounded awsome.
We all enjoyed the movie immensely (enough to go down the local fleapit next week) and I don't understand how people can say it's weaker than the preceding episodes; at least they killed off Kristoffersen before he hammed the film into oblivion.

__________________
If it ain't broke, fix it 'till it is.


Posted by joekker on 12-13-2004 05:03 AM:

Props to POT.., not too bad except for the scratchy audio intro.


Posted by frak on 12-13-2004 10:16 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Bravo
The term is used so loosely in here. I respect the effort by Pot, but they don't put out a true ts. They've learned how to mux/jack the audio, but they have never had a picture over 7. Most are 5.5 to 6. This falls in the 5.5 range. To anyone who rated this an "8"(or higher) I have to ask you, WTF were you watching.? The mods should check into this as this is starting to make this site not trustworthy for an honest opinion when it comes to quality. It is obvious some people are on Pots nutz if not directly working with them.


well said.


Posted by PleXo on 12-13-2004 01:19 PM:

ok, for all ya retards, this oviously aint a blade.trinity.telesync.svcd-maVen,
because it aint svcd, stop rating this compared to maVen svcd ts releases, rate it as a vcd ts, vcd and svcd are different completely
vcd is lower quality than svcd
rate it as a vcd telesync an stop slaging off POT!
audio-9.9/10
video-6.7/10
movie-10/10


Posted by TruthBT on 12-13-2004 08:54 PM:

watched this

not bad at all for a cam, but far from perfect

6/8/10

loved this damn movie


Posted by Bravo on 12-14-2004 02:18 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Bravo
The term is used so loosely in here. I respect the effort by Pot, but they don't put out a true ts. They've learned how to mux/jack the audio, but they have never had a picture over 7. Most are 5.5 to 6. This falls in the 5.5 range. To anyone who rated this an "8"(or higher) I have to ask you, WTF were you watching.? The mods should check into this as this is starting to make this site not trustworthy for an honest opinion when it comes to quality. It is obvious some people are on Pots nutz if not directly working with them.


I am amending this after watching the full release on a big screen. The picture is better than alot of pots releases although it seems to shake/breakup at times like it came from abad video tape. All in all not bad. Instead of a 5.5 i give it a 6.5 for vid. audio is always an 8 or better.


Posted by P1R473_133CH on 12-14-2004 07:21 AM:

Nice way better than that svcd
A head is in the way some of the time but its not that bad. Someone does stand directly in front of the cam for a sec, The colours are ok a little washed. The pic is nice though and sound is on the spot...
Thanks PoT


Posted by KrackZaa on 12-16-2004 06:35 PM:

honestly if ur gonna compare this to maVen/videoCD or even Centropy of a while back, there really is no comparison. videoCD and centropy's are obviously better quality. those ts's are around 8-10 range. but considering how centropy doesnt have their source anymore and videocd/maven release randomly here and again, pot always releases cams/ts. now to be fair to pot, this is one of their best quality releases video-wise, prolly other than their sleepover release a while back. i am going to give this a 7 for video simply because it is extremely watchable, but not the quality of videocd or centropy. it should be considered a ts, because the sound is simply not from the cam audio, so what else could it be called?

__________________
Dust myself up
and I scream at the sky
It's been so hard
but I can't let it die
Turn my head up,
looking at the stars
So many years,
I still wonder where you are?
Dust myself up
and I scream at the sky
Every day I ask myself why?
So much pain pouring
from inside
Above me I feel the spirit fly


Posted by VCDBITCHES on 12-21-2004 12:17 AM:

pretty good qy

pot keep it up bro

8/8/8


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:03 AM. Pages (6): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Show all 110 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.