VCDQuality Forums - Lockdown - TELESYNC

Show all 10 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Lockdown - TELESYNC - sWs (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=15355)

Posted by your name here on 02-17-2003 10:55 PM:

thank you guys this is by far your best rls yet and i really want to see this movie 7/7/?

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6

How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

Posted by polarbear_ak on 02-17-2003 11:13 PM:

Maybe I am missing something but IMDB says that this came out in 2000. If so, why are you releasing a telesync?
Polar

Posted by coathanger on 02-17-2003 11:22 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by polarbear_ak
Maybe I am missing something but IMDB says that this came out in 2000. If so, why are you releasing a telesync?
Polar

I noticed that to. That may be when it was filmed becase it doesn't show to be available in dvd or vhs.

I hope the jpegs are a good indication of the quality of this rls. I'm gonna get this 1 just so I can say I have seen a decent rls from sws. I just hope the movie is worth watching.

Posted by SharkE- on 02-17-2003 11:26 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by coathanger

I hope the jpegs are a good indication of the quality of this rls. I'm gonna get this 1 just so I can say I have seen a decent rls from sws. I just hope the movie is worth watching.

I will pay you 10 bucks if you can show me a decent sWs Rls. Besides that point. Quality sucks balls. Audio is iffy. Ill give this a 4/4/NA . sWs Your even lucky im giving you that much credit. Try Better Next Time.

Posted by Rep- on 02-18-2003 12:21 AM:

IMDB shows it as 2000, however if you goto the right and click on Release Dates
Canada 15 September 2000 (Toronto Film Festival)
USA 4 February 2001 (Hollywood Black Film Festival)
USA 1 August 2001 (Urbanworld Film Festival)
USA 14 February 2003 (limited)

So this was released a while ago in film festivals, but the first time its been in theaters. Nice quality too, 7/7/?

Posted by raides on 02-18-2003 02:01 AM:

all the people that asked the question, why does it say 2000 on imdb.com ...not one of them even read the nfo...haha...oh well.

Posted by HoldDaSalad on 02-18-2003 04:05 AM:

I doubt this release wasn't set back for some logical reason like money backing. It was set back because who the hell wants to watch dudes being raped? Not I.

Quality isn't that great, 4/5/? don't care to watch the movie. it maybe aight. Better than alot of sWs's rls's. I imagine once they get used to what they are doing they maybe a decent group.

__________________

Hold Da Motha Fuckin Salad.

Posted by CinapS on 02-18-2003 07:53 PM:

The movie was pretty good. I watched it in the theater last week at the sneak preview. Yes this movie was made a long time ago but only was played at film festivals and just went limited theater. But to bad SWS releases trash .

Video = Piss Poor
Audio= Nah
Movie= Pretty good

Thoughts: SWS give up on Ny the silvers suck. what your doing might rub off on your sister groups.

Posted by nycity on 02-18-2003 10:55 PM:

cynaps:::;

Thoughts: SWS give up on Ny the silvers suck. what your doing might rub off on your sister groups.

so what would there other groups be named? couse pv ... would not be one.. could be... but had there chance lol

and dont say ateam couse we all no sws is ateam without 99% of there members

Posted by fuck_all_ya on 02-19-2003 01:07 PM:

great flick

not bad sws you guy are moving in the right direction

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13 PM.

Show all 10 posts from this thread on one page