VCDQuality Forums
Show all 12 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Foreigner - SCREENER - QvD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=12546)


Posted by Swimj on 12-21-2002 02:28 AM:

*NUKE MISLABLED* ITS A WORKPRINT, POSITIVE IT IS. [that was siteops nuke]


Posted by CinapS on 12-21-2002 02:29 AM:

No it's A screener just you need to see before you speak.


Posted by m-drew on 12-21-2002 04:04 AM:

Pixelated, Bad AR, Nuked, Mislabeled.

Go QvD


Posted by KaMa on 12-21-2002 05:26 AM:

rofl


Posted by killerman on 12-21-2002 05:31 AM:

hell ye go qvd!


Posted by submarine on 12-21-2002 05:58 AM:

source seems legit. they just did a very bad job encoding. could have done much much better of a job on filters.

5/4/6

:/


Posted by Mike-420 on 12-21-2002 08:01 AM:

Talking

What the FEEZNUCKER?! Lmfao @ dat nfo what the feeznuck ???


Posted by Dspot on 12-21-2002 05:39 PM:

lunchin ass jpg

__________________
mellow like a cello


Posted by lo.pro on 12-22-2002 12:45 AM:

what was done to the qvd nfo here on vcdquality was wrong. i'm very disappointed with the administration here, to allow that.

the public nature of this board, along with its popularity, gives it a certain amount of power. there are undoubtedly many thousands of people for whom this board is the only place that they are likely to see that nfo. if staff allow themselves to abuse that power by altering original group documentation as a joke or in order to support their own opinions, it will only hurt your credibiility in the long run.

leave groups' nfo's alone. there is plenty of opportunity here to express how you feel about them, to the weight of which opinion enough is lent already by your status as moderator or administrator.

there is also, in forums like this one, a certain presumption of objectivity granted to the staff. once it's tarnished, it will be impossible to regain... people will begin to wonder whether some of you are in groups yourselves, and quickly begin to associate the board with one group or another. from that point on, everything that is said here will be viewed as tainted, as propaganda, and people will begin to look for a pretext behind every post that they don't like, and group members will come to hate and distrust this place as much as they have some other places (i don't believe i need mention any names).

those are my thoughts for today. thank you for listening, and don't forget to validate your parking stub on the way out.

//edited (spelling error)

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.


Posted by revolution-x on 12-22-2002 01:28 AM:

quality isnt that bad guys geez!


Posted by SiKzNuGz on 12-22-2002 03:22 AM:

QvD should have spent more time on the encode and filters of this rls b/c it's very pixelated and the AR seems to be off. Movie was very bad IMO, Steven Seagal should have stop'd his B movies a long time ago.

*Whats with the defaced JPEG/nfo not very professional (even tho it does suck ass)*


Posted by a1catraz on 12-24-2002 05:55 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Swimj
*NUKE MISLABLED* ITS A WORKPRINT, POSITIVE IT IS. [that was siteops nuke]


ehh...

this is a screener.. what gen? i don't know..

this just shows that you don't hav any sites..
"ITS A WORKPRINT, POSITIVE IT IS."

1st. "POSITIVE IT IS"

no one would say that.. especially in a nuke..
2nd. it isnt a workprint.. so that means you have no sites.. or if you do, ur siteops don't know wtf they are talkin about.

so.. it all comes to the fact that u don't have ANY sites.. u fukin lama.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 AM.
Show all 12 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.