VCDQuality Forums - Hollywood Ending *Nuked* - DVDRIP

Show all 12 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- SVCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=20)
-- Hollywood Ending *Nuked* - DVDRIP - DEiTY (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=7883)

Posted by Figaro on 09-08-2002 01:33 AM:

Only places this was nuked on was sites that dont follow svcd council rules. Wish someone would make up their damn minds on setting standards. =( Leeched it looks and sounds great. To hell with the nukers.

Posted by CraZy on 09-08-2002 08:17 PM:

NUKED !?!?!?!?!?

Ummm.....

DEiTY knows the SVCD 2002 standards and there is nothing wrong with this rip.
So what if its 3 disks, thats the rules and they go by the rules because they're a good group.
ESOTERiC's release was nuked for a few reasons on alot of sites.
192 audio = not standard for SVCD releases.
1710 bitrate = under the minimum bitrate of the 1750 standard.

I am no way flaming ESOTERiC , they are a great group and release nice looking VCD's .

So you got it backwards, this non nuke , ESOTERiC's nuke .

Posted by JoshNya on 09-09-2002 12:43 AM:

Lets see....

DEiTY ... over bitrated with duel 224k audio, skips on dvd players
3rd cd only takes 1/2 of cd
113 min = 2cds

I'll be d/l ESOTERiC, whoever made the 192k audio nuke rule is simply retarded... groups been doing it for years... and theres nothing wrong with 1700+k video

Posted by Figaro on 09-09-2002 02:09 AM:

erm do your math, its not over bitrated for dual audio. Plays fine and dandy. Time to get rid of them shit pioneers. As CraZy pointed out there are standards which almost every group participates in with the exception of TCF, ESOTERiC, TDi blah blah. With the exception of TCF who actually releases alot of releases still, they should have nothing to say. ESOTERiC's was nuked on a majority of sites who want quality. 192 bitrate also does not comply with 100% standalones whereas 224 does. Which is why the standard is in place.

Posted by JoshNya on 09-09-2002 07:52 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Figaro
192 bitrate also does not comply with 100% standalones whereas 224 does. Which is why the standard is in place.

Well then why does my 2 DVD players play them?

Last I checked DEiTY never signed nothing in that lame SVCD Council, just using it as an excuse.

They only needed 1 audio track, I could almost take that 2nd audio track out, glue all 3 pieces together, and cut it in half to make 2 cds.

This is a total shit rip!

...out with pioneers, *snicker* ya I see that happening.....

/me worships DEiTY so much it makes me want to throw away my pioneer!! NOT!

Posted by Figaro on 09-09-2002 02:14 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by JoshNya
Well then why does my 2 DVD players play them?

So your 2 dvd players constitute the entire DVD player market? Theres some more intelligent thinking again.

quote:
Last I checked DEiTY never signed nothing in that lame SVCD Council, just using it as an excuse.

What's so lame about setting standards? You do realize that there is probably a dozen so called 'rules' enforced when it comes to svcds. Alot of sites wont even take below 1700 or 1800 bitrate then again others dont give a rats ass. As long as its early they will take it. Thats why the above mentioned groups dont give a crap about standards. Well thats ok, they can do propers that will sit on their affils or to the few sites that dont give a crap what the rip looks like.

Posted by JoshNya on 09-09-2002 10:20 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Figaro

So your 2 dvd players constitute the entire DVD player market? Theres some more intelligent thinking again.

No, but it proves your %100 stat is total crap.

quote:
Originally posted by Figaro

Well thats ok, they can do propers that will sit on their affils or to the few sites that dont give a crap what the rip looks like.

The proper looked and played beautifully. Too bad Woody Allen isn't worth 2 cds, so it's definatly not worth 3cds. If I want flawless bitrate, I'll buy the DVD.

DEiTY only made, what, 3-4 SVCDs?? ESOTERiC made at least 20 times as many. I also go with experience. I can smell a DVD2SVCD newbie rip a mile away. And I've seen this newbie gripe before, all SVCD groups learn from this same exact experience, and I guarantee DEiTY won't do this again. Maybe when DEiTY has some experience under their belt, then their gripe will hold some water. Untill then you just have to go with experience. Good job ESOTERiC, if they wouldn't have done the proper some other group would have.

Posted by portal on 09-09-2002 11:11 PM:

JoshNya ur a dumass, i wanna kick ur ass for that comment, DEiTY is 50500050505050500 times more expireinced then ESTROTiC and ur just prolly a member from ESTROTiC that is Scared to admit the turth

Posted by JoshNya on 09-10-2002 05:47 AM:

Come get some dork, bring your mommy with you...

DEiTY stay with DivX, you can't do SVCD.

Posted by blacks on 09-10-2002 05:01 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by portal
JoshNya ur a dumass, i wanna kick ur ass for that comment, DEiTY is 50500050505050500 times more expireinced then ESTROTiC and ur just prolly a member from ESTROTiC that is Scared to admit the turth

You do know that ESOTERiC is actually TCF's subgroup right?

Posted by Figaro on 09-10-2002 05:09 PM:

You mean them 2 groups with all the nuked screeners under their belts? Cause they couldn't do a simple task as audio?

Posted by JoshNya on 09-10-2002 05:27 PM:

I bet he does now, LOL!!!!

I hate band-wagon fans.

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:49 AM.

Show all 12 posts from this thread on one page