VCDQuality Forums
Show all 123 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- 8 Mile *INTERNAL* - TELESYNC - TCF (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=11138)


Posted by Driven on 11-17-2002 05:37 PM:

Well here is the first public TCF TS release. Overall the quality is good but not great in my opinion. The audio is dead on. There is no static and it is in sync. The video on the other hand could use some improvment. I thought that it was a little dark that was the only problem. I also like the choice of vcd ts over svcd ts. Never was a fan of svcd ts and im glad that TCF isnt going in that direction. Good job TCF.


Posted by ashtray13 on 11-17-2002 05:39 PM:

Good job TCF... I checked out both samples sound is great.. video is pretty good too. I'd personally prefer SVCD over VCD cause my apex supports it, it looks a bit better too, less blocky.

7/8/?


Posted by desertboy on 11-17-2002 05:41 PM:

TCF I always had the faith

8/8/5

Forget CT-P a new master has arisen.


__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by sirryktor on 11-17-2002 05:42 PM:

FIRST POST!!! WOO HOO!! anyways does anybody know what source this is taken from? I really hope an SVCD is released of it. The quality of this release deserves it! As well does the quality of the movie!... damn internal releases spread so slow sometimes too.


Posted by ub3rk1d on 11-17-2002 05:44 PM:

Good stuff, although I prefer full screen As TCF asking for feedback more stuff like this *but earlier* would be very much welcomed


Posted by |sw1tch| on 11-17-2002 05:53 PM:

anyone get the sample? how does it sound/look


Posted by HATINonHATAS on 11-17-2002 06:00 PM:

Well they said it's not a proper but it sure is better than ECO's rls, although that was a good rls also. Just checked sample and it looks pretty nice not sure wich sample is from actual rls my guess is sample 1, though sample 2 was best, and the "if it was svcd" sample didn't look any better than the vcd samples. So, with that in mind stick with VCD format. I'm dl'ing whole movie now to check rest.

BTW there is already like 30 votes on this rls and only 4 posts in thread????

7/8/8


Posted by ShadyX04k on 11-17-2002 06:13 PM:

This is the third thread on the movie, hence the low amount of posts. Great release, judging by the sample.


Posted by svenbob on 11-17-2002 06:13 PM:

IMO the SVCD was sexyier than the VCD.... but thats just me

__________________
One time, my cousin Walter got this cat stuck in his ass. True story. He bought it at our local mall so the whole fiasco wound up on the news, it was embarrassing for my relatives and all, but the next week he did it again, different cat, same results, complete with another trip to the emergency room! So I run into him a week later in the mall and he�s buying another cat and I says to �em "Jesus Walt, what are you doing? You know your just gonna get this cat stuck up your ass too, why don�t you knock it off?" And he says to me "Brodie, how the hell else am I supposed to get the gerbil out?" My cousin was a weird guy....

-


Posted by ewfbootlegga on 11-17-2002 06:16 PM:

Sample 1 & sample 2 are both from the release. I like the SVCD sample for the audio sound but besides that its not much improved video quality. So stick with VCD save us the size and turn up the audio like you did in the svcd sample. The audio is still clear and its more audible but both are fine since we can just turn up the volume ourselves. All in all this is a great release if you can start getting them in prescreening and what not and getting releases a couple days earlier it would be nice to see somebody step up and beat ftf in speed and actually have some QUALITY to their releases. As ar as video for a TS goes I would give this a 9 as its the way its supposed to be done. Audio definetely gets a 10 but I'm going on the sample so far so I will wait to see if I hear the whole thing. As long as their are no mic drops and what not this will stick with a 10. I liked the movie so I will give that a 9 also.

Good release and this is much better then the eco release. That release for many had very choppy video especially in fast motion scenes. Once again thank you TCF this is another step in the right direction well see where it leads you.


Posted by ipuk on 11-17-2002 06:16 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ub3rk1d
Good stuff, although I prefer full screen As TCF asking for feedback more stuff like this *but earlier* would be very much welcomed


I total agree , think ill be getting the ECO rls just for the full screen


Posted by ub3rk1d on 11-17-2002 06:28 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by HATINonHATAS
Well they said it's not a proper but it sure is better than ECO's rls, although that was a good rls also. Just checked sample and it looks pretty nice not sure wich sample is from actual rls my guess is sample 1, though sample 2 was best, and the "if it was svcd" sample didn't look any better than the vcd samples. So, with that in mind stick with VCD format. I'm dl'ing whole movie now to check rest.

BTW there is already like 30 votes on this rls and only 4 posts in thread????

7/8/8

Thats because the thread wasnt added when the release was


Posted by aaron on 11-17-2002 06:52 PM:

TCF-

Great release of a great movie! ALthough I did like ECO's release, yours tops all of them put together. The only thing that I liked better about ECO's was that it was full screen instead of being widescreen. The only problem with that though is that you won't get the full aspect ratio. Yours has much better motion compensation as well as clear audio. The audio could be slightly louder though, but it is just fine the way you have it. As far as VCD or SVCD, I'd stick with VCD. The picture quality is just as good, and you won't waste the added file size. Congratulations on your first (of many I hope) great telesync release!

Cheers,
Aaron

P.S.
Maybe you'd consider releasing "Harry Potter"? Both of those releases out now aren't that good. UTI's has great sound, but bad picture. FTF's has okay picture and okay sound. Just a thought, that all "Harry" fans would probably like for you to consider.


Posted by Diezel on 11-17-2002 07:11 PM:

I agree, the SVCD version has better sound, and the VCD version is fine, so just stick with VCD, good work TCF


Posted by Tavz on 11-17-2002 07:23 PM:

Very Good Release

Ive only seen the vcd sample but it is very good. Audio seems almost perfect and video is also really good. I really dont care if its VCD or SVCD as long as its only two cds (unless of course its a really long movie).

Video - 8
Audio - 9
Movie - N/A


Posted by clubbizz on 11-17-2002 07:28 PM:

not too shabby, i like the widescreen.. clearer than the others, GOOD SH|TTE boyz. *cough* columbus *cough*


Posted by Crai on 11-17-2002 07:38 PM:

Bah.. Seems fine, watched the sample, but its hard to get.. all bots are full and / or slow .. I think i have to wait awhile


Posted by territory on 11-17-2002 07:41 PM:

Talking hmm, very nice release

although i think the svcd is slightly better, the video quality in full screen looks a bit more clear, and the audio is better.


Posted by VCDz on 11-17-2002 07:47 PM:

Sweet! Thanks TCF! .


Posted by TazgodX on 11-17-2002 07:51 PM:

i think intxX should be banned from voting al he votes is 1-1-1 or 10-10-10


Posted by krazyfoo on 11-17-2002 07:58 PM:

id say go for svcd unless its gonna reach over 3 cds then stick w/ vcd... i dont care about dl'n a 2 full 800mb images ... video is usually smoother if not much better

__________________
NFO Jones stole my bike


Posted by JJ2001 on 11-17-2002 08:24 PM:

stay with vcd and save everybody some bandwidth not even difference between them so it would be better in vcd


Posted by PlasticSpoon on 11-17-2002 08:25 PM:

I'd rather the vcd...unless the source is NTSC. Cause my dvd player won't play PAL svcd's : )


Posted by thedillybar on 11-17-2002 08:34 PM:

is it worth downloading this if i've already got the ECO PROPER?


Posted by brr8760 on 11-17-2002 08:43 PM:

TCF is the Brett Favre of da scene

quote:
Forget CT-P a new master has arisen.
I agree, TCF has really raised the bar. Their NFO was respectful, professional and fun to read. TCF is the measuring stick by which all groups will be judged.

This TS is wide screen and SHARP-- almost dvd-ish. It's that good, people.

TCF RULEZ ALL.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.


Posted by creamhackered on 11-17-2002 09:01 PM:

Re: TCF is the Brett Favre of da scene

quote:
Originally posted by brr8760
I agree, TCF has really raised the bar. Their NFO was respectful, professional and fun to read. TCF is the measuring stick by which all groups will be judged.

This TS is wide screen and SHARP-- almost dvd-ish. It's that good, people.

TCF RULEZ ALL.



I agree there

They proove themselves every SVCD they churn out but now its onto TS and they are taking the crown here. Good things come to those who wait Was always the same with CTP


Posted by master-drew on 11-17-2002 09:03 PM:

Looks very nice TCF. Props to you!

ECO vs. TCF

Okay:

1. ECO's version was very watchable, but some points of the movie it seemed as if they were holding the CAM or something and it was shaking/moving a bit. Not too often, but it happened.

2. ECO's versions audio wasnt too bad, and clear enough to understand.

3. ECO's version look as if the CAM was zoomed in too much. You can tell this because half the times peoples faces are cut off in the picture, and the credits at the begining were totally cut off.

4. ECO's version was Full Screen.


1. TCF's versions video looks like it has a bit more color, and its a bit brighter with better focus.

2.TCF's versions audio is a bit better. Clearer then ECO's, very decent.

3. TCF's version is Widescreen, and displays the FULL picture, nothing is cut off on the sides and the picture is much larger.


Thats just my 2 cents.


master-drew


Posted by Serpentor on 11-17-2002 09:28 PM:

So is this release hands down better than the ECO release? ECO's is already on the usenet, so if there's not much of a difference in quality, then I'd rather just grab it there. Just looking for ECO vs TCF comments


Posted by pHo on 11-17-2002 09:46 PM:

thought i'd check this out, as its always nice to see what groups doing stuff for themselves are capable of..

video :: the camera is positioned a bit to the right hand side of the picture, as evident by the opening logos, its not too far, and from the size of the logos and opening credits, it looks like around 90% of the picture is intact, which is a huge improvement on most caps. im presuming the film is shot in 2.35:1 (imdb doesn't have its techspecs up yet, so i cant tell) and if so, hats off to em for being able to film such a wide film so well. if you want the full screen version that ECO offers, then just hit zoom a few times, as thats basically the difference. personally, i'd rather see the film in its correct frame. the motion of the picture is good, with only slight motionblur, which is to be expected from the telesync method, and a minimal amount of grain. i found the video on the ECO release to feel almost "quantized", and it was quite annoying. colours are accurate, and only a slight flicker from the NTSCfilm>PAL conversion. overall, compared to the TS' i've seen in my life over the last 5 or so years, it has to be a 9.

audio :: audio is taken from booth or another direct stream, rather than a dynamic mic or receiver. its perfectly in sync, and the full range is evident when played back thru my amp/speakers. nothing to fault, another 9.

movie :: don't know im afriad.

votes taken from skipping over the whole of CD1 on a DVD player connected toa 21" 4:3 TV and a seperates hifi system.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by TBA on 11-17-2002 09:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Serpentor
So is this release hands down better than the ECO release? ECO's is already on the usenet, so if there's not much of a difference in quality, then I'd rather just grab it there. Just looking for ECO vs TCF comments


(Long time lurker, first time posting)

Just wanted to say, I personally think the ECO release was over-rated. As a _few_ people mentioned there's something wierd w/ the framerate. It's just very studdery - kinda like the first few releases of "Transporter". It's watchable, but after reading some of the good comments about the TCF TS, I'll probably grab that one and watch the movie again.

Also, the ECO release wasn't standard VCD 2.0 compliant, so be ready to re-encode it if you have a picky DVD player (as I do).

Cheers.


Posted by themovieguy21 on 11-17-2002 09:56 PM:

glad to see TCF has finally launched off their homemade telesyncs. i do like the picture and audio quality alot. nothing is cut off the the video camera isnt too close like with ecos.

it almost looks like the video cam was zoomed back really far. they almost made this one look like a DVD widescreen.


Posted by impossible on 11-17-2002 09:59 PM:

Great quality overall....video is clear and has vivid color, sound is nice, very clear. I'd say go with SVCD unless the movie is so long it would be 3cds, then go with VCD, since you can tell a great difference in video quality between your svcd and vcd samples.

8/9/xx


Posted by Corrado on 11-17-2002 10:00 PM:

all i got to say, wow.

if this is the quality of things to come from TCF, i cannot wait. I believe that the quality of this telesync even surpasses that of video and the screeners that tcf put out...again...wow.

Video quality i would give a 9. I was a little annoyed at first about TCF not releasing Jackass etc, but it appears that the tests they did to perfect the telesync method really paid off. The full widescreen ratio is also a major plus point for this release. Looking forward to a 007 and a lotr fix from TCF to watch a few times after going to the cinema

Audio quality deserves a 9, there is a slight hiss in the back that could be eliminated but nothing that would make the release impossible to hear. Fully clear, and sounds AMAZING through the dolby digital setup, very impressed.

Film itself, not a clue, going to check it out as soon as cd2 is done...the pains of living in the uk, this film isnt looking at a cinema release till feb


Posted by themovieguy21 on 11-17-2002 10:05 PM:

sucks for all u who live in UK. u gotz to wait til feb to see 8 mile but u get hp2 right away. from UTI.

looks like TCF will knock CTP from the top spot.


by the way who cares bout jackass flick look at how many came out. that movie sucks like whoa. and its rating is a 0. 8 mile took that one off #1.

harry potter will probably be in #2 spot because of the excitement for it.


Posted by thedillybar on 11-17-2002 10:05 PM:

well worth the download. better than the PROPER for sure. nice job TCF.


Posted by KaMa on 11-17-2002 10:08 PM:

Smile

Good Work TCF. I Have to Agree i like SVCD. But this is just fine,
ECO and FTF where Alright But i also agree this one tops them all.

Good to see you guys arent just doing SCR'S , Also giveing people the choices in your samples is really cool Guys.. Just keep up The good Work guys, When People think of TCF they thing of good quality. So you guys defiantly have a name for your selfs. Well i guess this is when i rate the Movie.

8/8/7
Gj Guys


Posted by desertboy on 11-17-2002 10:16 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
thought i'd check this out, as its always nice to see what groups doing stuff for themselves are capable of..

video :: the camera is positioned a bit to the right hand side of the picture, as evident by the opening logos, its not too far, and from the size of the logos and opening credits, it looks like around 90% of the picture is intact, which is a huge improvement on most caps. im presuming the film is shot in 2.35:1 (imdb doesn't have its techspecs up yet, so i cant tell) and if so, hats off to em for being able to film such a wide film so well. if you want the full screen version that ECO offers, then just hit zoom a few times, as thats basically the difference. personally, i'd rather see the film in its correct frame. the motion of the picture is good, with only slight motionblur, which is to be expected from the telesync method, and a minimal amount of grain. i found the video on the ECO release to feel almost "quantized", and it was quite annoying. colours are accurate, and only a slight flicker from the NTSCfilm>PAL conversion. overall, compared to the TS' i've seen in my life over the last 5 or so years, it has to be a 9.

audio :: audio is taken from booth or another direct stream, rather than a dynamic mic or receiver. its perfectly in sync, and the full range is evident when played back thru my amp/speakers. nothing to fault, another 9.

movie :: don't know im afriad.

votes taken from skipping over the whole of CD1 on a DVD player connected toa 21" 4:3 TV and a seperates hifi system.



Nice review

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by PaulAAtreides on 11-17-2002 10:23 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ashtray13
Good job TCF... I checked out both samples sound is great.. video is pretty good too. I'd personally prefer SVCD over VCD cause my apex supports it, it looks a bit better too, less blocky.

7/8/?




the SVCD sample was definitely better!!!


Posted by DJ_Laher on 11-17-2002 10:54 PM:

anyone noticed they've encoded in pal this time instead of their usual ntsc??


Posted by pHo on 11-17-2002 11:02 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ_Laher
anyone noticed they've encoded in pal this time instead of their usual ntsc??


films in the theater are projected at NTSCfilm (23.976fps). if you try recording this on a standard NTSC (29.97fps) you are gonna notice a horrible amount of flickering. so a PAL(25fps) cam is used, and then i expect the final image has a deflicker filter run over it to kill as much of the 1fps difference as possible.

converting PAL<>NTSC is a hassle, and its not worth it, so the discs are left in PAL. most people can watch these back without any problem, and PAL is a technically superior format to NTSC anyway, so theres no point making the picture quality lower just to please people who bought hardware that doesn't play the PAL standard.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by crapper on 11-17-2002 11:06 PM:

k.
tcf this is 2 u..

1 svcd even if its a 3cd./. cuase the quality is great.. sounds amazin..

2 keep the cam straight.. (yur hanging a bit to the right)

3 ws very welcome.. and well i dont m ind if its a bit not straight.. dont put bars over it..

great release..

thumbs up.. good to see yur doin it finally


Posted by Scorpion on 11-17-2002 11:15 PM:

Really nice. A bit of flicker in the corners, but it's hardly noticable. The second sample seems to have a bit of an audio buzz, but it's overlookable.

Really nice TS, and I hope to see more from TCF soon!


Posted by themovieguy21 on 11-17-2002 11:19 PM:

someone give them a mini dv pal camcorder.


Posted by djkoolaide on 11-17-2002 11:28 PM:

TCF 0wnz joo


Posted by PhAnToMs on 11-17-2002 11:40 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by themovieguy21
sucks for all u who live in UK. u gotz to wait til feb to see 8 mile but u get hp2 right away. from UTI.

looks like TCF will knock CTP from the top spot.


by the way who cares bout jackass flick look at how many came out. that movie sucks like whoa. and its rating is a 0. 8 mile took that one off #1.

harry potter will probably be in #2 spot because of the excitement for it.



comments on assholes:

ctp from the top spot what the fuck are u talkin about they released 1 ts in around 4months and yet there still #1 u got problems man if i had to pick 1 group thats number one that i would like to see release movies it would be ftf they release almost everything and most stuff is watchable but for qual id pick uti they release rarly though tcf is comming up though since this is much better than jackass this means there number 1 right movieguy and in 4 months they still will be number 1 even if this is still there only ts ur fuckin dumb

comments on the movie:

video ok video is great clear some colors has everything cause its widescreen camera was alittle to the right u could notice on the opening credits but no flaws perfect

audio audio was great perfect i thought

movie great movie

TCF keep it with vcd no point of svcd

__________________
Jesus fucking christ my sig was huge so Dwaggy replaced it with this message


Posted by nokia on 11-18-2002 12:00 AM:

Damn! Right when I just finished downloadin CD1 of ECO's release yesterday this shit got released! But now I got both fully downloaded and here's my review:

Video - ECO's was only a percentage of screen, some say 33% or something less than 50% that's why alot of people's faces are cut off, the left/right/bottom/top of scenes aren't visible (so it's not pan&scan... it's cropped, there is a difference). TCF's is WS displaying the complete screen.

ECO's is pixelated on some scenes and the color is kind of dull, motion is also jerky like the transporter ts's and minority report tc. TCF's plays smoothly and color is vibrant (some scenes seem to have a blueish/green tint reminiscent of ctp ts's but not nearly as bad or noticable) also 2-3 really bright scenes displayed a millisecond of flicker (you can see it in the first sample but it barely flaws the image)

Sound - ECO's was good for a TS, but OMFG this is where I was blown away. TCF's audio was crisp, clean, clear and almost near perfect for a telesync. Hell, it was even better than the audio on some of VideoCD's telecine/screeners. Slight hum in the beginning where the company intros (it even had all of the end credits, not that it matters to me but that's even rare on TCF's screeners) are but it went unnoticed during the film.

Conclusion - If you haven't downloaded ECO's or if you just want a better quality overall release then try to find TCF's internal. You won't be disappointed imo, it's as good (if not better in some aspects) than c3ntropy's ts's.. I give props to TCF for the job well done, they're the ONLY group with quality consistency doing screeners/dvds and now telesyncs! I just hope mods won't start blocking out TCF with ***'s lol.


Posted by AgGz on 11-18-2002 12:54 AM:

props

nice rls tcf good sound and good pic

props to all the groups that got this movie out all rls were decent

8/8/7


Posted by hippyhater on 11-18-2002 12:58 AM:

nice rls,

i think if the quality is good enough for a SVCD rls, it should be rlsed as a SVCD, but only if the quality would be reduced if it was released as a VCD

tcf looks like they are set to release the best quality they can, and if SVCD will make it better, than make it SVCD

for everyone who complains about it being SVCD can convert it to vcd very easily


Posted by IrcLeet on 11-18-2002 01:12 AM:

Talking

WOOHOO, Finally a good release of this movie! Way to Go TCF, keep up the good work!


Posted by devilbeast on 11-18-2002 02:40 AM:

sirryktor
this is a TS telesync as in direct audio but video taken w/ a camera kthx atleast learn that basic of a definition


Posted by blacks on 11-18-2002 05:52 AM:

Post

I think *** is way better than ***


Posted by OzZyOz on 11-18-2002 05:57 AM:

hmm great pic great sound only thing is its a tad 2 small on a TV so I had to stretch it out not a problem but if its a tad bigger up and down would be nice overall great first release. 7/8/9


Posted by McSwitch on 11-18-2002 06:05 AM:

Not that bad at all.. Sound was fine but it seems that no one is able to make the colours proper to me... just always ... odd
Definately worth the 2 cd's to burn on for keeps


Posted by nokia on 11-18-2002 06:21 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by OzZyOz
hmm great pic great sound only thing is its a tad 2 small on a TV so I had to stretch it out not a problem but if its a tad bigger up and down would be nice overall great first release. 7/8/9
It's only small on small tv's, hehe... j/p ah, at least now i can go back to downloading telesyncs safely again... i haven't dl'ed a ts since ctp's reign.


Posted by nookieaki on 11-18-2002 09:30 AM:

Woah, another great release by TCF. Great job guys.

__________________
<Hitman47 > aight, im going to bed, but i leave you with this, remember, everytime you masturbate, your dead relatives are watching


Posted by daizepam on 11-18-2002 10:18 AM:

This has to be one of the sweetest TS i have ever seen. big props to my fav grp in the scene. YOU OWN.
And imo...keep it VCD.

__________________
My Lexicon


Posted by t33d0ugh on 11-18-2002 11:18 AM:

alright ya got me convinced.... Im gettin it tatooed on my forehead
tcf f0ckin 0wnz!!!
thx guys
keep up the great work


Posted by sirryktor on 11-18-2002 11:32 AM:

quote:
sirryktor
this is a TS telesync as in direct audio but video taken w/ a camera kthx atleast learn that basic of a definition


... where did this come from lol. My post said:

quote:
FIRST POST!!! WOO HOO!! anyways does anybody know what source this is taken from? I really hope an SVCD is released of it. The quality of this release deserves it! As well does the quality of the movie!... damn internal releases spread so slow sometimes too.


I think you misunderstood me... i meant that maybe this was ripped from a silver or some other misc format, and i think an svcd would do it justice.

Anyways i have both releases and i can say i agree with nokia on everything he said. I couldnt say it better if i tried. This release kicks the pants off the others.


Posted by robbieb2k on 11-18-2002 01:13 PM:

Thumbs up

im impressed, Clear pic, and sound is GREAT. I have only seen the samples and that was enough for a download The SVCD issue, i thought this would be SVCD (killer sound in the sample).Good work TCF, and keep'em coming.

__________________
-- T h a t s - i t --


Posted by Bullets on 11-18-2002 04:07 PM:

TCF:

definately release in SVCD from now on, you guys have the quality that is required for such a format, and it looks amazing, keep up the good work!


Posted by DividedSky on 11-18-2002 04:30 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by OzZyOz
hmm great pic great sound only thing is its a tad 2 small on a TV so I had to stretch it out not a problem but if its a tad bigger up and down would be nice overall great first release. 7/8/9
Are you trying to say that the picture is squished somehow, meaning there's a problem with the release? Or do you just not like watching 2.35:1 movies letterboxed?


Posted by Bullets on 11-18-2002 04:37 PM:

nice tcf, definately gotta do SVCD from now on though, it looks so much better than the vcd, practically screener-like..its amazing...good luck to you and keep em coming!


Posted by Sig-Bro on 11-18-2002 10:49 PM:

Wow

IMO this has to be one of the best, if not the best TS I have ever downloaded. See-Tee-Pee had some nice releases in their day, but I think they figured their comeback would be mesermizing, but it seems like Tee-See-Eff might be the new king's of TS. This is an amazing rip, we shouldn't see another TS of this at all, it's about as good as they come!

Video is off to the right a bit, but nothing to bitch about at all, at least it's WS.

The audio is definetely one of the best audios I have heard ever. Almost like being in the theatre...not quite but close if you have Surround.

If you have any other copies (ie. FTF, ECO), throw them bitches out the window, this one's a keeper.

P.S. It would have been great if Tee-Cee-Eff had ripped the freestyles for this one in MP3, but mehh, anyone could do it themselves!
Congrats all around for a nice release!

__________________
With Me And Kitties It's Like That Book 'Cather In The Rye'. I'm Kinda Like The Guy Who Looks Out For All The Kitties In The Park. Otherwise There'd Be Nobody To Look After Them. This Cacksucker Right Here, I Found Him In A Storm Drain!
---Bubbles---


Posted by HATINonHATAS on 11-18-2002 11:13 PM:

Re: TCF is the Brett Favre of da scene

quote:
Originally posted by brr8760
I agree, TCF has really raised the bar. Their NFO was respectful, professional and fun to read. TCF is the measuring stick by which all groups will be judged.

This TS is wide screen and SHARP-- almost dvd-ish. It's that good, people.

TCF RULEZ ALL.



Yes, it's very good but not even close to being DVD-ish. A SVCD-DVD-RIP is barely DVD-ish. So, lets not get too carried away. May be you watched too many bootleg VCD's that you forgot what a real DVD looks like.


Posted by Crombie42 on 11-19-2002 03:32 AM:

Exclamation wooooow

This release is great im EXTREMELY impressed with the way this one came out, audios 100 percent clear, video is pretty good also.....TCF if think itll look awesome in SVCD format , keep em coming, especially good TS's like this, we need these

8/8/?


Posted by d0l3m1t3 on 11-19-2002 04:10 AM:

I just got done watching it. It's not DVDRip quality, but it's pretty good as a VCD. I didn't get a chance to check the SVCD sample but I'd be interested in seeing it. It seemed like the vid was blocky on some lines. The color's a little dark but understandable for a TS. And there's noticable noise on the second cd, didn't notice too much of it on the first...

All that said, an excellent release. You really can't ask for much better than this besides a DVD screener. Very sexy, and expected of TCF's high standards. Thanks for a great job and keep em coming


Posted by kustomkla80 on 11-19-2002 05:52 AM:

I think you should do all your future ts's in svcd format. It's all about svcd. While you're at it, do all your vhs screeners, and all other releases in svcd. you've always been able to make some of the best quality standard vcd's, let's see some svcd's!


Posted by cccmmm on 11-19-2002 12:19 PM:

ahhh. to see TCF come all this way... :'^) . i had faith in these guys, and they delivered. hope to see more great releases from them. this is one of the best i've seen. period.

8/8/10


Posted by Comedy on 11-19-2002 01:53 PM:

I was waiting for a good release of this movie, the last thing i thought it would be is a TS and the last people i thought would release a TS is TCF.

Well done guys you must have been practising this one, picture is good. Sound is spot on, i could hear a buzzing at the beginning but it goes when the other sound kicks in.

As for the VCD/SVCD thing personally i'd prefer VCD from a TS, i havent seen the SVCD sample but there's a limit to what the quality can be on a TS.

Still this is a sweet release so keep it up


Posted by simoncwhitfield on 11-19-2002 01:59 PM:

SVCD for sure

In my opinion, TCF should release in the SVCD format, here's why-

1: SVCD has a variable bitrate, so less pixelation in action scenes.

2: The resolution of an SVCD is greater than a VCD so the picture isn't strecthed as much to make it full screen, again causing less pixelation.


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 11-19-2002 02:00 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by d0l3m1t3
I just got done watching it. It's not DVDRip quality, but it's pretty good as a VCD.


LOL.


Posted by ghettopuf on 11-19-2002 03:24 PM:

Question Sound quailty

I was wondering if the sound quailty was good on this copy compared to the first TS of this movie? Thank you


Posted by VCDz on 11-19-2002 06:08 PM:

I'm not really bothered about SVCD format TeleSyncs...

Because it's not really going to be that much better, and I doubt they'll do it... because if they don't do SVCD for their screeners, then they probably aren't going to do it for their TeleSyncs .

Besides its just a waste of bandwidth/space and a CD...


Posted by lo.pro on 11-19-2002 07:28 PM:

Re: Wow

quote:
Originally posted by Sig-Bro
P.S. It would have been great if Tee-Cee-Eff had ripped the freestyles for this one in MP3, but mehh, anyone could do it themselves!
Congrats all around for a nice release!


VA-8_Mile_(Freestyles)-TCFMP3

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.


Posted by lo.pro on 11-19-2002 07:32 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by VCDz
I'm not really bothered about SVCD format TeleSyncs...

Because it's not really going to be that much better, and I doubt they'll do it... because if they don't do SVCD for their screeners, then they probably aren't going to do it for their TeleSyncs .

Besides its just a waste of bandwidth/space and a CD...


although personally i agree that TS's should be VCD, you should be aware that the reason why groups use SVCD on TS's & not SCR's is because the TS comes from DV, and so theoretically you might squeeze a bit more out of the TS using SVCD. the SCR, on the other hand, coming (usually) from VHS, is already set well below the limit of quality for an SVCD, and so (IMO) there's no point to it at all (with the exception of SCR's that come from an SVHS source, which is rare).

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.


Posted by obvious on 11-19-2002 08:43 PM:

Credit

All Credit to TCF for this fine release. I had to come out of my dark corner and say:-

Welcome back TCF you've been missed!

Feedback

1. SVCD please but no 3CD releases.

2. Widescreen aspect is the only way to go. I mean whats the point of watching a movie on your damn monitor?

Thx
Obvious


Posted by RichieRags on 11-19-2002 09:05 PM:

Thumbs up nice, very damn nice.

Impressed. Very good quality for a telesync.

As for the VCD vs. SVCD, i´d personally prefer SVCD. TS´s of this kinda quality is a good enough source for the higher res of SVCD.


Great release guys, really appreciated.


__________________
Life is eternal and love is immortal
and death is only a horizon
and a horizon is nothing
save the limit of our sight.


Posted by d0l3m1t3 on 11-19-2002 09:10 PM:

Re: Sound quailty

quote:
Originally posted by ghettopuf
I was wondering if the sound quailty was good on this copy compared to the first TS of this movie? Thank you


Sound quality is very good on this copy. A little background noise in parts, but minus the noise, the sound is still crisp and clear, not hollow. They could've filtered the noise a bit but eh... no big deal.


Posted by bertieg on 11-19-2002 10:10 PM:

Third release of this that Ive downloaded and they have all got progressively better.Thanks TCF.


Posted by kustomkla80 on 11-20-2002 01:57 AM:

quote:
Besides its just a waste of bandwidth/space and a CD...


Another One! We're all cheap enough as it is just stealing all our movies, but to not be able to spare another cd, that's just sad. I know the quality difference from svcd to vcd in a ts won't be huge, but vcd is garbage. whenever someone/something moves, the surrounding area just goes to shit. The pixelation can make it so bad, it's not even worth watching (I'm not insulting tcf or any other group that does vcd releases, I'm expressing an opinion on the format). The SVCD can clean that up in a ts, and if it does, it's served it's purpose.


Posted by MaStERjedi420 on 11-20-2002 02:12 AM:

why do you guys like fullscreen? it cuts off 60% of the picture...so if you are really into movies you want to get the full emotion of the film right? well then watch it in widescreen


Posted by WiZZLa on 11-20-2002 03:55 AM:

very good release. Even better job staying within the rules and not doing something stupid like a TS SVCD.

With the great quality comes the leftover & useless centercopy groupies, but don't let their dick sucking get to your heads.


Posted by Astaroth on 11-20-2002 04:09 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by WiZZLa
very good release. Even better job staying within the rules and not doing something stupid like a TS SVCD.

With the great quality comes the leftover & useless centercopy groupies, but don't let their dick sucking get to your heads.



This is good but not better than C*T*P in their prime.


Posted by Outrage_Display on 11-20-2002 04:28 AM:

Thumbs up

Holy sh|t fuk! I didnt expect too much from tcf being this their first official TS and all but DAMN!!! Audio is 100% grade A! Great that its widescreen too Video could use a slight light filter, but its free, wtf!

'I Like It'


Posted by Klonin on 11-20-2002 07:10 AM:

Idiot

quote:
Originally posted by Astaroth


This is good but not better than C*T*P in their prime.



Dude (entropy is dead...........suck hard and maybe they will cum back for you.................


Posted by nokia on 11-20-2002 09:47 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Astaroth


This is good but not better than C*T*P in their prime.

c3ntropy's vcd releases looked similar to this vcd, if this is only the beginning of tcf's telesyncs then i can't imagine how they'll look in their prime. the svcd sample they included already looked as good as c3ntropy's svcd ts's.


Posted by ABlix0 on 11-20-2002 01:14 PM:

I hope they release often. I just finished watching it.

9/9/5

Video: The color was very nice and sharp. mad sexy. as good/better then some groups screeners.

Audio: I noticed some hissing at the beginning, perhaps it was my speakers, but not noticible during all the "fuck dawg, it's chill bro" shit movie

Movie: wtf is up with this shit? all they do is talk shit. i really don't see anything in it.


Posted by Astaroth on 11-20-2002 03:55 PM:

Re: Idiot

quote:
Originally posted by Klonin


Dude (entropy is dead...........suck hard and maybe they will cum back for you.................



C*T*P isnt dead fuck face just keep that mislabeled Cams groups cock in your untill they do-2 cents from a newb


Posted by Homey on 11-20-2002 05:36 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by WiZZLa
very good release. Even better job staying within the rules and not doing something stupid like a TS SVCD.




fuck the rules .... the svcd woulda been WAY BETTER even the audio was better unless your a reject you can clearly see that ...

and someone said something about FS earlier in this thread i prefer FS myself.


Posted by [RaZoR] on 11-20-2002 10:24 PM:

wtf , this is the best fuckin telesync i have ever seen .
heh ,seems like i have to suck other dicks now

yeah , i really have to say this looks better than any c3ntr0py TS . its my opinion , so dont flame me dickheads . its very sharp , has perfect colors and the sound is ... damn , near CD quality
position of cam is a little bit right , plz make it center next time.

use SVCD ! who gives a fuck about dvd player which are so old/sucky that they cant play svcd . and why should they be 3 cds ? just lower the bitrate , shouldn't be a prob for people with brain

now the dicksucking : TCF is no.1 !! i luv ya ! bring us more HQ TS like this . doesnt matter if it takes some days or even 1-2weeks after cinema start , quality over quantity and speed .
waitin for 007 and lotr2

__________________
no idea


Posted by Corrado on 11-20-2002 10:26 PM:

Re: Re: Idiot

i don't see why people like fullscreen. Pan scan is tolerable, but the kind that comes with telesyncs is annoying. I was so surprised when i slapped in the vcd and i saw that it was widescreen, pretty damn impressed too and im looking forward to all releases being widescreen from TCF. As for the people who said that svcd audio sounds better, its in your head. Both use the EXACT same compression so there should be no difference. TCF just hardlimited the volume on the svcd sample, tweaked it a little. Thats the only difference, its not because of the format at all.


Posted by CHAOSMAN on 11-21-2002 03:24 AM:

quality release TCF thanks. Hope to see more of these babies soon I also think they should be svcd's, imho the svcd sample looks better, but if it hits 3cds, then definatly make it vcd, 3cd's is a bit much for a TS, but its just mho, thanks


Posted by BONE on 11-21-2002 06:09 AM:

Thumbs up

damn this is good .. i'm giving it a high rating because it is what it is .. telesync
9/8/8
possibly the best TS i've seen to date


Posted by lo.pro on 11-21-2002 08:54 AM:

Re: Re: Idiot

quote:
Originally posted by Astaroth


C*T*P isnt dead fuck face just keep that mislabeled Cams groups cock in your untill they do-2 cents from a newb



do you seriously believe that this release is a mislabeled cam?? lol

as for the svcd quality, if you take a look at the sample's bitrate, you'll see that they'd never have been able to fit the flick on 2 cd's with bitrate that high.

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.


Posted by desertboy on 11-21-2002 01:32 PM:

Re: Re: Idiot

quote:
Originally posted by Astaroth


C*T*P isnt dead fuck face just keep that mislabeled Cams groups cock in your untill they do-2 cents from a newb




Why don't you download the film first before you comment. No way anyone who actually saw TCF's version would think that it was a mislabelled cam. C-T-P Jackass was more likely a mislabelled cam than this.

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by Astaroth on 11-21-2002 04:17 PM:

Re: Re: Re: Idiot

quote:
Originally posted by desertboy



Why don't you download the film first before you comment. No way anyone who actually saw TCF's version would think that it was a mislabelled cam. C-T-P Jackass was more likely a mislabelled cam than this.



I got this the first day of release and its very good. I wasnt referring to TCF its that when C*T*P was in their prime people were bitching about C*P dicksucking and praising Silver and cam groups with shit quality.


Posted by phrozen902 on 11-21-2002 07:00 PM:

8/9/8

Very good release, I'd like to see more releases like this one in future.

The audio was great but the video was a little dark.

8/9/8


Posted by RFtAFAN1 on 11-21-2002 08:06 PM:

good job tcf


Posted by fLoraL on 11-21-2002 09:09 PM:

very good

wow, the qual. is much better as the eco release.

really bad ass guys. u´ve done good work.


Posted by Ten98 on 11-21-2002 09:56 PM:

Losers

All the losers at the start of this thread are funny as hell.

"yeah this version looks cool but I'm sticking with the vcd"

stupid lamers were too impatient to wait for an elite rip like this one and watched the crappy fullscreen VCD.

This rip is so much better I'm glad I waited.


Posted by WiZZLa on 11-22-2002 03:34 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Astaroth


This is good but not better than C*T*P in their prime.



Well that was their prime, and it seems centercopy is way past their prime. TCF's first public attempt, and it's pretty good, just imagine how their 'prime' rips will look. If you love CTP's svcds so much, keep watching them, pretend that they're new movies if it makes you feel better.


---

quote:
Originally posted by Homey


fuck the rules .... the svcd woulda been WAY BETTER even the audio was better unless your a reject you can clearly see that ...

and someone said something about FS earlier in this thread i prefer FS myself.



well I'm sorry I can't see the audio, you must have some spectacular wavelength sound viewing capabilities that I and everyone else lacks . As for being a reject, first off, it's you're as in you are, which makes it blatantly obvious that you were a fourth grade English class reject.
The fact that you prefer full screen to wide screen, meaning about 1/3rd less picture, shows how much of an idiot you are and you've pretty much lost all merit.
Fuck The Rules? Yeh, a lot of groupies & Kazaa users say that because the rules don't really pertain to them.


Posted by Astaroth on 11-22-2002 05:49 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by WiZZLa


Well that was their prime, and it seems centercopy is way past their prime. TCF's first public attempt, and it's pretty good, just imagine how their 'prime' rips will look. If you love CTP's svcds so much, keep watching them, pretend that they're new movies if it makes you feel better.


---



well I'm sorry I can't see the audio, you must have some spectacular wavelength sound viewing capabilities that I and everyone else lacks . As for being a reject, first off, it's you're as in you are, which makes it blatantly obvious that you were a fourth grade English class reject.
The fact that you prefer full screen to wide screen, meaning about 1/3rd less picture, shows how much of an idiot you are and you've pretty much lost all merit.
Fuck The Rules? Yeh, a lot of groupies & Kazaa users say that because the rules don't really pertain to them.



I see you jumped off FTFs cock and on to TCF why? FTF wouldnt give you a reach around or what? -2cents from a newb


Posted by WiZZLa on 11-22-2002 06:55 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Astaroth


I see you jumped off FTFs cock and on to TCF why? FTF wouldnt give you a reach around or what? -2cents from a newb



First off, change your last line to '2cents from a dumbass' because that's what you are, not to mention the fact that your 2cents are worth less than a Tanzanian Shilling. I've never been on 'ftfs cock' nor any other groups cock for that matter.
Do yourself a favour, get some credibility (by making it atleast seem like you have some intelligence,) before you start making idiotic comments. It'll further help your life on VCDQ.

Don't take it out on me because the group who's cum constantly dribbles on your cheek no longer releases any TS SVCDs for you to jerk off to.


Posted by lo.pro on 11-22-2002 09:34 AM:

i'm constanly amazed at the absolute lack of creativity you people show even in your insults. you're sucking this group's cock, take that group's cock out of your mouth, you're a dumbass, haha you fucking n00b. booooorrrrrrinnnnnngg.

jesus, the art of the flame really is dead, isn't it?

if you're going to flame, do it with finesse, show a little style. as it is, most of you exhibit all the sublime qualities of a pre-pubescent boy, who, upon coming home from school to find his mother unexpectedly absent, begins running about the room shouting "fuck!" and giggling to himself that there's no one to spank him for it.

it's no accomplishment to attack someone else online, nor does it demonstrate anything about your boldness or lack of giving-a-fuck about what others think, or whatever else it is that fits in with the ubercool image of yourself that you're failing so miserably to project; after all, you *are* only confronting them online, so it's not like there's much chance that the person you're calling a cocksucker or whatnot will wait for you down at the bus stop tomorrow to kick your pasty little ass, and we know that as well as you do. the only real way you have to distinguish yourself in this sort of community is by what you contribute to it. anything else is just noise.

those who moderate forums or administer discussion boards have a certain distinction, by virtue of their 'position'; and this often creates in the uninitiated a sort of hyper-active combination of resentment, rebellion, and jealousy. what is rarely understood is that such positions are largely a matter of devoting one's time and energy to a task that is 90% tedium, filled with repetitive, tiring, and time-consuming enforcement of simple rules that are constantly broken, with a few interspersed sparks of interesting discussion. they pay for the place, they try to keep it straightened up, they try to keep it somewhat interesting, and they do all of the rest of the thankless work that it takes to maintain a public forum, with doors wide open for any random asswipe to come along and spout his opinion.

those workers deserve a measure of your respect, if only because you obviously find the environment that they create & maintain worthy of your own time, or you wouldn't be here. if you are here, admit to yourself that you find something of value in what they've done, and try to conduct yourself as though you were a guest in their homes -- as. in a sense, you are exactly that.

if you're going to bother coming here, then don't act the part of the spoiled brat, who stomps around eating things out of the refrigerator, drinking all of the soda & eating up the snacks that are set out on the table, tosses the wrappers on the floor, gets bored, sulks a bit and talks shit about how "there's nothing to do here, this place is lame", says "fuck this, i'm out of here", and goes home to masturbate desperately on the toilet seat (trying not to make too much noise), finally skulking off to his bedroom to sleep -- only to show up at your house again the next day, to do the very same thing. you little shits know exactly what i'm talking about. so don't get all huffy.

the reason that people bother to maintain a discussion-based community is in hopes of actually generating some worthwhile discussion, or to learn or share something, or at least to have a little fun. it need not be some high-flown intellectual conversation, you don't have to be "serious" about everything; but it'd be nice if you could bring a bit of personality along with you -- that is, one other than that of a lumpish gray slug, who slimes about in the corners of the room & occasionally disgusts someone.

if what you've got to contribute is a particularly nasty flame toward someone who obviously deserves it, or to call attention to the hypocrisy or pandering of others, so be it! go to it, and make 'em remember you when you're done. i'll laugh my ass off if someone can manage to put someone down without making themselves look like an idiot in the process, and it'll have been worth the price of admission.

it's that not making yourself look like an idiot part that seems to stump most of you, which is just pathetic. pull yourselves together, for christ's sake! it's embarrassing.

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.


Posted by pingwin on 11-22-2002 11:30 AM:

Get a life dude.

quote:
Originally posted by lo.pro
i'm constanly etc


:: what is it with you fucking retards who feel you have to quote an entire post when its like fuckin 2 cm above yours? jees... -pHo


Posted by lo.pro on 11-22-2002 12:28 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pingwin
Get a life dude.



*sigh*

case in point.

p.s. i'm not a 'dude', dude.

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.


Posted by Astaroth on 11-22-2002 01:25 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by lo.pro


*sigh*

case in point.

p.s. i'm not a 'dude', dude.



here lo.pro do this: get off your fat ass(yes actually stand up) walk toward the front door(avoid the fridge as that will be surely a distraction for you) open the front door(it only takes a few foot pounds of energy to do it so dont be disuaded) and walk out and look around(realize to yourself that yes my computer is not real life)-2 cents from a newb


Posted by Astaroth on 11-22-2002 01:30 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by WiZZLa


First off, change your last line to '2cents from a dumbass' because that's what you are, not to mention the fact that your 2cents are worth less than a Tanzanian Shilling. I've never been on 'ftfs cock' nor any other groups cock for that matter.
Do yourself a favour, get some credibility (by making it atleast seem like you have some intelligence,) before you start making idiotic comments. It'll further help your life on VCDQ.

Don't take it out on me because the group who's cum constantly dribbles on your cheek no longer releases any TS SVCDs for you to jerk off to.



LOL look at most of your lame posts they are either attacks against peeps for enjoying quality releases by certain groups or attacks against anything you disagree with, so dumbass if you want to wizzle on something i got something for you lamer-2 cents from a newb


Posted by astrostock on 11-22-2002 10:12 PM:

Good release TCF, I'd love to see more from you guys TSing (Oh man, I must be riding their cock now huh?)



8/7/9

__________________
Will they censor ******** if I put it in my Signature?


Posted by sirryktor on 11-22-2002 10:50 PM:

1. About the whole SVCD/VCD quality issue.
I think the chart below speaks for itself on weather or not SVCD is better than VCD in both audio and visual. The answer is YES SVCD IS CAPABLE OF MUCH BETTER VIDEO AND AUDIO. This quality of a source defidently deserves an svcd version. ALSO for proof on how much better svcd is... just take a look back and download some of the Fellowship of The Ring releases... Theres not a vcd released weather its ts, cam, or dvd-rip, have come close to TCF's SVCD rip of Fellowship!
http://www.vcdhelp.com/images/svcdvsvcd.png

2. About c3ntr0pys svcds and cocks...
I'd like to say that nobody was complaining when ctp was releasing 2 svcds a week. Sure better "propers" came out shortly... but half of those wouldnt have existed without having C+P's to reencode. SW2, Spiderman, and scooby doo, lasted me until a dvd-rip of each came out, and those came out same day as movie. And jeez i am starting to think people that flame around here truly are "FLAMERS". I cant even sit down and try to find a couple reviews about the quality of a movie without seeing cock at least 5 times on each page. so here i think this will satisfy all you cock hungry wierdos and hopefully bring an end to this stupid, old, cliche, childish, idiotic, did i say stupid, and just plain pointless idea of a comeback... are you ready?!?!?! Let the cockfest comense...

CockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCo
ckCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCock
CockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCo
ckCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCock
CockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCo
ckCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCock
CockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCo
ckCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCock
CockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCo
ckCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCock
CockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCo
ckCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCockCock
CockCockCockCockCock... COCK! Heres a visual aid... 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D 8======D
There kids get all your giggles and smirks out and lets grow up and dig deep in our heads to find a new vocabulary word to use over and over like the rest of the crowd...


Posted by WiZZLa on 11-23-2002 03:11 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Astaroth


LOL look at most of your lame posts they are either attacks against peeps for enjoying quality releases by certain groups or attacks against anything you disagree with, so dumbass if you want to wizzle on something i got something for you lamer-2 cents from a newb



Thanks for taking the time out of your 'precious' life to read most of my posts. Not only have your proven that you're an idiot by your previous comments, but you've also shown everyone on VCDQ that you 1) have the time to sit down and read most of my 170-something posts (what a great life you must have) and 2) have trouble deciphering simple comments and are probably teetering on the line of complete illiteracy.
Also please, stop making homoerotic advances towards me, I don't swing that way.


quote:
Originally posted by sirryktor
1. About the whole SVCD/VCD quality issue....


btw sirryktor, the discussion isn't if svcd is better than vcd in general; it's whether an svcd is warranted under certain circumstances. Just because svcd's have a higher bitrate, doesn't mean it's going to make a fuzzy, shaky cam look better.


Posted by [RaZoR] on 11-23-2002 01:27 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by WiZZLa
[B]

Thanks for taking the time out of your 'precious' life to read most of my posts. Not only have your proven that you're an idiot by your previous comments, but you've also shown everyone on VCDQ that you 1) have the time to sit down and read most of my 170-something posts (what a great life you must have) and 2) have trouble deciphering simple comments and are probably teetering on the line of complete illiteracy.
Also please, stop making homoerotic advances towards me, I don't swing that way.




i totaly agree , this Astaroth is really an asshole³ .

__________________
no idea


Posted by Astaroth on 11-23-2002 02:41 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by [RaZoR]


i totaly agree , this Astaroth is really an asshole³ .



lol!!! you dumbfuck, yes im an asshole to dumbfucks like you and wizzla, but the reason is i cant stand lame leechers like yourselves.


Posted by djkoolaide on 11-23-2002 05:40 PM:

this is, IMO, better than c.t.p. could ever do

tcf 0wnz j00!


Posted by djkoolaide on 11-23-2002 05:49 PM:

btw guys next time make it svcd

release both vcd and svcd so those damn flamers wont bitch about it


Posted by Astaroth on 11-23-2002 06:06 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by djkoolaide
this is, IMO, better than c.t.p. could ever do

tcf 0wnz j00!



your kidding me right. C*T*P '0wn3d'


Posted by Dspot on 11-25-2002 12:53 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by desertboy


Nice review



I agree very nice review pHo, if only everyone would post knowledge instead of the usual bullshit!!

btw. beautiful quality, im lovin it, this is the best ts i have seen for many many months, Keep it up TCF, and thank you!!

__________________
mellow like a cello


Posted by StonyVision on 11-25-2002 05:44 AM:

hrm people labeld this 8/8/? you people relize you rated this higher then some of the screeners tcf's released...... kinda intreaging if you ask me, id say 6.8/7/9

:: Rate releases to other releases of the same type, telesyncs to telesyncs, screeners to screeners, cams to cams.


Posted by WiZZLa on 11-27-2002 09:07 AM:

The stupidity and ignorance of this astaroth character is very reminiscent of another simpleton...


Posted by Gadget-Man on 11-28-2002 09:52 AM:

Angry 8 Mile Internal TCF

Did anyone have a lot of pixelation towards the end of both discs? I am trying to find out if this is the way the release is or if maybe I got a bad copy of the release.


Posted by starwars22 on 11-29-2002 09:34 AM:

great release, this is mostly a dark movie and you can see everything going on in this release.

8/8/7


Posted by chrisandcebu on 12-03-2002 04:08 AM:

Quite good!

Not much of a fan of Eminem, but thought the quality of this Telesync was quite, quite good. I would give this one a high rating for sound and video.

Chris


Posted by Mystic Slippe on 12-06-2002 01:06 PM:

What can i say that hasn't been said already? For a debut TS (well, the first 'authentic' one, i use the word in it's loosest form) this is totally mindblowing!

I wish i could have something negative to say about it but i don't...actually no, wait a sec scrub that. WHY COULDN'T YOU GET A FUCKIN' SCREENER OF THIS MOVIE?

LOL just kiddin'.

Great picture, great sound. Gay-ass movie. All hype and nothing to back it up with = p.o.s. movie.

8/8/4


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00 AM.
Show all 123 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.