VCDQuality Forums
Show all 125 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Terminator 3 *SVCD* *DUPE* - TELESYNC - Centropy (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=23044)


Posted by Leigh^ on 07-06-2003 01:45 PM:

Terminator 3 *SVCD* *TS* - TELESYNC - Centropy

Nice image clarity, clear sound, very nice on the TV. I will definitly be watching this on the TV tonight

Great work.

8/9/8


Posted by Bitch on 07-06-2003 01:53 PM:

yep even better than TCF's, which was very watchable btw

I'd say 8,5 / 9 / 10

This movie is friggin awesome
Waaaay better than The Matrix reloaded (there is some comparison)


Posted by psyche on 07-06-2003 02:01 PM:

Comparing the exact same scene from CD2 of TCF's copy and CTP's sample it doesn't look THAT much better. Better colors=yes (although a bit red, look at Arnolds face) but there is a very noticable angle especially when they zoom out on Arnold standing and shooting and during the casualty count screen. Also I hate to say but even though CTP's is sharper and TCF's is more grainy, CTP's is actually more pixelated (compare the explosion fire). Another downside is the amount of cropping BUT the sound seems MUCH better and also the colors/sharpness. This is just my opinion through comparison, both are great releases but I already watched the previous copy so I'll pass. 7/8/10 Choose whatever version, they're both good


Posted by Butch on 07-06-2003 02:11 PM:

*From sample*

Well thought this would be another fortnight or so.Will watch this tonight even though i endured the umms release.
usual CTP quality.
8/8/10

__________________


Posted by pezley on 07-06-2003 02:17 PM:

i would actually say this is a whole lot better than tcf's .. besides the cropping .

angle doesnt bother me ... ive grown to live with it .. sound is ctp usual ... nothing to complain about .. . same sort of pixelation as most of ctp's releases ... ( on high color , fast moving scenes )
color seems good , but a bit to highly saturated at points ...

anways ,. besides the cropping its a great release, this will be the one i will watch

8 / 8 / ? .. hope its good ( i think ill wait for cinema first tho )


Posted by MQ-James on 07-06-2003 02:25 PM:

Getting Sample...
Watching Sample...

very nice, little pixelated, couldn't notice much of an angle, slightly too red on faces. it is as good as/better than a screener imo


Posted by Steve-o on 07-06-2003 02:40 PM:

8/8/12


Posted by perra_himself on 07-06-2003 02:49 PM:

better colours than TCF.
what a shame that it 25 days left beforce i can go to the cinema and watch it
8/8/? (hopefully a 10) =)


Posted by Piratesam on 07-06-2003 03:02 PM:

Its pretty much the same as TCF version from the sample, but has better colors. TCF was good and this one is better.

8/9/9


Posted by thejackal2000 on 07-06-2003 03:09 PM:

this one looks better, but tcf sample is from night and this is day, so cant give a fair judgement.
tcf`s was grainy, but most TS tend to be during a night scene. sound is good on this and i think pic is fine. if u havent seen it yet, then get this even if u have got tcf.


Posted by hadu on 07-06-2003 03:11 PM:

FINALLY!!!!

Was waiting for this mother fucker to bust out!


8/8/9


Posted by BruceBanna on 07-06-2003 03:12 PM:

Video is better than TCF, only it's a little too dark, dark areas disappear. Also a little zoomed in, cropped both sides and top/bottom.
Audio is better.

7/8/7 - movie wasn't as good the second time I saw it.


Posted by Orky on 07-06-2003 03:30 PM:

Video is a 7. I don't think this one was as good as The Hulk or Charlie's Angels 2. Not as sharp.
Audio is a 9. Very good, very sharp and nice.
Movie is a -. Havn't seen it yet. Probably won't do for a while.

__________________
,,|,, ^_^ ,,|,,
DISCLAIMER:
When I write "Havn't seen it yet" in a moviereview about a new release I mean that I havn't seen the whole movie, only the sample.
"Written to avoid accusations of only judging by jpg"


Posted by jmur on 07-06-2003 03:48 PM:


nice release....8/8/7...not usual ctp quality, but best release of this movie.
-jmur


Posted by ek247 on 07-06-2003 03:50 PM:

It seems to be crpped alot, which is a major downside. very rich in colour. But the audio rocks with very little hissing noise.

Video 6/7
Audio 8
Movie N/A


Posted by brr8760 on 07-06-2003 03:55 PM:

quote:
so, I'm hearing conflicting reports here and dont want to download it because i have the TCF, is this a dupe?....and if so, why are people saying its a better release?...is it or isnt it a dupe?
As I understand it, "dupe" means that there is already a "SVCD TS" of a particular movie that has been released. It's a stupid "scene" rule, IMO, because it discourages improved releases, and does NOT mean that it's a copy, or even from the same source! CTP has an exclusive supplier/creator all to themselves (unless you believe they add the famous CTP "angle" in post-production), so "dupe" is a very misleading and unfair term. Current CTP releases have only one serious problem: excessive CROPPING. (7/9/7)


Posted by tha_realist_one on 07-06-2003 04:30 PM:

I still get a kick outta some of you guys knocking on ctp and how they're doing it and how it looks but still can't bring yourself to say anything negative besides"little too much cropping". pffft you guys would've unleashed if this was a tcf or anyone else. When are you guys gonna pulls your heads outta ctp's anus?
Video 6
Audio 8
Movie 9 without first 2 7 with them
ctp copys good but don't get too stressed if you can't get ahold of the ctp copy jus dl the tcf and watch it.


Posted by scousethief on 07-06-2003 05:07 PM:

are you all blind ? the angle on this is nasty and your giving it an 8 ??????? youre all fucked up ill admit that the colors are better than tcf's version but so what id rather stick with my tcf than burn this angled crap


5,8,7


Posted by aXs-SVCD on 07-06-2003 05:11 PM:

Ok i know i am late on my post, But here is my Comment!

...

Video Quality is 8
Sound Quality is 8
and Movie is already 8

this release is Much Much Better Then any other releases that has been rlsed!

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.


Posted by sc1 on 07-06-2003 05:28 PM:

Nice colors, but the angle renders this release useless. TCF wins this round


Posted by Vai on 07-06-2003 05:30 PM:

Don't know why this release isn't as good quality as their others but the video is less clear and lacks the definition of their other new releases. Sound also seems to be lacking in quality and seems 'distant'. At least the colours are good and the picture doesn't seem squashed as TCF's did.

7/7/?


Posted by Mattey on 07-06-2003 05:47 PM:

just watched TCF`s all the way thru & in my opinon the CTP is much cleaner than TCF`s i dunno how it was duped but thats what happens

8/8/9


Posted by The CandyMan on 07-06-2003 06:03 PM:

They should have "proper" this, that's why its being called a dupe. Saw both samples, getting full versions now, and CTP still seems better overall, but I'll burn both tcf and ctp cd 1s and play it on my stand alone/surround sound and see which looks and sounds better in the enviroment I'll be watching this in. Do this with many releases.

7/7/?

__________________


Posted by Ibegoat on 07-06-2003 06:20 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by The CandyMan
They should have "proper" this, that's why its being called a dupe.


Actually it should have been *Internal* because there was no reason tom proper TCF's release

::7/8/7::

__________________
Banned for repeatedly advertising pyramid schemes in signature.


Posted by LOLobo on 07-06-2003 06:24 PM:

Lightbulb

quote:
Originally posted by The CandyMan
They should have "proper" this, that's why its being called a dupe. Saw both samples, getting full versions now, and CTP still seems better overall, but I'll burn both tcf and ctp cd 1s and play it on my stand alone/surround sound and see which looks and sounds better in the enviroment I'll be watching this in. Do this with many releases.

7/7/?




It's a dupe for sure. CTP's release is not really that much better than TCF's. And since wife like's TCF's version, it won't be a big deal if I don't get CTP's full. I just won't try too hard like I usually wound with other CTP releases.


Posted by Carson on 07-06-2003 06:33 PM:

Colors are rich and vibrant. Centropy angle is present ofc.

Audio is clean and sharp.

Haven't seen the full movie yet.

8.5/9/?

Now on to the personal feelings.. which most people can't seem to distinguish. My biggest peeve about movies is white-flicker. I'll take a good many other negatives before having white-flicker in faces, backgrounds and the sky. I pass on all TCF TS's for that reason. This is the release for me. (Unlike all the other folks here, I follow that 'don't like it, don't download it' idea.)


Posted by napalmfuzz on 07-06-2003 06:35 PM:

if youve allready got the TCF release.. keep it.. this release isnt a big enough improvement to completely redownload.. and in some areas i believe that TCF's is better ala cropping/angle.. so if you got tcf.. hold on to it.. cause thius release really isnt better

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"


Posted by apache-vampire on 07-06-2003 06:47 PM:

tend to agree with a few on here the ctp version is NOT that greater an improvement to download it again,
i didnt like the zoom on ctp rls and TCF did a fgrand job on T3,
not knocking this rls either,big ups to both grps for getting it out ,
i love the terminator in them star sunglasses lol excellent!!
edit:
forgot to mention that i aslo think that the ctp version 'whites out' a lot more in the brighter areas


Posted by SaLiX on 07-06-2003 06:49 PM:

this is wicked nice, colors are nice, sound is nice

8.8/9/9


Posted by The ClamMan on 07-06-2003 06:53 PM:

I have to say TCF was very good.
This is a little better

8/8/8


Posted by chocco on 07-06-2003 06:54 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Carson
Colors are rich and vibrant. Centropy angle is present ofc.

Audio is clean and sharp.

Haven't seen the full movie yet.

8.5/9/?

Now on to the personal feelings.. which most people can't seem to distinguish. My biggest peeve about movies is white-flicker. I'll take a good many other negatives before having white-flicker in faces, backgrounds and the sky. I pass on all TCF TS's for that reason. This is the release for me. (Unlike all the other folks here, I follow that 'don't like it, don't download it' idea.)



It's funny listening to people whine & complain when they get stuff for free nor do they understand why things occur .. Personally I don't like flicker either and i'm willing to sacrifice angle for detail/sharpness.. It's a small price to pay, but the end result is an image that is a lot clearer You can't have it both ways unfortunately, at least not unless you're filthy rich and even then there're limitations.. Point is when a projector beams an image onto the white screen it reflects light back towards the audience.. this is why you see the image & this is also why there is flicker with a cams recorded video when recording dead on.. The less direct you are in viewing the image head on then the less flicker there is in addition the more detail a camera will pick up because it can focus.. IMO People that argue about small details on good releases should just shut up & spend the money to see the movie anyways...

Oh and regarding this release 8/8/6

Script was poor and essentially a rehash of T2 minus character development... Too many gay arnold cracks turned a suspense film into an action comedy..


Posted by Dirty on 07-06-2003 07:11 PM:

The color is alot better than TCF's.
Thats basically the only change I see in this shit. The audio sounds as TCF's release to me. The video isnt all THAT great anyway. Bleh..
Centropy could have done WAY better than this. I'm sticking with the TCF release though, seeing as how I already have it. Too lazy to redownload.

7.5/7.5/X


Posted by Krakn3Dfx on 07-06-2003 07:24 PM:

I watched the TCF release last night, and thought it was excellent. Even my wife was okay with it, and she generally goes to do something else whenever I start up a cam movie. This morning I grabbed the sample of the CTP version. Colors are a little more vivid in some parts, but otherwise the difference is negligable. I won't download the entire CTP in favor of the TCF, although clearly either one will do. IT's ood to have a choice for people, and judging this thread, it's clear that telesyncs can be a very subjective thing. I appreciate the efforts of CTP and TCF, and enjoyed this movie immensely.

8/7/8.3


Posted by someth1ng on 07-06-2003 07:42 PM:

No doubt I'd suggest peeps pick up the ctp rls of this movie; Unless you love to see every scene with brightness flicker. Just watch cd1 during the car chase, the tcf version flickers a lot during bright scenes (ex when the cam shows the sky, explosions; the part when arnold kicks over the ambulance and it lands on its side is a perfect example of this). I'll take a slight angle any day as long as I'm getting great colors, sound, NO excessive flickering. 8/9/9


Posted by Chomp_on_this on 07-06-2003 07:54 PM:


8/8/9

__________________
Well hello Mr. Fancy Pants!


Posted by OldSchool on 07-06-2003 08:32 PM:

Way better than TCF SVCD TS (as always)
Sound is nice and clear and understandable, no
excessive hiss from volume compression.
And video is nice and clear with vibrant colors,
jolly good show....
8/8/?


Posted by Yobanok on 07-06-2003 08:46 PM:

Ne time Centropy does a release
its always better than the previous
nice job guys


Posted by your name here on 07-06-2003 08:51 PM:

not some of there best work but still best rls overall

video seems cropped audio is good as usuall

7/9/?fuck i wanna see this!!!!

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????



Posted by Scorch on 07-06-2003 09:05 PM:

Eh.. what to do.. knew this was coming..

Yeah, more vivid colors, but I think I might just stick with TCF's release.. I mean, there's no angle or anything..

6 (I hate any little bit of an angle)/8/10


Posted by chocco on 07-06-2003 09:36 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Carson
I'm glad my posts amuse you. I rated the release, I tendered my personal feelings and labled them as such. If I'm not mistaken a simple lens filter will get rid of the white-flicker that plagues all TCF TS's.. and if I'm wrong, then so be it. However, please never assume that you know more than anyone else on this forum. I'm not a stupid person and I realize why white-flicker occurs, however I don't believe I've seen any other groups that have it so pronounced as TCF. What makes you think I'm not going to pay to see the movie? I got the release, but I'm not going to view it till after I've gone to the theatre (this afternoon at the matinee) so again, I ask you to go ahead and *not* assume stuff you have no way of verifying. Thanks for including your opinions on the actual release finally... should have just stuck with that like most others are able to.

Carson



Everyone's entitled to their opinion and while i just happened to click the quote button this time I was actually agreeing with your post not picking it apart.. The added parts concerning people complaining about angle were not directed towards yourself neither was the comment about going to the theatre.. those comments are directed toward the one line posters overly critical expecting perfection from Telesyncs/Cams who don't shell out some cash to see big releases like this the way they were meant to be seen.... Not going to sit here and bicker because this is the internet, but if you can't deal with my posts then don't read them or go complain to pHo...

Again as stated before in regards to this release 8/8/6


Posted by unique on 07-06-2003 09:47 PM:

just watched the sample...not bad i give it a 7/8/? .
video is not that great, sound is ok.
gj centropy, as usual

__________________
---


Posted by DaGaMe87 on 07-06-2003 09:50 PM:

Seen sample for both, TCF has really good sound and a good picture, but the colours are not great, but it is definatly watchable,
Centropy release has about the same sound and the picture is much better than TCF's because it has better colours. But i changed the colour contrast on my tv and it made the TCF release have much better colours.

If you have a choice of TCF'S release or Centropy's release, you should definatly get centropy's release because it is slighyly better.

THANKS TCF AND CENTROPY FOR QUALITY MOVIE
RELEASES!!!!!!!!


Posted by psilocybinC on 07-06-2003 09:56 PM:

Talking

Audio: 8.5/10
Video: 8.5/10
Movie: 10/10 terminator 0wnz0rz


Posted by Monei on 07-06-2003 10:03 PM:

With so many releases of this movie, it gives people a choice, which i guess is nice, but the fact stands that a dupe is a dupe, ctp has proven to users in the past that it can raise the bar, however on comparing this release to TCF's, i dont think it justified them releasing it anyways and ingnoring the rules. Props to TCF and smaller props to CTP... Hey CTP you guys can't win all the time! Don't let it get to you and keep releasing! Both you guys own let's keep it going.

T3 CTP - 7/8/10


Posted by skinlab100 on 07-06-2003 10:33 PM:

About time CTP releases T3 from sample i saw give 8/8/9 , watched tcf last night and must def comparing the sample to this gettin this one also , color is better and i dig CTP's angel. Props to tcf before ctp but ctp is "THE ONE" L8rs

:: They have an "Angel" now too? -K::


Posted by LuDes on 07-06-2003 10:37 PM:

Oh no there are two releases out.. Who cares, just get which ever one you want. You know many people where waiting for a centropy release and here it is right on schedule. Great... fantastic.. yeah i though the colors where much better and so was the audio there was a buzz on tcf. There is an angle but nothing that was worth crying over. I will probably get this .. cause who cares, you guys act like you all arent a bunch of leeches anyway..

i voted 8/9/7

I agree there is only slight improvement but there is improvement (minus angle) plus its got the centropy seal of approval which so many demand..


Posted by swiz on 07-06-2003 10:50 PM:

There is nothing to discuss - this release is much better then the TCF. Colors are more clear, angle nearly ok... audio quality - hmm, i see no difference between the 2 versions - both OK!

My rating - 8/7/?

I can't believe it, they really did it!! Absolutely great movie!

My rating for it --- 10!


Posted by CcZ on 07-06-2003 10:56 PM:

It's a nice release...colors are decent, sound is nice, it's a slight improvement over TCF's but not huge. The movie was suprisingly enjoyable, saw it today, maybe I'll give my opinion on it later but Leigh's review pretty much sums it up...
7/8/7


Posted by perra_himself on 07-06-2003 11:04 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Monei
but the fact stands that a dupe is a dupe



/me listening to FEDEX - Quality (Nothing else matters to me)

Seriously I see no point with those appz dupes and mp3 shitzor but this is SVCD man and a GREAT movie i presume
TCF roxx but Centropy´s is better and as you probably already understood, the better quality - the happier me

8/9/?


Posted by orcko on 07-06-2003 11:27 PM:

not bad but movie suck

nice to see another release but i think the movie was not that good i was expecting more and i already got the tCf one Dupe well the sample look pretty ok but i have seen better but since hte movie was not good i stick with tcf


Posted by Mr_Grinch on 07-07-2003 12:02 AM:

Groovy (Sorry, been watching Evil Dead 2)

I think people have got over rating CTP's releases highly just cos they're ctp. Fact is all their releases (With few exceptions) are of excellent quality. This one too. The quality is far superior to TCF's (Which was good), much better in dark scenes.


Posted by master-drew on 07-07-2003 12:11 AM:

I'll admit this is a better release then the TCF one, but Centropy needs to fix a few things.

1. Play by the fucking VCD/SVCD scene rules and stop thinking your god and better then everyone. Its not too fucking hard to put INTERNAL in your foldername, but then if you guys do that, then that means someone beat you to it, and you guys cry.

2. Stop cropping the damn video size so much and stop fucking moving the camera every scene to try and make the camera pick up shit on the sides that are cutoff. I noticed in charlies angels, Centropy moved the camera around quite a bit. Angle the camera properly, and leave it, shit.

3. Fix your angle problem as it is quite annonying. It wrecks the movie so much.

Im done.

TCF: Video=7, Audio=7, Movie=9
CTP: Video=7, Audio=8, Movie=9


Posted by JayTray on 07-07-2003 12:44 AM:

Good Job...

Good work CTP... But, I can't stand the fish eye your camera lens creates. Sure the colors are awsome, but TCF's release had a perfect angle. I don't mind having less vibrant colors instead of your release that has that notorious "fish eye" angle. Anyways, keep em coming and please try to see about a new lense for the camera. Thanx for keepin them coming.

7/8/8

__________________


Posted by gofast on 07-07-2003 01:32 AM:

Another fine rls from CTP
about as close you'll get to a screener atm.
picture maybe a tad redish but it's something you can fix on your tv, sound is practically perfect
movie is very good!!

8/9/10


Posted by EccoDomi on 07-07-2003 02:47 AM:

Aspect Ratio vs. Cropping (and my review)

quote:
can someone who's seen both releases explain this to me please?

measuring the aspect ratio of the tcf version it was a near perfect 2.35:1

i just got the jpeg sample of ctp's version and i measured the aspect ratio to about 2.3:1

so what are people talking about a cropped image? have the top and bottom been cut to compensate for a smaller wide picture, thus deceptively mimicking a more acceptable aspect ratio?



LOL. Aspect ratios and size/cropping ARE NOT THE SAME. they haver nothing to do with each other. The denotation of: xx:xx is a comparison of width and height . 4:3 aspect ration (i.e. Fullscreen) means there are 4 width blocks and 3 height. (similar to 800x600 or 1024x768 notation, but who the hell wants to deal with all those numbers? Its easier). 16:9 (i.e. Widescreen) is a lot wider as you will notice. Its more wider than if it were 4:3 (using simple math, 4:3 is the same thing, basically, as 16:12, so you see the ratio difference.) Why is the 9 height smaller than the 3 height in their respected ratios? Simply because it does the 16 first, and adjusts the 9 to fit to that proportionally.

Now lets talk about cropping. I work in a movie theatre and actually get to see a lot of shti you guys dont. Example: Did you know they shoot and deliver the video raw to theatres? Yup. When in the theatre and the masking tape that hides the extra width and height is removed, you can see the boom mikes they used to film the movie with. They leave em in! The movie is actually MUCH bigger than the screens. I've seen plenty of raw movies, and the picture is actually a good 5 feet above and below the screen and about 1-2 feet more ont he side (including sound lines). The theatre then fits the movie on to the screen (we are an older theatre so we use maskin tape over the lens). So, and I forget which movie it was, but lots of folks were bitchin about seeing the boom mikes in a CTP release. Those aren't their mikes (lol and why would they be? Are they using them cause the speakers are in the theatre seats where the mikes are pointed to? lol), thats bad theatre cropping and centering (if you see those and its cropped [with tape] then the theatre did a bad job and the movie isn't centered how it should be). Ok, sry for the digression, back to cropping vs. aspect ratio. A movie, if cropped proportionally will have the same aspect ratio because aspect ratio is width vs. height (e.g. if the original movie is 16 feet by 12 feet, and is cropped [or scaled, which would lose no picture data] down to 4 feet by 3 feet, the aspect ratio is the same. 16/12 = 4/3. Simple fraction reduction.)

So the aspect ratio might be the same, or near the same, but that doesn't mean it wasn't cropped. So what probably happened was that TCF filmed their on a larger screen where the theatre didn't cut out as much. Lets say their was a 16:12 and CTP was a 12:8. Same Aspect Ratio, less movie. Get it now? (all the number in these last two sections are made up. I dont really know what they used and cant be nothered to get the actual aspect ratio and stick it into a calculator and mess with it.)

Review: 7/7/? - If ya got TCF or hate angles, stick with it. If you love CTP, get this. I'm gonna get neither (i see em for free ne way :P )

-J


Posted by UltrA1 on 07-07-2003 02:48 AM:

Thumbs up

please stop the angles
8x8x9
omg keepn TCF's no angles and less red
why waste the disc's
you both rock keep it up
later


Posted by GeNeTiX on 07-07-2003 02:50 AM:

better than the TCF
but i have the TCF so im gonna stick with it, its not that much better
it is cropped, probably to reduce the angle
i dont really notice it, but i guess it really bothers some people
awesome colour, sound is superb
8/8/10

__________________


Posted by RUiNU on 07-07-2003 03:11 AM:

Nice colors but from the sample it has alot of pixulation Sound is good

7/7/? havent watched the whole thing yet


Posted by Chewsmoka on 07-07-2003 03:20 AM:

Video : Nice colors, clean picture, everything you would *expect* from ctp.

Audio : Clear and synced, no complaints.

Personal preferance on which version is better, TCF is you want a wider image, CTP if you want a cleaner picture - imho of course.

8/8/? tonight's feature!

__________________
Ignorance Is Bliss. An Example -

quote:
Originally posted by platinum_bomb
Dude, It wasn't there and still isn't... I was waiting to see what the pic looked like cuz the release was up, but there was no pic and i didn't find the sample, mo fo. Don't make me come and tie ur arms to ur chair and beat u silly with your own keyboard

lol

Will edit this after i get it.


Posted by nogana naishi on 07-07-2003 03:31 AM:

Judging by the sample, this one has much, MUCH better colors than the TCF version, and it isn't artificially brightened like the TCF. It's also a bit sharper, but as a consequence there are more visible MPEG artifacts.

There are no quiet parts in the sample, so I can't tell if there's a buzz in this version, but the audio does seem clearer.

Movie was good.

8/7/7

-Nogana Naishi
[email protected]


Posted by DiSRUPToR on 07-07-2003 04:44 AM:

dupe or not, this sounds nicer and i think sound is more important than video

8/8.5/X

ctp... hmm thanks i guess but i was expecting more?


*edit* i heard today that 3 CTP members got busted when recording charlie's angels 2... maybe this explains the TCF rip-off?

just a thought

__________________
I Have This Thing, Advanced Dillusionary Schizofrenia with Involuntary Narcissistic Rage. It's No Big Deal.


Posted by _luck666_ on 07-07-2003 05:10 AM:

cropping....its become a signiture of CTP......the nuke i can understand tho.....seems like if CTP crops a flick and filters the audio they can call it thier own. Dunno for sure if that it was they did but it sure as hell looks like it. This release i give a 7/8/9 to. Vid is good but not up to par.....sound is kewl..and movie is terminator(go arnie). BTW.....Centropy...if yer listening.....i could give a &hit about the boom mic or angle (angle is noticable no matter)....DONT CROP....and ill feel better. This was good....better than yer X2 chopfest but still....chins and forheads on actors and actress ALL the time is something ive come to expect in a movie.

trying not to flame without bashing myself


Posted by quietstorm on 07-07-2003 06:39 AM:

7/7/8


Good stuff as usual! Probably just me but I noticed a slight angle on this. It didn't affect me being able to watch the movie though, so no problem. I think this is probably due to camera location more than anything else, but I'm no expert.


Posted by EmPreSS on 07-07-2003 10:40 AM:

From the sample (didn't see it burned yet) I saw on my pc, it's very good quality all the way through. From the sample I didn't notice any angle or any bad cropping like in Charlie's Angels 2. Cropping on that movie was very bad.

About Charlie's Angles 2... IF 3 members of ctp got busted while recording the movie, how in the hell did they release it then!? LOL

Ctp obviously (imo) records their movies after hours and they know the manager or assistant manager or they/he/she is a manager...

I'm just glad they go through all the trouble to put these movies out so fast with great sound and watchable video. Beats going back to the theater a bunch of times to see a movie you really liked again and again. And their ts releases are good enough to satisfy till a dvd becomes available.

__________________
My YMDB page
http://www.ymdb.com/user_top20_view.asp?usersid=18281


Posted by dalton4life on 07-07-2003 06:05 PM:

Nice picture and sound as always from Centropy. The angle does bother me a little. This version has better color and sound than the TCF one but not that much better so I'm gonna stick with the TCF version which doesn't have the angle but both are very good for watching. It's a matter of what you prefer. For T3 I don't want a bad crop or angle if possible. I can always tweak color a little. The movie was good not great. T2 was better and so was the 1st Terminator.

8/8.5/8


Posted by stezo2k on 07-07-2003 06:17 PM:

to say this is from Tcf's release, it seems quite a bit beter quality, especially the sound, impressed, as for CTP i really hope they didnt get busted, i LOVE that group

8/9/8


Posted by OBTANIUM on 07-07-2003 07:00 PM:

I agree with Scouse....CTP has been getting some unusally high ratings as of late..props are one thing-but you know if CTP views this board and uses comments made here to better their techniques-some truth might be helpful

Vid-6/Snd-9/Film-5


Posted by Mean Machine on 07-07-2003 07:02 PM:

8/9/?

Very nice stuff indeed. Dupe or not, this is the one to get.


Posted by JiGGi on 07-07-2003 07:34 PM:

Red face T3 Made Me Feel Gooey

Lovely Movie I Must Say, Two Thumbs Up on CTPs great quality and great sound, and the movie was awesome for any die hard Terminator fans like myself. Everyone should go see this movie!


Posted by JiGGi on 07-07-2003 07:36 PM:

T3 IS THE BEST

i think ctps t3 was the best out and every will be untill the DVDRip comes out or untill i go see it in theaters, i watched it last night and it was f00king awesome. i give it 9/9/9, its also a GREAT movie, expect a few emmys for arnolds work in this movie.
Also The Female Bot Was Oh So Sexay


Posted by Wheely on 07-07-2003 07:40 PM:

Colours are brighter than TCF, but the angles kill it.
Also, like I've said before, CTP should try NOT to crop so damn much, it ruins it for them. They have a bad habit of doing this..!!

Nice audio and pic (besides angle) so....

7/8/9


Posted by Khameleon808 on 07-07-2003 07:46 PM:

Nice release 7.8 / 7.5 / 8.2


Posted by wesley pipes on 07-07-2003 09:15 PM:

8/8/?


Posted by [sylver]bound on 07-07-2003 10:29 PM:

Love this release of t3

8/8/9

Excellent film and an excellent version of it.
defo a one to watch.


Posted by OzZyOz on 07-07-2003 10:33 PM:

Angle really isn't any big deal at all. My dads a real picky bastard about realeases and he say through this and didn't say anything about an angle. I said isn't there an angle he said I didn't notice. This one is realyl good quality seriously. Cropped a little too much but other than nice it was very nice. The movie rocked still liked T2 better but this was pretty fricken awesome great job centropy. 8.5/9/9. Watch it on ur TV looks ooo so nice .


Posted by napalmfuzz on 07-07-2003 10:53 PM:

Re: T3 IS THE BEST

quote:
Originally posted by JiGGi
expect a few emmys for arnolds work in this movie.


its a television series now?

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"


Posted by bryehn on 07-07-2003 11:05 PM:

i tried to post that witty comeback like 3 times with no success :P

__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?


Posted by typesdragon on 07-07-2003 11:42 PM:

Thumbs up

9/9/10++++


Posted by EmPreSS on 07-08-2003 01:06 AM:

The true crime isn't groups bootlegging these movies. The true crime is someone watching Terminator 3 at home before seeing it in the theater!

This centropy release is decent (not their best) but it still doesn't even compare to seeing the real movie in the theater. Any true Terminator fan will see this in the theater first, then pick up this centropy release to hold them over till a dvdrip comes out.

The Matrix Reloaded had a better picture than this rls. But the T3 audio is better. It's good, but I'm a little disappointed by this rls. I was hoping ctp would use this movie to make the very best rls they've ever done. About cropping, the worst part of the cropping was when the crane truck does the somersault and you miss seeing all of arnie in the lower left on top of the pick-up as it comes crashing down behind him.

But... I can't complain at all. I paid to see this in the theater so I got my money's worth. I leeched this ctp version for free... so I got what I paid for.

Still, it's watchable and keepable till a dvd. But it's a crime to see this ctp version before seeing it on the big screen.

It's very pixelated while watching on my standalone during certain fast-moving sequences... it plays better on the pc but watchable on your tv. Sacrifice size for quality, or quality for size...

__________________
My YMDB page
http://www.ymdb.com/user_top20_view.asp?usersid=18281


Posted by DaGaMe87 on 07-08-2003 02:06 AM:

I just finished watching the movie, and the sound was excellant, no glitches, as good as it gets, and the picture was brilliant. I have not watched the TCF version, but it looks much straighter but the colours are not great, so definatly grab the CTP one, Also the movie is incredible, should be watched in theatres, but not out here so i couldnt , but i will definatly see it when it comes out

VIDEO : 7
AUDIO 7
MOVIE : 10!!!!!!!!!!!!


Posted by Spurs#1 on 07-08-2003 02:14 AM:

Video=9
Audio=6


Very good Centropy


Posted by Khameleon808 on 07-08-2003 03:10 AM:

I watched this on an Iart Flatscreen last night , one word WoW. i didnt really want to watch it on my pc at the time i was more concerned with making it fit on a dvd and with nice 6000 bitrate it made the quality loss un noticeable and i am actually re rating this video the pic gets an 8.5 from me cause after pausing it and coming back in the room there were frames i noticed that were just stunningly good quality for this recent release . so centropy again i say GOOD JOB , btw love the intros ,keep em coming


Posted by Paula on 07-08-2003 05:25 AM:

oh boy

oh boy.... you know, if Centropy were to release a movie without the angle (which is not noticeable by the majority), some of you would still see "an angle" because you are brainwashed into thinking every CTP release MUST have an angle....which is not the case.


Thanks CTP for a great release.....picture and sound.


And for the record, CTP has never put PROPER or INTERNAL on their releases regardless of other releases out. Why should they start now? Because a few noobs to the scene say so?


Posted by Scorch on 07-08-2003 05:50 AM:

Re: oh boy

quote:
Originally posted by Paula
And for the record, CTP has never put PROPER or INTERNAL on their releases regardless of other releases out.


CTP has an internal on the Jackass release.


Posted by Nihilum on 07-08-2003 05:54 AM:

The TCF version was watchable but the color was very washed out.
Just finished getting the CTP version and its IS a improvement. The color is much better and the sound is great as usual.

Nice job CTP. Thanks for the release!


Posted by jippey on 07-08-2003 06:21 AM:

I must say that I was god**** impressed by the quality of this release.
Video was kickass(8/10).. the colors were just eyecandy(not at all like tcf's)
Sound was kickass(8/10).. clear and nice

Movies was... dunno... we'll see

A kickass release!


Posted by AAjax on 07-08-2003 07:28 AM:

Just got done watching it on my Iart 48in in cinema mode

Nice

Thanks CTP, allways a pleasure to watch your stuff

7.5/9/9.5 It was really a far better movie than I expected


Posted by doofus on 07-08-2003 12:35 PM:

Austrian bodybuilder, Norwegian blond girl, braindead American avtion/sci-fi history = BIG hit!

Damn, watched this on a Panasonic PT-AE 300 projector.

The angle bothers me, blurry picture. But best so far, waiting for a DVD-R screener.

(The sunglass scene is a classic!)

Doofus


Posted by Devil^Boy on 07-08-2003 03:37 PM:

Just watched the whole movie, I thought it was great....another quality Centropy release. Not too cropped and hardly an angle at all, so I don't know what the complaints are all about.

8.5/9/9

__________________
Beauty lies in the hands of the beer-holder.


Posted by spdabbs on 07-08-2003 10:15 PM:

Talking

WOW! Just watched the whole thing on my standalone. Picture and Sound EXCELLENT! Centropy rocks! A great film, well worth downloading, even worth (dare I say it) going to the cinema to watch!!!

Thanks to Centropy for another excellent release.


Posted by dalton4life on 07-08-2003 10:30 PM:

Re: Re: T3 IS THE BEST

quote:
Originally posted by napalmfuzz
its a television series now?


And more. Look for Arnold to win a Grammy for the hit song "I am A Machine".


Posted by Gorax on 07-09-2003 12:13 AM:

Usual CTP quality (that means AWESOME).

9/9/-


Posted by ckz on 07-09-2003 01:57 AM:

http://www.fhost.org/x/dublin/t1.JPG

here ya go exact same frame colors are diffrnt and the angle


Posted by Paula on 07-09-2003 03:55 AM:

Re: Re: oh boy

quote:
Originally posted by Scorch
CTP has an internal on the Jackass release.



that one doesn't count, lol


Posted by flennigan on 07-09-2003 10:30 AM:

@ckz: Thx for the comparison. It's a great help. Now I know which one I'm going to see.


Posted by Quinny83 on 07-09-2003 11:28 AM:

Talking Best release yet

well done CTP, excellent quality and Excellent sound, only two problems, you managed to cut short the scene where the 1st CD ends by about 30 seconds and you cut off 20 seconds off the end of the movie, that is sooo annoying but apart from that great release guys.


Posted by mad_weegie on 07-09-2003 05:01 PM:

8/8/4
This was one of my most sought after movies of all time and boy was i left disapointed! ok picture and sound are great! credits due! shame about the director and script lol! ok so we all know theres gonna be a T4 "Danes And Dahl" have revealed there contracted to do another movie! but WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL TERMINATOR THEME TUNE !!! They have stolen it!GRRRRR


Posted by brandonx on 07-09-2003 06:16 PM:

Just watched part of CD1.

The angle wasn't noticeable to me that much. Audio was good, but I watched it on my laptop, so the speakers aren't that great. Video was good. I'm looking forward to seeing this on my TV, tonight.

8/8/8


Posted by PsychoPostalWor on 07-09-2003 10:38 PM:

Duped...not duped...who gives a sh*t
This is better than the TCF release...period.
8/8/7(wasn't that impressed with it)


Posted by Oliver25687 on 07-10-2003 01:32 AM:

Terminator 3

This release is nearly amazing. The picture is Brillient typical centropy quality, but i noticed in the background of the audio in some scenes there is some crackle doesnt bother me that much but it is deffinatly there. The movie is brillient way better than i expected, i love the not so happy ending this is what should happen in alot more films, Bring on Terminator 4. In the words of arnie "Ill be back!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

__________________
I Love this but not as much as i love Quality


Posted by temp0 on 07-10-2003 01:38 AM:

Fantastical colours, mindblowingly beautiful sound, and a STUNNING ANGLE.

TCF's release blows this shit out of the water.

6/9/8


Posted by moviebootlegger on 07-10-2003 03:21 AM:

WTF are some of you idiots talking about. i watched this movie on my tv and it looks great! the sound was ok. the video was fantastic. one of the best ts's out there! i saw no goddam angle. there is no ANGLE!
8.5/7/9

movie kicks ass!!! not as good at t1 or t2 but its better than 99.9% of action movies now.

the quality on the video was so good even after i had to convert it to divx and lower the resolution in order to make it work on my Qcast tuner in my ps2.

great work centropy.


Posted by lvliniMe on 07-10-2003 05:08 AM:

i didn't notice an angle in this release... i don't understand why some of u had to mention it, i even tried and didn't notice it, cropping was used a bit but that doesn't matter the least bit really IMO very nice centropy.


internal.. proper.. these words mean so little when watching a high quality kick azz movie

__________________
http://rip.dre3k.net/matt/sig.jpg


Posted by temp0 on 07-10-2003 07:54 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by moviebootlegger
WTF are some of you idiots talking about?

one of the best ts's out there! i saw no goddam angle. there is no ANGLE!



Maybe you're blind or just a tard. But a lot of people noticed the obvious, probably intentional, bad enough to ruin the TS angle.

As another viewer posted: http://www.fhost.org/x/dublin/t1.JPG

You seriously don't see the Jay Leno chin?


Posted by lo.pro on 07-10-2003 08:09 AM:

Re: Aspect Ratio vs. Cropping (and my review)

quote:
Originally posted by EccoDomi
Now lets talk about cropping. I work in a movie theatre and actually get to see a lot of shti you guys dont. Example: Did you know they shoot and deliver the video raw to theatres? Yup. When in the theatre and the masking tape that hides the extra width and height is removed, you can see the boom mikes they used to film the movie with. They leave em in! The movie is actually MUCH bigger than the screens. I've seen plenty of raw movies, and the picture is actually a good 5 feet above and below the screen and about 1-2 feet more ont he side (including sound lines). The theatre then fits the movie on to the screen (we are an older theatre so we use maskin tape over the lens). So, and I forget which movie it was, but lots of folks were bitchin about seeing the boom mikes in a CTP release. Those aren't their mikes (lol and why would they be? Are they using them cause the speakers are in the theatre seats where the mikes are pointed to? lol), thats bad theatre cropping and centering (if you see those and its cropped [with tape] then the theatre did a bad job and the movie isn't centered how it should be).
i've mentioned this before in relation to the boom mike argument. however, it's only true for films shot in Super35, i believe. this innovation was developed as an alternative to "pan and scan", which loses much of the picture when the movie is telecined and then made FS. with super35, you usually actually see MORE of the picture in the full screen version, not less as with pan and scan. most theatres use an attachment that fits onto the end of the projector and boxes out the extra part of the fiim, rather than masking tape (but you mentioned that the equipment in your theatre was old).

as for the dupe issue: it's a dupe. anybody who argues with that doesn't understand what the scene's all about. CTP's refusal to tag the dir with INTERNAL or PROPER is pure arrogance. if they started to do so, 90% of sites that don't take internals would probably make an exception for ctp anyway, so it wouldn't really make any difference to the end user. there are already sites with rules like "no CAM or TS except CTP or TCF". any CTP internal will spread everywhere, the only reason they don't tag it that way is because they think they're better than everyone else and don't have to play by scene rules. and as long as sites keep letting them get away with it, they're right, at least about the last part.

i've got a lot more respect for TCF in that regard. they own the screener scene, but you don't see them acting like they can just put out whatever they want, regardless of whether it's been done by anyone else or whatever. and when they do proper or internal, they tell their reasoning in the nfo, as is appropriate. they don't just stick it out there as if it's a given that everyone wants their shit, so there's no reason why they should have to stoop to following the conventions that allow the scene to function. if everybody acted like CTP does, the scene would be chaos, and what quality control there is left would be shot to hell.

also, it's lame in that they're being allowed to 'rest on their laurels'. if sites don't nuke them as dupes, then that means they never need to worry about whether any other group starts to come up and give them some competition. and wtf, maybe another group could have made their release better, but they were trying to race and beat other groups (which is the point of the scene, remember?). if ctp wants to pull themselves from that part of the scene, and considers themselves above competition, then ALL of their releases should be considered internals. because if TCF had released after them, TCF would have been nuked as a dupe (except for the fact that TCF would have labelled theirs INTERNAL, as is appropriate). nukers who allow a group to release a dupe without it being nuked, and yet nuke other releases which dupe theirs, are suckers; they've allowed themselves to be pressured and conned by a group into doing whatever the group wants them to do, including giving them an unfair advantage in competition. you can still take CTP's releases if they mark them INTERNAL; you can still get them in your request dirs if they don't. but don't let them push you around, it's bad for the scene.

quote:
Originally posted by chocco
It's funny listening to people whine & complain when they get stuff for free nor do they understand why things occur .. Personally I don't like flicker either and i'm willing to sacrifice angle for detail/sharpness.. It's a small price to pay, but the end result is an image that is a lot clearer You can't have it both ways unfortunately, at least not unless you're filthy rich and even then there're limitations.. Point is when a projector beams an image onto the white screen it reflects light back towards the audience.. this is why you see the image & this is also why there is flicker with a cams recorded video when recording dead on.. The less direct you are in viewing the image head on then the less flicker there is in addition the more detail a camera will pick up because it can focus.. IMO People that argue about small details on good releases should just shut up & spend the money to see the movie anyways...

reflected light isn't the only reason for flicker. there's also the issue of the frame rate difference between FILM and PAL. no lens filter will get rid of that, it's got to be processed out during the encode, or not picked up in the first place (by adjusting the camera's frame rate).

as to your whining about people whining, i don't understand why people get upset about those who comment on deficiencies in the releases; what otherwise is the point of this forum, if not to talk about that? no matter how good the release is, it's never going to match watching it in the theatre, so you wouldn't need to look at people's comments in order to make that decision. if you want to see it in the theatre, do so. if you want to download a release of it, you probably would like to know as much as possible about it before you waste your time and bandwidth. obviously, some have a problem with picture angle, some have more problem with graininess, etc etc, so for those people it makes sense that it is mentioned whether those problems exist, so they can decide which release they'd prefer to download.

also, wtf, big deal if someone does comment about it. i'd rather hear people's opinions on these details and / or some sort of technical discussion / argument than read 150 one-line "ctp rawks, great release, thx guys" or "tcf ownz0rz j00 all mofos, this rls r teh suck" replies, any day.

quote:
Originally posted by temp0
Maybe you're blind or just a tard. But a lot of people noticed the obvious, probably intentional, bad enough to ruin the TS angle.

As another viewer posted: http://www.fhost.org/x/dublin/t1.JPG

You seriously don't see the Jay Leno chin?

don't need to look at the chin. look at the vertical lines on the walls, it's pretty hard to argue with that.

quote:
Originally posted by dalton4life
And more. Look for Arnold to win a Grammy for the hit song "I am A Machine".


heh not to mention possibly being governor of california by next year :-O

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.


Posted by moviebootlegger on 07-10-2003 09:32 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by temp0
Maybe you're blind or just a tard. But a lot of people noticed the obvious, probably intentional, bad enough to ruin the TS angle.

As another viewer posted: http://www.fhost.org/x/dublin/t1.JPG

You seriously don't see the Jay Leno chin?




the angle doesnt bother me and it isnt noticable.

quote:
Originally posted by lo.pro
i've mentioned this before in relation to the boom mike argument. however, it's only true for films shot in Super35, i believe. this innovation was developed as an alternative to "pan and scan", which loses much of the picture when the movie is telecined and then made FS. with super35, you usually actually see MORE of the picture in the full screen version, not less as with pan and scan. most theatres use an attachment that fits onto the end of the projector and boxes out the extra part of the fiim, rather than masking tape (but you mentioned that the equipment in your theatre was old).

as for the dupe issue: it's a dupe. anybody who argues with that doesn't understand what the scene's all about. CTP's refusal to tag the dir with INTERNAL or PROPER is pure arrogance. if they started to do so, 90% of sites that don't take internals would probably make an exception for ctp anyway, so it wouldn't really make any difference to the end user. there are already sites with rules like "no CAM or TS except CTP or TCF". any CTP internal will spread everywhere, the only reason they don't tag it that way is because they think they're better than everyone else and don't have to play by scene rules. and as long as sites keep letting them get away with it, they're right, at least about the last part.

i've got a lot more respect for TCF in that regard. they own the screener scene, but you don't see them acting like they can just put out whatever they want, regardless of whether it's been done by anyone else or whatever. and when they do proper or internal, they tell their reasoning in the nfo, as is appropriate. they don't just stick it out there as if it's a given that everyone wants their shit, so there's no reason why they should have to stoop to following the conventions that allow the scene to function. if everybody acted like CTP does, the scene would be chaos, and what quality control there is left would be shot to hell.

also, it's lame in that they're being allowed to 'rest on their laurels'. if sites don't nuke them as dupes, then that means they never need to worry about whether any other group starts to come up and give them some competition. and wtf, maybe another group could have made their release better, but they were trying to race and beat other groups (which is the point of the scene, remember?). if ctp wants to pull themselves from that part of the scene, and considers themselves above competition, then ALL of their releases should be considered internals. because if TCF had released after them, TCF would have been nuked as a dupe (except for the fact that TCF would have labelled theirs INTERNAL, as is appropriate). nukers who allow a group to release a dupe without it being nuked, and yet nuke other releases which dupe theirs, are suckers; they've allowed themselves to be pressured and conned by a group into doing whatever the group wants them to do, including giving them an unfair advantage in competition. you can still take CTP's releases if they mark them INTERNAL; you can still get them in your request dirs if they don't. but don't let them push you around, it's bad for the scene.


reflected light isn't the only reason for flicker. there's also the issue of the frame rate difference between FILM and PAL. no lens filter will get rid of that, it's got to be processed out during the encode, or not picked up in the first place (by adjusting the camera's frame rate).

as to your whining about people whining, i don't understand why people get upset about those who comment on deficiencies in the releases; what otherwise is the point of this forum, if not to talk about that? no matter how good the release is, it's never going to match watching it in the theatre, so you wouldn't need to look at people's comments in order to make that decision. if you want to see it in the theatre, do so. if you want to download a release of it, you probably would like to know as much as possible about it before you waste your time and bandwidth. obviously, some have a problem with picture angle, some have more problem with graininess, etc etc, so for those people it makes sense that it is mentioned whether those problems exist, so they can decide which release they'd prefer to download.

also, wtf, big deal if someone does comment about it. i'd rather hear people's opinions on these details and / or some sort of technical discussion / argument than read 150 one-line "ctp rawks, great release, thx guys" or "tcf ownz0rz j00 all mofos, this rls r teh suck" replies, any day.

don't need to look at the chin. look at the vertical lines on the walls, it's pretty hard to argue with that.



heh not to mention possibly being governor of california by next year :-O



dude! relax! take a chill pill. its jus the internet you should go outside sometime. did you shed a tear writing about "scene rules." i wonder how much time it took you to write that shit. dupes, propers, whatever, relax as long as its good download it. jus comment on the release not cry your heart out. get a friggin life!


Posted by lo.pro on 07-10-2003 02:30 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by moviebootlegger
dude! relax! take a chill pill. its jus the internet you should go outside sometime. did you shed a tear writing about "scene rules." i wonder how much time it took you to write that shit. dupes, propers, whatever, relax as long as its good download it. jus comment on the release not cry your heart out. get a friggin life!

1. i'm not a dude.

2. no, i didn't cry, but thanks for your concern.

3. it didn't take very long at all, actually, and even if it had, i'm an insomniac, i got time. might i respectfully suggest that if you'd take your ritalin, like you're supposed to, then you wouldn't have an attention span that's even shorter than your penis.

4. i didn't plan on downloading this flick in the first place, at least not soon, there are other movies i'm more interested in at the moment. thanks for the advice about downloading it if i liked it, tho. i probably wouldn't have thought of that on my own.

5. my post originally only took up half the space that it does now, after your having quoted it despite its length and the fact that it was the post directly above yours. then again, i could see why you'd need to, what with all of the insightful analysis of its content that you volunteered. wouldn't want anybody to get lost trying to follow the twists and turns of your intricate logical ballet, after all.

6. i really appreciate your concern for me & my life, and whether or not i'm getting out enough, etc. that's very thoughtful. if you'd like to send me some money, as well, pm me and i'll hook you up with my paypal account.

7. i don't mean to be rude, but that was a pretty sorry excuse for a criticism. predictable, trite, boring as hell, and offers not even a bit of entertainment value to compensate for its lack of meaningful content. do yourself a favor: if you're going to flame, put your heart into it. otherwise, my amicable suggestion would be that you stfu. you're a waste of perfectly good entropy.

p.s.:
quote:
the quality on the video was so good even after i had to convert it to divx and lower the resolution in order to make it work on my Qcast tuner in my ps2.
and you think i need a life? (btw, that sentence needs a prepositional object. maybe i actually should encourage your posting comments here; you need the practice if you ever want to make it to high school.)

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.


Posted by Dimios on 07-10-2003 10:27 PM:

It seems ok with good quality


Posted by moviebootlegger on 07-10-2003 10:28 PM:

i dont find a reason to type correctly because it doesnt matter online. i try to type it as fast as possible i dont give a shit about grammer here. is this a spelling bee asshole? hahaa bud go do something besides live on the net.


Posted by Jugalator on 07-11-2003 02:42 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by temp0
Maybe you're blind or just a tard. But a lot of people noticed the obvious, probably intentional, bad enough to ruin the TS angle.

As another viewer posted: http://www.fhost.org/x/dublin/t1.JPG

You seriously don't see the Jay Leno chin?


Well, what can I say... I still prefer to watch a movie in color.


Posted by alpha_code on 07-11-2003 02:44 AM:

This movie is excellent.. a little deep in the color dept but a fine release .

8 | 8 | 8


Posted by psyche on 07-11-2003 03:03 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Jugalator
Well, what can I say... I still prefer to watch a movie in color.
In color with heads and chins cut off is a must


Posted by DoAo on 07-11-2003 09:21 AM:

8/8/7.5


Posted by xenomorph on 07-11-2003 10:19 PM:

props ctp yet again you never let us down, im glad i waited
video 9
audio 9
film ? not watched yet.

__________________
just coz a guy got a library card dont make him yoda!!


Posted by ippe on 07-12-2003 02:15 AM:

6/7/9

advice: take the tcf rls, lower the brightness and pump up the colors and voila, you got yourself a f***in good lookin telesync, far superior to ctp´s one!


Posted by Athena on 07-12-2003 02:32 AM:

same here, ive decided to wait for the CTP release when i saw the sample of the TCF release. The colors are... 'greyish' and the 'black is not black'. Maybe if you are going to tweak the settings of your dvd player a bit but i still to much greyish. I loved the CTP release (like everyone... and like every CTP release ). The colors are verry good. The CTP agle is back... not a big supprise and as soon as the movie starts (whoa, a huge battle with Terminators in the future) you are allready forgotten about the angle. As soon as this movie hits the box office in Europe, you will find me at the premiere, i loved this movie and i will going to watch this movie on a huge screen with dolby digital sound. And... the movie has costs so much... the moviecompany deserves my money, so they can make more of this kind of huge and good actionmovies. (Terminator 4, for instance )


Posted by psyche on 07-12-2003 12:36 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ippe
6/7/9

advice: take the tcf rls, lower the brightness and pump up the colors and voila, you got yourself a f***in good lookin telesync, far superior to ctp´s one!

Yea, TCF made a bad move by trying to brighten it. When I boosted the colors on my TV and lowered the brightness almost all the way down it was like a CTP TS but without the flaws. I hope TCF people are reading this and follow this advice.


Posted by lo.pro on 07-13-2003 03:57 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by moviebootlegger
i dont find a reason to type correctly because it doesnt matter online. i try to type it as fast as possible i dont give a shit about grammer here. is this a spelling bee asshole? hahaa bud go do something besides live on the net.
i said nothing about your spelling (which is atrocious). a sentence like the one i quoted, however, is flawed beyond a simple rule infraction -- it does not make any particular sense.

it's funny that, of all the things you might have responded to in my post, you chose the least significant: a parenthetical subsection of a footnoted afterthought.

and you couldn't even pull that off. sad, really.

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.


Posted by tmgomez on 07-13-2003 05:23 PM:

Thumbs up Terminator 3 *SVCD* *TS* - TELESYNC - Centropy

theater quality, great picture and sound, made for an enjoyable evening of movie watching. thanx.

__________________
http://www.cox-internet.com/texaswarez/cool.gif


Posted by Kleenx on 07-13-2003 07:50 PM:

watched whole movie.... seems dark in many parts, and red in other parts. Other than that this version is very watchable. Also, amazing movie... a must see.

7/8/8


Posted by monroevsdean on 07-13-2003 08:19 PM:

picture on this was pretty good, though i thought it would be better after reading some of these posts, but the angle isnt bad at all, imo. id give the picture a 7
sound was nice too, but when i play it in souround sound, you can hear some crackling noises every once in awhile, but nothing major at all. 8
the movie itself was good. not as good as the first 2 of course, but better then i thought it would be. it had a few REALLY bad one-liners in it ("talk to the hand", "you are terminated"-please!)
that were obviously trying to be another catch line for the series. other then that, the effects were good and if you hate the cgi effects in flicks like spiderman, the new matrix and the hulk, where you cant tell if you are watching a video game, a cartoon, or a feature film, youll like these cuz they actually look realistic. of course, you cant help but imagine what this would be like if james and the rest of the original cast was onboard.7


Posted by Djshrew on 07-14-2003 04:17 PM:

What happend 2 the Cheese?

Watched this copy thought the Quality way good 8.5 Sound was good but a little bit clicky near speak but cannot tell from a distance. 7! Angle not really that bad! But i was a bit disapointed not to hear some of the arni cheese like i want your clothes ur boot's & ur motorcycle! Classic! But overall a good film! there has to be a 4th tho! but arni sez that's it for him, Wont be the same!

Shrew


V8.5 ¡ A7 ¡ M8


Posted by ProgZ on 07-25-2003 01:31 AM:

Hmm

Very well done release by Centropy (was there any doubt?). A few of the high points-

1. Excellent video clarity (tempted to give it a 10 but I'll give it a 9)

2. Impressive audio clarity (with a few exceptions noted below, it's worth an 8)




At the end of the first cd, my dvd player had quite a bit of trouble decoding and there was garbage on the screen. This is relative to your dvd player since they all decode slightly different. There were a few points where the audio increased strangely, but nothing too bad.

The movie itself was garbage, imo. I'm certainly glad I didn't pay to see it, and I couldn't recommend it to anyone else in good conscience. 9 8 4 - watch pirates of the caribbean instead.


Posted by solidus1299 on 07-26-2003 05:30 AM:

props to CTP! good work!

8/7.5/9


Posted by lance on 08-03-2003 01:50 PM:

omg this quality of this movie was sensational. one of centropys best.

9/9/9 this moviez mad

lance


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:10 PM.
Show all 125 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.