Show all 127 posts from this thread on one page
|
Show all 127 posts from this thread on one page |
VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Dumb And Dumberer - SCREENER - VideoCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=21457)
nuked for mislabeled workprint,
but fuck that, awsome rls,
<3
hmm Mislabeled. I don't think so...
Has anyone ever seen a workprint with a "property of" watermark?!?! I certainly haven't and ive seen all workprints since the american pie one...
anyway AWESOME rls, so fucken early, sample is gooooood 
props to VideoCD
8/8/?
ya.. it's an aweomse rls. 8/8/?
how did they get this
audio and video superb for a pre
sample was pretty damn funny, lil cliche though
8/8/x
ya the rls rules man. very surprised at a pre screener. who cares bout wrokprint it is real nice and that is what matters
Fast release! 1 day early!
1 day early nice , would have been awesome if it was released as a workprint 2 weeks ago! Check out Hulk (very early)! :WHOEVER said that there has never been a ''property of'' thing is wrong...........there were 2 that i know of which were A man apart and Willard(videocd).This particlular person also said they have seen all workprints..................well bullshit you have!
mislabeled? wat is it then? if its not dumb and dumberer, then it is...?
::LOL! -FuzZ::
yea , quality is pretty good , would have been better if it was not nuked due to the WP.
Based on sample : 8 / 7 / X
quality was pretty good, specially for being early. a little timer and "property of" on the bottom middle, really isn't bad at all. 7/7/X.
JPEG looks pretty good, getting the sample now
7/7/3
EDIT: this movie fucking sucked ass
__________________
Nice rls, VERY watchable, and sample is hilarious 
7/7/9
__________________
Alex licks it.
site ops are sooo fuckin picky and gay.. "oh, its 1 day before theatre release so its a definite workprint" REALLY, who cares? its watchable, quality is screenerish, and the movie is supposed to suck anyway.. so House of 1000 Corpses can be released 2 months before and not be a wp? THINK ABOUT IT
8/8/?
aye been nuked on my site for being a mislabled workprint
too what a fooker,only managed to grab the sample
then it was taken off site but shit looks good indeed
nice crisp colours very watchable.
due to it being a pre it would be easy for me to give it
10 for everything but i will keep it sensible and say
8/8/x
HOLY SHIT
SCREENER??? PRE????
GREAT FUCKING JOB BOYZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
7/7/?...looks funny
__________________
Evil monkey
Watched the sample, nice rls 8/7/?
Very nic release. Video and audio are good, property of isn't that bad. To bad the movie will probably suck.
7/7/x
It's a decent release. Frankly, I don't care if it's a screener or a telesync or a telecine or a workprint or even a fucking dvd screener, I'm not watching it. I downloaded the sample to give my opinion on the release for all of you, and that's what I'll do. Video is nice, looks like an average non-TS or DVD VideoCD release. I don't care if they stole "Omnicron" or w/e they're called source, it has a nice image. It's a little grainy, but it's fine. Colors are nice. Sound is good too. 6.5/7/x for a screener/workprint/whatever
Who Cares if its labled Screener / WorkPrint - From the sample this looks nice - Picture is good a bit grainy and sounds excellent. Better then alot of TS's. Props to VideoCD on the Pre and Nice Release.
7/8/?
__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!
PROPS!
Props on this one. Pre-screeners are always a good release (and if this is a workprint, who gives a shit?) looks like a screener to me. cant wait to d/l the whole movie.
8/7/x
Blur in the upper right hand corner, Perm. Property Of Watermark as well as a timecode below that. The clip from the sample is pretty funny
8/8/???
great release
8/8
__________________
wow i just downloaded you gotta love these guys great quality movies fast as fuck hope these guys stick around bring us more thanks 7/7/8
quote:
Originally posted by Kn!ghTMarE
mislabeled? wat is it then? if its not dumb and dumberer, then it is...?
::LOL! -FuzZ::
definitely a screener.
watermark, blurred serial and timecode
1...2...3...
and it really doesnt matter wtf it is. its not a TS and its before rls date. so mad props to VideoCD
7/7/x?
now what are you staring at you ugly monkey?
__________________
They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
so is this going to be nuked as a workprint or not?
I dont think its a workprint.
*nuked* scary word that one...
whats the deal with this 'nuked' shit wen u can still get your hands on the rls after it's been 'nuked'
all it takes is some random person to blurt out "oooh this should be nuked because blah blah blah"
this is a great pre videocd, WP or SCR i dont give a shit why should ne1 give a shit why does it matter why lord oh whyyy 
neway 7/8/7 LESS CHIT-CHIT MORE VOTING BEEHATCH'S
__________________
I Have This Thing, Advanced Dillusionary Schizofrenia with Involuntary Narcissistic Rage. It's No Big Deal.
nice 1 day early.. the picture is good.. audio is pretty good too.. 8/8/x
Nice another pre-release and decent quality too
7.7.? sample only
From the sample:
The video looks good. Even better on the television, but the text displaying "Property of New Line" and the serial number under it sucks; but if you're really into seeing this movie this wouldnt really bother you i guess.
The sound is crystal clear so no complains.
As for the movie, you can't even compare this crap to the first one. I guarantee you this movie will blow big juicy ones.
7/8/X
early
pretty damn early for a scr guys, good job on the speed, although on the tv it's still heavy pixelized, for a comedy it should do.. don't have high expectations and the counter and scr msg really bug me so i don't think i'll check this one out yet.
7/8/?
quote:
Originally posted by DiSRUPToR
all it takes is some random person to blurt out "oooh this should be nuked because blah blah blah"
very sweet pre
nice quality pic is good
audio is good a little low
will DEFFINATELLY NOT PICK THIS UP
7/7/who cares
::edit i know i said i wasnt gonna watch this, but i had to see if it was that bad, and yes it was, officially the worst movie i have ever seen!!! 7/8/0 ::
__________________
quote:
Originally posted by deftones6
How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????
quote:
Originally posted by vm0b
JPEG looks pretty good, getting the sample now
7/7/x
quote:
Originally posted by Kn!ghTMarE
mislabeled? wat is it then? if its not dumb and dumberer, then it is...?
::LOL! -FuzZ::
__________________
mellow like a cello
nice release 7/8/? props to VideoCD for the early release
nice work on this one you all. i was suprised to see it tonight!!
keep it up!
7/8/?
__________________
Salty Pancakes make me yack!
---me
greetz to the fellerz in VideoCD........
you guys always seem to keep ME happy...... fuck the haters
awsome job on the pre time...... I give you a 12 on that
as far as video (judging from sample) - 9
audio - 9
movie - ? havent finished leeching it
all in all MAD PROPS on this........ it almost feels like oscar season
__________________
Did you REALLY think we where gonna pay $7 for THIS????
you so nasty produktionz 2k3
VERY NICE 9/8/Not Finish Yet
Movie not better than the first DUH how can it be better without James Carrey! Nice try though.
::Err im pretty sure his name is Jim.
::Umm im pretty sure his real name is James Eugene Carrey. Now STOP FLAMING ME!
I just got the sample, and I must say the video is not as good as you all make it out ot be...its very pixelated and has motion blur. The audio however, is very decent...I think we might be able to see better picture with a TS...the video has many flaws....I don't know if I am going to download this release yet...
5.5/8/?
__________________
I wasn't expecting much from this movie.. and I got exactly that. The audio is great, the video is just hard to do with vcd format. It gets pretty pixelated and jerky in the motion scenes, but for the most part you aren't missing anything. Most of the humor is audio and not visual anyway. The property marks, blur on the right, and timer are all static so they don't interfere with the picture too much (not like the ones that scroll or pop up do).
The best performance in the movie is easily Bob Saget.. which made me laugh and laugh. Not much else though.
7/8/4
7 / 7 / 6
*sighs* the movie fuckin sucked!!! that was no comedy.. this movie should get nuked for being the dumbest movie of the year! omfg.. if ur gonna make a sequal arent u supposed to have the same actors back?? *shots Lloyd and Harry with a awp*
::Maybe if this was a sequel, im pretty sure its a prequel, so i highly doubt jim carey and lloyd idk his actor name, could play like 16 yr old kids.
wowzers! what a great pre! WTG VideoCD, the sample was funny as hell, gonna check out the movie tommrow 8/9/x
..........See guys I always knew that was the reason the small bus was so cool!!!!!
LOL, the movie was great! not quite as good as the first, but a damn good sequel. The quality is great, counter and property of is coo, hardly notice the blury bar thingy in the top right, sound is fantastic....
9/9/9
(upside down that says 6\6\6 , told you I rode the small bus)
Wow the quality for this really isn't that bad, and it's a pre screener to so nicely done guys.
There is that little...fuzzy bar in the top right not to mention the Water mark in the middle which can be kind of annoying but aside from that good release guys.
first of all, based on the sample only, video is great, audio is great, i give it a 7/8 or if you want to weigh it based on content i say 8/8 because it's just a damn comedy, and what more do you want for a june comedy?
unless there are fast car chases, nice bullet time explosions, or middle earth wars in this movie, this release is fine. and if you're going to complain about a small 10 pixel tall blurr on the top right or timer you're too new to the scene.
for whatever idiots are saying this is nuked, granted i've only watched the sample -- what kind of workprints have a serial number that needs to be blurred or a property of or a counter? this is a SCREENER, and the n00b kiddiez who are nuking this need to go back to warez school dammit.
great release videocd, centropy: your time is best spent on something else, like the hulk, which i would definetly not pay for.
thanks videocd.
what???
wtf did i see 9/9/9? hahaha right
first of all , the movie sucked . the only part that struck any level of humor to me is when the brick flew through the window.
as for the release GREAT JOB!!!! i dont care what you call it , mislabled or whatever , pleasing on the eye but the movie is like watching two files fucking in front of drying paint
7.1/6.9/3.0
Is this workprint a final version? Or is there likely to be extra scenes or sfx in the theatre version? I only ask because this has been released to close to the release date of the final
Ugh... great job on the release, haven't seen the movie so i'm not gonna comment prematurely. 8/7/?
"*sighs* the movie fuckin sucked!!! that was no comedy.. this movie should get nuked for being the dumbest movie of the year! omfg.. if ur gonna make a sequal arent u supposed to have the same actors back?? *shots Lloyd and Harry with a awp*"
.... it's a "prequel" and common sense says that you can't have the same actors turn 20 years younger and play themselves in highschool.
'tis rather tasty ..
nice picture ... great audio
workprint ?? screener ??? does it realy matter ??
i dont think u would find much cgi in this one that can go wrong
7/8/7
quote:
Originally posted by |Ware|Man
*sighs* the movie fuckin sucked!!! that was no comedy.. this movie should get nuked for being the dumbest movie of the year! omfg.. if ur gonna make a sequal arent u supposed to have the same actors back?? *shots Lloyd and Harry with a awp*
I'm getting it now. Very nice release videoCD.. fast and good quality.
why people nuke stuff for being mislabeled is beyond me.. nerds need to get a life. I don't give a shilt if its a work print or a screener.. all I know is the quality looks good and it's out a day early.
-frakU
havent posted on the forum for a while..
but this release made me..
i gotta hand it to you guys, awesome release.
the quality was really really good, the watermark and timer didnt bother me at all.. it's very sweet. the movie was kinda funny too.. but plain "dumb"
9/8/7
__________________
..
quote:
Originally posted by wholeinfo4less
VERY NICE 9/8/Not Finish Yet
Movie not better than the first DUH how can it be better without James Carrey! Nice try though.
__________________
Copyright = Right to copy
// SPS
quote:
Originally posted by Kn!ghTMarE
mislabeled? wat is it then? if its not dumb and dumberer, then it is...?
::LOL! -FuzZ::
__________________
Argueing over the internet is like the special olympics, even if you win, you're still a retard.
LMAO. Half you morons think it is a sequel. A sequel occurs AFTER the first movie. Notice how this movie takes place before the first one?
props to videocd for this awesome rls
video was very close to vhs quality on my tv and audio was was fine... as for the movie it was really horrible! i thought it would be one of those "its so stupid its funny" movies but nope... its just stupid and i didn't really laugh through the whole thing.
video: 7.9
sound: 8
movie: 2
even though the quality is good this movie is not worth watching... horrible!
*From Film*
Film is not too bad.Film is incomplete cuts off before the end.
Props on the speed VideoCD!.
And you can also get away with cropping out the text and timer.
video 7
audio 8
film 3
__________________
Dumb & Dumberer Review NOT Complaint
Video (6): Slightly grainy including lots of macroblocks, typical VideoCD motion blur (although less than some of their previous encodes), colors are good but aren't vibrant like some screeners, jagged edges i.e. Bob Sagat's glasses, etc., slightly jerky playback on some scenes, semi-annoying watermark (quite small), jumping counter, and small unnoticeable blur (upper right side) throughout video. Overall good source and very nice for such an early release.
Sound (8): No complaints, very nice audio.
Movie (?): No comment yet but probably not as good as the first.
KaiKo: All types of watermarks, counters, serials, and so on can exist on workprints. They are afterall unfinished studio screeners.
rAppA & SPS: His full name is James Eugene Carrey, born Canadian on January 17th 1962, has a daughter named Jane. The credits of "In Living Color" also displayed "James Carrey", he started using Jim when he migrated from TV to silver screen.
Conclusion, the average leecher would not care if this is a workprint/telecine/screener most likely because they just want the release as soon as possible, as decent as possible (no pun intended, just my thoughts). The "scene" however, SOMETIMES looks beyond a fast release (as good or bad as it may be) and tries to justify the label/source to prevent clutter/confusion for validity of releases. If a Beta PC Game gets released and it is as good as FINAL, it'll still get nuked if a REAL FINAL is released with proof that the previous version was beta. I'm not saying this isn't a screener nor am I saying that it is a workprint, but the difference between the two is not it's quality... it's the content. Without watching other versions of this, no one should scream "workprint!" without proof such as missing or uncut scenes, absence of music or un/edited dialog, and so on. Sorry for the long post, just trying to clarify some concerns. I decided to start doing thorough reviews because alot of the posts lack this information instead of the typical "yay, nay, boo hoo" stuff. Well, good job VideoCD! 6/8/?
Re: *From Film*
watched it all, quality throughout is fine, great for a comedy, audio is great too, this is the first release of this movie and it should be the ONLY release of this movie until the dvdrip for those that like to archive everything, this release is PERFECTLY fine. as for the movie...meh. was pretty funny; worth watching but i wouldn't pay for it and i'm glad i didn't.
quote:
Originally posted by Butch
Film is not too bad.Film is incomplete cuts off before the end.
butch movie went all the way to the end for me, it cut off right before the credits, and after the bloopers.
pretty funny movie
heres some usefull information on this rls.
video is nice not bad for a wp or scr
audio is nice
the print is very weird towards the end of cd 2 we see what looks like outakes and different scenes out of sequecne before it cuts off alltogether . so if your expecting the whole movie from start to finish, beware.
also i think its hard to judge the movies content because it is incomplete.
quote:
Originally posted by Rep-
LMAO. Half you morons think it is a sequel. A sequel occurs AFTER the first movie. Notice how this movie takes place before the first one?
great release, who cares if its workprint
Re: *From Film*
quote:
Originally posted by Butch
Film is not too bad.Film is incomplete cuts off before the end.
Props on the speed VideoCD!.
And you can also get away with cropping out the text and timer.
video 7
audio 8
film 3
7/7/? not bad for first release
it was definitely dumberer. Definitely wouldn't spend $5 on it. Not nearly as great as the first one... although had some funny parts
10/10/10
Great screener, pre-theatre too, as good as it will get for a vhs cap.
And no real site nuked this for being workprint, because real sites arent stupid. So ignore the lamers.
And the movie is not incomplete, the movie cuts off at the last blooper(after the movie is already over), maybe an attempt to get it as short as possible and fit it on 1 cd, which didnt work, nevertheless, the movie is a screener and is quite complete.
The movie is hilarious, Eric Christian Olsen and Derek Richardson portray a young Harry and Lloyd excellently, and despite Jim Carrey's lack of a blessing of this movie, it was great and is deserving of much success. Also, another self-deprecating cameo by Bob Sagget (former spitting image of the father family man), which was scrumtrulecent.
P.S. someone said "Good job videocd i hope they stick arround". Well, they've been around a while, you lamer, so dont act like they just appeared.
lamers suck
looks like a legit screener to me...
movie was better than expected, but still not too great at all...
nice job though...
8/8/6
:::EDIT:::
definately a screener, little blur in the top right where the screener code would be...used to get these all the time when working at a cd warehouse.
__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?
wtf, this is a movie ? I would have been so pissed if i spent any money at all on it. The only reason I watched the entire thing was for the hot chicks in it =]
6/7/3 (<- for the chicks)
Very nice release shame about the movie itself tho - bit shit compared to the first one.
8/8/3
quote:
Originally posted by SPS
Honestly... I think its JIM Carrey
Btw to all of you who says "Who cares if its a screener or a workprint?" well it is a damn big different :P
A workprint aint always a complete movie, scenes or special effects can be left out and such things... A screener tho, is the real "retail" version but in promotion porpuse (cant spell) and thats because of all watermarks, serials and that shit....
I really think it does matter if it is a workprint or screener
quote:
Originally posted by vm0b
JPEG looks pretty good, getting the sample now
7/7/x
quote:
If you cropped out the text and timer wouldn't there would be a HUGE blur or black bar over it? That would look horrible dude.
__________________
just grabbed the sample looked decent for a early release..
CHEERS!
just got done watching this movie, man it was hilarious, I laughed my ass as the whole way throgh. Great look-a-likes for harry and llloyd. I also enjoyed the appearence of Bob Saggat as Jessica's Dad n-e wayz great pre video is definately watchable I give it
8/8/10
**edited***
I just got done watching a release special on comedy central for this, and I definately think this is a mislabled workprint because they should some scenes that on the special that weren't on the video cd, just my 2 cents still a great pic and if you can't see it in the theater I'd definately grab this one
8/8/8
Good video and audio quality. The movie wasn't as funny as the original, but it was still very funny. I think it might be missing some scenes though, I'll have to wait for a TS to find out. Good work VideoCD.
Like it, nice to see the first version of this as a screener, shame about the counter etc.. but I stuck with it and its ok, the films a laugh, not as much as the original. Nice video, nice audio
8/8/8
street bootleggers have had this out for awhile, so i would imagine that is where they got it, for those wondering
Something weird about the Watermark saying Property of....
it seems to be reaaallly steady unlike the counter that jumps up and down , it´s almost like they put the watermark by them self.
I mean the picture is a little jumpy , that´s normal for a vhs, but the watermark doesn´t move at all.
Im not sure if im making myself clear , just a thought.It could be a workprint with the counter and then they put the watermark on themself , to make it look like a screener.
__________________
"i think i am getting hacked. my modem lights are flashing..."
great release here, i just got done watching it. this movie was A LOT better than i thought, at first i thought that it would make the original suck, but turned out that it got a few good laughs, still not as good as the first one, which was exptected.
7/8/7
looks pretty good
it looks good from the picture sample.
good job guys hope to see some others screeners.....
8-8-??
::LOL dont do that shit again -FuzZ::
movie ain't that good but my kids loved it... anything that keeps them quiet for over an hour is ok by me
8/8/9 <-- from the kids
Starlord
quality is what I expect from a vhs. I want to say better than a telesync but the quality of telesyncs today are bad ass. It has a counter and a property of lable. also a blurred out serial in the top right. This could have been ripped as SVCD because of the small size. Overall it would of turned out better and its still only using 2 CDs. Only 25 megs too big and it could of been a 1 CD release. sigh.
7/8/8
quote:
Originally posted by Stabbe
Something weird about the Watermark saying Property of....
it seems to be reaaallly steady unlike the counter that jumps up and down , it´s almost like they put the watermark by them self.
I mean the picture is a little jumpy , that´s normal for a vhs, but the watermark doesn´t move at all.
Im not sure if im making myself clear , just a thought.It could be a workprint with the counter and then they put the watermark on themself , to make it look like a screener.
the picture looked good and sound was good too, i wish all of the first releases could look like this one, but the movie SUCKED. don't waste your time downloading it.. i've seen the first one so many times and i love it, i'm sure everyone has watched it a lotta times, i knew they couldn't match that one, no chance in hell. the fart scenes in his dream and taking the pic of the special class were just gay, it was so stupid and when i saw that in the previews i knew it would suck but i was hoping it would be alright. some of the scenes were good but bob saget, i don't see how you guys liked his stuff, it was stupid, him yellin and all.. it was very awkward watching this movie with my parents, all the talk about sex and the cussin from saget.. nothin like laughin my azz off when watchin the first one..
8/8/3
__________________
http://rip.dre3k.net/matt/sig.jpg
I thought this movie was just funny not as good as the first one but right up there, the comedy is only understoof by few apparently im sure a few flamers will have something to say. I think they did an excellent job finding people to match up so closely to the cast from the original movie. Good film worth the download def worth seeing in theaters.
8/8/9
*after seeing MOVIE(MOST OF CD1 anywayz)*
I have to say that VideoCD did a Great job to bring this movie out
so early and of great quality TOO!!!
My Rating: 8/7/2
THE MOVIE WAS TERRIBALE AND I LITERALLY FELL ASLEEP DURING CD1, IT'S A SHAME THAT THE MOVIE WAS NOT GOOD BEACUSE I'M SURE LIKE MY SELF, MANY OF US WERE ANXIOUS to see this..... well what can you do.. thankx again VideoCD for ur efforts in the rls of this movie.
ps: the Blur and text on the bottem are not at all irritable as that of the movie it self. 
I say a 7/8/6. Movie was kinda boring, but had some very funny parts. It left me wanting more!! I guess that's what they set to do.
I had a chance to grab it off my site before it got nuked.
Props out to VideoCD for the quality of these release
Based on the movie I give it a: 8/8/x
descent quality vid and sound , but i got one thing to say..its not a screenr..come on guys, stop mislableing shit...this is a workprint..
__________________
Signup today at www.citywidehost.com, and Use the Discount Code: "SG50" (without quotes) for:
50% OFF YOUR FIRST MONTH
/me takes a deep breath
This movie was not terrible and like BigShrimp said apperently the comedy is only understood by some. Too many people formed an opinion of this movie before they even seen a preview let alone the movie. The movie is decent quality should've jus made it one disc though as small as it is it's kinda a waste on two. And as far as all you people doing the complaining about Jim Carey not being in this one....well DUH!!! This is set in there High School years Jim Carey's too old to play a high shcool kid use your heads. Worse movie ever released!? Your an idiot jus because you have some obsession with Jim Carey doesn't mean "it's the worse movie ever released" or you've never seen House of 1000 Corpses. A lot of you people need to learn how to form your own opinion.
There I said it!!
7.5/7.5/8
very good copy, very watchable... movie was not that good.. only part that made me laugh was that shit dude fuck ahhhh shits everywhere.
give it a 8/7/5
Pretty nice release.
7/7/1
One of the least funny, boring films I've seen this year, no where near as good and funny as dumb & dumber, will appeal to americans.
Someone has American penis envy...
Excellent pre and a great job across the board, VideoCD.
Movie was entertaining.
7/8/8
Good video and sound, shame about the blur on the top right, and the logo/run time at the bottom, sound is also clear and good.
7/9/?
nice pre, i didnt see any evidence of it being a workprint, I think you're just assuming because you havent seen screeners pre-release day. If it's a workprint, what do you think it was missing? I doubt a wp would have a bunch of out takes at the end?
Looked and sounded fine for a screener but i've definately seen sharper. movie was funny at times but nothing special 7/8/5
Great quality, props on the speed, but awful movie. 7/8/1 All the writing and stuff on the screen gets in the way a bit... but still very nice.
quote:
And as far as all you people doing the complaining about Jim Carey not being in this one....well DUH!!!
good release movie sucks tho
7/6/3
__________________
Flamers No Point Its All FREE Just Stick 2 What Yur Good At Sweet FA
Those Who Flame Will Be Flamed By Others (HehE)
8/10/6
Not a bad movie, some pretty funny parts but it seemed like they almost tried too hard to make some references to the original. Still funny though.
Its a workprint but the propert of is definetely meant to be there.
Worst movie evvverrrr
This movie is bad. Some people say its better than the first... I say, you're high.
I compare this to Austin Powers 2 without Mike Myers in it. Recycle the jokes with new unknown actors and you get pure garbage. The jokes don't hit... its just all around bad.
8/8/5
pic is fine. very nice job.
sound is fine too. no complaints.
movie should have been better. most of it was just plain stupid. gave me a headache at times.
7/7/7
Movie was a HUGE surprise after i thought it would be garbage, turned out to be pretty damn funny. I think 80% of the people giving it 1's and 2's didn't see it. Anyway Video was good, heck, for a day early too, we usually dont have a screener(of this quality anyway) for a few weeks so a PRE-Theatre screener is always good. Audio was good, a lil weird at times but good, in the end everything was good.
__________________
Great screener
Great screener!
8/8/3
Only progblem is the film almost ruins the first one.
Sweet
Just watched it Pictures Good Sound is spot on film is shite.
Nice release!
8/8/3
quote:
Originally posted by sleeper0
nice pre, i didnt see any evidence of it being a workprint, I think you're just assuming because you havent seen screeners pre-release day. If it's a workprint, what do you think it was missing? I doubt a wp would have a bunch of out takes at the end?
Looked and sounded fine for a screener but i've definately seen sharper. movie was funny at times but nothing special 7/8/5
The video and the sound were good, but the film was pretty bad. A few parts of the film are really funny though, but only a few.
8/8/4
The quality was excellent on this release.
I don't get the bad reviews.. I laughed my ass off. I liked it better
then the first.
7.5/7/7
-frak
wow... great release, actually a very funny movie, sound was good too!! great release, is it me or are some of the outtake bits at the end not in the film? owell good film none the less
8/8/7.5
someone commented that they saw some extra scenes that werent in the movie in trailers, well this is something movies have been doing for a whiel now(especially comedy movies), showing scenes that dont contribute to the plot and are just extras, so that when people go to see the movie they arent like "oh i saw that in the previews". basically what they want is a fresh material so people are laughing and stuff. the end. still a screener ! also, official runtime of the movie is posted as 102 minutes, subtract a few minutes for the credits (movie theatre runtimes include the whole reel minus the trailers), and drawn-out intro-credits, and you get what the vcd runtime is (about 96 minutes total).
actually, i've found conflicting sources on what the runtime is, just found on saying 85 minutes, so i dont know...
Very nice release. Good picture and really good sound. As a movie it was ok. It sure didn't beat the original and sometimes it felt like they tried to hard. But it was a good try. The one playing Lloyd did a great job actually. Jessica was cute also..
Giving it a 7/8/6
quote:
Originally posted by lamercrusher
someone commented that they saw some extra scenes that werent in the movie in trailers, well this is something movies have been doing for a whiel now(especially comedy movies), showing scenes that dont contribute to the plot and are just extras, so that when people go to see the movie they arent like "oh i saw that in the previews". basically what they want is a fresh material so people are laughing and stuff. the end. still a screener ! also, official runtime of the movie is posted as 102 minutes, subtract a few minutes for the credits (movie theatre runtimes include the whole reel minus the trailers), and drawn-out intro-credits, and you get what the vcd runtime is (about 96 minutes total).
this is the worst movie. no one waste ur time downloading it. i promise u you will regret it. i didnt even laugh once
6/8/1
Dumb and Dumberer is not as bad as most people are saying. It has some funny moments. I wouldn't PAY to see it though...
I noticed that there were scenes in "The Sweetest Thing" when it was shown on a cable movie channel (I think it was Encore) that were NOT in the release I dl'ed. Particularly a dance/musical number that was pretty long that featured talking about the size, etc., of a guys member. I was wondering if it was edited out because I dl'ed it from a non-porn site? It was actually pretty raunchy.
quote:
Originally posted by ember
I noticed that there were scenes in "The Sweetest Thing" when it was shown on a cable movie channel (I think it was Encore) that were NOT in the release I dl'ed. Particularly a dance/musical number that was pretty long that featured talking about the size, etc., of a guys member. I was wondering if it was edited out because I dl'ed it from a non-porn site? It was actually pretty raunchy.
video is not that bad at all. really good quality, better then any ts that will come out which i doubt since a screener already came out. video and sound good average for screener. movie is pretty funny. not better then the first but still funny as hell.
for a screener:
video9
audio 9
movie 7
After watching the first cd I sincerely doubt I can stand to finish this release... Props to VideoCD on the pre; it's excellent quality however, this is without a doubt one of the worst films I've ever seen... Brings comparisons to National Lampoon's Senior Trip only without the crazy Trekkie (that was actually a bright point of that film)...
9/9/ -1
I thought this was pretty good for quite an early release. yeah the timer is smack in front of the screen but the quality is pretty good.
I am never going to complain about crap angles or if its a little dark or to bright as its these people who release these films for us to watch are doing a great job.
You may say its wasting your time to d/l this but these people spent a lot more time getting stuff like this released.
Long live the groups that release these films.
even the crap releases too
This is a workprint! They are missing like at least 3 scenes in it. In the preview it shows them eating that pie and laughing and stuff but in this copy it doesnt show it but they still refer to the scene in the end like "I still ate your moms pie!" They would have cut that out. And also where they are dressed up as like ninjas and go to the quickie mart store, they showed a flashback of that in one scene and even showed outtakes of it. And everything that other guy mentioned about like the vending machine and stuff. This is a workprint.
7/8/3
quote:
Originally posted by Yomper
I thought this was pretty good for quite an early release. yeah the timer is smack in front of the screen but the quality is pretty good.
I am never going to complain about crap angles or if its a little dark or to bright as its these people who release these films for us to watch are doing a great job.
You may say its wasting your time to d/l this but these people spent a lot more time getting stuff like this released.
Long live the groups that release these films.
even the crap releases too
quote:
Originally posted by TillbeJr
This is a workprint! They are missing like at least 3 scenes in it. In the preview it shows them eating that pie and laughing and stuff but in this copy it doesnt show it but they still refer to the scene in the end like "I still ate your moms pie!" They would have cut that out. And also where they are dressed up as like ninjas and go to the quickie mart store, they showed a flashback of that in one scene and even showed outtakes of it. And everything that other guy mentioned about like the vending machine and stuff. This is a workprint.
At the end they show outtakes not the actual scene
Not bad.....good rls timing. 7/7/x <---- Sample was very funny
__________________
what is it with you massively oversized sigs?
JUKED
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:21 PM. | Show all 127 posts from this thread on one page |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.