VCDQuality Forums - Charlies Angels 2 Full Throttle *INTERNAL* *READ NFO* - SCREENER

Show all 13 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Charlies Angels 2 Full Throttle *INTERNAL* *READ NFO* - SCREENER - OBUS (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=27234)

Posted by lokee on 09-02-2003 09:08 PM:

8/8/ movie was ok
rls looks good
why do this though when centropy has a version out weeks ago thats the same or slightly better
good work though quality is nice

__________________
heres a thought insted of opnions on the movie how about rate the quality

Posted by g!no on 09-02-2003 09:32 PM:

video is pretty good,sound is acceptable and the movie itself sucks hard .....

not bad for an internal vhs rip but could be better ...

Posted by Virus-01 on 09-02-2003 11:36 PM:

Charlies Angels 2 Full Throttle *INTERNAL* *READ NFO* - SCREENER - OBUS

4/5/?
picture Quallity poor/ sound also poor .

wish i could understand why a group would lower themself in standards by releasing a shity quallity movie. .

Posted by RaCeFaSst on 09-03-2003 01:39 AM:

Not bad its got a blured ser. but it better than the svcd
7/7/6

Posted by Wolter on 09-03-2003 02:26 AM:

is the blurred Serial all over the movie? Does it move?

Posted by mIRC on 09-03-2003 03:48 AM:

is the blurred Serial all over the movie? Does it move?

well the serial is not blurred all over just on the right-hand side & stays there througout the movie.

well do not know what to say bout obus but only this that they should not have released this.

read the nfo they said they wrked upon video & audio well they should not cause if the screener is bad then wats the use of releasing it. This is all to be first in the game.

video : 4 (do not like the blur)
audio : 5
movie :7

__________________
—=m-I-R-C=—
Those who give, get. Those who leech want. Those who have, share.
And, Those who want, cry.

Posted by Commy on 09-03-2003 04:05 AM:

Re: Charlies Angels 2 Full Throttle *INTERNAL* *READ NFO* - SCREENER - OBUS

quote:
Originally posted by Virus-01
4/5/?
picture Quallity poor/ sound also poor .

wish i could understand why a group would lower themself in standards by releasing a shity quallity movie. .

dude.
it isnt THAT poor, and they did not release this and try to pass it off at being a good release. they clearly stated in the nfo all the issues, and only released it internally. stop being a hata

7/7/-

__________________
I like big butts and I cannot lie.

Posted by fuzzyboy on 09-03-2003 04:26 AM:

its an internal

jeez guys it was INTERNAL, read the goddamn nfo. they said it was bad quality and a late rls

Posted by Tweezer on 09-03-2003 04:42 AM:

not too too shabby, ill pass on this release though

7/7.5/5

Posted by jmur on 09-03-2003 05:00 AM:

Re: Charlies Angels 2 Full Throttle *INTERNAL* *READ NFO* - SCREENER - OBUS

quote:
Originally posted by Virus-01
4/5/?
picture Quallity poor/ sound also poor .

wish i could understand why a group would lower themself in standards by releasing a shity quallity movie. .

watch the sample before you post. dont post based on the nfo. just cause the nfo says that the audio/video quality were poor doesnt mean you post according to that. if you kept on reading they spruced up the audio/video. so next time, watch sample.

anyways, onto the release....looks ok on a standalone, audio could be slightly better, and video is a little less than the average screener. the blur sucks mainly because of the position of it. other than that a nice release. if you like this movie, then wait for a dvd scr or a retail dvd.
6.5/6.5/4
-jmur

Posted by Juan on 09-03-2003 06:57 AM:

Re: Charlies Angels 2 Full Throttle *INTERNAL* *READ NFO* - SCREENER - OBUS

quote:
Originally posted by Virus-01
4/5/?
picture Quallity poor/ sound also poor .

wish i could understand why a group would lower themself in standards by releasing a shity quallity movie. .

stfu they released it internaly because they knew it wasn't that great, and actually its not that bad. 7/6/6

Posted by stezo2k on 09-03-2003 09:29 AM:

6/6/1

it's an ok rip, but the centropy ts was better quality

Posted by intensmile on 09-03-2003 10:14 PM:

*INTERNAL* *READ NFO*

quote:
Originally posted by Virus-01

wish i could understand why a group would lower themself in standards by releasing a shity quallity movie. .

quote:
Originally posted by mIRC
well do not know what to say bout obus but only this that they should not have released this.

read the nfo they said they wrked upon video & audio well they should not cause if the screener is bad then wats the use of releasing it. This is all to be first in the game.

I don't understand why people even post things like quoted above? OBUS states perfectly clear in the NFO why they released this. And technically they DIDN'T "release" it. Do you not understand what internal means? Just because internals get spread just as much as regular releases nowadays doesn't mean that it is what they intend to happen. I seriously doubt that they had any GAME in mind.
I personally think it is a decent release.
7/7/6

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:30 PM.

Show all 13 posts from this thread on one page