VCDQuality Forums

Show all 15 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- SVCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=20)
-- Why? (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=18904)

Posted by Movieguy on 05-08-2003 07:30 PM:

Why?

Why was this even rls when a perfectly nice FS was rls 4 months ago?

I realize this is ws but still 4 months late is no reason to rls it

This should be Internal

Posted by Mystic Slippers on 05-08-2003 08:49 PM:

Dude. FS sucks. WS owns. Period.

Posted by napalmfuzz on 05-08-2003 09:01 PM:

isnt this an old rls? i think ive allready watched/burned this... or maybe im stoned

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"

Posted by pHo on 05-08-2003 09:02 PM:

WS is always allowed after FS.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Posted by bryehn on 05-08-2003 09:09 PM:

makes sense to me, i burned the FS a while ago, but this one's so much later that i'm not gonna bother with it...

sample looks good on my buddies TV and all, but pretty useless...(i'm assuming you're talking bout I60)

since all the senior people seem to be in here...what's the diff between limited/internal?

Posted by Mercenary13 on 05-08-2003 10:00 PM:

ive had this for awhile now just posting the nfo

Posted by Joynt on 05-08-2003 10:29 PM:

Rls Date....: 20-04-2003
??

Posted by slurmman on 05-08-2003 10:44 PM:

old release, about a month or two old, nfo just never got posted as stated already.

__________________

Posted by dopeuser8 on 05-08-2003 10:53 PM:

widescreen svcd, whats wrong with that? this is the version Ive been holding out for.
limited: meaning the movie itself is in 'limited' release, as far as movie theatres, and video/dvd, it might be a hard one to find, depending on where your looking. (not the dictionary definition, but the basic idea)

Posted by Mr_Grinch on 05-09-2003 12:45 AM:

As well as the widescreen/fullscreen side of things wasn't the previous release a dvd screener? where as this is a retail dvd.

Also (I'm not sure if it was just the divx rip I had) the sound seemed to suffer and fade in and out on the previous release. I'm unsure as to whether it did or not on the svcd.

Either way I loved this film and I love widescreen.

Posted by Davy on 05-09-2003 02:04 PM:

"Rar files...: 114*50 MB" (From NFO)

114 * 50 = 5700Mb. 5.6 Gigs for a 2 Disc SVCD .. I take it that its the NFO that is fucked, and not the release seeing that it hasn't been mentioned here already :P
But has anyone actually seen this to see if the rar's are infact 50Mb each, cause i thought that was only used on DVDR releases :\

Posted by whitehat on 05-09-2003 02:25 PM:

prolly just used their dvd-r nfo template for this release.

__________________
Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional.

Posted by horizonstar on 05-10-2003 12:41 AM:

um, am I the only idiot who has no idea what release y'all are discussing in this thread? the title of the thread just says "Why?" ...

Posted by bryehn on 05-10-2003 12:56 AM:

i think so :P

Interstate 60...

__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?

Posted by horizonstar on 05-10-2003 01:21 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by bryehn
i think so :P

Interstate 60...

ah! well, in that case, I must say that I very much appreciate the widescreen release. it made an already excellent movie even better.

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:31 PM.

Show all 15 posts from this thread on one page