VCDQuality Forums
Show all 15 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DVDR (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=24)
-- House of D *NTSC* - DVDRIP - JKR (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=66461)


Posted by X69 on 09-29-2005 05:17 AM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

6 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

7 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

8 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by Surfsnake2 on 09-29-2005 05:20 AM:

um ya looks good
but a side not, JKR won the race and boozers lost.

__________________
~LaZy~
rar!


Posted by grouch on 09-29-2005 05:46 AM:

JKR is PAL (720x576)
Boozers state R1 Retail

And PAL is allowed after NTSC, and vice versa.


Posted by Jc100 on 09-29-2005 02:19 PM:

Grouch you are retarded.. JKR is labeled NTSC..720x480 29.97 so in what respect is it a pal??? Boozers lost the race on it... fair and square at least it seem so... Boozers should have checked to see what came out and didnt... Tough luck to them i guess... My 2 cents.


Posted by JoshNya on 09-29-2005 06:16 PM:

I don't think JKR is on the same level of sites Boozers are. So thats probably why tops sites saw Boozers first.

My .02


Posted by Jc100 on 09-29-2005 07:08 PM:

but still goes by overall scene and they can easily dupe check.. so even if they didnt see it.. still got nuked for it.. this place is wrong if you check anything that does nuke... so... my 2 cents.


Posted by JoshNya on 09-29-2005 08:22 PM:

Of the 2 dupe sites who posted it, both got Boozrers first. *shrugs*


Posted by Jc100 on 09-29-2005 09:01 PM:

Lol then your dupe sites are fuxored. !pre on any one worth a crap and you see the JKR came out first... but maybe your sources arent so hot.. who knows... just stating it.. but o well.. let the 2 groups duke it out =P.


Posted by porco556 on 09-29-2005 09:51 PM:

My question is, which release is better. I personally hate the lack of information in the Boozer's NFO, and then I see this Joker release which has an even worse NFO.

For a movie this calibur, I don't want to D/l both and compare. But I am sure someone out there will

But I also got the Boozers release first. So I dunno what's going on myself. But then again, it took me a week to see Barbie and the Magic of Pegasus, so I guess I am not well connected


Posted by JoshNya on 09-29-2005 10:45 PM:

I not getting either of these releases. I'm going toward brand name on this one:

House.Of.D.2004.NTSC.COMPLETE.DVDR.iNTERNAL-XPDVD

glad i waited


Posted by Jc100 on 09-29-2005 11:06 PM:

Well either way.. JKR won the race.. and you got 2 others to choose from.. grab samples, see whats best, and choose the one you like =P. Thats the true test of time method.. or download a few rars.


Posted by porco556 on 09-29-2005 11:22 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by JoshNya
I not getting either of these releases. I'm going toward brand name on this one:

House.Of.D.2004.NTSC.COMPLETE.DVDR.iNTERNAL-XPDVD

glad i waited


Eek, 3700kbit/sec on a 97 min movie (RE: XPDVD release)... Ouch... That is pretty poor IMO. That's like 3 gigs on the movie (with 5.1) and 1.4 gigs of extras.

At least they mentioned something about bitrate. I will see what the others have to offer. Most likely I'll get 1-2 RARs and see which has most movie bandwidth. Of course, I will hope that they used CCE, which unfortunately can't be assumed


Posted by JoshNya on 09-30-2005 12:19 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by porco556
I will hope that they used CCE, which unfortunately can't be assumed


Ya I'll take 3700kbit/sec over possible one-clickers anyday. 3700k isn't that bad to me, if the others left their extras untouched and/or removed only some, I'm sure they will all be close to 3700k, since xpdvds was rendered down to 2800k.

My .02


Posted by porco556 on 09-30-2005 03:23 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by JoshNya
Ya I'll take 3700kbit/sec over possible one-clickers anyday. 3700k isn't that bad to me, if the others left their extras untouched and/or removed only some, I'm sure they will all be close to 3700k, since xpdvds was rendered down to 2800k.

My .02


True enough. I really don't know what the others did (not to mention how many/little extras they kept). This will end up probably on my rental list anyways and just do it myself. I would have figured that each of the 3 releases are different, but they are all the same (in respect to what they kept). A pleasant choice would have been the XPDVD release, and an *untouched* video with no extras. But oh well, heard of this movie, we'll see if Duchovni (sp?) did a good job.


Posted by pablo_escobar on 10-04-2005 08:11 PM:

14 posts and none talking about the actual release. Anyway this was a good release nuke or not. My only complaint is they left in the 2.0 english audio track. So this release has 5.1 english, 2.0 english, and the 2.0 DC track. All extras are ripped.


v8 average bitrate is 4900

s10 no audio tracks stripped

m7 movie was decent, robin williams was good

some may like the xpd release as i'm sure the included extras has the alternate ending


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:03 PM.
Show all 15 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.