VCDQuality Forums
Show all 15 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Crank (2006) - CAM - RPT (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=71909)


Posted by X69 on 09-04-2006 04:26 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by lifeblog on 09-04-2006 05:50 PM:

v 3
a 3
m waiting 4 a better version


Posted by flameUK on 09-04-2006 06:06 PM:

Yup its a typical cam, fairly dark, hollow sound, and rather pixelated i found.

Based on CAM:
V: 7
A: 6
M: # waiting for decent copy

Based on Overall Quality:
V: 3
A: 3
M: # waiting for decent copy


Posted by isingintheban on 09-04-2006 06:33 PM:

6

7

9

__________________
hurf durf


Posted by The Leather G on 09-04-2006 08:17 PM:

From sample:
Blurred, hollow,yadayadayada.....


Video=4
Audio=4

Gott give Jason Statham a proper,(pun intended) release.


Posted by EnglishLad on 09-04-2006 09:15 PM:

Based on cam not all that pixelated but overall watchable if you really need to see this. Saw in theartre


will wait for something better though

nice try

6.5/6/9


Posted by rawx on 09-04-2006 10:30 PM:

http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/4039/crank2006cl5.png

some screens...

Not sure if I will watch this or not, but thanks to team for ur work!


Posted by sigboss on 09-05-2006 01:23 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by isinginthebanned
6

7

9



I will rate it as I see fit and not how retards like you tell us how to rate.

Nobody, NOBODY can say what a typical CAM should be . NOBODY

Rate on how you think the video looks and how the audion sounds. Simple.

I have seen and I know others have also seen some crappy TCs and sweet looking cams.
Yes, thats right, cams that look better than a TC.

So dont tell people how to base their votes.

6/7/7


Posted by CATBOX on 09-05-2006 02:29 AM:

Extremely dark video. Motion blur and pixilation. Many of the scenes are so dark and hazey that you can't even see whats going on. Its zoomed in, and cropped with some fish eye action on the sides. Audio is loud and hollow. I'm waiting for a better copy before watching entire movie.

4/6/?

CATBOX


Posted by ThAtViDeoGuY on 09-05-2006 03:22 AM:

no one has seen the screener floading around......? its dvd quality, so why waste time on this? good movie by the way, i had different expectations but i found it to be very entertaining, you will be suprised to realise its a comedy Crank.DvDSCRN.AVI thats how the file looks! enjoy

"TEH THE TEH" - thatVideoGuy


Posted by Minshu on 09-05-2006 05:28 AM:

Video = 5
Sound = 4
Movie = DNF


Posted by porntogo on 09-05-2006 06:12 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by isinginthebanned
6

7

9





If everybody should rate cam vs cam etc, then how come even a really good cam doesnt get a 10/10? Even the likes of you do this.

Practice what you preach muppet. Even a really good cam just gets 6-7/10.

Want to know what EVERYBODY does? They rate it how they see fit and normally its on the scale of 1-awful picture quality to 10- the dogs bollocks. Cams/dvds etc,etc nobody gives a fuck, a good picture is a good picture regardless of source.


Posted by franku on 09-05-2006 05:44 PM:

From the sample


There are cams and there are cams. Some are as good as TCs, others are completely unwatchable. This release is near the bottom of the scale. Grainy, pixilated, blurry and just plain ugly. Audio is crap too but who cares if you can't watch it.

V 3

A 4

M ? We’ll see when something comes out that can be watched. The XanaX version is not that something else.


Posted by whitedevil on 09-05-2006 06:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by porntogo
If everybody should rate cam vs cam etc, then how come even a really good cam doesnt get a 10/10? Even the likes of you do this.

Practice what you preach muppet. Even a really good cam just gets 6-7/10.

Want to know what EVERYBODY does? They rate it how they see fit and normally its on the scale of 1-awful picture quality to 10- the dogs bollocks. Cams/dvds etc,etc nobody gives a fuck, a good picture is a good picture regardless of source.



couldnt of said it better.

v5 a5 m? watchable from sample


Posted by Mailman on 09-07-2006 12:52 AM:

This is watchable, but a big disappointment to me. I was hoping for a bit better video. It's very distorted and the sound has some hiss.

V-5.5
A-6.5
M-7


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:20 AM.
Show all 15 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.