VCDQuality Forums
Show all 18 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Miss Congeniality 2 Armed and Fabulous - TELESYNC - STN (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=60625)


Posted by IRC_Moviefan on 03-26-2005 04:50 AM:

This looks like crap , no other way to put it , Silvers look better then this. Its missing the left side , its not just dark , its extremly dark , and its blurry as hell too. Sound is very very low also ...

The CAM in my opinion, picture was much better then this copy, this copy is on the verge of unwatchable.

As a TS:
3/6/1


Posted by kenpark on 03-26-2005 05:49 AM:

i didnt know there were blizzards in late march...

2/5/*

horrible for a TS


Posted by DOUGH on 03-26-2005 08:54 AM:

Thumbs down

the CAM is much better then this lol least ya could see the CAM the pic on this is so washed and dark I thought I was goin blind and the audio sounds...well..from what i COULD hear of it ..sounds horrid muffled all ta hell if u must watch this stick to the CAM is a first resort this rls being a last resort.

5.0/3.0/x

__________________


Posted by stezo2k on 03-26-2005 09:56 AM:

Video quality is terrible, its blurry and quite dark, not very watchable

Sound isn't too bad i guess, being a TS though you expect decent audio

4/7/x


Posted by Tafari on 03-26-2005 11:18 AM:

from sample:
not as bad as some say, but still the cam is much better.

6/-/-


Posted by Hairyhamster on 03-26-2005 11:30 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Tafari
from sample:
not as bad as some say, but still the cam is much better.

6/-/-




not as bad as some say????

have you seen this???
im not one to moan but this is pure shite.
i wouldnt have put my name to this release...
utter rubbish.

3/3

__________________
One Day The Dead Shall Walk The Earth.


Posted by Furius on 03-26-2005 12:54 PM:

Video is pretty bad as everyone has already said, but audio is actually ok.
4/7/?


Posted by devnullusr on 03-26-2005 01:23 PM:

yeah mislabeled cam for sound it's nuked .. and its not really just a tad off like jacked audio on the old TS this is cam audio and picture could have been cleaned up nice try though guys


Posted by Dr.B on 03-26-2005 02:20 PM:

4/5/?

pure shat

__________________
wanna see my winkle?


Posted by dontgiveafuck on 03-26-2005 03:02 PM:

3/x/x


god damn. sites need to stop affilling this group until they get something better than a $99 video camera.


Posted by FrogDawg on 03-26-2005 03:34 PM:

4/5/6

man this is horrid
washed out/dark/muffled

stick to the cam if you wanna see it, wait for a better copy if ur not in a hurry

__________________


Posted by Horton on 03-26-2005 03:39 PM:

Pure Shat?

Im sorry, but i will credit any group that tries to make there own home-grown telesyncs. the problem with this one is it was filmed at the drive in, and no matter the cam really the light escapes all over the place before hitting the lens, unlike in a theater where the light only has a minimal amount of places to go.

thats the reason some of STN's ts's look grainy, bright, little blurry etc.

not great, not bad either, ill rate it:

6/6/-1

movie was pure shit.


Posted by TheWebJunkie on 03-26-2005 03:48 PM:

4/6/1

Not a bad effort STN hopefully you will improve over time


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 03-26-2005 07:53 PM:

video is a disgrace...audio is good...

4/7/? will definitely wait on a better version...looks like this was filmed in a sand storm...or a vaseline blizzard.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by Da Postman on 03-27-2005 04:01 AM:

I actually like the sound...I mean it's better than a cam. It's not really clear, but it isn't muffled either. The music seems very flat, but the talking is good. As for the video, I don't understand how STN is doing this. They put out some good releases and now they're working hard to give everyone the new stuff quickly. Yet there video quality is really not what they had started out with. They're Grudge and recently Pacifier were very good. I thought they were a good group pushing the standards. The past 2 weeks things aren't as standard. The video is dull and dark with a very grainy, washed blurr. I can watch it if I have to, but I will hold out for better releases.

V-4.5
A-7
M-6


Posted by RUiNU on 03-27-2005 05:56 AM:

I think most must be commenting on sample cause after watching the first 15 mins, this isnt that bad sound is nice picture is washed but watchable.

6/7.5/?


Posted by qwertyu on 03-28-2005 09:10 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by RUiNU
I think most must be commenting on sample cause after watching the first 15 mins, this isnt that bad sound is nice picture is washed but watchable.

6/7.5/?


Exactly! People; watch the film.. the copy is ok..


Posted by qwertyu on 03-28-2005 09:12 PM:

Copy is presentable and watchable.

Audio:6
Video:5
Movie:6


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:25 PM.
Show all 18 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.