VCDQuality Forums - The Island - SCREENER

Show all 20 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Island - SCREENER - PreVail (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=66289)

Posted by X69 on 09-19-2005 06:22 PM:

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

6 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

7 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

8 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Posted by Airhead2 on 09-19-2005 06:25 PM:

Wow ... what an un needed release.

For starters , who the hell crops VHS screeners ? !!! This copy has bars on the top & bottom. Big counter top right , interlaced , bleeding colors , and really blurry. Sound is really good.

Only thing going for this release is 2CD and Nice audio. If you got that TC released weeks ago , avoid this copy as its way worse (quality wise).

5/8/8

Posted by mattmatt02 on 09-19-2005 06:47 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Airhead2
Wow ... what an un needed release.

i couldnt agree more!! the tc was almost dvd quality, this is like 3rd gen vhs. hmm...why?

preciate the effort tho prevail

as a scr

6/7/9

Posted by supermarch on 09-19-2005 07:16 PM:

Crap release for a VERY crap movie.

7/7/0

Posted by fizzyk on 09-19-2005 07:19 PM:

i just watched the tc last nite on dvdr and wat a fantastic copy that was

this seems wasted

but i guess one mans rubbish = another mans treasure

i am just waiting for them dvd screeners to start rolling thorugh

Posted by Dodgy Del on 09-19-2005 07:56 PM:

why this release?

the telecine will take some beating till retail as it hasn't been cropped and no timer.what more can i say?

__________________
Lets praise all the groups out there who make this scene for what it's worth because if we didn't then we'd all be spending a fortune at the pics.Remember to practice SAFE SEX (as illistrated in the pic).

Posted by crudman on 09-19-2005 08:26 PM:

Probably released so someone could say they got there first.

Posted by TrV on 09-19-2005 08:55 PM:

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dodgy Del
[B]why this release?

Because the grp are credit whoring lamers who will do anything to hang onto/get better/bigger/ faster pre sites and see their name up in lights.

There is no fucking need whatsoever for gay nth gen vhs screeners UNLESS there is not a good vers released to date.

As I said, a stupid bandwidth wasting pile of shit born out of the sheer greed of a no name grp who like so many these days will fucking release any old shite just to whore creds.

Posted by Bullet on 09-19-2005 09:05 PM:

quote:
Because the grp are credit whoring lamers who will do anything to hang onto/get better/bigger/ faster pre sites and see their name up in lights.

bit more respect for the peepz who try to give us the best. Ok now and then a rls isnt as wanted as the others. Still;...if you aint camming or ripping yourself;.stfu

is my humble opinion

__________________

Posted by dontbegay on 09-19-2005 09:13 PM:

quote:
As I said, a stupid bandwidth wasting pile of shit born out of the sheer greed of a no name grp who like so many these days will fucking release any old shite just to whore creds.

that about sums it up.

Posted by T-H-E-W-H-O on 09-19-2005 10:28 PM:

I have to disagree with a few things said about this rls.

1. its not a "waste" because they are still contributing to "the scene" or atleast whats left of it these days. *HOWEVER, they could have atleast made this INTERNAL. Imo, atleast they put out what they had acsess to/obtained. Thanks for that guys.

2. "credit whores" perhaps, but then again, wouldent you want to release something if your supplier tried hard to get his/her hands on it? Again, i would still say because of the better version it should have been internal, but none the less, atleast put out what you get ahold of.

3. "For starters , who the hell crops VHS screeners ...interlaced ...really blurry. Sound is really good.
The sample didnt appear to be interlaced for me, but if it was that should justify this being nuked. Atleast if a group is gonna pull of an old flick, make it properly encoded.

As based on the sample imo:

6/8/8

Posted by LighTer on 09-19-2005 10:43 PM:

piece of crap. unneeded rls. already got xvid asteroids version. has obvious timer and is crapped bad.

__________________
Yes...

Posted by Airhead2 on 09-19-2005 10:50 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by T-H-E-W-H-O
I have to disagree with a few things said about this rls.

1. its not a "waste" because they are still contributing to "the scene" or atleast whats left of it these days. *HOWEVER, they could have atleast made this INTERNAL. Imo, atleast they put out what they had acsess to/obtained. Thanks for that guys.

Actually i couldnt agree more when i think about that statement. Not to many groups out there anymore with "Real" Sources , so contribuiting wise , i appreciate it.

Also agree with it should have been labled iNTERNAL.

Good points T-H-E-W-H-O.

Posted by NoNe23 on 09-19-2005 10:59 PM:

Yea I Agree This Wasnt Needed But thanx anywayz

V=6

A=8

M=8

The DVDr Release Done by ROYAL Was Way better Than this

__________________
GGG-UnOt

THUGLIFE

MaKaVeLi All DaY

Posted by AssKing on 09-19-2005 11:51 PM:

As a screener, 5/8/8.

Yeah, I appreciate the effort, but unless this was gonna be better than the asteroids release (which IMO it isn't), I'd rather they spend the time sharing a movie that hasn't seen a good release yet.

Fun movie, BTW, definitely underrated.

Posted by darksoad on 09-20-2005 02:35 AM:

If you see the quality of the TC you'll only want a DVDScr or DVDRip, I don't know why they do copies worse than TCs...

Posted by packman on 09-20-2005 03:51 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Dodgy Del
why this release?

the telecine will take some beating till retail as it hasn't been cropped and no timer.what more can i say?

My thoughts exactly, I never rant or rave but must say this was totally not needed.
I normally don't rant or rave but in my humble opinion there was no need for this release.

But thanks for your valid attempt and work.

Posted by crapper on 09-20-2005 04:49 PM:

nice release

pic 6 (not that amzing .. clearly not the best source.. blocked and well not amazing)

sound good 7

movie 5 .. and pigs can fly ,... well i wouldnt be amazed if thats the next thing

great release just very much not needed.. but thnxx for the effort.. cuase i guesse someone doesnt like russian dvds and well this is there solution

thnxx and keep em coming

Posted by Methadon on 09-21-2005 08:16 PM:

What the hell? Didn't Asteroids encode a nice xvid for us over a month ago? Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the work that was done on the source; but why would PreVail wait this long after a dvd-quality xvid was available? If there's an *actual* reason.... think about it: whoever in this group got this version by some means, which possibly was a dvd-r that someone else did work on previously. Either way, this member of PreVail made this particular version available to everyone who reads these forums *cough*dontknowwhere*cough*, when he/she *could* have just kept this 6/6 "I've seen better screeners" screener internal, as we've already got a perfect 9/9 TC already. Thanx for the work, but would've appreciated just not seeing this so extremely late.

Posted by skewsy on 09-29-2005 01:19 AM:

NO NEED FOR A SCREENER

THE TC WAS ONE OF THE BEST IVE SEEN AND IT JUST SHOWS THIS RELEASE UP BY FAR

STICK WID THE TC BOYS

::EDIT:: Turn off the CAPS you eye-pickling bastard - NS::

__________________
Skewsy

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:30 PM.

Show all 20 posts from this thread on one page