VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Night At The Museum *PROPER* *XViD* - TELESYNC - mVs (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=73983)

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

first of all props to the other group looked very good for first release lets hope they improve with time.But yet again mVs doing this shit better than anyone else thanks!!from sample

video 8.8
auido 8
movie? not watched yet

...

Shut it if you're not going to comment on the release itself -LOLobo

looks the same source to me m8ty same slight tilt at start of movie

Ha,
Funny rate on this one. Encoded proper and rated at 5, the other encoded poorly and it gets an 8? Owell thanks mvs for right encode job and keep up good work. Not many others in scene are keeping up like you.

V: 7.5
A: 7
M: watch tomorrow night

this rls is better than the vcdus one....i have both....this one has better audio and same video.....so get the mvs rls.


yeh they rate the mvs rls worse and its better?

fuck u faggots dunno what your doing


rated on a TS

Video - 8 mavens usual quality we came to love
Audio - 8 its direct, loud and clear, not 5.1 but shit its nice.

Movie - aint watched it all yet...ben stiller one of my favs!

vcdus i gave 8/8 this i gave this 7/7 simply because it's the exact same release, mVs just increased the colour saturation, ran the audio through some filters and boosted the volume hence the hissing.

If it had been the other way round vcdus would have been slated to death.

[...]

V 6

A 7

M 9 Really liked it.

[...]

Extra crap omitted - Reminder folks, these threads are to rate and comment on the release, not give us an history lesson on the release group -LOLobo

__________________

Video: 8
Audio:7 (eh its better then average)
Movie: 1 - Wow that movie was so sh*ty I wanted to turn it off.

I am however tickled to death for not paying for this trash.

Saw this movie in the theater last night.
Awesome movie!!!

the mvs release, (
watched 2day - full movie and not the sample)
slight tilt at start,
but was corrected soon after,
very slight pixelation,
great sound.
Played from the laptop to the 42" plasma..

I give it an: 8 - 8 - 8

watched this one on the TV...

(also watched most of the other release, but the audio was a tad annoying after awhile).

anyhow, props to both groups. I'm just glad people are still doing this on our behalf.

The video is about the same on this release, but the audio is improved. Watchable release, even tho I've been spoiled with all the screeners of late....

v: 6.5
a: 7
m: 7

8/7/9

One of the top5 favorite movies for me. Excellent!! Only downfall of this release is sound - hollow. But colors are fine. Definately grab this release - watcheable and enjoyable.. Good job!

One of MvS's best yet. Picture was very nice but yeah, the audio left a bit to be desired.

Please keep 'em coming guys, nice work.

8/6/6

quote:

---

Originally posted by gunitnucca
this rls is better than the vcdus one....i have both....this one has better audio and same video.....so get the mvs rls.


yeh they rate the mvs rls worse and its better?

fuck u faggots dunno what your doing


rated on a TS

Video - 8 mavens usual quality we came to love
Audio - 8 its direct, loud and clear, not 5.1 but shit its nice.

Movie - aint watched it all yet...ben stiller one of my favs!

---

yeah gettin sick of people comparing mavensupplier with maven.
mVs is not mVn. they are no where neart he quality of what the real maven used to supply us with.

v:6
a:7
m:5 (it passed the time, jumanji in a museum)

Watched this on a 56" DLP video seemed a little dark to me but definately watchable sound was OK movie thought it could be better but not bad for a family type flick. Thanks mVs keep it up!

V-7
A-6
M-5

not bad

Bit dark, but overall not bad. Good Job for a fine quick release.
7/7/6

[...]

vid 8.5

sound 6.9 cause cant hear on standalone

mov 8.0



Create a new thread here for your encoding questions -LOLobo

V: 7
A: 7
M: 8

I don't like the slant, but its only really noticable in parts with writing. Certainly watchable.

BAD IVTC - Nuke, please

I'll admit, the VCDUS release had duplicated frames, just like the nfo says. However, the MVS release is IVTC'd under the assumption that the capture framerate of the cam was 23.976, which is wrong. The cam video was captured at 25fps, meaning there were blurred/blended frames, and as a result the MVS release has DELETED FRAMES; that's why the motion jumps a little bit every so often. Duplicated frames are bad, but I'd rather have duplicated frames than deleted frames. At least I'll be able to correct the jerkyness with the other release. MVS does have better audio (de-inverted left channel, unlike VCDUS. EDIT: scratch that, it's inverted, just less noticably) but the video is enough to warrant a nuke for BAD IVTC.

TO WHOEVER SAID THERE'S NO AUDIO ON YOUR STANDALONE: This is because the left channel is "inverted" compared to the right, i.e. an exact negative copy of the waveform. Just like if you take a negative image and combine it with the normal image, combining the two channels effectively cancels them out. The most you'll hear is a little noise where the waveforms are slightly different due to mp3 compression. This is trivial to fix, or could have been; all MVS needed to do was open Goldwave or Audacity, select the left channel and hit "invert". Lazy, lazy work.

Video: 0 - Botched it horribly, at least if they even vaguely hoped to justify a proper. It's the same source, same quality, same motion blur as the previous release, only this time it has the added problem of skipped frames.

Audio: 6 - It's listenable, but it has the problems I mentioned above. The inverted audio in particular is a problem, since anybody who watches this on a standalone hooked up to a mono TV won't be able to hear anything. On top of that it's amplified WAY too much, or at least shoddily, so that you get some clipping in the audio.

Movie: 8 - It was pretty good and had a few unexpected twists, along with some great performances. However, it still had a bit of that ol' Hollywood predictableness in there as well, and a few things made absolutely no sense. Still, I wouldn't mind there being some kind of spin-off to this, maybe a series or (more likely) cartoon series picking up where the movie left off.


Bottom Line - I don't care what the hell you tag it, this release is inferior to the previous version in every way imaginable. The skipped frames alone should warrant a nuke. The previous version isn't perfect, no doubt, but this isn't a step in the right direction. Shame on MVS.