VCDQuality Forums
Show all 22 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- House Of Wax *PROPER* - CAM - COBRA (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=62455)


Posted by Sco0t on 05-09-2005 12:46 AM:

nuked-grp.req
invalid proper, as it has no audio. Also put a big watermark on it.

__________________
die!


Posted by Surfsnake2 on 05-09-2005 12:47 AM:

BWHAHAHA. So they put a blur on, in the middle center of their movie so it doesnt get stolen, and then, so no one steals their audio, they dont put it in.
U ROXORZ MY BOXORZ COBRA

...Um no, it was not a group req. nuke.
yes, it was an invalid proper though(unless it Vulcans is considered to be over cropped, but lets remember, it is a cam).
And yes it is crappy.

__________________
~LaZy~
rar!


Posted by lozman on 05-09-2005 01:01 AM:

waist of time poor picture bad blured out watermark in the middle of the screen & no audio WTF


3/0/?


Posted by Sco0t on 05-09-2005 01:02 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Surfsnake2
...Um no, it was not a group req. nuke.
yes, it was an invalid proper though(unless it Vulcans is considered to be over cropped, but lets remember, it is a cam).
And yes it is crappy.



Yes, it was nuked for grp.req.

__________________
die!


Posted by Surfsnake2 on 05-09-2005 01:07 AM:

quote:
Yes, it was nuked for grp.req.


Um, once again, no it was not. i watched it get nuked 20 secs out.
so no, your still wrong

__________________
~LaZy~
rar!


Posted by CCkid on 05-09-2005 01:20 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Surfsnake2
Um, once again, no it was not. i watched it get nuked 20 secs out.
so no, your still wrong




yes, no, yes, no, yes, no

are you 2 siblings or what? Just rate the release and shut the heck up cause your wasting our reading time. Mods should make an example of you to start cleaning up this board!

Poor video, no audio. get vulcans or wait for TS or TC to come out.

v-4
a-0
m-5

__________________


Sexy, Dangerous, Seductive ... 3 top Q's


Posted by swaber on 05-09-2005 02:26 AM:

all i can say is . dont bother


Posted by Hanin on 05-09-2005 05:15 AM:

Cool

well... maybe this isn't so bad of a release
i mean...... it is a paris hilton movie.... do you really need audio? =)


Posted by conagra100 on 05-09-2005 06:48 AM:

:: Good work on stringing together as many obscenities as possible. I hope the Tourette's treatment works out, but do that again and you're gone. -K::


Posted by mirrors34 on 05-09-2005 09:42 AM:

no audio

0/0/0

__________________
one eyed magpie


Posted by valentine on 05-09-2005 09:46 AM:

lol @ conagra100. Dude, how old are you? Like 12?

I would hardly call any release group fuckers, they are risking their necks for our entertainment, they deserve more respect than that. Regardless of quality/nukes

PS _http://www.dictionary.com

No point in downloading/rating a nuked release.

EDIT: To all the all dumbies that said SAOSiN show these guys how it's done, etc.

I only ask this. Where is your precious SAOSiN now? I imagine your wondering why Cobra has not release a repack now? Well after ungrateful scavenger's such as yourselves, I wouldn't bother repacking either.

__________________


Posted by AL1VE on 05-09-2005 12:18 PM:

from the nfo :

M FORMAT.......:VCD M
M SiZE.........:45x15mb 43x15mb M
M ASPECT RATiO.:Yup M
M IMDb Rating..:None M
M IMDb URL.....:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0397065/ M
M Audio........:Yes Sir M
M GRP RELEASE..:05/07/05 M


heh.


Posted by Dodgy Del on 05-09-2005 01:27 PM:

Thumbs down

was looking forward to this one. what a disappointment i got after checking this one out. nothing more to add apart from AVOID!!! what a pile of crap!!!

__________________
Lets praise all the groups out there who make this scene for what it's worth because if we didn't then we'd all be spending a fortune at the pics.Remember to practice SAFE SEX (as illistrated in the pic).


Posted by moby008 on 05-09-2005 02:37 PM:

video was pretty poor, with a huge watermark in the middle
no audio


4/0/?


Posted by lindoors on 05-09-2005 04:21 PM:

Thumbs down

crazy release watermark in the middle.no audio ,COBRA you guys suck ass,what a pile of dog shit this is....


Posted by SultrySalesma on 05-09-2005 09:41 PM:

Everyone needs to calm down. Ya, it's a poor release, but at least it's a release. At least we know a group is out there working for us. They do this as a favor and put their necks on the line for your entertainment.

I say, it's nuked, we know it's bad, but don't treat the group like crap. What happens when groups like Centropy and TUN take off? Your best hope is on small groups taking their place and and making the same quality releases. They can't do this without practice and they WON'T do it if you insult them.

*steps down from soapbox*


Posted by HeartOfStone on 05-10-2005 09:08 AM:

I think that Vulcans release was pretty good. I liked the video except for in dark scenes, and felt that the audio was ok at best. I have yet to check out this copy for there is no sound, and I'm assuming the video sucks. I just finished getting House.Of.Wax.INTERNAL.CAM-LeXuS and I'd have to say that the video is basically the same as Vulcans, maybe a little worse but the sound is quite better.

This release:

0/0/7 (seeing as I have yet to get the sample).

Vulcans:

7/5/7 (good picture, audible sound)

LeXus:

6/8/7 (picture is almost as good as Vulcans and the sound is an improvement. It's good for a cam).

__________________
You can't laugh last, if I stab you in the throat with the knife that you left in my back


Posted by corvex on 05-10-2005 12:45 PM:

Video is grainy/blotchy/blurry , no audio, and its labeled proper (um ok).

Typical CAM shit
Is it only me or should CAMS now be banned from the scene, to todays standards, you got to be mighty impatient that your willing to watch a movie in CAM format, come on.
Tons of sites do not allow CAMS anymore, ever wonder why

video : 2
audio : 0 (none)
movie : 5 not bad


Posted by Sco0t on 05-10-2005 04:13 PM:

:: dont edit my comments it defines the point of having feedback.





::EDIT:: How about we edit whatever posts we want and if you don't like it or can't follow simple posting rules, you get banned? - Neversoft::

__________________
die!


Posted by sonic76 on 05-10-2005 10:22 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Sco0t
:: dont edit my comments it defines the point of having feedback.


Haha...it defines the point eh? I think you mean defeats?
In any case, i'd wait for a ts or better


Posted by lickmyzack on 05-11-2005 02:13 AM:

Cams were being Banned from top sites because of bandwidth limitations and the huge flood the last year or so of releases however I have noticed that more are actually popping up on sites now as BW limits are getting better and better... and the amount of releases is slowing down... so in fact it should be exactly opposite.

The sites I've seen that don't allow Cams usually have a request folder.. and if it's a good Cam it'll usually wind up in there.

Anyway to rate this release.. well it was pretty bad.... but at least they are trying.. which is more than you can say for some groups.

4/0/5

LMZ


Posted by kalvaitis007 on 05-11-2005 04:57 PM:

Knock off the bickering and flaming, you old ladies. Keep your posts confined to the quality of this release. If you don't like the release, just say so. Your added "flavor" ends up costing the thread usefulness after awhile.

-K


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:35 PM.
Show all 22 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.