VCDQuality Forums - United 93 - SCREENER

Show all 22 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- United 93 - SCREENER - HUSTLE (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=70286)

Posted by X69 on 05-21-2006 04:49 PM:

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes

*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Posted by MrFreestyle on 05-21-2006 04:53 PM:

Source seems to be same as Believers and also audio gone towards the end.
Video 8
Audio 8.5 (nice and direct)
Movie ? (havent seen)

Posted by DaisyF on 05-21-2006 05:08 PM:

Seems like last five minutes of audio are missing

v 7
a 7
m 6

I liked Flight 93 better

__________________
Daisy D Fetherweight

Posted by minkink on 05-21-2006 05:59 PM:

its a screener The resolution is not all that great but when are screeners ever. The Audio is fine.

Iv included some screencaps of the picture.

http://img67.imageshack.us/img67/9453/screencaps1hp.gif

Posted by wrist on 05-21-2006 06:41 PM:

No audio on cd2 from 48 minute mark.

Posted by norrie on 05-21-2006 06:58 PM:

Yup missing about 1 minuite of audio from actual video footage.

You think its a coincedence that the audio on TS and the screener goes dead at the exact same section lol

Doesnt look like you miss anything really but this is no Screener thats for sure

6/5/?

Posted by Chuffster on 05-21-2006 10:03 PM:

I'm pretty sure the audio is supposed to go silent like that...

Posted by Stonington on 05-21-2006 10:21 PM:

I think this is same source as United.93.TS.SVCD-BELiEVERS (at least the audio for sure) b/c the audio also cuts same place on this release.

Posted by baller26 on 05-21-2006 11:34 PM:

Can anyone confirm that the audio is supposed to be gone or if it's screwed up?

Posted by minkink on 05-22-2006 12:08 AM:

The audio is supposed to go dead at the end like that. Its also where no audio has been released from the feds. The trans-script has been posted on TSG now though.

Posted by norm on 05-22-2006 02:44 AM:

What is the point in this release when there's already a DVDR release of this movie available, albeit in PAL.

2006-04-17 United.93.2006.LiMiTED.COMPLETE.PAL.DVDR-AFO

Posted by pjfan0281 on 05-22-2006 05:50 AM:

same source, frame for frame, as the Believers TS. i dont see how this is a screener....no timecodes, no b&w frames, no property of logos...looks to be the saem exact source as Believers, just a 1cd version.

Posted by Stonington on 05-22-2006 06:47 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by minkink
The audio is supposed to go dead at the end like that. Its also where no audio has been released from the feds. The trans-script has been posted on TSG now though.

The audio does NOT go out like that on the movie (check United.93.CAM.XviD-SubAtom for proof). The audio goes on until the black screen (right before it tells you some info on united 93 and the passengers aboard).

Posted by BLEACH on 05-22-2006 10:13 AM:

Checked the NFO and no info so thought i would ask

Does this screener have any Black/white scenes or flash watermarks ?

Posted by jezhead on 05-22-2006 10:27 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by norm
What is the point in this release when there's already a DVDR release of this movie available, albeit in PAL.

2006-04-17 United.93.2006.LiMiTED.COMPLETE.PAL.DVDR-AFO

Does the audio cut out on that part of the dvdr also??

Posted by grittree on 05-23-2006 02:25 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by norm
What is the point in this release when there's already a DVDR release of this movie available, albeit in PAL.

2006-04-17 United.93.2006.LiMiTED.COMPLETE.PAL.DVDR-AFO

That's the mislabeled TV flick Flight93

Posted by number1bum on 05-23-2006 06:16 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by norm
What is the point in this release when there's already a DVDR release of this movie available, albeit in PAL.

2006-04-17 United.93.2006.LiMiTED.COMPLETE.PAL.DVDR-AFO

That's the TV movie Flight 93.

Posted by Iammyself on 05-23-2006 06:56 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by BLEACH
Checked the NFO and no info so thought i would ask

Does this screener have any Black/white scenes or flash watermarks ?

LOOK AT ALL THE RECENT RLS SAMPLES, THEY ARE ALL THE SAME... no TS, no SCR, no TC, no DVDSCR, this source is not known (i suspect some sort of Kvcd dvd source but thats argueable)

This has been re-encoded by every scene group that cant find a source but BT or kazaa... NO black/white but black/white means shit compared to this framerate, i got 1 kvcd and this looks about right, too bad whatever this source it didnt get done properly...

if you are willing to stick your dick in an affected area, be willing to get burnt... was this cunt of a encode willing to get burnt by? (not talking to any1 but the P2P encoder)

1/1/8

but for practical reasons other than disliking reencodes, the same as before

6/7/8

I have my doubts, but that takes nothing away from engulfing your emotions in this movie... if you can, you can place yourself within it... if not then you might see a shell of a situation.... I can see it as both... even with some skepticicism of what happened, the movie itself was heart wrenching... and thats all I can say

Posted by DJMasterX on 05-25-2006 05:02 PM:

7,8,8.5

The quality may not be perfect but it certainly is a gripping and involving movie. To be honest, it got me and my friends a little fired up by the end of it !!

I read the transcripts from the flight recorder to find out what was missed when the audio cuts out at the very end of the film. They pretty much just keep saying "allah is great" over and over so it's no great loss. Personally, i thought it was meant to be that way when i watched the film, and it certainly created a dramatic effect to finish the film with. After reading the transcripts, your not missing much and the cut out audio definalty creates a more dramatic ending to the film than "allah is great" over and over would have done....

Im going to check out the reccomended Flight 93 now.

Posted by guardie on 06-09-2006 11:02 AM:

I agree with DJMasterX on this one, i also read the Transcript and is as he said all about how great Allah is, so no loss really, i'd give this film 7 / 7.5 / 7

Posted by FiZzY1 on 06-18-2006 07:03 PM:

v 6
a 6
m 4

You'l notice this movie discriminates against other religons. It is like the americans "mainstream" way to turn people against a certain religion. For something that was staged by their own. Americans staged the whole thing from pentagon to twin towers.

This movie is just a help towards the cover-up with various bits re-staged for the sake of the bbc news and so on such as families of victims on phone and sound recorder from the flight.

Its just my opinion so dont flame. But i don't see anyone slating americans in a mainstream movie by the religion they are slating right here. Its funny though. Hw far they'd go for oil

http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/nwo.htm
Scroll down to the Twin Towers / Pentagon staged act. It was a legit american demolition controlled drama. Them Boeings also have a something under the fuselage that no boeing driver has witnessed in their history or flying.

Enjoy

__________________
----------

Posted by Sonikku on 08-09-2006 07:51 AM:

You sir, are an idiot. There was nothing 'staged' and the 'thing underneath the plane' was a trick of the light, since in 63443534 video's it's not there.

Conspiracy theorists always ignore the insanely huge amounts of evidence that all support the facts that 4 planes were hijacked by al-queda jerk-offs (Radio interceptions, radar tracking, cell calls, 5462872548 eye witnesses, wreckage analysis, flight data recorders, post crash investigations of the highjackers which proved they trained at flight schools, had hotels, were registered on the flights, were on airport security tapes.....etc etc etc)

Stop being ignorant. For 9/11 to be a conspiracy you would have to make the claim that THOUSANDS of people were 'in on it' and that none of them talked. Right. They can't keep Abu-Ghraib abuse secret but they can pull off 9/11 without a hitch? Grow up.

as for the movie , 7/8/8.

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:16 AM.

Show all 22 posts from this thread on one page