VCDQuality Forums
Show all 23 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Cellular - CAM - FRA (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=46571)


Posted by vip3r on 09-11-2004 06:59 AM:

LOL!! The picture on this isn't half bad, blurry as suspected, not too bright or dark, good colors .. not as good as FRA's first few cams though, but it's up there with POT's. Now on the otherhand .. the Audio is fucking TERRIBLE. If any of you remember the first Godsend CAM, with the alien hiss/echoes .. well this is about the same, just half as bad.

5.5/3/? - Rated from sample


Posted by nakid on 09-11-2004 07:11 AM:

Sample isn't bad.. but its kinda fuzzy or more like a smoothing filter was over used on it.. .. .has a tin box sound too it.. but its watchable


6.2
4
? -- not till i've see it.


Posted by generalss on 09-11-2004 07:11 AM:

6/3/?

will wait for a TS


Posted by darknez on 09-11-2004 02:05 PM:

not bad crap sound


Posted by dos000 on 09-11-2004 03:10 PM:

Ah....first release, looks okish, from sample

5/4/?

Sound is wank, but women is nice in the sample :P


Posted by Miller on 09-11-2004 03:48 PM:

not the best cam. video is nice, a little blurry, nice colors for a cam though. sound is a real issue , as some one has said it has a tin can kind of effect, hollow with a hiss. movie looks not bad, only watched sample

7/5/?

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!


Posted by LocK on 09-11-2004 06:43 PM:

Video looks nice for a CAM, audio isn't good at all.

7/4/?


Posted by shizzn on 09-11-2004 07:08 PM:

5/3/7

video average for cam...audio worse than some 28kbit webradio stream. movie was n1ce

__________________
...dont be poor - be a whore!...


Posted by UltrA1 on 09-11-2004 07:12 PM:

Get the sample and deside from there..
not worth a dl till it's a TS
imho is's
5-5-5

__________________
Anyone with any complaints, contact:
[email protected]

Movie From Maven Priceless!!

*Broadband internet not included...


Posted by Debo on 09-11-2004 09:04 PM:

6/4

__________________


Posted by hadrian on 09-11-2004 09:20 PM:

vid:4, sound: 3, film: 7 (could be better if I could hear it properly)

A really good film but parts are fucked by crap sound, should be better with a decent release.


Posted by Snoop on 09-11-2004 11:09 PM:

5/3/?

Total garbage... wait for a TS

__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you work for UPS? I thougt I saw you checking out my package.


Posted by Samantha on 09-12-2004 12:42 AM:

Angry Cellular

Well.. sound sux..hollow as sin. lol Picture is fuzzy..Makes my eyes hurt.. I'll pass and wait for a good release.


Posted by redhat39 on 09-12-2004 01:27 AM:

Don't d/l

This release is screwed up. The 2nd CD is the same as the 1st CD. So only half of the movie is here in this release.


Posted by redhat39 on 09-12-2004 01:36 AM:

Found the problem

Its actually the CUE file thats messed up. The CUE file for the 2nd BIN points to the 1st BIN. Edit the 2nd CUE file and it should be ok after that.


Posted by protekt0r on 09-12-2004 09:30 AM:

8/4/?

Colors and clarity are great in video. Totally watchable, unlike POT's piece of shit CAM of Resident Evil.

Sound sucks. Low bit rate? It's got that "listening into a seashell" effect... like u get with 64bit kbps MP3s and streaming media. Dunno what u call that. Anyways, not bad.

-protekt0r

__________________
"Signatures Suck"


Posted by MTV on 09-12-2004 09:50 AM:

pics cropped . not all that clear but good colours.sounds not good. very hollow *& i know its a cam*but wait for better.good speed in getting it out though.

6/4/?


Posted by hatguy on 09-12-2004 04:20 PM:

Video is okay, sound is bad.

Video - 5 (I'd say it's about average for a CAM... video is a bit blurry and it's hard to see the dark scenes, but overall colors are good. It's also cropped, but not that badly.)

Audio - 3 (For the most part... horrible. Audio has a very weird, low bitrate sound to it. It's hard to hear the dialogue in many scenes.)

Movie - 6 (Movie was decent. I liked it.)

Yeah, it was a fast release, but I'd wait...


Posted by nicam on 09-12-2004 08:00 PM:

the quality of this release is just plain bad we need maven or videocd to release a quality version


Posted by Da Postman on 09-12-2004 08:06 PM:

A surprisingly nice CAM. It still is a CAM, but still cleaner and with better sound then I thought it would have. Excited about a TS version though.

V-6
A-5.5
M-5


Posted by horizonstar on 09-12-2004 10:54 PM:

omgomgomg! 404notfound, check out this thread!!

- Almost everyone posting ratings and comments backing up their ratings, both good and bad.
- No one flaming.
- No one posting about maVen/CTP/etc.
- No one (except me) going off topic.

I think we should make this thread (so far) a Sticky as an example of a useful ratings thread.

::edit:: darn, when I posted this, nicam's message had not yet made it through the mod queue. I guess we shouldn't sticky this thread after all.

__________________


Scrobble all you want, we'll make more!


Posted by Panthro on 09-13-2004 05:33 AM:

Angry

the sound drove me totally fucking nuts after 2 mins...5/3/?


Posted by ryan- on 09-17-2004 12:24 AM:

video is bad.. 5 seemed dark in the scenes
audio is worse...4
movie...havent watched yet just went trhough pretty quick

thanks for the release i cant get ahold of fbc's version for some reason.. so this will do


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:36 PM.
Show all 23 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.