VCDQuality Forums - Spy Kids 2: The Island of Lost Dreams *PROPER* - TELESYNC

Show all 23 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Spy Kids 2: The Island of Lost Dreams *PROPER* - TELESYNC - HafVCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=6190)

Posted by TeAr-Dr0p on 08-12-2002 11:08 AM:

wtf did the entire HafVCD crew come on and vote this 8-10s?

this rls is crap also. picture is dark and flickers. pretty blurry too.
sound is that of an average TS.

5 for video. 6 for sound

. . . movie itself looks like it could babysit the youngens for a hour and a half

Posted by Sorontur on 08-12-2002 01:46 PM:

Kinda dark, blury, dark/light splotch effect on right and left side of the picture.

Definitly far from a proper, but what do you expect from hafvcd? ; )

Posted by Asterisk on 08-12-2002 05:23 PM:

This is a Proper? Don't make me laugh. The sound is bad in the first half hour and the tracking on the original video source needs adjusting... The sound gets better after half an hour then the cam starts moving. Dont bother with this one folks.

4/5/6 rating.

Posted by VonRashniek on 08-12-2002 06:52 PM:

its ok

i guess their nfo was correct, did proper for the right reasons. but the pic is a lil blurry. this is ftf quality ts, maybe a bit better.
5/6 - 6/7 ish. best so far. i am judging from the sample, as this movie is not for me.

__________________
Opinions are like azzholes, everyones got one, and yours stinks.

Posted by MacMall88 on 08-12-2002 07:07 PM:

i personally don't see a need for a proper, the first release looks almost exactly the same as this. lucky for me i don't want to see this movie anyways

Posted by binx on 08-12-2002 07:09 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by MacMall88
i personally don't see a need for a proper, the first release looks almost exactly the same as this. lucky for me i don't want to see this movie anyways

same ere............

Posted by Asterisk on 08-12-2002 07:36 PM:

This one's worse than the last release.

Posted by Smeghead on 08-12-2002 08:15 PM:

Is it fixed????

The deal is, there video and audio were out of sync in the others. Hows this one?

Posted by JoshNya on 08-12-2002 09:35 PM:

Well I watched this version. Heres what i saw:

1. Runtime: 84 min
2. Cut scenes. 28:30: First sec there talking about their watches, next sec their in a submarine.
3. A 10th+ generation tape, many many vcr tracking scrolls are seen.
4. Out of sync near the end on CD1

This is definately not a proper.

Posted by I_Drink_24_7 on 08-12-2002 10:15 PM:

just a pubic hair differnce

anyone care?

Posted by Truman on 08-13-2002 12:44 AM:

the 1 st rls with the subs was the best yet so .....get it crop the subs and dont bother with the other 2.

Are we gonna have shit loads of the same rls again? How come say for instance Stuart little 2 didnt get this much attention?(i know the film sux just an example ).

Posted by I_Drink_24_7 on 08-13-2002 04:37 AM:

i dont know why groups even bother, its dangerous enuff releasing shit against the laws, but why take the risks on garbage? and shit that 98% of us know its garbage..
why risk being caught for garbage?

makes no sense

Posted by blacks on 08-13-2002 05:01 AM:

Tell me exactly, what release do u actually think is NOT garbage?

Posted by I_Drink_24_7 on 08-13-2002 06:32 AM:

read other threads and you will see

its like trying to find waldo, its hard to find it, but you just know its there

Posted by TrV on 08-13-2002 03:15 PM:

OMFG.......This is an absolute piece of shit and these clowns should go hang themselves now!!!
Bow your heads in shame haf vcd........you have the award for "piece of shit of the week"

Posted by mrnoregard on 08-13-2002 06:52 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by I_Drink_24_7
i dont know why groups even bother, its dangerous enuff releasing shit against the laws, but why take the risks on garbage? and shit that 98% of us know its garbage..
why risk being caught for garbage?

makes no sense

I thought this was a forum to discuss the quality of movies that may or may not exists somewhere else.......... why all the hatin'..... if you don't like a groups release then don't watch it........ lets get back to the purpose of this site and I_Drink you sound like a cop or somethin........ life is full of risks........... if you have aquired any of that garbage at home you are in danger too......... fool..............

__________________
If yo daytons got a lil' mo shine than the ones i got, ama get my nine and yo shit is mine.......

Posted by I_Drink_24_7 on 08-14-2002 03:12 AM:

are you ok?

stand upand move away from the drugs!

Posted by delboy1 on 08-15-2002 11:20 PM:

spykids 2 *proper*crap

this is no *proper* it looks a recode from a video and not a very good on at that dont give up your day job leave it to the pro,s

Posted by delboy1 on 08-15-2002 11:25 PM:

total crap dont give up your day jobs leave it to the pro's *proper* i think it should of said proper shit

Posted by mrnoregard on 08-17-2002 09:32 PM:

can anybody tell me why this release wasn't nuked....... i mean if its this bad shouldn't it have just been nuked????

__________________
If yo daytons got a lil' mo shine than the ones i got, ama get my nine and yo shit is mine.......

Posted by Smeghead on 08-20-2002 12:57 AM:

CHILL

Goodness how our standards change so fast!
This release is ok, bit fuzzy, ok sound but its free people!
A screener it aint, dvd quality it aint but ok, quite watchable.
Everyone wants dvd quality cam-jobs these days sheeesh!@

Posted by peterowenobrien on 08-21-2002 10:39 AM:

Spy Kids 2

Quality of picture & sound is very poor

Posted by peterowenobrien on 08-21-2002 10:45 AM:

Very Poor

This VCD is very poor quality some rate @ 8/10 I say (6/10)

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:18 PM.

Show all 23 posts from this thread on one page