VCDQuality Forums
Show all 23 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- TMNT *REPACK* *XVID* - TELECINE - PROP3R (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=75710)


Posted by X69 on 04-06-2007 07:31 AM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes

* Haven't read the forum rules? Want to play Russian roulette with your forum account?
READ THIS TO AVOID BEING BANNED



*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by kevlar on 04-06-2007 07:33 AM:

as stated in the prev comments on their first rls..this seems to be like the TS prev rlsd...if you have the TS, stick with it....i skimmed through various places...ratings as a TC

v-4
a-7
m-8 great flick


Posted by shaunp on 04-06-2007 08:06 AM:

are you kidding me? look at the 1st sec of the video...
warning: nothing to output bframe decoder lag, yea typical TS..this is a TC and why do you guys always hate on new Groups its no wonder they come and go so often LoL

V: 8
A: 8
M: 8


Posted by slipknot on 04-06-2007 10:06 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by shaunp
are you kidding me? look at the 1st sec of the video...
warning: nothing to output bframe decoder lag, yea typical TS..this is a TC and why do you guys always hate on new Groups its no wonder they come and go so often LoL

V: 8
A: 8
M: 8



LMAO, anything encoded to .avi with gordian knot and not using post frames comes up with bfame warning :P:P:P

on this rls
V - 8
A - 6 (in & out of synch)
M - Master Splinter Rulez! :-D

__________________
........ and such is life


Posted by OSH on 04-06-2007 11:37 AM:

Looks ok on the computer. Personally I don't think that this is a TC unless the Pukka release was one (which it wasn't), because I believe they're one in the same. The sound on this is really good I can't remember what Pukkas was like so I can't say if it's the same. All around good release.

Note: I have not watched the full release so I'm not sure whether or not it goes in and out of sync.

V-7
A-8
M-?

__________________


I'm gay. <3 <3 <3


Posted by Bisky666Bisk on 04-06-2007 11:43 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by shaunp
are you kidding me? look at the 1st sec of the video...
warning: nothing to output bframe decoder lag, yea typical TS..this is a TC and why do you guys always hate on new Groups its no wonder they come and go so often LoL

V: 8
A: 8
M: 8



pmsl, \I could add 1 of them warnings meself very easily, got nothin to do with TS or TC, learn what ya talkin about before postin.

TS not a TC, but rated as a TC cos thats what its labelled.

M - 4
A - 6
M-?


Posted by Z-Man on 04-06-2007 11:49 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by shaunp
are you kidding me? look at the 1st sec of the video...
warning: nothing to output bframe decoder lag, yea typical TS..this is a TC and why do you guys always hate on new Groups its no wonder they come and go so often LoL

V: 8
A: 8
M: 8



Not "hating on" the group, simply stating the obvious. It's not a TC as stated...but if you want to call it one, I'll rate it as one...

V=6 still blocky
A=7...
After watching, noticed it jumps in and out of sync
M=8...A good watch
Still say if you have the Pukka release, you're better off.....Cheers


Posted by Cynergetix on 04-06-2007 12:02 PM:

Looking at this is looks like it is the same (exactly) as the Pukka TS - when the Turtles come into it and their names come up on the screen you can see the Donatello is cropped EXACTLY the same as the Pukka TS - only thing they managed here was to make the video worse - more washed out??

V-6 Not as sharp as the Pukka TS
A-4 Synch issues in all the same places as Pukka
M-10 Its the Turtles!!


Posted by Rock4HYM on 04-06-2007 03:43 PM:

This very clearly is not a TS... it is a TC. Some people just like nuking new release groups as someone else mentioned here.
Ive seen 20th, MrNiceGuy, Fuze, MvS all release worse shit than this and not get their files nuked.
I watched it this morning on my dvd player and didnt notice any of the issues with audio sync either. Are you sure you guys checked the correct release?

The audio is clear the picture is clear.
(Clearer than the release by pukka on both accounts.)
9 /
8/
9/

You mentioned gradient. You even get fucking gradient on DVDR releases you fa*'s. If your gonna comment on shit at least know what to look for when posting bad comments.


Posted by mromariz on 04-06-2007 03:49 PM:

I have this ifo:

[PRED] [ TMNT.REPACK.TC.XVID-PROP3R ] [ XVID / PROP3R ] [ 732.80MB /
49F ] [ nuked: audio.in.and.out.of.sync ] got released 2h 12m 31s ago


Posted by kevlar on 04-06-2007 05:28 PM:

im not hating on new grps, i just rate it as how they label it..here is more info for the rls guys as there were more problems with the rls

[NUKE]-[TMNT.REPACK.TC.XVID-PROP3R]-[cbr.audio_qpel.video_dupe.PUKKA.2007-03-24_same.source]


Posted by Jc100 on 04-06-2007 11:28 PM:

Same as kevlar said.... Its nuked. Looks like same source as the TS to me from sample too..... Was a really good movie. Go see in theaters if you liked the old series!

BOO to PROP3R for trying to pass this off as a TC and their own.


Posted by signum on 04-07-2007 12:18 AM:

mislabelt nuked
ru source ts is it

__________________
la dolce vita


Posted by Rock4HYM on 04-07-2007 09:02 AM:

Dont know how anyone can be dumb enough to say this looks like a stolen pukka release.

Freaken just watch the end credits and you can see the differance.
The proper snapshot with the turtles was taken in full screen...
the pukka was taken in the default video size. I see a HUGE difference in the pixelation side of things. PUKKAS image has way more pixelation even at a smaller size than the Proper. Youd litterally have to be one stupid dumbass to even try and say these were both from the same source (Video wise.) Audio... hmm maybe they are the same audio but definately not even close in comparissons on the video.

Pukka:
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/3728/pukkafi5.th.jpg
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/3728/pukkafi5.th.jpg

Prop3r:
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/...roperdw3.th.jpg


Posted by pHo on 04-07-2007 10:41 AM:

I love your video comparison.. one is a shot of the credit roll whilst the other is a CG shot.. and that tells us what exactly?

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by OSH on 04-07-2007 11:00 AM:

No way that this is a different release. For those of you who think that it is, it wouldn't really matter seeing as it's worse quality than Pukkas. Open your eyes and shut your mouths.

__________________


I'm gay. <3 <3 <3


Posted by cirr0 on 04-07-2007 04:16 PM:

nuke

(FOR A TELECINE)
v5 a4 ::edit:: well apparently it was my gf trying to mes with my reciever, its still not the greatest but ill be fair and give it a 6.5
and the movie: suckz

NINJA TURTLES III = ownz this

btw

has anyone noticed that rlz'z posted @ vcdQ
that EVERY RLS from PROP3R is NUKED!!!!
there needs to be post rules on limits of nukes.
because you'd think someone other than us would have probs with it. \

like the group releases something so shitty and has a friggin party over it while 200 nerdies (except dwaggy and any mods ) insult them.loll
IM CONFUSED

new grp name = P00P3R

:: Mod Edit: VCDQ does not nuke releases, they are nuked by the scene. ::


::edit :: i understand, i meant like if you have (x) amoutn of releases and say (in poopers case 100% nukes, shouldnt that just be like a scene ban? you can easily filter out groups not following scene rules or just putting out straight garbage. no dissrespect to vcdQ

__________________
"but i choose to die, on a steady diet of booze and lies"


Posted by Rock4HYM on 04-07-2007 07:11 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by LostInAHazeOfMyself
No way that this is a different release. For those of you who think that it is, it wouldn't really matter seeing as it's worse quality than Pukkas. Open your eyes and shut your mouths.


You quite obviously are as blind as your are dumb.

Btw. Comment above yours... theres 2 animated shots and 1 credits.

1 anime for each release and the credits for the pukka release.

Judge for yourself by the anime shots. The Prop3r shot was taken in full screen and the pukka was only half screen. The pukka was way more pixelated. So not only are they from differant sources but the Prop3r was better in my own opinion.]

The group has so many nukes mainly because they are new in my opinion. Everyone always liked nuking the new guys.
Common just look at the nuke reasons...
They have like 4 for the files not being in bin/cue format.
1 for the release having audio out of sync. (Which in my opinion wasnt even out of sync I watched the whole film.)
1 for just gay reasons which 20th propered with a worse quality POS.
1 for being stolen from pukka supposedly when it was really only nuked on 1 freaken db. Its nuked for audio sync on a few but only on 1 where it says its pukkas source. (Probably 1 run by a group of homos)

In all reality these guys are beating all the other groups with quality, quantity, and speedy releases. So what if the momos dont know how to pack their files correctly yet. Look at any other release group most had problems at the start and got better as time progressed. I think the files should be rated on the quality and not on the packing format personally.


Posted by EViL-EWoK on 04-07-2007 09:21 PM:

8/8/8

I LIKE PIEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!

__________________
I Just Want to Be like Radiohead, And do something ingenious.


Posted by CANES1 on 04-08-2007 01:09 AM:

So once and for all. Is it or is it not a TC?
Isn't there some kind of forensic analysis someone could do to find out for sure?


Posted by signum on 04-08-2007 01:29 AM:

not tc!
is Super-TS

__________________
la dolce vita


Posted by DaDirtiest on 04-09-2007 01:34 AM:

This is definitely the same source as PUKKA proper, this group should be scene banned, every release I've seen from them is a re-encode and it's nuked. ROCK4HYM is dickriding them so bad, he's probably their star member. Good job on the crappy re-encodes with out of sync audio.

Don't waste your bandwidth on this folks, the proper PUKKA release is much better, and I had people believing IT was a TC, not this crapper.


Posted by kelnar on 04-09-2007 11:28 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Rock4HYM
This very clearly is not a TS... it is a TC.



wow, you just won the first prize for being a noob.
so, everyone else is wrong, and you are the only one who thinks this is a tc, so you must be right and we are all wrong?
so u seriously can't tell it's just the same video as pukkas only made brighter? wow then you should seriously stop downloading these now.
do u work for PROP3R or something? because either you are...
a.) completely full of shit
b.) blind as a bat
c.) retarded


pukkas might be darker, but pukkas is not a re encode, and it is way smoother video and all in sync. my friends all think the pukka one is a dvdrip who i lent it to. if i gave them this one, even my noob friends who dont know anything about nothing could tell this is an inferior try hard copy.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:57 AM.
Show all 23 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.