VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Stardust *XviD* - TELECINE - mVs (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=78682)

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes

* Haven't read the forum rules? Want to play Russian roulette with your forum account?
READ THIS TO AVOID BEING BANNED


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Since R5 popped up, telecines are kind of rare, so it pretty nice to have an telecine of this movie.

This is indeed good. So rated as a telecine:

V - 8
A - 6
M - 10

Video is really good but Audio could be better, comparing with DELAY's audio there isn't much difference.

This release can easily be watched.

TC? mmm....maybe, but not great. Audio cuts out at start of credits. Have seen better TS. brightness too high, and not a sharp image at all. As TC

V 6
A 6
m ? good cast, looks interesting

Just finished watching.

For a TC....

Video seemed too bright , but also too dark in dark scenes , clear enough to watch on my 37" , watchable though i think this is a TS.
v = 7

Audio was loud , bass seemed a bit distorted , also constant thump noise in the backgorund (but not to bad)
a = 7

Movie was good , also pretty funny (DeNiro made me laugh)
m=8

__________________
hardcore will never die!!!!!!!!

Looks more like a Tc of good Ts if you get my drift
Ratings as Tc

Video/6 fuzzy
Audio/5 too bassy over filtered
Movie/? looking forward to this 1 heard some good reports

__________________
Getting Old but not that Old Yet

just finished watching this and more than watchable.
Is a bit bright and a little dark now and again but not enough to ruin watching it. Audio is fine just seems a bit quiet in places but nothing the volume didn't sort out.

Watched on 32" lcd

V= 7 (very watchable)

A= 7 (little low and had a funny knocking noise through out)

M=7 (not bad made a nice change and de niro was funny)

Would be a very nice TS, but rated as a TC:
v 6
a 6 (distorted, direct though- not the best imho)

Will wait for R5

From 2 rars. Haven't seen a TC for so long forget a little how to rate versus TS's, R5's, your assortment of Rips, Screeners, and anything else. So will focus on watchability which is the only thing 99.9% of the people visiting the site care about anyway.

A bit bright resulting in washed out colors. Resolution fine. Sound slightly bass less. Best out so far though. For $65 million budget and superb reviews from those supposedly in the know this release of movie good enough to view.

7.5/7/?

It isn't the geatest TC, but it's a whole lot better then anything else which was released before it. Sound is fine, not full, but fine. Video is better then a TS, so enjoy it or wait for the DVD.

V-8
A-7
M-7

Any of you also looked at the .nfo

As for the quality, its looking allot better then the previous source, and the sound is also. But that's just judging from the sample..

I love this genre
tc rated
v 7
a 6
m 8

chill mvs, your a fool if you let comments from others come so close

__________________
*
Don't steal!. The government hates competition.

Rated as a real TC and not the mislabled R5's we used to get early last year.


v: 6 (Bright in light scenes Dark in darkish scenes , grainy)

a: 7

this is a good old TC not an r5.. just TC and a nice one for a TC..

pic 7+
sound 7

movie donno but i;ll find that out soon..

as far as i care...

MVS ROCKS!!!

thncxx for an awsome release and as for labeling .. well thats just for the sheep

and u know what they do with sheep..

V 6 - rated as Telecine
A 5 - some strange noises in it
M ? - dunno, stopped watching after some minutes

Unfortunately mVs are too fucking dumb to differentiate between VCDQ members reviewing the quality of a release and besmirching their good reputation.

Hey mVs, we know you can only release what you have, if we say it's shitty fucking quality it isn't a reflection on you, just an honest evaluation of the "watchability" of it... You palsied cum-gargling fuckholes

V - 6
A - 6
M - ?

__________________
Statistically... 9 out of 10 people actually enjoy gang rape.

Weirdest looking TELECINE to me. Seems to have been ripped from a poor film reel. Also looks similar to a TELESYNC maVen would release though with slight more flickering. Audio sounds like TELESYNC though the releases itself is very good. Picture wise, you can see everything, audio wise, you can hear everything and then some for some reason. Not a bad release though not exactly DVD quality. Still best copy of this film out to date, all of whom who dire to see this now, watch this one...

Not a bad release but some might want to hold out for SCR

V-6 Dark
A-5 low for me. Difficult to hear in quiet scenes
M-* Gonna go watch it after I get fisted by my father.

If this is a TS and ont a TC, then it would be pretty much the first TS (which is in essence a CAM with direct audio) I`ve ever seen, to have:-

A) The Correct AR.

B) Correct picture Geometry.
(IE not from any angle, so if it were a TS then the camera was about 10ft in the air from the theater floor)

C) Credits all the way to the end.

The picture clarity is comparable to the TC of 1408, all of which say TC to me rather than TS.

Audio is quiet and slightly sparse sounding but other than that is pretty clear.

As a TC:

V:7
A:6
M:7

...the tone of the movie reminds me of Tim Burton or the new ABC show Pushing Daisies...

Quality wise.. ITS BAD. This is not a TC. Its like a TS thats been brightened, colors are faded and objects are blurry in the background. Audio is horrible. I seen the same thing done with transformers on here. Some how they turned up the contrast and its just too annoying to watch.

__________________
My Burnt Dvd's are my sig.

Deffo not a TC and im supprised that its not been nuked. Even with there NFO stating that we cant judge the quality on here.

TC would not have a flickering sky like a cam/ts the sky shots would be clear..

As a TC

V.4
A.7
M.unwatched ill wait for a better release...

BAD QUALITY!

Believe me , it's really really bad for a TC.
The only explanation for this, assuming that it is a TC (which i doubt), is that the source reel was badly damaged.

People who rate this release above average don't know what a TC is. I've seen cams more watchable than this



Video 4
Audio 3
Movie: will wait for better release

Looks like mVs have dedicated a few lines of their NFO to you

quote:

---

We are already laughing at the comments on various gay hangouts (Hi I'm a member on vcdq forums and know fuck all about fuck all, but I think this is a ( choose one --> CAM\DVD\TS\R5\SCR ). When I am not writing shit that i know nothing about, I like to hang in #2,000 or get fisted by my father, just before teatime.)

As per usual we tag our releases correctly, because we KNOW our source. So any nukers wanting to claim otherwise, feel free to do so. Next nfo you never know, we may make you famous !!!

---

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by Uke
Looks like mVs have dedicated a few lines of their NFO to you

---