VCDQuality Forums - Without A Paddle *SVCD* *NFOFIX* - TELECINE

Show all 25 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Without A Paddle *SVCD* *NFOFIX* - TELECINE - fbC (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=46089)

Posted by Rep- on 08-31-2004 11:23 PM:

Without A Paddle *SVCD* - TELECINE - fbC

not very good quality for a TC, but the movie looks like shit anyways, so whatever... 5/6/x

definitely looks more like a TS than a TC...

Posted by vip3r on 08-31-2004 11:27 PM:

Well, it does say "silver video," so you shouldn't expect much of it, i mean TC's are usually homemade..o well. Good movie.

I'm gonna have to agree on the nuke, mislabeled.ts.or.re-encode.of.tun
It's probably a reencode of TUN's release, but this is uber shitty, i'll pass for sure

4.5/6/8

Posted by fytypy on 08-31-2004 11:35 PM:

wow quick nuke

Posted by neatz on 08-31-2004 11:36 PM:

um wtf tuns video all motiony flicker wow now this is lame give us a pal copy

__________________
why bitch about the cost just switch to dvd-r "dam-it"

Posted by diekund on 08-31-2004 11:37 PM:

there is no way in hell this is a tc, not in the slightest. this has a flicker on it, just like TUN's home cam, making me think it mite even be their video. its got shit colours, blocky, grainy and just terrible. the audio has a hissy buzz on it and is in no way DTS. i knew from the second i saw fBC it would be a nuke.

4/4/?

Posted by Miller on 08-31-2004 11:53 PM:

Without.A.Paddle.SVCD.TC-fbC was [NUKED] ::: 23m 14s :::
reason mislabeled.ts.or.re-encode.of.tun :::

anyway this is deff not a TC. not to bad but its not better then tuns rls . video is decient at best . audio is nice the no issues. only get to watch the first 3 rar's since it got nuked, so i may be wrong. movie was really funny

6/7/8 as a ts

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!

Posted by AvaLoN on 08-31-2004 11:55 PM:

ROFL MAo!! Enough said?

4 / 4 / 8

Posted by psyche on 09-01-2004 12:22 AM:

not really a comment on the release but a comment on the film itself, it may seem like a shitty movie but it had my rolling on the floor in the theatre. don't pass it up cause it's hilarious (but of course as with all things that start off good, the ending r the sux).

Posted by nakid on 09-01-2004 12:22 AM:

3/4/7

Posted by crawleygreen on 09-01-2004 01:03 AM:

REP dont know shit hes posting on samples .............. get movies from right source or do you wanna advertise all the time no one clicks your links

Posted by Miller on 09-01-2004 01:27 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by crawleygreen
REP dont know shit hes posting on samples .............. get movies from right source or do you wanna advertise all the time no one clicks your links

many many people post on samples. i don't use my credits to download a full rls that i have already seen i just download the sample, unless the new rls is better then the one i have . so maybe you should calm down and don't bash people

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!

Posted by Rep- on 09-01-2004 01:47 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by crawleygreen
REP dont know shit hes posting on samples .............. get movies from right source or do you wanna advertise all the time no one clicks your links

wtf? Everyone rates movies by the samples. That is what samples are made for. Do you think everyone on the forums downloads the movie and checks out the quality afterwards? wtf? 1 minute is plenty for me to decide how the quality of the video and audio is.

and for your information, people do click my links... sorry to burst your bubble.

Also, these forums are for posting on QUALITY, not flaming other people, especially when the other people are right.

Posted by bcool2k on 09-01-2004 02:03 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Miller
Without.A.Paddle.SVCD.TC-fbC was [NUKED] ::: 23m 14s :::
reason mislabeled.ts.or.re-encode.of.tun :::

anyway this is deff not a TC. not to bad but its not better then tuns rls . video is decient at best . audio is nice the no issues. only get to watch the first 3 rar's since it got nuked, so i may be wrong. movie was really funny

6/7/8 as a ts

I agree completely except...why did u rate it a 6 for Video.LMFAO..And A 8 if u didn't watch it...We arent' rating TUN's rls here...More like...4.5/6/Dunno only saw first 3 rars...

Posted by Miller on 09-01-2004 02:07 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by bcool2k
I agree completely except...why did u rate it a 6 for Video.LMFAO..And A 8 if u didn't watch it...We arent' rating TUN's rls here...More like...4.5/6/Dunno only saw first 3 rars...

um 8 becuase i already seen the movie. a rls from a diffrent group but its still the same movie , it even has the same actors :P
as for the video its becuase its no improvment

i really do wish people would stop looking for stuff in other peoples post to rant about. if a person post on quality/audio and you don't agree with it and what to rant at them their is this feature called PM

oh this is not directed to you bcool2k just diden't want to make two poitless posts

enough!~
/end rant

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!

Posted by Bakkoda on 09-01-2004 03:16 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by AvaLoN
ROFL MAo!! Enough said?

Yes. About both you and the movie.

I once said Lillard couldnt mke a bad movie. But I guess after gems like SLC everyones entitled to one paycheck movie.

Movie - 5

Audio - 7... isnt that bad but has some hollowness to it. Easily fixed.

Vid - 3... sucks. makes me kind of sick to my stomach. dark, flickery and just shity in general.

Posted by frak on 09-01-2004 09:13 AM:

out of curiosity, what is meant by "silver"?

can't find a definition of it anywhere.

anyhow, from the sample, it looks just like tun's source.
it's almost like they tried to framerate convert, and mixed
field orders and then tried to correct it after.

shame, I'm still waiting for a good cut of this flick, it looks
funny.

-f

Posted by tigerwlf on 09-01-2004 09:41 AM:

to rep and miller in particular, but moreover anyone that posts on samples

the only problem about posting about a sample is you are posting on a sample which means if part of the movie is cut you won't know that. If half way through the movie there is an audio artifact you won't know that. You won't always notice a flicker in a sample.

Say you post saying the release 10/10 and is perfect based off the sample, what you missed was that 15 minutes of the movie was gone. (this is an example folks, not a comment on this particular release).

Posted by corvex on 09-01-2004 02:48 PM:

Hmm, i thought some other grp would have rls'ed this one by now, its not stated in their .nfo but im sur they labeled it as TC so others could finaly make a decent TS out of it....could be wrong thow just a thougt.

TC Rating 2/2/7
(Obvious) TS Rating 4/4/7

Movie is quite funny.

__________________
eat, live , breathe : VCD

Posted by firefighter on 09-01-2004 05:06 PM:

Took me a bit , just watched rars & sample before i just read fbC's nfo and i cant stop laughing.

fbC you are my dumbass of the week!

frak - out of curiosity, what is meant by "silver"?
Silver is a movie in which was cammed with a cheap NTSC Camera. Usually audience laughing , people moving in front of camera and blocky/pixelated and even interlaced picture. The Cammer then races home after filmed and with no encoding job what so ever to make the movie pretty, throws the movie onto a DVDR and hits the streets. Time is money ... Silver are ok or watchable at best but never a keeper as picture quality is always lacking.

Back to fbC! The even state in their nfo that the source is Silver + DTS Audio. Well Silver + Direct audio = VCD TELESYNC *at best*. Where the hell they got TELECINE outta this is beyond me. Gj fbC for wasting out time on this release!

Onto the "Quality", Sound is good, Picture isnt.
One Word - AVOiD

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!

Posted by Dodgy Del on 09-01-2004 10:29 PM:

prob the worst telecine i've seen. better waiting on another release of this one.

Posted by DigitaLSD on 09-01-2004 10:58 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by firefighter
Took me a bit , just watched rars & sample before i just read fbC's nfo and i cant stop laughing.

fbC you are my dumbass of the week!

frak - out of curiosity, what is meant by "silver"?
Silver is a movie in which was cammed with a cheap NTSC Camera. Usually audience laughing , people moving in front of camera and blocky/pixelated and even interlaced picture. The Cammer then races home after filmed and with no encoding job what so ever to make the movie pretty, throws the movie onto a DVDR and hits the streets. Time is money ... Silver are ok or watchable at best but never a keeper as picture quality is always lacking.

Back to fbC! The even state in their nfo that the source is Silver + DTS Audio. Well Silver + Direct audio = VCD TELESYNC *at best*. Where the hell they got TELECINE outta this is beyond me. Gj fbC for wasting out time on this release!

Onto the "Quality", Sound is good, Picture isnt.
One Word - AVOiD

A silver is ANY Movie Pirated to a DVD5, can be any source that is not DVD actually, not just a cam or a TS... Silver is a generic term for a pirated copy, usually silvers stem from cams yes, or sometimes Asian TC's or Russian TC's... But a Silver can also be VHSRip, Lazerdisc Rip, TC, TS, or any other format you can think of that was pressed to a DVD From a pirated source...

Posted by Miller on 09-03-2004 09:48 PM:

Re: to rep and miller in particular, but moreover anyone that posts on samples

quote:
Originally posted by tigerwlf
the only problem about posting about a sample is you are posting on a sample which means if part of the movie is cut you won't know that. If half way through the movie there is an audio artifact you won't know that. You won't always notice a flicker in a sample.

Say you post saying the release 10/10 and is perfect based off the sample, what you missed was that 15 minutes of the movie was gone. (this is an example folks, not a comment on this particular release).

yes your right the sample usually doesn't show mistakes. now since this was directed at me and rep i'lll let you know a little somthing. i don't have the time to scan threw every rls i get also if the release ends up with messed up parts i post again once i watch the full rls ,second of all if a movie is utter shit i download the sample, since i don't wast my credits on crap

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!

Posted by damitssam on 09-05-2004 02:26 AM:

this is no telecine! Dam this is a subpar telesync!!

4/3/5 movie wuz aite

fbc if u realase your movies can u actually label them correctly?

thx.

Posted by frak on 09-06-2004 03:29 AM:

vcd, maven, etc.. anytime guys.

every version of this to date as been unwatchable.

Posted by paleh0rse on 09-07-2004 06:45 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by frak
vcd, maven, etc.. anytime guys.

every version of this to date as been unwatchable.

*cough*...what he said!...*cough*

__________________
-paleh0rse-

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:01 PM.

Show all 25 posts from this thread on one page