VCDQuality Forums - Diary Of A Mad Black Woman *SVCD* - TELESYNC

Show all 25 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Diary Of A Mad Black Woman *SVCD* - TELESYNC - ORACLE (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=59939)

Posted by Surfsnake2 on 03-15-2005 11:12 PM:

big improvement from robots, although a bit grainy, and i seem to notice some flickering in the sample
4.5.0/8/?
FS....
reAd down to reconsinder dling

__________________
~LaZy~
rar!

Posted by IRC_Moviefan on 03-15-2005 11:35 PM:

Ok , it has to be said , i know some groups will do anything for credit , but ORACLE is getting outta hand ...

4 releases , all have been useless, as there copy's of EXACT the same movie are already out.

History:

Diary.Of.A.Mad.Black.Woman.TS.SVCD-ORACLE
Diary.Of.A.Mad.Black.Woman.iNTERNAL.TS.SVCD-DiGiCON (2 weeks prior)

Robots.TS-ORACLE
Robots.Internal.ts-STN

Hitch.PROPER.SVCD.TS-ORACLE
Hitch.SVCD.TELESYNC-POT

Cursed.TS.SVCD-ORACLE
Cursed.VCD.TELESYNC-COBRA

Diary Of A Mad Black Woman - Exact same silver, sound, flicker .. everything as DiGiCON, difference between the two? DiGiCON is iNTERNAL.

Robots - Exact Same picture and Sound as STN (stolen, renamed rars , and repacked)

Hitch - Once again , exact same silver as POT, proper with the exact same copy .. wtf!!!

Cursed - Exact same copy as COBRA's , only difference was COBRA was MPEG1 (VCD), and ORACLE was MPEG2 (SVCD)

ORACLE basically is the rape credit grp so far from what i have seen, all they do is take previous copies and change the format , or take iNTERNAL's (which should be iNTERNAL) and release them anyways.

DiGiCON's release , even thought it was iNTERNAL did spread ...

ORACLE releases's, so far. have been a waste of time , bandwidth , space ...

Im not tryin to bash the grp here vcdQ modz , im just stating the obvious facts for all the users who are gonna also waste their time & bandwidth, all because 1 group just wants credit of a release which is already out.

Quality!

Dark , Flickery , FullScreen , on a major angle .. only thing good going for this release is the sound which we all had 2 weeks ago when DiGiCON released it. Usual Silver and reason why DiGiCON iNTERNAL'd

3/9/?

Posted by charliechan100 on 03-15-2005 11:57 PM:

I must agree here,encode's of same movies without even making the movie better to view,avoid this at all costs.
3/7/7

Posted by ilickb4istik on 03-16-2005 12:12 AM:

I AGREE LOW QUALITY-SAME RELEASE NO BETTER-WAIT FOR SOMETHING BETTER
VIDEO-4
AUDIO-7
MOVIE-9

WADE K'S MOVIES SUCK

Posted by conagra100 on 03-16-2005 12:30 AM:

this is not worth D/L but do as you please..

This is ok but i think you cannot copy others and take credit come on WTF this is a no brainer dont download

Posted by Suplyndmnd on 03-16-2005 02:50 AM:

RE: IRC_MovieFan

You bring up very good points and seem to back up your arguement. This does seem like a shotty group who shouldn't even have their releases reported here IMHO. I'm all against bashing groups but if you're gonna steal other peoples work as your own, then you deserve what you get.

Posted by xXRomeoXx on 03-16-2005 03:57 AM:

Have to admit improvement since Robots.. 6/8/?

Posted by yucatan on 03-16-2005 05:21 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by xXRomeoXx
Have to admit improvement since Robots.. 6/8/?

what improvement??? the robots release was the same as stn's? this group should be scene banned!

Posted by bcool2k on 03-16-2005 05:27 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by IRC_Moviefan
Ok , it has to be said , i know some groups will do anything for credit , but ORACLE is getting outta hand ...

4 releases , all have been useless, as there copy's of EXACT the same movie are already out.

History:

Diary.Of.A.Mad.Black.Woman.TS.SVCD-ORACLE
Diary.Of.A.Mad.Black.Woman.iNTERNAL.TS.SVCD-DiGiCON (2 weeks prior)

Robots.TS-ORACLE
Robots.Internal.ts-STN

Hitch.PROPER.SVCD.TS-ORACLE
Hitch.SVCD.TELESYNC-POT

Cursed.TS.SVCD-ORACLE
Cursed.VCD.TELESYNC-COBRA

Diary Of A Mad Black Woman - Exact same silver, sound, flicker .. everything as DiGiCON, difference between the two? DiGiCON is iNTERNAL.

Robots - Exact Same picture and Sound as STN (stolen, renamed rars , and repacked)

Hitch - Once again , exact same silver as POT, proper with the exact same copy .. wtf!!!

Cursed - Exact same copy as COBRA's , only difference was COBRA was MPEG1 (VCD), and ORACLE was MPEG2 (SVCD)

ORACLE basically is the rape credit grp so far from what i have seen, all they do is take previous copies and change the format , or take iNTERNAL's (which should be iNTERNAL) and release them anyways.

DiGiCON's release , even thought it was iNTERNAL did spread ...

ORACLE releases's, so far. have been a waste of time , bandwidth , space ...

Im not tryin to bash the grp here vcdQ modz , im just stating the obvious facts for all the users who are gonna also waste their time & bandwidth, all because 1 group just wants credit of a release which is already out.

Quality!

Dark , Flickery , FullScreen , on a major angle .. only thing good going for this release is the sound which we all had 2 weeks ago when DiGiCON released it. Usual Silver and reason why DiGiCON iNTERNAL'd

3/9/?

An Excellent Review, and while i usually like to give credit where credit is due. This group does NOT even bother to give credit to the groups that they steal from. This is waste of bandwith stolen silver. FS dark and flickery throughout garbage and it hopefully will be NUKED very soon. Thumbs down ORACLE

4/7/Awaiting a better release.

Posted by rascallion on 03-16-2005 05:32 AM:

its cheating really! we could all have our own group if thats how easy it is

Posted by xXRomeoXx on 03-16-2005 06:16 AM:

Have you guys ever thought that it's the same silver as DiGiCON's, or NBPS?.. You know they are sold in NYC thousands of people have access to them.. Doesn't mean its stolen

Posted by bigbug41 on 03-16-2005 06:23 AM:

If its a better copy !!!

Come on guys this is no better than whats out there I guess some people just want there names up in lights

Nice try anyway

3/7/6

Posted by Califax on 03-16-2005 06:28 AM:

People like to call everything a silver, besides if it sais so in a nfo how do you tell?

Posted by gregtheman on 03-16-2005 06:43 AM:

what a shame to see yet another poor copy from this group, stolen or not this is just poor

Posted by IRC_Moviefan on 03-16-2005 06:49 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by rascallion
its cheating really! we could all have our own group if thats how easy it is

Irony - Pirates stealing from Pirates !

Well guys (or) gals , i never ment to start a thread bashing this group over "possible" stolen movies.

Robots was stolen and quite obvious as STN had an "ice age intro" and ORACLE didnt even bother to take it out ...

As for Cursed , Hitch , and now Diary Of A Mad Black Woman, all 3 movies came from *Silvers* Sources , and as we all know ... Silvers are a dime a dozen.

I was just pointing out the fact that this is exactly the reason why theres a rule in the movie releasing dept "You cannot proper on quality" , or we get 10 copies of the exact same movie as the next grp over might think they can encode better. (seems latley we get 3 copies of the exact same silver anyway, CAM , VCD TS & SVCD TS)

ORACLE on the other hand, released these 4 movies listed above, and there were EXACT same as copies already out. I mean they didnt even improve the picture quality (silvers are a bitch to cleanup anyway). So Same picture quality , same sound quality as previous copies out .....

Why bother ? .... gotta earn that leech somehow

I was just trying to save all the users reading this time time & bandwidth of downloading this release (as mentioned) , as its useless ...

Oh ! .. one more thing i couldnt pass up !

quote:
Originally posted by xXRomeoXx
Have to admit improvement since Robots.. 6/8/?

Votes for Diary Of A Mad Black Woman *SVCD* by ORACLE
xXRomeoXx 8 10 n/a

?????? *scratches head* ...

Posted by on 03-16-2005 08:42 AM:

5/8/6

and wtf is this grp thinking. why would anyone affill with such nonsense.

Posted by uRMoM.=P on 03-16-2005 08:51 AM:

testORACLE

I tried to not comment on releases since thare are tons of people who do on a regular basis. However.... I just couldnt resist to put in my 2cents..

1. Groups like this should be banned. Allowing and accepting their releases just encourages other kiddies to follow in their shameless and sorry foot steps. Taking someone elses work and claiming it to be your own (STN's robots) or taking an already released silver and re-releasing it for the second or third time, because they think they can encode better (which obviously they cant) is just lame; Its a waist of time, bandwith and a poor attempt to make a name for yourself. Props to the STNs, FTFs, POTs, COBRAs, UTis, MaTinEs and anyother group out there who provide us with the best quality available to them, weather it be their hard work at producing a home made cam or quickness at re-encoding a silver. They may not provide the best quality, but they certainly deserve better than a no name, no shame, no brain group like oracle to take their work and claim it their own.
2. read 1 again!

So in closure... read 1 again

__________________
Bangin your mom since '98

Posted by jugsta on 03-16-2005 10:13 AM:

as it has been said...same everything as Digicon...so props to them ...
i personally dont have beef with if someone "steals" a release or combines video from one and audio from another IF ...IF! it brings about a better final product for the scene....
but deceit should not be tolerated, but dont worry site admins dont let this go on too.
i would be 100% behind oracle in their actions if they actually improved the movies...they didnt...so from me...they get the finger!

Posted by Dodgy Del on 03-16-2005 11:54 AM:

don't even consider grabbing this one. nothing going for it at all.

__________________
Lets praise all the groups out there who make this scene for what it's worth because if we didn't then we'd all be spending a fortune at the pics.Remember to practice SAFE SEX (as illistrated in the pic).

Posted by moby008 on 03-16-2005 12:17 PM:

Calling Oracle a "group" is too much honor for them
Stealing other peoples movies and renaming and repacking it isn' t right
You could atleast have tried to improve the quality, but even that was too much effort for you to do

3/7/?

Posted by IRC_Moviefan on 03-16-2005 06:46 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by xXRomeoXx
Have you guys ever thought that it's the same silver as DiGiCON's, or NBPS?.. You know they are sold in NYC thousands of people have access to them.. Doesn't mean its stolen

Exactly , doesnt mean it stolen yes , as i said , silvers are a dime a dozen.

But the grp must have some brains and realises that, as you said:

quote:
Have you guys ever thought that it's the same silver as DiGiCON's, or NBPS?..

They have to realise its the same silver, they (ORACLE) dont improve the picture & sound quality . So why waste our times ? Leechers like myself dont want to download 5 copies of the exact same silver , especially if there is no improvement to the video like all of ORACLE's releases.

All ORACLE is releasing for is not for improvements on the video , but as i said , earning that leech spot ..... what a joke.

Posted by OLD_DRUNK~SAM on 03-18-2005 11:46 PM:

poor quality not worth the get 3/4/9

__________________

Posted by vcdking24 on 03-20-2005 07:26 AM:

Finally came across a copy of this. I cant understand the comments on this. its a pretty nice reencode of digi's. its the best copy out there and not deservant of the scores given.

7/7/7

Posted by Da Youngloada on 03-21-2005 01:52 PM:

UTTER SHIT

Posted by lindoors on 03-21-2005 06:35 PM:

this movie was SHIT.dont matter about the quality of this one.

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:38 PM.

Show all 25 posts from this thread on one page