VCDQuality Forums
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Be Cool - TELESYNC - STN (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=56281)


Posted by Surfsnake2 on 03-05-2005 11:44 PM:

absolute shit, looks like a terrible cam, maybe nuked?


Posted by Freeder on 03-05-2005 11:47 PM:

Ugh... what a turnaround from The.Jacket :P

Well... where to start. Video is SO washed out, you can barely see anything. Like looking into a snowstorm

Audio isn't too hot either... there's a nice sized hum in the background, looks like if it's not a CAM, they took the audio from a mono armrest source or something.

I would definitely pass on this one.

3/4/?

Enjoy

-Uncle Freeder


Posted by fellatio on 03-05-2005 11:51 PM:

very crappy ...

Crap and already been nuked ... REASON: washed.vid.damaged.buzzing.audio.esp.stn-bc2.r38.mpg

Even so, one of the ugliest TS's I have seen recently ... Nice try but I would def. pass on this one


Posted by Dodgy Del on 03-05-2005 11:51 PM:

Thumbs down

best passing on this one. not one good thing to say about this release. very poor!!!

__________________
Lets praise all the groups out there who make this scene for what it's worth because if we didn't then we'd all be spending a fortune at the pics.Remember to practice SAFE SEX (as illistrated in the pic).


Posted by se7ensoftware on 03-06-2005 12:01 AM:

well if this ins't a CAM then the sound is direct from some of the most craptacular handicappable jacks ever

the pic wasn't that bad, if the audio wasn't total crap could have been a decent release.

If you want to watch this? Which most everyone should. i say PASS!

5/1/?


Posted by bob0r on 03-06-2005 12:05 AM:

v:3.a:3.m..

..not watched, but quality is so bad, i go to the cinema.


Posted by Mongoloid on 03-06-2005 01:04 AM:

I'm in a good mood so i'll give em more than they deserve :

2/2/might be funny


Posted by travisz on 03-06-2005 01:41 AM:

Thumbs down

Maybe it was capped from one of those video camera phones


Posted by MistahQ on 03-06-2005 02:11 AM:

v:2 a:2 m:cant even watch it


Posted by Kick on 03-06-2005 03:04 AM:

No thanks on this also its been nuked bad sfv on disk 2 ah well better luck next time anyways quality juged from sample um lets see

2/3/???


Posted by bcool2k on 03-06-2005 04:58 AM:

Muddy Video and Terrible Audio. Oh well i just saw this film in theatres and it was well worth it. Definitely AVOID this Release at ALL COSTS...


3/4/9 Based on Full Viewing of the movie in the theatres ENJOY


Posted by AreaZeroOne on 03-06-2005 05:53 AM:

Video: 4

Washed out colors. Yes you can view it , but why force yourself through such bad quality?

Audio: 4

Sounds as if there's a sweater over your speakers and you can't get it off.

Movie: 7

It wasn't comedy gold , but it was funny. The Rock , I thought , was hilarious.


Posted by BGspoonz1 on 03-06-2005 10:02 AM:

I know there are kudos for being first...
But why be first with a total waste of bandwidth?

V = Butt
A = eewww
M = ?

__________________
Remember when u too were a NooB?


Posted by sportsfan99 on 03-06-2005 11:00 AM:

3\3\?

HAHA....

video - it's like viewing through a dirty windshield. It's pure shit. Blurry, contrast is messed up. Looks like really old-school bootleg.

audio - considering 99% TS's have DTS-source audio nowadays (this being the 1\100), I'm surprised the group went on and released this. I've heard cam-audio that's better.

Edit:
3 for a TS audio from sample - I can make out the words what Travolta is saying to the bikini bitch. But as obvious it should be on the low end of the scale cuz it ain't DTS-sourced.


Posted by Neversoft on 03-06-2005 11:35 AM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN IT)

6 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

7 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE FORCED TO WATCH ALL OF THIS RELEASE ***


Posted by brewbackups on 03-06-2005 01:26 PM:

Cell Phone

My cell phone could have done a better job recording this.

2/2/7


Posted by proto on 03-06-2005 05:25 PM:

Thumbs down

well what can i say...this release is terrible. video is washed and bright, and audio isn't much better

from sample: 4/4/?

__________________
proto


Posted by Suplyndmnd on 03-06-2005 05:58 PM:

Well, I always fuss at people who dont watch the whole release and then post their comments but I dont think it's possible with this release

Video - 2 - If you're absolutely, positively, without a doubt DYING to see this movie and you HAVE to watch it RIGHT NOW. Grab this release. But be warned the video is definately washed and hardly watchable. Heck, it may even cause eye damage

Audio - 2 - Like stated previously it's hard to explain other than it's just crap. I'm thinking if the source was direct then maybe the jack wasn't all the way in possibly.

Movie - ? - I haven't seen it yet because I had to work Friday morning ((That's when I go to movies so there's noone else there)) but I will be seeing it Monday morning I guess. I couldn't finish watching this release but the movie looks rightly nice.

*Edited*

Deerr, forgot my ratings
Video - 2 - Because there was infact a picture and that's it

Audio - 2 - Same as video. There was infact audio

Movie - ? - Not seen


Posted by Movieman420 on 03-06-2005 06:10 PM:

Guess the race is more important than the rep. I'd rather lose the race than be associated with this kind of quality. But of course I'm not the one taking the risk, so I'll just stick to the rating...

2/3/?

__________________


Posted by Muzak on 03-06-2005 08:33 PM:

barf.


its still amazes me how far the scene has come in the last few years. just 4 or 5 years ago, people woulda crapped themselves over the "quality" of this, lmao.

lets hear it for better cameras!!

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
ok, well in future when you join a community that is very anti-sellers, you really should choose a username that isn't going to cause confusion and annoyance. its like joinin an arabic forum with the name BUSHRULES because you like the australian outback.


Posted by Zipomatic on 03-06-2005 09:06 PM:

I was looking at the comments here thinking that as usual people were being way too harsh on a release (which is usually the case) so I took a look at this one. Seems you are all right. Pic is washed out, it IS watchable but only if you are desperate.

I can't figure the sound. It should be good with this release being a TS and all, but man... it sounds muffled almost, and on CD2 a buzz comes into play which gets so loud you can't hear the audio on the movie. Not good at all.

Video - 4
Audio - 3
Movie - Supposed to be bad, but we'll see eh?


Posted by deelite on 03-07-2005 12:19 AM:

Yikes.
Wait for a better one.
If you can't wait for a better copy, I guess this one will do.


Posted by weedchemist on 03-07-2005 05:20 AM:

hmm???

ok grabbed the sample a few hours ago and im not quite sure what went on with this one, but the contrast is all whacked and color saturation needs to be turned up and adjusted with the contrast, i turned my friends, usually dark monitor down about 3/4 way and it didnt look too bad, some1 had said it looks like an old bootleg and id have to agree, but im not sure if thats the silver that was so bad, or the encoding, cuz 2 me it looks like alot of the haze over the film is added by encode problems... oh well, as for the audio hmm the sample was bad and ppl said it gets worse toward the end..? wow shoulda had some filters, as it sounds like a rusty headphone jack or something... eitherway this is a 1st rls, take it and do some adjustments in an encode prog and u may have a 1/2 way watchable rls, but not in its present state... 4/5/? <-wanna see but not this 1


Posted by Wehrmacht on 03-07-2005 11:17 AM:

The horror... the horror.

I wonder if the cammer hid the camera in a plastic shopping bag while he filmed?

V - 2
A - 3
M - Turned it off in disgust. Not at the movie itself, mind you.


Posted by Da Postman on 03-13-2005 09:36 AM:

Finally able to download cd1. I was hoping this would be better than all the ratings. Most raters have a habit of giving lower scores than I feel is correct. Over the past 2 years, I've noticed a slant toward groups in one direction or another. That's OK, but this one I couldn't believe it was rated so low. Well, they are pretty damn correct here. I can't believe how the camera is so good on the spot with little cropping. All of it for waste, the video is very washed and it is hard to see. I think the colors could've been very good, but the white film over the screen destroys it. The sound has a hum throughout the disk. I could've handle this, but not with the bad video. How can they not encode this release again and lose such a top movie to this mistake?

V-3.5
A-5 (better than cam, but not saying much)
M-3


Posted by darrenw on 03-13-2005 08:37 PM:

not worth a d/l film un-watchable. wait few days untill ANYTHING else comes out 2/3/? this is why every1 hates cams?


Posted by lindoors on 03-19-2005 04:14 PM:

This was like watchin those TMD movies all over agian.total crap .waste of SHOT this was.... Terrible Audio.video is washed OUT.My 2 year old could have done a better job recording this/


Posted by Da Youngloada on 03-21-2005 05:09 PM:

What the uff is this?????????
Word of Advice. STN stop embarrassing yourself. You either have good quality or you dont. Stop releasing Shit

Stunner 1 Prodz


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:10 PM.
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.