VCDQuality Forums
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- King Kong *XviD* *PROPER* - TELECINE - PRODiGY (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=67960)


Posted by X69 on 12-30-2005 01:34 AM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by workz on 12-30-2005 01:36 AM:

[Nuked]
REASON-valid.proper.but_bad.ar_see.CD1.16s_oval-shaped.Earth

Meh

Audio best so far, video is much crisper than Asteroids

8/8/10


Posted by DvDSharer on 12-30-2005 01:59 AM:

Bad video quality!! Disregarded it...


Posted by crapper on 12-30-2005 02:11 AM:

very fine release best so far..

bad ar? havent seen that yet..

pic 9 better sharper
sound 8 much better and DIRECT AND NOT MIC like the other tc
movie well sucks monkeys
or maybe theres a dino in my slimy LOL

bad movie nice release..
keep em coming.. and as far as i care the best out there


Posted by gunitnucca on 12-30-2005 02:25 AM:

i dont see anything wrong with the asteroid rls as i watched it all last nite, yeh its cropped at the bottom....

still gives me no reason to download this.......hmm wondering why the asteroid one was nuked the other day? and today no nuke symbol?

and the prodigy one got nuked??


Posted by myndphuk on 12-30-2005 02:42 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by crapper
sound 8 much better and DIRECT AND NOT MIC like the other tc



The last releases were direct as well, it was recorded in true stereo (analyze the file for yourself and look)

8/7/?


Posted by pyroshady on 12-30-2005 03:03 AM:

Crapper man I think you may confuse what movie you seen cause king kong 2005 in no way sucked my friend. Best movie in a f'n long time my friend.

Video of this def. sharper
Audio 10 times better then ast.
Movie 10 straight up best movie since the titanic hands down.


Posted by noodles on 12-30-2005 03:15 AM:

Nice rls, video qual is pretty much the same as asteriods imo. AR is out slightly. Audio is considerably better.

7.5/8.5/8

__________________


Posted by CATBOX on 12-30-2005 04:04 AM:

I didn't notice the bad AR. Video is better than asteroids. The colors are more vibrant, and its a bit sharper. The audio sounds full, and is a definite improvement. Thanks for the quality stuff PRODiGY!

CATBOX


Posted by myndphuk on 12-30-2005 04:17 AM:

If you do a frequency analysis on both releases (asteroids + prodigy) you will notice that prodigy have actually used/stolen the audio from asteroids (how lame is that!!)..

Every spike + line noise after 16000 Hz is perfectly identical in both releases (and this is not the movie itself, its line noise!)

So basically... what can I say? They removed some bass, enhanced the mid-range and amplified the entire thing... It's what I would have done, but now I don't have to!

--mynd


Posted by yatri25 on 12-30-2005 05:48 AM:

Well the question I have for you all that have seen this is: what's the cropping like? Is it better or worse than Asteroids'?


Posted by overstayer on 12-30-2005 07:48 AM:

grabbed the sample from the prodigy TC and compared it with the asteroids tc and the same scene..

they looked exactly the same?

someone else might want to double check.


Posted by TheFool on 12-30-2005 09:56 AM:

ok ive checked both qualities on this one and ASTEROiDS

ASTEROiDS has the better video but you can bearly notice the difference. you have to look real hard to see which one is better. actually i compared 3 different scenes to find out. id give ASTEROiDS video a 8.7 out of 10 and PRODiGY's video a 9 out of 10

PRODiGY (this one) has the much better audio. ASTEROiDS's audio is muffled and very low. PRODiGY's is crisp, clear, and loud. id give PRODiGY's audio a 9 out of 10 and ASTEROiDS's auido an 7.5 out of 10.

out of the 2 releases, PRODiGY wins because of its audio.

rls-video/audio
PRODiGY- 8.7/9
ASTEROiDS- 9/7.5

id give the movie itself a 10 out of 10. its a must watch!


Posted by HBx2000 on 12-30-2005 11:46 AM:

@yatri25: It's the same. Check: hxxp://img510.imageshack.us/img510/2531/kk11yz.jpg

V=10, no more blurr in the far away shots.
A=9, great. To bad no AC3.
M=7, would have been higher. If they had cut the first 50 minutes. Feld like Titantic -in short- to me.


Posted by White Rabbit on 12-30-2005 02:27 PM:

yeh this is much better than asteroids which is good coz i didnt get round to downloading the full rls.

v 9.5 (super nice, much sharper than asteriods copy, richer colors, and the blacks are black rather than dark grey)

a 9 (clear and direct, theres none of that shit where they get cam audio and remove various frequencies of sound to pass it off as direct, resulting in radio quality sound)

m ? (STILL havent seen it, but hope to soon)

Overall it looks similar quality to the telecine of aeon flux in terms of picture, and the sound is better than most direct audio being put out by groups these days

thanks PRODiGY!!

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
the difference between compression and encoding is:

compression software works the same way as trying to get The 404, who is 350lbs, through a normal door. its method is to basically keep kicking The 404 until he gets thru the door. This works quickly, but leaves a nasty mess.

encoding software is the equivalent of The 404 going on a diet and walking thru the door. takes longer and sometimes more skill, but ultimately worth it.


Posted by yatri25 on 12-30-2005 03:57 PM:

Smile King.Kong.2005.PROPER.TC.XVID-PRODiGY is the best to date.

I don't care about the AR (Aspect Ratio) as much as over cropping as with the Asteroids release. I tweak the AR with the player when I watch movies, So AR aint no big deal to me.
One up for PRODiGY.

Remember these rating are in terms of TC.

Video 9 - Rich colors, sharp contrast the only flaw is some
________slight [encoding] ghosting around some objects. Easily
________the best video for this title to date.
Audio 10 - A very robust range of tones, strong volume, no
________noise. Easily the best audio for this title to date.
Movie 9 - A great version of King Kong. Not sure I liked the
________ending Mr Jackson.

PRODiGY, good on ya mates!
Supor Super


Posted by Achilles on 12-30-2005 05:18 PM:

Video 7 ( looks the same as Asteroids release to me )

Audio 9 (alot better Asteroids )

Movie 8 ( worth watching more than once but not an all time great for me)


Posted by PaND on 12-30-2005 05:54 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by White Rabbit
yeh this is much better than asteroids which is good coz i didnt get round to downloading the full rls.

v 9.5 (super nice, much sharper than asteriods copy, richer colors, and the blacks are black rather than dark grey)

a 9 (clear and direct, theres none of that shit where they get cam audio and remove various frequencies of sound to pass it off as direct, resulting in radio quality sound)

m ? (STILL havent seen it, but hope to soon)

Overall it looks similar quality to the telecine of aeon flux in terms of picture, and the sound is better than most direct audio being put out by groups these days

thanks PRODiGY!!



If you didn't download the full asteroids rls, how can you comment on it? You can't tell anything from samples.

__________________
BANNED! Just because I said "nub"? LOL! Oh, well... I guess Protektor is sucking the admins cocks.


Posted by efex172 on 12-30-2005 06:33 PM:

Video: Comparing it to Asteroids this one is actually a bit blurry, stretched vertically and slightly more colour added.


Posted by bobbish on 12-30-2005 11:46 PM:

prodigy's is cropped the exact same way...and has a bad AR too.

7/8/8

sorry, can't stand skinny ppl


Posted by tornado=[GSW] on 12-31-2005 12:55 AM:

best release of the movie so far. Audio and video are above par for the 15 minutes I watched, couldnt sit through another screening of this average movie. Somebody should erase LOTR from Jackson's memories, he is suffering from a LOTR hangover. Pretty good popcorn flick for the teen crowd though, so no wonder it is getting rave reviews

//end of rant

8/7/4


Posted by Eclipze on 12-31-2005 04:37 AM:

Shame on Prodigy for calling this a proper, they streched it and played with the sound and messed up Asteroids TC. I carefully looked at this in VirtualDub and by resizing Astroids TC they blurred it. VCDQuality got it right by Nuking it. I'll stick with Asteroids Thanks!


Posted by alluro on 12-31-2005 04:52 PM:

Good Quality

V: 8.5
A: 8.5
M: 8.5

Thanks a lot for this

Happy new year

Alluro


Posted by NoNe23 on 12-31-2005 10:49 PM:

Well I Just got this for the audio which i used with Asteroids/NBP's Video Source And Now i got a Nice Copy for myself and All In Sync

But anywayz the purpose of this release was for better audio...kinda surprise that Prodigy had found Direct Audio Cuz they have a hard time finding it for there releases

Video-8(Bad AR and Just sharpened The Pic from Asteroids)

Audio-9(Nice Direct And Better Than NBP's)

Movie-7

__________________
GGG-UnOt

THUGLIFE

MaKaVeLi All DaY


Posted by daveok on 12-31-2005 11:54 PM:

Sample looks best one so far. Grabbing it now, going to watch it tonight.


Happy New Year to all. 2006 looking good so far

__________________
Originally posted by 10ACJED
I thought The Rock was in this.... I did'nt see his name in the credits????

>>Stars ::
Karl Urban, Rosamund Pike, Deobia Oparei, Ben Daniels, Razaaq Adoti, Richard Brake, Al Weaver, Dexter Fletcher, Brian Steele, The Rock, Yao Chin, Robert Russell, Daniel York, Ian Hughes, Sara Houghton<<<<<

See No "The Rock" ??


Posted by scooter99 on 01-01-2006 04:26 AM:

Definitely the best release yet. So what if AR is slightly off. Most dvd players nowadays let you have whatever AR you want.

Video - 9

Audio - 9

Movie - 9


Posted by The CandyMan on 01-01-2006 04:59 PM:

Watched this last night on my stand alone and 65" widescreen, didn't notice any ar issue, (used expand format on tv which might have helped). Out of all the releases so far, this has much better audio than any of them including Asteroids. The best one to get so far.

V-8 ( a little bright in places)
A-8 (best out of all releases)
M-9 excellent, better than I thought it would be.

__________________


Posted by ZX3Junglist on 01-02-2006 11:51 PM:

Shame that it's been nuked. I understand scene rules, but good thing it's being propagated fairly well anyhow.

Definitely the best quality release. Does in fact have a slightly bad AR, check it on the univeral "earth" at the beginning, it's taller than wide. This certainly isn't noticable during playback. GSpot shows video of 608 x 256 which is 2.375:1

Video itself is decent for an hour and a hlaf per disc, but a bit bright and washed.

Audio is 2 channel (mp3) but very crisp, much more so then asteroids' which is windy and hissing. The only downside to the audio in this release is the lack of low bass. On a good system, the LFE channel doesn't slam when it should, which makes Kong's presence a bit diminished as compared with the theater's subbass, as it slams almost constantly in this movie.

Film itself is fantastic, although I'd have to say to make sure you see it on the big screen, it's worth it. or wait for the DVD if you have a good home theater. This one warrants a huge screen and a powerhouse system to do it justice.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:29 PM.
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.