VCDQuality Forums
Show all 29 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Skeleton Key *SVCD* - TELESYNC - FUCK (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=65631)


Posted by X69 on 08-17-2005 01:30 AM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS FILM!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN IT). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

6 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

7 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by Big on 08-17-2005 01:59 AM:

Sample looks good, nice colors. Audio, while decent, sounds a bit high-pitched to me. All in all good stuff!


V: 8
A: 7


Posted by Airhead on 08-17-2005 02:03 AM:

Thumbs down

This is the exact same as their CAM they released 2 weeks ago

All -FUCK and -LRC did was clean up the picture and heavily filter the audio, but there was still no avoiding the hollowness of the CAM. They should have did this 2 weeks ago when they released the CAM .... instead like every group latley they rush and release a half ass'd copy just for bragging rights.

Also W.T.F. is with all the groups tryin to pass off CAMs as TELESYNC's , they must think everyone is extremly dumb , and we wouldnt notice that its the EXACT same as their previous copy just cleaned up ..

Sigh .. no rating and no props for mislabel.


Posted by Davey18 on 08-17-2005 02:08 AM:

I looked at the sample and thought
Video 7.5
Audio 7.5
Movie 5

Not a bad release


Posted by weedchemist on 08-17-2005 02:15 AM:

cams being heavily passed off as ts is a sign of the time, its happened b4, it will stop in a few weeks/months and then it will happen again, tis the everchanging landscape of the scene i guess, either way the copy was pretty good, the audio is better, and ill rate this as a ts even tho its prob a cam, but sound without dts is good as long as i can hear it without interruptions... the movie i didnt like too much didnt waste my time watching it, just wont watch again more than likely... 6/6/6


Posted by _jadakiss on 08-17-2005 02:19 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Airhead
This is the exact same as their CAM they released 2 weeks ago

All -FUCK and -LRC did was clean up the picture and heavily filter the audio, but there was still no avoiding the hollowness of the CAM. They should have did this 2 weeks ago when they released the CAM .... instead like every group latley they rush and release a half ass'd copy just for bragging rights.

Also W.T.F. is with all the groups tryin to pass off CAMs as TELESYNC's , they must think everyone is extremly dumb , and we wouldnt notice that its the EXACT same as their previous copy just cleaned up ..

Sigh .. no rating and no props for mislabel.



very well said


Posted by akak1da on 08-17-2005 02:26 AM:

from sample

The video has a slight flicker and is a little dark as well. The audio is very hollow. Definately waiting for a better release, good job for the effort though.

7/5/-


Posted by flipp0r on 08-17-2005 03:06 AM:

cd2

skimmed thru CD2 and it poses a question

for those who have seen prev rls does the
lens get covered for 3-4 seconds :and a spike-updo appears in lower left hand corner?

occurs about 7 min into CD2

__________________
They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."


Posted by Nodders on 08-17-2005 03:59 AM:

not to bad picture: 7
Sound is as cam is it gets: 1 (6 as cam)
Movie was silly: 5


Posted by Maxpower2005 on 08-17-2005 04:15 AM:

Yes, spikey hair-do guy is in it...



4/4/7- the ending made up for the rest of the movie


Posted by jerets on 08-17-2005 04:20 AM:

what are you guys talking about? check your ears. You can hear it's direct sound but their is very little base. If you can't tell a Cam from a TS audio.. i feel for ya

video wasn't bad. movie wasn't bad either.

__________________
-=jerets=-


Posted by garvey100 on 08-17-2005 06:04 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Airhead
This is the exact same as their CAM they released 2 weeks ago

All -FUCK and -LRC did was clean up the picture and heavily filter the audio, but there was still no avoiding the hollowness of the CAM. They should have did this 2 weeks ago when they released the CAM .... instead like every group latley they rush and release a half ass'd copy just for bragging rights.

Also W.T.F. is with all the groups tryin to pass off CAMs as TELESYNC's , they must think everyone is extremly dumb , and we wouldnt notice that its the EXACT same as their previous copy just cleaned up ..

Sigh .. no rating and no props for mislabel.



By eck you do sound like you know something airhead

7/7//7


Posted by vcdman on 08-17-2005 07:52 AM:

A telesync is the same spec as a CAM except it uses an external audio source (most likely an audio jack in the chair for hard of hearing people).

this is stright from the definition page if you click on the description of what a TS is...


Posted by zerobyte on 08-17-2005 08:04 AM:

Yeah the bass is very low because its been so filtered.While attempting to eliminate cam noise they also eliminated much of the lower frequency.If it was direct there wouldnt be this problem.


Posted by Hairyhamster on 08-17-2005 12:18 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by jerets
what are you guys talking about? check your ears. You can hear it's direct sound but their is very little base. If you can't tell a Cam from a TS audio.. i feel for ya

video wasn't bad. movie wasn't bad either.





no way is this direct audio

__________________
One Day The Dead Shall Walk The Earth.


Posted by moby008 on 08-17-2005 05:02 PM:

Why did this group release a copy of their CAM release and pass it as a TS this time?
As for me, the source is exactly the same.
same flickering video, and hollow sound.

6/3/6


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 08-17-2005 10:22 PM:

After watching this release the whole way through. Its the same video from the cam version, but filtered and fixed up..thanks for that. Also the audio is different. Its strong and direct, obviously if your watching on the pc. maybe your speakers are jacked up..but on the television its fine and very f..king clear. So to knock them for that ...is crazy...

Nice Job -FUCK and at least effort is being made, besides the spikey shadow in one part, overall release is nice.

8/8/9 movie was good. slow building but overall nice way to end it.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by KOLZ on 08-18-2005 12:18 AM:

crap

The quality was really good. The sound, video, and syn was all great. By damn time. a movie is done right. Now the movie it's self was garbage. The whole movie bored me, plus the bitch's exrteme nosyness is annoying as hell from start to end. Very sickening. Great quality, shitty movie.

__________________


I am forever.


Posted by bluegrass on 08-18-2005 03:54 AM:

7/7/6 not too bad movie is ok


Posted by Red_Tides99 on 08-18-2005 06:25 AM:

quote:
A telesync is the same spec as a CAM


Actually the definition on this site is a bit off. A Telesync requires an outragouesly expensive specialized camera that can match recording framerates to the films framerates (~24FPS), hence the Sync. By syncing the frames it reduces flicker, blur, color bleeding, and twatfactor (you need an empty theater to properly setup the cam, which also lends to no funny angles). In the end it produces a much better image quality than a straight CAM recording(~30fps).

That is how the dope theater pirates did it back in the day (80s & early 90s). Arrrrr me cully, there be booty upon them empty seated shores.

Nowadays with computers, Hi-8/Svhs/digital cams, better encoding/filtering techniques, a cam can pretty much mimic a TS but in reality they are no where close, a true TS, when done correctly, is much better visually than a straight CAM.

Vid: 8 (little better than the last try)
Aud: 7 (direct or not a bit hollow)
Mov: 9 (Gotta give it props for the ending alone)

Peas out.


Posted by 4NAK8TR on 08-18-2005 08:16 AM:

Very nice job on the CAM release of this movie. I never thought I would say it but I hope if we do see more CAMs their as good as your SK. I'm not real sure who you are trying to fool with the filtered audio. "A telesync is the same spec as a CAM except it uses an external audio source (most likely an audio jack)" found here. http://www.vcdquality.com/index.php?page=faq#2

You'll get a lot more props and keep them, if you put out what you have as you have it, even CAMs when they are as good as your recent one. The sound was just a touch hollow, after 3 or 4 minuites I didnt think about it at all.

Thats my two cents anyway.


Posted by fractious on 08-18-2005 08:23 AM:

7/7/8

who cares its better than the cam in every way yes? end of just rate it.


Posted by vurtX on 08-18-2005 04:23 PM:

TWAT FACTOR 10

video = 7 .. well watchable even on my friggin huge projector
audio = 7 ... does the job, loud n clear .. sounds mono
film = 3 ... you've seen it all before
twat factor = 9 .. spikey haired twat comes on around the hour mark & is on view for a full 7 minutes, by which time you are ready to kill him SIT THE FUCK DOWN!!! CUT YOUR FUCKING HAIR!!!


Posted by Tuvarc on 08-18-2005 05:43 PM:

Now im Probaly gonna get Flammed Banned or whtever for this ,but this is not F***s own Source...

I had this version from a guy who knows the camer ,at the same time that They released there original version..not sure if thats classed as stolen or not..

as i was torn because ,there original has no Mr spikey in it ,but this does but was deffo alot better quality ,also i got it on dvd-r
and it had been taken straight fromn the cam to a standalone dvd recorder ,as on the end of it ,it had part of another film...

Ive downed CD1 of this & there encode is nowhere near as good as the dvd-r version i have.

But that said..alot better than there original release( but still a cam)

7/7/7

Tuvarc


Posted by darkened05 on 08-19-2005 06:35 AM:

7.5/7/6.5

Video is nice and very watchable, camera dude barely blocks any of the picture more for something for ppl to bitch about than an actual problem

Audio sounds good from my dvd player piping it out over coxial to my dolby digital decoding system that transmutes it to 5.1 from its 2.0 svcd source, honestly if this was a cam and not a ts im very impressed as theres no way i could tell either way.

Movie its good imo, i wasn't really feeling it until the ending. The ending really made me enjoy this movie. I'd love to comment on it but it would ruin the whole movie. Trust me, this isnt a movie where the ending just makes the movie peter out, its the punch to it that makes it a good movie and not something just average.

__________________
ps2.gamingstore.net

Swap Magic Playstation 2 Backup DVD Solution


Posted by Doomsdayer on 08-19-2005 10:24 AM:

oh yea? well my uncles.. brother-in-laws, friend.. has a cousin, whose sisters.. boyfriends, lil brother had a copy of this months ago!!! Anyhow... its a TS... some are better than others, and we usually watch a great TS and then expect that all are going to be that great, but it doesnt happen... This was a pretty good movie.. I guess overall i'd give it 6/6/7.5 I watched it off the PC.. so I wont get into it about the audio, but its all watchable none the less.


Posted by PiMpZta on 08-19-2005 07:04 PM:

not worth it to watch this one, wait for a better rls

6.5/6.5/?

__________________
HOLLA AT YO BOY!


Posted by giannisKM on 08-20-2005 01:41 AM:

7/7/8


Posted by buffy on 08-20-2005 10:19 AM:

nice cam 7/6/8

It's great, but like others have said wait for a better release if you can. It's a great movie though, just for the ending alone!


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:38 AM.
Show all 29 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.