VCDQuality Forums
Show all 3 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- X2: X-Men United *AC3* *Recode* - DVDRIP - DiAMOND (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=25956)


Posted by basslin3r on 08-14-2003 01:50 AM:

why do this dvdripp and the DVL dvd ripp have NA ratings ?
they look extremly good to me..
or does no one care when its perfect? only when its half perfect?


Posted by psyche on 08-14-2003 08:05 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by basslin3r
why do this dvdripp and the DVL dvd ripp have NA ratings ?
they look extremly good to me..
or does no one care when its perfect? only when its half perfect?

Most people here don't care about the divx section. It's all about the "new" movies that are still in theatres which excite these kids hence why the DVD/TC/SCREENER releases also have less comments than most TS/CAM releases. Bragging rights about having/seeing the movie first I guess but there are still a few of us posting about quality and quality alone. Back to this topic, the DVL version looks a little better in terms of sharpness, less blotchy like the nfo said. Maybe it's a combination of both xvid superiority to divx and one from real dvd and one from downsampled dvdr. Who knows, but I'd rate this 5/9/10 (for stolen source and less quality) and the DVL 10/9/10.


Posted by blahblubb on 08-19-2003 03:23 PM:

i think its that theres alot more to talk about if its a ts ... a dvdrip is either done properly and looks perfect ore messd up and deserves a nuke there istn much in between ... on a ts the quality differences are bigger and more obvious ...


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:10 PM.
Show all 3 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.