VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Razzel Dazzel *XviD* - DVD SCR - APT (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=76408)

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes

* Haven't read the forum rules? Want to play Russian roulette with your forum account?
READ THIS TO AVOID BEING BANNED


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

why nuked

I actually watched this movie and there is very little wrong with it. It is is full screen
but its all in sync and the quality is fairly good also. The wife loved the mocumentary as it actually does happen at a lot of dance places.

video 8.5
audio 8.5
movie 8+

If you hover your mouse pointer over the nuke symbol it says "no .ivtc". Which means "no inverse telecine". I'm a complete novice at this but based on what I have read it appears that it was nuked because it had the wrong frames per second. I believe they say that it should be 23.976 fps rather than the 29.97 fps that it is because the source originated as film rather than video. The .NFO file does say that the source was PAL full screen. I don't have a clue if that factors into the nuking as well.
My attitude toward the videos that I find mentioned here is that I expect them to have at least minor blemishes. Just tell me about the ones that are grossly unwatchable. I don't want to know if they violate some video technical spec if they are easily watchable. Personally I'd rather see the videos nuked here because of bad acting, direction or writing. But then again you'd only have a hand full of non-nuked ones then.