VCDQuality Forums - Knockaround Guys *SHEEP FiX* - SCREENER

Show all 30 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Knockaround Guys *SHEEP FiX* - SCREENER - VideoCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=10067)

Posted by MoNoXiDe on 10-23-2002 03:32 AM:

Votes for Knockaround Guys *SHEEP FiX* by VideoCD

USERNAME VIDEO AUDIO MOVIE
TCFDickSucker 9 9 1

THE ABOVE iS iDiOTiC!!!

__________________

..::HiGHONASCii::..

Posted by Squirell on 10-23-2002 04:08 AM:

USERNAME VIDEO AUDIO MOVIE
TCFDickSucker 9 9 1
Tavz 10 10 10

Correction, Both are idiotic!

Posted by Tavz on 10-23-2002 05:16 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Squirell
USERNAME VIDEO AUDIO MOVIE
TCFDickSucker 9 9 1
Tavz 10 10 10

Correction, Both are idiotic!

Please explain how i am "idiotic"? Obviouse this isnt a release, I was joking around, you know what that is right? Fucking moron.

Posted by Commy on 10-23-2002 05:21 AM:

busted!

__________________
I like big butts and I cannot lie.

Posted by PSyc0N on 10-23-2002 05:30 AM:

now now, play nice children, and Tavz, just to let you know, voting 10/10/10 will have your voting privliges revoked, joking or not. too many people put biased votes, and it wrecks our whole voting system.

Posted by Tavz on 10-23-2002 05:32 AM:

Yes, it fucks the voting system up on releases, but does it really matter if its a goddamn fix? Stop being idiots.

Posted by robg75 on 10-23-2002 05:33 AM:

sheep fix? i dont wanna know what these guys are doing. lol

Posted by IamJackBlack on 10-23-2002 06:04 AM:

ahahaha

can you spell anal?

Posted by Fire_Sokar on 10-23-2002 06:06 AM:

I have yet to notice the point of this constant bickering... this release as well.. oh well lets just settle the hell down. Eventually we will all get the grubby svcd in our hands and say oh it could of been better so lets just stfu for once n appreciate all the low level end groups and quit about oh the rateing the mods take care of it not the forum stalkers.

Posted by dumwaldo on 10-23-2002 06:59 AM:

OK i will bite, what the fuck is a sheep fix? i have never heard of this before and i had no problems burning this release. i havent watched it yet so whats the deal?

__________________
what the hell do i know, i watch my movies on a 2.2" screen.

"pho est wonderful!" "pho est wonderful!" really, he is

Posted by hacku on 10-23-2002 07:26 AM:

Dumwaldo, I was just about to ask the same damn question...

What the hell IS a Sheep Fix... anyone care to answer this?

__________________
Hacku
[email protected]

Posted by |Ware|Man on 10-23-2002 08:47 AM:

both of u are IDIOTS! and uhm LOOK AT THE GOD DAMN NFO BEFORE YOU ASK SUCH A DUMB QUESION!

Posted by haywoodyablowme on 10-23-2002 09:24 AM:

dont know what a sheep fix is but i used vcdgear to put in to mpg and it split the file into three seperate ones. so thats probaly the fix! i tryed running it thru nandub and tempgnc and they both spit it back out , could just be vcdgear

Posted by SeeDee on 10-23-2002 10:27 AM:

A site or two were nuking it as it was rumoured it was a *LIMITED* rls. So *SHEEP* nukers were nuking it as well. The .NFO is just to let all the sheep nukers and the original nukers its a general rls, not a lim.

Sheep Nuker = someone who nukes because someone else does, without checking it for themselves

Posted by reverend on 10-23-2002 10:37 AM:

Phew. Glad we got to the bottom of that.

I think we can leave 'Sheep Nuker' off pHo's FAQ page for the time being.

Posted by CYBERKILLERUK on 10-23-2002 11:27 AM:

JUst to many problems with nukers at the moment i think i go back to downloading with kazaa ! ha ha

Posted by ntwrkguy on 10-23-2002 02:06 PM:

To even vote on this as a joke is wrong....stupid stupid stupid.

Posted by crapper on 10-23-2002 04:26 PM:

what is this release?
i heard it was joke ..

i mean its not funny./.
the other release was nice..

if this isnt a proper why release it..

and i totally support sheep nukin..

Posted by Tobytl on 10-23-2002 06:06 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by crapper
if this isnt a proper why release it..

and i totally support sheep nukin..

Um, becuase the first was nuked by sheep...

And yes I support nuking sheep too, those wooly things always bothered me.

__________________
Tobytl - That thing that went 'bump' in the night, and left a gooey mess to prove it...

Posted by Azrael626 on 10-23-2002 07:16 PM:

Uhm

quote:
Originally posted by crapper
what is this release?
i heard it was joke ..

i mean its not funny./.
the other release was nice..

if this isnt a proper why release it..

and i totally support sheep nukin..

Why would you support sheep nuking? One nuker gets a bug up their ass and doesn't check their shit, and then nukes it and a bunch of idiots follow him blindly and it leaves groups with hours of explaining time to have them all unnuked. It happens ALL the time, so many unqualified nukers in the scene today it's pathetic.

Posted by bbrain on 10-23-2002 08:54 PM:

nuking these

i have been in the .. i dunno "scene" for a loong time.. since compuserv and local dialup BBS days. just never got intointo it enough to realize who or why people nuke things. or to get on a topsite or whatever. i just irc. anyways.. why do these people nuke things that are perfect videos and all.. just because they do not like the movie or the group ? or a minor infraction in the nfo. ? oh well. just checkin.. peace

Posted by mafioso on 10-23-2002 10:46 PM:

Does anyone have a real review out there?

Sheep are fuzzy and warm and they don't talk. That means your 'secrets' are safe

__________________
I cut the pockets out of all my pants

Posted by blacks on 10-23-2002 10:56 PM:

Sheep nuking is retarded, I would think that nukers appointed on sites actually do know something about nuking without looking at what others do.

Posted by Barloue on 10-24-2002 03:25 AM:

Question....

Why nuke something anyway . Fair enough its a pain in the ass to dload something that either isnt what they say it is or has something wrong with it. Only thing is if it wasnt for groups like this we WOULD have the film anyway. We would have to go pay at the cinema or buy the dvd like normal people do. It FREE so why keep bitching about it. If u want something with no hassle and nothing wrong with it go fork out for the original. Answer this . Where would u be if groups got that pissed off they STOPPED releasing stuf period. Then u would say "they werent THAT bad"

*looks up* and to finish off

Shut The F*&k up and enjoy what u get for nothing.

Posted by pHo on 10-24-2002 03:56 AM:

the "you dont pay for it, so be happy" argument is invalid in the scene. if thats your attitude, then fair enough, but do not imply it on others cos it simply doesn't work that way.

if it wasn't for the staff and linkops of the affil sites, the groups wouldn't have anything, if it wasn't for the couriers the releases wouldn't spread, and if it wasn't for the groups there'd be nothing to spread anyway. everyone contributes on top level, and if it trickles down to usenet/p2p/fxp etc, then you should be grateful for that, but dont tell site staff what to do. its their hardware, and they have every right to site nuke if they believe its the right decision.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Posted by Natural on 10-24-2002 07:02 AM:

purple monkey dishwasher

shit like this shouldn't be on the board. wastes our time, and gets blown out of proportion

Posted by rvwinkle on 10-25-2002 07:37 AM:

Sorry if this is common knowledge but why would a release be labeled as "limited"? More importantly who would care wether or not it was "limited", enough so to nuke it fot that reason?

:: well if a site has "No Limited" in its rules, then why not :P - pHo

Posted by Diezel on 10-26-2002 04:52 PM:

Now I am confused, so what exactly is this release? Is it a repack, or just the same thing re-released?

Posted by Tobytl on 10-27-2002 11:53 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Diezel
Now I am confused, so what exactly is this release? Is it a repack, or just the same thing re-released?

Its the same thing re-released. The original was nuked so bad it didnt spread as far as it should have, so they had to release it again to fix the sheep nuking problem. (although i saw the original everywhere, so I have no idea why they did it again...)

__________________
Tobytl - That thing that went 'bump' in the night, and left a gooey mess to prove it...

Posted by fluffykiwi on 11-10-2002 04:32 AM:

Personally when i thought about downloading this I checked the nfo once i saw the size of the release.
All it was was a version of internet explorer, supposedly so the nukers could learn how to use it before they started nuking for shitty wrong reasons.
This is the opinion of the group not my own.

Im all for nuking because of wrong labelling, but maybe not for ommitting the word limited even if correct, if I want the movie I dont care if it's a limited release. If I am going to download a cam I want to know beforehand. If I think I'm getting a dvdscreener then that's what I want after downloading.
I appreciate the groups work and will download the release anyway, just dont lie about it please.

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:41 AM.

Show all 30 posts from this thread on one page