VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- Movie, movies and more movies! (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=14)
-- The Other Movie God Thread (legitamacy) (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=11235)

The Other Movie God Thread (legitamacy)

What do you guys think about the whole MG situation. Most of the discussion is in the Die Another Day thread, but I thought that this dispute could get its own thread. Mainly just the poll is what I wanted to put in place though.

This just isn't even worth responding to.

(Yes i see the irony in responding to something i'm saying i'm not responding to)

404

__________________

Would you like him to not post his reviews here at all, and not even have a clue if these movies are good or not? Give me a fucking break he posts here to tell us because he wants to not because he has to. Give the guy a break you piece of dog shiet. That is all.

-dc

grow up...and can you not see this is grossly offtopic?

You sir are an idiot

__________________

FIRST of all.. you fucking ninny shit head.. youre in the wrong goddamn forum.. SECOND of all you cock sucking whore.. what would you do if someone came in your house and called you a fucking ass fucker (sure its not that far of a stretch from the truth)
youd get pissed off no doubt.. and your juvenile im a badass routine would kick in.. and youd get your ass pounded.. lol
in this situation.. youve came to MG's home.. and called him a liar (this forum was pretty much crafted by a mod FOR MG)

so like i said before.. why dont you just.... GO AWAY motherfucker.. goddamn noone cares.. GET TO FUCKING STEPPING!

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"

napalmfuzz you sir are cool so is MG

__________________

MG is legit... He also does movie reviews for a Hawaiian Radio station... and if I'm correct, I THINK it was this one: http://www.ksskradio.com/main.html

If not, please correct me MG .

he posts reviews of movies in here and we are pretty much all greatful for that you think that there is an off chance he is making shit up then dont read em

i for one would like thank him for taking the time to post his reviews here cause he could just as well not do it so... THANK YOU MG


hehe if you hit that link posted by VCDz you will see the face formally known as Micheal Jackson's LOL

__________________
"As far back as I can remember, I've always wanted to be a gangster." -- Henry Hill, Brooklyn, N.Y. 1955.

Fucking lame ass question cccmmm! MG does us a favor by coming here and giving us his reviews, and all you can do is look a gift horse in the mouth!? Fucking retard....go back to Kazaa!

and I'll say for the THIRD TIME NOW SO YOU IGNORANT F**KS HAVE NO EXCUSE!

IF YOU HAVE A F**KIN QUESTION ABOU TA MVOIE THAT HE DOESNT INCLUDE IN THE F**KIN REVIEWS ASK HIM!

quote:

---

Originally posted by kap0n3

hehe if you hit that link posted by VCDz you will see the face formally known as Micheal Jackson's LOL

---

I have no opinon in the situation, but half the people who have voted thus far are what I would define as "MG Dicksuckers"

The plot thing, I kinda gotta go wiht you, but the thing is, your going about it the wrong way man. Your making MG seem like a fag and an ass, or atleast it seems to me thats the point your trying to get across.

I dont agree with that, not even a little. I think MG is an awesome guy, but no more awesome than any other cool poster here, And I do agree that I think that his reviews are plot summarys rated, doesn't mean he doesn't see the movies, but he sure writes a shitty review... lol. (No offense intended MG) I could write a review for LOTR Return of the King right now, do a summary of the plot, and give it a 10, and my review would be accurate, and alot like MG's but doesn't mean I've seen the movie.

I think people sucking MG's dick for these reviews that I could have done in 4th grade annoys the piss out of me, either people shut up about him, or MG tell em to stop, or admit your reviews are fake if they are... something. This is getting old as shit, and annoying me even more than poeple going "I LOVE CTP/TCF!!"

I want people to understand that I dont dislike MG, I just think his reviews arent worth the verbal oral sex he gets.

__________________
One time, my cousin Walter got this cat stuck in his ass. True story. He bought it at our local mall so the whole fiasco wound up on the news, it was embarrassing for my relatives and all, but the next week he did it again, different cat, same results, complete with another trip to the emergency room! So I run into him a week later in the mall and he’s buying another cat and I says to ‘em "Jesus Walt, what are you doing? You know your just gonna get this cat stuck up your ass too, why don’t you knock it off?" And he says to me "Brodie, how the hell else am I supposed to get the gerbil out?" My cousin was a weird guy....

-

Wow. So many posts to address. Where to begin.

First of all, I knew that this thread was going to be a big hit w/ most of you guys, but I could
really care less. That’s not to say that I don’t care about your opinions though. There’s not much
to say about this subject that I haven’t said already. I hate being lied to, therefore I took it upon
myself to make sure that MG’s reviews aren’t as praised anymore. However, I can’t just simply
change your minds. It’ll take your own desire to accept the fact that something may not be as
true as you’ve believed all along. I AGREE that MovieGod is a good guy. He DOES make good
threads and say nice things and make constructive and helpful comments to those that need help.
I am not trying to take that away from him in the least. And the mis perception here is that I
hate this guy and think he should go away. None of this is true. The only deal I have with MG is
the fact that I personally believe his reviews not to be true and accurate. This is my personal
opinion. To this you could say, “then keep it to yourself.” I, however, chose to make this
opinion public in order to see how others felt. I put my credibility at risk by saying this and have
been, as I predicted, horribly flamed. A little dispute got started in the Die Another Day thread,
and I just figured that, since there was such a disagreement, I’d make a poll so that everyone
could voice their opinion without having to flame other people. And seeing as Moviegod is such
a large part of the VCDQuality boards, I thought that I’d give people a chance to peacefully state
their opinion. But apparently I misplaced my faith in you guys not to freak out. That says more
about you than it does about me no matter who’s right and who’s wrong.

And to those of you who believe that I’m going about this in the wrong way (i.e. svenbob whose
opinion I do respect nonetheless) here’s the first post I made in this thread:

quote:

---

What do you guys think about the whole MG situation. Most of the discussion is in
the Die Another Day thread, but I thought that this dispute could get its own thread.
Mainly just the poll is what I wanted to put in place though.

---

quote:

---

Give me a fucking break he posts here to tell us because he wants to not because he has
to. Give the guy a break you piece of dog shiet.

---

quote:

---

grow up...and can you not see this is grossly offtopic?

---

quote:

---

You sir are an idiot

---

CCCMMM, what do you do for a living? you sound very well educated and support your points quite well over most the people here. I voiced my opinion about the situation, a little different than yours, but not wholly. And I agree people took the wrong method in argueing thier point, but putting "Legitamancy" in the thread topic immdiatly puts a bad taste in someone's mouth and pisses them off because your insulting thier diety. Everyone should know my standing on MG at this point in time in my posts in this thread and the other, and dont need to reinforce it here, just read up a few posts.

__________________
One time, my cousin Walter got this cat stuck in his ass. True story. He bought it at our local mall so the whole fiasco wound up on the news, it was embarrassing for my relatives and all, but the next week he did it again, different cat, same results, complete with another trip to the emergency room! So I run into him a week later in the mall and he’s buying another cat and I says to ‘em "Jesus Walt, what are you doing? You know your just gonna get this cat stuck up your ass too, why don’t you knock it off?" And he says to me "Brodie, how the hell else am I supposed to get the gerbil out?" My cousin was a weird guy....

-

I believe MG is 100% accurate remember critics do not explain details about the movie or events in the movie so before you go and talk shit about MG read your local newspaper(if you can read) and read some reviews tell me if you see the movie broken down to your standards.

I do have one complaint The reviews of one Mystic Slippers they are all old news and a waste of bandwidth IMO-2 cents from a Newbie

quote:

---

Originally posted by svenbob
CCCMMM, what do you do for a living? you sound very well educated and support your points quite well over most the people here. I voiced my opinion about the situation, a little different than yours, but not wholly. And I agree people took the wrong method in argueing thier point, but putting "Legitamancy" in the thread topic immdiatly puts a bad taste in someone's mouth and pisses them off because your insulting thier diety. Everyone should know my standing on MG at this point in time in my posts in this thread and the other, and dont need to reinforce it here, just read up a few posts.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by cccmmm
The only deal I have with MG is
the fact that I personally believe his reviews not to be true and accurate. This is my personal
opinion.

---

__________________
"As far back as I can remember, I've always wanted to be a gangster." -- Henry Hill, Brooklyn, N.Y. 1955.

The Accuracy I'm speaking of is not in the "correctness" of the review itself (because you're right: there is no such thing), but more the accuracy to the movie itself. like stuff besides plot points and things like that. an accurate review would be one that told a little about the plot and then described what the movie did well and what it failed at etc. see what i'm saying. I completely undrstand what you wrote though. I probably should've been clearer about what I meant.

Hmmm, this is very interesting. I don't want to say that I agree with one side or the other right now. I never really paid that much attention to his reviews except for films that I want to see (Two Towers). I realize that he is some type of forum god or something, but if you really look at the reviews, there really isn't anything critical about the movie except for his final grade. I want to believe MG is who he says he is, so if he could just start making his reviews more critical, or give some type of proof.... (Saying something on his Radioshow?) or maybe that will compromise him. (Of course, if he is who he says he is, there can't be that many movie critics on radio shows in Hawaii). I talked to a friend who was in Hawaii if he knew of a famous critic in Hawaii, and said that there was one, so I just assumed it was MG. I just want some better reviews, or some type of proof if MG is going to say who says he is. Otherwise, his posts are fine with me even if he isn't a critic. It lets me know what movies are coming out (Since, I don't check imdb as much as here).


"I am the ultimate fence sitter!"

Why is it that almost everytime someone backs up a member, or a group they get accused of "sucking their dick"? Can't people just defend someone or something without being thought of like someone who just wants to get on someone's/somthing's good side? I could care less what MG thinks about me, or anyone else for that matter, but that doesn't deter me from thinking he's a great member that doesn't deserve to have his integrity (I know, honor among theives and all...) put to the test. cccmmm, you're right I shouldn't of gone off like that, it was uncalled for, but really I feel that this thread is almost an attack toward someone we at VCDQ have come to respect.....just could of been handled better I think. For instance, you're 6 options, only 1 of which would be considered "for" MG.

"And since when is this place MovieGod’s home? You really do treat him
like a god, verbally dedicating this forum to him."


if youd do a little searching.. youd see that PHUCKER pretty much designed the movie discussion forum for the sole pourpose of MOVIEGOD to post his reviews of movies

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"

quote:

---

Originally posted by cccmmm
The Accuracy I'm speaking of is not in the "correctness" of the review itself (because you're right: there is no such thing), but more the accuracy to the movie itself. like stuff besides plot points and things like that. an accurate review would be one that told a little about the plot and then described what the movie did well and what it failed at etc. see what i'm saying. I completely undrstand what you wrote though. I probably should've been clearer about what I meant.

---

__________________
"As far back as I can remember, I've always wanted to be a gangster." -- Henry Hill, Brooklyn, N.Y. 1955.

I voted honestly.

but in fairness to moviegood the poll seemed more like BS because there is only 1 postive selection, the other 5 are all negitive.

there should have been 2 positive,
2 netural,
an 2 negitive selections to vote for.

Hence i see the the poll, as much as i dont want to admit it, as SLANDER
which is worse than just flaming the guy.

That was a low blow cccmmm that might have left a scar.
if I was moviegood youd be on my list.

To be honest with you guys...i'm kinda over this thing. i gave it a little thought and figured that its really not my business. If MovieGod wants to do his thing, nothing should stand in his way. I just won't pay attention.

After reading the arguments that a lot of you presented, it made me realize that there are a couple of ways to look at this.
and @Starscreamer, intesting point about the poll. There is one that is "for" MG and that's the first choice. But I admit, since I am swayed to one side, it was a slightly biased poll. I wasn't unfair, but made more options for the level of unsatisfaction. That could be for the best though. Because you either believe him, or you have some degree of disbelief. so maybe more choices in that dept. were necessary after all. it all in the eye of the beholder on that one though.

anyway...back to where i was going. i'll just not say much more about this unless soemone flames or something. then i'll argue a little, but i really don't care. it was more of the principle for me. I still strongly believe that i haven't been told the whole truth, but who cares. i can live w/ that. I don't want to be hated for the duration of my VCDQual. life. sounds kinda shitty to me. Im not folding, but will just kinda let this one go. MG, you haven't said much throughout this, so is there anything you'd like to say to defend your name or anything like that? I'm sure you've seen this thread. You must have felt that it wasn't your place to get into this debate as it was about you. So, i'd like to appologize to you if this shit hurt your feelings or whatever. you're not off the hook yet imo though, so why don't you post a msg explaining some stuff. no bullshit. you owe it too the people around here.

MG doesn't owe us anything.

And he probably ignored the threads cuz it's a ridiculous topic.

in my opinion if i may be so bold i think MG did all explaining he had to do time and time again and i really dont think that he needs to "defend" his honor here...he's got his fans and unfortunately he's got his ennemies but i am sure that goes for all of us

__________________
"As far back as I can remember, I've always wanted to be a gangster." -- Henry Hill, Brooklyn, N.Y. 1955.

Starscreamer - I agree with you - the whole dick sucking references thing is a bit worrying, really. Yeah, condescending - but people ages shine through when their best retort is "You suck dick!" If you enjoy talking about sucking dicks, then please do so in the privacy of your own room and not on here.

This is very, very simple. It's great if a member wants to review a movie. But MG's posts are not reviews. I encourage him to fully review a film - post it's strengths and weaknesses - without giving away any spoilers. Mere plot summaries and a 8.5/10 at the end isn't of any use to anyone.....

quote:

---

Originally posted by crob
Mere plot summaries and a 8.5/10 at the end isn't of any use to anyone.....

---

Let.. it... go!

This is flaming and nothing else, and the second thread today that i close.. fun!

__________________



i have sigs off