VCDQuality Forums
Show all 30 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Charlie And The Chocolate Factory *SVCD* - TELESYNC - (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=64788)


Posted by X69 on 07-17-2005 07:56 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS FILM!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN IT). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

6 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

7 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by mattmatt02 on 07-17-2005 08:02 PM:

:: Shut up. -K::


Posted by Hairyhamster on 07-17-2005 08:32 PM:

well.... not seen the cam version.... but this seems ok
played on standalone.... only skipped through not watched yet, and looks good to me/
not the best ive ever seen, but very watchable, and great for the uk peeps who aint getting a release till the 29th.

rating as a ts
8/7

__________________
One Day The Dead Shall Walk The Earth.


Posted by Fordirelifesake on 07-17-2005 08:46 PM:

When I picked up the sample for this I thought it might be the same source as Baphs' copy. Both are cropped badly, and sound the same.

7/7/?

__________________
Return to the womb (new life).


Posted by Bullet on 07-17-2005 09:16 PM:

not watchable for such a good movie

to light and bad sound

5/5/8

__________________


Posted by RottenFoxBreath on 07-17-2005 09:16 PM:

i believe this has been nuked as its the same as the other one

pre [NUKED] mislabeled.cam.same.video.and.audio.as.BaPH.cam

5/6/8


Posted by gooneruk on 07-17-2005 09:26 PM:

cropped on the left and bottom, but the sound's good quality.

6/7/?


Posted by HypoLuxa on 07-17-2005 09:43 PM:

It’s the same source as the BaPH cam, and SVCD for a cam? Come on now. And anyone who thinks this is a good movie really needs to see the original or read the book. I’m personally a very huge Tim Burton fan, but I must say...this time he seriously disappointed me. But then again, some things just should NEVER be remade because the original is perfect already. And Johnny Depp was a HORRIBLE Willy Wonka. Gene Wilder played the perfect roll as a slightly insane and scary Wonka, Depp on the other hand acted like he was a 6 year old in a mans body...total disgrace.
Anyway 6 (cropped horribly)/8/-10000 WHY TIM WHY!!!!!! (not to mention it was just fine as a VCD)


Posted by dc_man on 07-17-2005 09:54 PM:

6/6/10

:: No flaming. -K::


Posted by HaLiKuS on 07-17-2005 10:04 PM:

6/6/8 Creepy.


Posted by moby008 on 07-17-2005 10:29 PM:

I also have suspiciouns It’s the same source as the BaPH cam release.
They both start at exactly the same point.
The re-encoding wasn' t very improving either.

6/6/7


Posted by MyNameIsAnakin on 07-18-2005 12:18 AM:

\\ Sample \\

My god. The video is so cropped. I can't stand half faces, just not my favorite.

The audio is good.

V - 5
A - 7
M - N/A

__________________
Coming soon....


Posted by ddb on 07-18-2005 12:38 AM:

6.2/6.0/johnny depp meets michael jackson on a hunter s. thompson acid trip,

__________________
HARLEY FUCKING DAVIDSONS
LIVE TO RIDE RIDE TO LIVE


Posted by butch99 on 07-18-2005 02:41 AM:

sry guyz,thecopy is dubbed....recoded
but is more detailed....sound too
8/8/7


Posted by bcool2k on 07-18-2005 03:23 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by RottenFoxBreath
i believe this has been nuked as its the same as the other one

pre [NUKED] mislabeled.cam.same.video.and.audio.as.BaPH.cam

5/6/8



You would be correct Sir and just another case of Shit immitating SHIT..I mean why steal what sux in the first place..


6/5/6


Posted by _jadakiss on 07-18-2005 04:23 AM:

the movie so nice and I though johnny deep was great for the part ....

now this realese how ever is very badly cropped.. REALLY bad ... and the sound is okay


4/7/10


Posted by catflusher on 07-18-2005 11:25 AM:

This is identical to the BaPH release just reencoded into mpeg2 format instead of mpeg1 like the BaPH so i give it a 4/4/7


Posted by Joseon204 on 07-18-2005 12:18 PM:

Charlie.And.The.Chocolate.Factory.TS.SVCD


Ok, so I viewed the sample and then decided to download the whole release. It was very apparent that the source of this and the CAM were the same as most of you all know already. The audio was out of sync if you pay close attention and there's a lil bit of blockiness but it's watchable. I've also heard that there's a few scenes missing. So if anyone can find out, I'd appreciate it. Overall, it's watchable but I'd wait for a better release.

So with that...

V - 6.5
A - 6
M - I'll rate it later

__________________
The Renagade


Posted by MadGeordie on 07-18-2005 01:29 PM:

V - 6
A - 7
M - I'll post later ...

The video is so cropped it should be nuked ...

__________________



Posted by dvdhouse111 on 07-18-2005 04:21 PM:

judging from the samples of both versions Ill wait for a better version to surface, even though that might be some time or maybe never looking at the current scene

dvdhouse


Posted by shady1 on 07-18-2005 04:22 PM:

Thumbs down

this is one bbaaaaaaadddddddd flick.not to mention the quality. it may b closer to the book,but most peeps will compare it to the last film,an compared to that.........its naff!
v-3
a-7
m-0!


Posted by Lab on 07-18-2005 09:15 PM:

6/7/6

Decent release ..


Posted by xiaNaix on 07-18-2005 10:05 PM:

The cropping makes this unwatchable.

Video: 3
Audio: 6 (passable)
Movie: 6 (you'll either love it or hate it)


Posted by aheintz on 07-19-2005 01:35 AM:

Video good
audio more like a cam auio not a TS
movie still watching


Posted by Loafboy on 07-19-2005 02:07 PM:

so whose release is this ?



::EDIT:: Yo Mommas! - NS::


Posted by loxs on 07-19-2005 04:01 PM:

Ah good shot whoever done it I managed to sit and watch it!

and i find it hard to believe people are whinging after everything that has happened lately.

dont like it? to cropped go to the THEATRE and watch it then these guys are just giving you an alternative.

6/7/8?

__________________


Posted by fluffinator on 07-19-2005 10:34 PM:

Props to the unknown releasers for having the balls to release this right now, or maybe stupidity.

but...................

5/5/?

umm, don't bother with this, it seems to be the same source as the cam but, amazingly, lower quality.

I'd almost say it's a re-encode of the cam that was encoded to maybe xvid then to SVCD or something.

Picture does get clearer on a standalone, but I'd stick with the cam for now.

Cropping aside, can anyone clarify if there are scenes actually missing? I haven't made it thru all or either copy, and won't even bother.

If you are desperate, and can't find the BaPH release this one is watchable.

__________________
And it appears Burt Reynolds has changed his name to Turd Furgeson.

That's right, it's a funny name


Posted by cirr0 on 07-20-2005 11:56 AM:

v-6 cropped/washed a-7 m-4

__________________
"but i choose to die, on a steady diet of booze and lies"


Posted by n1ckn4m3 on 07-21-2005 12:44 AM:

Eh.

5/5/7

Video - 5 -- Cropped to all hell, most of the people's faces are cut off in any semblance of a closeup. Colors are slightly washed out, motion is a tiny bit blurred (on my TV -- was VERY blurred on my PC), a little grainy.

Audio - 5 -- Poor audio source. Anything remotely loud is unintelligable, ie the Oompa Loompa songs. Anything really quiet is also unintelligable.

Movie - 7 -- Much truer to the book, but I'm pissed about Tim Burton's craptastic tunnel scene and I'm not so sure about Johnny Depp.

IMHO, wait for another release -- this one ain't worth the bandwidth.

__________________
... n1ckn4m3


Posted by cosmicfool on 07-29-2005 02:26 AM:

vid/6
aud/7
mov/8.5

if it wasnt for the cropping id give the video a 8 but this does have some serious cropping to the lower half and sides.
a good way to explain how cropped is if the frame is of a adult standing next to a child you will only see the childs forehead and nothing below that.
if your a serious J.D fan or burton fan save your bandwidth for a better release


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:38 PM.
Show all 30 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.