VCDQuality Forums - Minority Report *REAL PROPER* - DVDRIP

Show all 31 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- SVCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=20)
-- Minority Report *REAL PROPER* - DVDRIP - iNTENSE (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=11745)

Posted by ABlix0 on 12-02-2002 01:23 AM:

um..wtf is it really that resolution? (jpg sample based)

Posted by VCDz on 12-02-2002 01:28 AM:

No... someone did a bad job on the jpg...

They even forgot the *Title *Group* *VCDQuality.com* stamp on the jpg...

__________________
VCDz = Xilf .

quote:
Originally posted by viv
Hi! i�m new...aand i�ve a question:
What means a TEG-vcd
do i need a special codec to watch "teg-vcd�s"?

Posted by Platinum on 12-02-2002 01:34 AM:

their info says 3 cd's and vcdquality shows 2

:: i know its an instinct of mine to hit "2CD" when updating, cos i never bother to check, so its probably cos of that.

Posted by Xiphi on 12-02-2002 01:35 AM:

Again? how many rips are there of this movie..

its becoming a big list..

http://www.vcdquality.com/index.php...t&submit=search

i got one of those.. and looked fine to me..

Posted by reelnewbie on 12-02-2002 01:48 AM:

"how many groups does it take to rip a dvd..." - this shit isn't much/any better than most of the previous releases.

Posted by opso on 12-02-2002 01:52 AM:

lets hope you just fucked up on sample and don't make your selfs look dumb by sayin how many groups it takes to rip a movie

Posted by [dj-mike] on 12-02-2002 01:54 AM:

that was me i fucked them jpegs up some new are up now i think

Posted by Swimj on 12-02-2002 01:54 AM:

hmmm

welp imma go buy this when its out or wait for a tcf rip that will never come due to the amount of fuckin releases.. fuck you rfta..! they fucked up our chances on a good rip

Posted by ToughMan on 12-02-2002 02:07 AM:

Stop bitching kids. Not like you we don't have unlimited BW. You don't want to waste your valuable time? Then just download the sample! How hard can that be? What?

Posted by crapper on 12-02-2002 02:10 AM:

i'm gettin this bond vibe.. donno hwy LOL
damm this is the 3rdproper..

i've seen the tcf screener/workpritn and i'll buy hte dvdwhen itsout..
to many bad rips..

ohh this one is indeed oK

Posted by Vtec on 12-02-2002 02:17 AM:

Re: hmmm

quote:
Originally posted by Swimj
welp imma go buy this when its out or wait for a tcf rip that will never come due to the amount of fuckin releases.. fuck you rfta..! they fucked up our chances on a good rip

I agree with you, I'm pretty sure TCF has a copy but with 50 million versions out I highly doubt they will even attempt it either. Oh well, this DVD deserves a purchase anyways.

Posted by DividedSky on 12-02-2002 02:39 AM:

I haven't even seen the sample, but those wonky CD sizes sure don't give me confidence that they have a clue what they're doing:

CD 1 : 51x15 mb
CD 2 : 56x15 mb
CD 3 : 45x15 mb

This is what, SVCD DVDRIP #6?

Posted by backoff on 12-02-2002 03:26 AM:

OK why would you download the SVCD rip of this movie when the RFtA DivX version is great. Just encode that to 3 SVCDs and you have a great movie. 19 releases of this movie is too much. Just learn to use TMPGEnc and then you can make your own rips instead of the 2.4 GB download of yet another SVCD rip. This one looks good, but who knows. I used the RFtA DivX rip and it was fine. I dont download SVCD DVDrips, I encode them myself. Do whatever you want, if you are a newb then get the SVCD ones if you aren't then get the DivX version that hasnt been nuked like all the other releases.

Posted by JcM AkA ViPER on 12-02-2002 03:39 AM:

hey, anyone realize that TCF have rlsd this move 5! times

Posted by phate on 12-02-2002 04:01 AM:

id just like to say that i dont really think this needed to be propered after DCi's version...i watched it on my widescreen 50 inch and i was not displeased in the slightest bit...dont waste your time getting this one if u already have DCi's version...

Posted by chocco on 12-02-2002 04:02 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by backoff
OK why would you download the SVCD rip of this movie when the RFtA DivX version is great. Just encode that to 3 SVCDs and you have a great movie. 19 releases of this movie is too much. Just learn to use TMPGEnc and then you can make your own rips instead of the 2.4 GB download of yet another SVCD rip. This one looks good, but who knows. I used the RFtA DivX rip and it was fine. I dont download SVCD DVDrips, I encode them myself. Do whatever you want, if you are a newb then get the SVCD ones if you aren't then get the DivX version that hasnt been nuked like all the other releases.

Divx to svcd encode is an atrocity..... divx is an atrocity... suggesting such is an encode is an atrocity ... please end yourself...

Posted by Platinum on 12-02-2002 04:41 AM:

BTW the DNA version with DK subs was already the best and also better then this one.

Posted by JoshNya on 12-02-2002 04:49 AM:

This rls is *Bad AR*

Posted by sickdick on 12-02-2002 06:25 AM:

lol sux
the dci version was just fine imho

Posted by reelnewbie on 12-02-2002 06:35 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by chocco

Divx to svcd encode is an atrocity..... divx is an atrocity... suggesting such is an encode is an atrocity ... please end yourself...

agreed. there's a reason that divx-->svcd rips are scoffed upon in the scene, the main one being quality is shit. if you always reencode divx-->svcd backoff you must not care about how good something can look if done correctly.

Posted by JayTray on 12-02-2002 06:54 AM:

you R thee' Newb'

quote:

Originally posted by backoff
OK why would you download the SVCD rip of this movie when the RFtA DivX version is great. Just encode that to 3 SVCDs and you have a great movie. 19 releases of this movie is too much. Just learn to use TMPGEnc and then you can make your own rips instead of the 2.4 GB download of yet another SVCD rip. This one looks good, but who knows. I used the RFtA DivX rip and it was fine. I dont download SVCD DVDrips, I encode them myself. Do whatever you want, if you are a newb then get the SVCD ones if you aren't then get the DivX version that hasnt been nuked like all the other releases.

What the hell are you thinking suggesting to recode from DivX to SVCD... LMAO. You saying the word Newbie is an Oxymoron, Why waste your time encoding uit

If people did that every release would be nuked for poor quality.

Posted by Vtec on 12-02-2002 10:56 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by JcM AkA ViPER
hey, anyone realize that TCF have rlsd this move 5! times

I counted 3, workprint/telecine/screener... the dutch version wasn't by TCF but I guess mods thought it was and what does that comment have to do with this release? I also agree that encoding divx to svcd is a bad idea, no way in hell can the results be nearly as good as directly from the DVD. Silly rabbit, tricks are for kids.

Posted by [dj-mike] on 12-02-2002 12:07 PM:

JoshNya 1 8 8
sickdick 1 1 8

lol spot the other group members

Posted by backoff on 12-02-2002 10:37 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by reelnewbie

agreed. there's a reason that divx-->svcd rips are scoffed upon in the scene, the main one being quality is shit. if you always reencode divx-->svcd backoff you must not care about how good something can look if done correctly.

OK tell me something then you guys... why are all of the SVCD rips always nuked? When I searched for this movie in www.packetnews.com I came up with a tons of the DivX release and a NO SVCD DVDrips, there are a few DVDscreeners, but no DVDrips. If the DivX is so bad then why hasnt it been nuked? I also like 2 hour downloads instead of 6 hour downloads for movies. I see no problem with my DivX releases, sometimes they are better than SVCD releases. DivX is nuked alot less than SVCD. So just shut up. Because apparently my DivX releases are of better quality than your SVCD releases because they arent nuked.

Posted by desertboy on 12-02-2002 11:10 PM:

I agree a divx svcd conversion is an atrocity. Divx/Xivd itself is great in fact I'd say my mpeg4 stuff looks a lot nicer than my mpeg2 stuff bitrate for bitrate. If I really want to watch it on my dvd player I just convert it to a high bitrate mpeg2 4000Kilobits+

Mpeg4 rules, mpeg2 is great and mpeg1 sucks. Mpeg4s are often fucked up trying to fit them on 1cd or poor encoding.

PS. Packetnews rules, My downloader comes second, link from this vcdquality. I might be a newbie but at least I know how to spell Elite.

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.

Posted by reelnewbie on 12-02-2002 11:59 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by backoff

OK tell me something then you guys... why are all of the SVCD rips always nuked? When I searched for this movie in www.packetnews.com I came up with a tons of the DivX release and a NO SVCD DVDrips, there are a few DVDscreeners, but no DVDrips. If the DivX is so bad then why hasnt it been nuked? I also like 2 hour downloads instead of 6 hour downloads for movies. I see no problem with my DivX releases, sometimes they are better than SVCD releases. DivX is nuked alot less than SVCD. So just shut up. Because apparently my DivX releases are of better quality than your SVCD releases because they arent nuked.

you sir, are a retard. just because a DiVX release isn't nuked and an svcd release is does not mean your DiVX-->SVCD encode is going to be good quality. i don't even want to know what kind of screwed up logic led you to believe such a thing. don't you think that if divx-->svcd produced a better quality product than a dvd-->svcd encode there would be groups dedicated to re-encoding a divx and releasing it to the scene?

if you don't have something smart to say, don't say anything at all.

on another note, you finding lots of divx releases and no svcd releases of this movie on www.packetnews.com means jackshit to anyone who can understand the difference in quality derived from dvd->svcd and divx->svcd. in fact, packetnews.com implies that you are more of a newbie/lamer/<insert adjective here> douchebag than some of us.

Posted by Mr_Grinch on 12-03-2002 12:42 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by reelnewbie

on another note, you finding lots of divx releases and no svcd releases of this movie on www.packetnews.com means jackshit to anyone who can understand the difference in quality derived from dvd->svcd and divx->svcd. in fact, packetnews.com implies that you are more of a newbie/lamer/<insert adjective here> douchebag than some of us.

Being a "Packetnews using lamer", I still understand the difference in quality between a divx -> svcd encode and a dvd -> svcd encode. Just cos some people don't spend half their life downloading films, don't assume they know shit-all.

On the same note, I used to work for Blockbuster video and do my own rips of dvd's, I use to encode to divx (version 3... it was a while back I worked there!), roughly encoding so that the films would fit on two discs. This suited me fine as I used my TV-Out to watch the films.

However when I wanted to watch the films at my mates I had no choice but to rip them to svcd and, yes, divx to svcd ISN'T as good as DVD to svcd BUT done right, the quality itself isn't that different to the original divx encode. And I suppose, if you had a crap connection (Which I'm unfortunately lumbered with) then it may be quicker to download a divx rip then convert to svcd. You're not gonna be losing out much on quality.

And on a second note, I realise this is vcdquality.com and not divx-digest.com so I'm gonna shut up and go and have a look on packetnews for Ballistic DVD rip whilst downloading a few music tracks off kazaa.

Oh and no-one call me a n00b, that word is stupid, everyone's gotta start somewhere.

Posted by backoff on 12-03-2002 10:49 PM:

OK I understand that straight to SVCD is better. I will give you that. I think the DivX encodes are great. If you can really see a big difference between the DivX and SVCD encodes than get the one you like best. I am on good cable, but most servers I get to that dont have 99 person queues dont upload near 100+ kb/s so I would just as soon get the DivX than the SVCD. I guess I will end it now. You are right and I was wrong quit the fucking flaming of my message because I am admitting it. I am sure you were new to this sometime too. So give me a break. I dont understand why you fucking people have to be so violent. Jesus christ it is a fucking opinion and you sound like you want to just kill me right here. Not everyone is a 1337 person like you who gets all whenever and calls people newbs to cover up his own problems like living with his moms basement. Just get a fucking life. That is all I have to say. If you flame this message that just shows you have too much free time and need to get a job.

Posted by Platinum on 12-04-2002 03:14 AM:

LMAO you guys are so pathetic.. calling eachother names because of some release.. jeez man.

If a release is good > fine.. enjoy
If a release is bad> too bad, note whats wrong and wait for something better
If a release is watchable > download if you like or not

complain about mistakes all you want but most people her reall have no life.. they would even kill for their favourite release group it seems..

and those stupid americans that think german = dutch and that they speak dutch in denmark..

german is spoken in germany, danish in denmark and dutch in the netherlands you patriotic fools.

Posted by mew on 12-05-2002 02:43 PM:

Just get the PAL DVDR if you want quality, it was released by a group called EFTERLYST. Otherwise a ntsc one should be out soon too.

Posted by WiZZLa on 12-06-2002 08:31 AM:

^ not everyone has a dvd-r

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:57 AM.

Show all 31 posts from this thread on one page