VCDQuality Forums
Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Skeleton Key *SVCD* - TELECINE - NBP (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=65751)


Posted by X69 on 08-21-2005 04:43 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS FILM!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN IT). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

6 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

7 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by SoulnoS on 08-21-2005 04:56 PM:

uh?

Anyone know why its nuked?


::EDIT:: Put your mouse pointer over the nuke icon In this instance, the bitrate is way too high which will freak-out 99% of DVD players - NS::


Posted by andrews on 08-21-2005 05:13 PM:

i have d/l an XviD version of this tc by asteroids 9/9.5/?


Posted by trenty on 08-21-2005 05:20 PM:

why is it nuked? 9800 k bitrate is heaps good. so why nuke it?


Posted by Airhead on 08-21-2005 05:26 PM:

No way this is getting a 9 , only "average" quality for a TELECiNE.

The Picture is Extremly dark to the point the dark scenes are near unwatchable and you can only see objects moving but cant really make them out. So dark that in NBP's sample that you cant make out facial expressions due to the dark shadows on the people's faces. This copy is also blurry and grainy , tad overcropped , slight red tint to the picture. VCDQ states bitrate is extremly high but i didnt notice it ... sounded quite good to me.

Average TC , nothing special

6.5/7/?


Posted by Hairyhamster on 08-21-2005 05:34 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Airhead
No way this is getting a 9 , only "average" quality for a TELECiNE.

The Picture is Extremly dark to the point the dark scenes are near unwatchable and you can only see objects moving but cant really make them out. So dark that in NBP's sample that you cant make out facial expressions due to the dark shadows on the people's faces. This copy is also blurry and grainy , tad overcropped , slight red tint to the picture. VCDQ states bitrate is extremly high but i didnt notice it ... sounded quite good to me.

Average TC , nothing special

6.5/7/?




agreed.... ive already encoded and burnt to dvd..... very very dark.... no signs of bad cropping..... audio is spot on, but as stated this is only average for a tc.... just too damn dark

8/9

__________________
One Day The Dead Shall Walk The Earth.


Posted by Hairyhamster on 08-21-2005 05:35 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by andrews
i have d/l an XviD version of this tc by asteroids 9/9.5/?



congratulations.... bet ya mama is proud

__________________
One Day The Dead Shall Walk The Earth.


Posted by fraty on 08-21-2005 05:44 PM:

Yes average TC but still the best rels out so why complain and sound is good bad bitrate or not!

8.5/8.5/7.5


::EDIT:: Bitrates aren't an issue on a PC but your DVD player will bork at a bitrate that high - NS::


Posted by Neversoft on 08-21-2005 05:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by X69

5 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN IT). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

/me collectively taps the monitors of "Andrews" and everybody who pointed out his faux pas


Posted by mattmatt02 on 08-21-2005 06:09 PM:

asteroids release is better than this one, but this is still good. i would call it an average to good tc.

8/8/will watch eventually

nice but ill go for the xvid as its better quality and half the size


Posted by giannisKM on 08-21-2005 06:43 PM:

i agree for asteroids.
its more clear.this is a bit dark

still good though

8/7/??


Posted by Bullet on 08-21-2005 07:00 PM:

NBP gets nuked a lot. But personally they are my heroes. My dvd player (standalone) plays it wonderfully. And i love their quality. Same as with the island. I dont mind it and it's very easy to correct on my tv. So pls KEEP THIS UP...thx for all the effort you guys are putting in. Really appreciate it

8/8/5

__________________


Posted by ol_perfesser on 08-21-2005 07:14 PM:

It is a bit dark but the color quality is emensely better that the cam versions. Turn up the briteness on the TV and its a little better. Sound is very good. Movie is a dark story, and it seems like I have seen it before, and better done.

7/8/5

__________________
Op


Posted by traxelle on 08-21-2005 08:01 PM:

lighten it up yourself!

ever though of using a program called enhance movie 1.3 it will lighten the picture for you! good release thanx NBP

__________________


Posted by notgnihsaw420 on 08-21-2005 08:12 PM:

DO YOU PEOPLE EVEN GET THIS RELEASE????




RATING FOR A TC


v - 6 Blurry like the machine was out of focus... Very orange and yellow tint to it... and yes the dark scenes are still dark... Color just plain sucks... I have seen TS with crsiper detail... Not good for a TC... Looks like the same source as WotW... Maybe Boris ripped this one to...


s - 7 A little hollow, and it sounds super hot in the high ends but its not cam sound so anything is better...


m - 2 YAWN.....


TY NBP for a very watchable release...



And YES the The Skeleton Key Astroids xvid is out same source...

__________________
All my movies are burned using "PC Club" generic CD-R, and generic DVD-R disks. They are played on a AVAYON DXP1000 xvid/svcd/vcd/blah blah blah blah player...


Posted by fraty on 08-21-2005 09:13 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by fraty
Yes average TC but still the best rels out so why complain and sound is good bad bitrate or not!

8.5/8.5/7.5


::EDIT:: Bitrates aren't an issue on a PC but your DVD player will bork at a bitrate that high - NS::



oh ic


Posted by AddNtoX on 08-21-2005 11:00 PM:

all i gotta say is the russians who originally made this..like a week ago seem to think its a TS not a TC so its mislabelled anyways never mind the non compliant bitrate


Posted by nozafc on 08-21-2005 11:00 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Avenue_1
You are my hero..why post this in a review thread for the SVCD version?


You are my hero!!!

You flame someone on a movie review thread yet still fail to review the fucking movie. Fucking tit wank

Anyway

I really liked this film, bitrate problem only matters to those that still watch on cds

8/7/7


Posted by geoffbob30 on 08-21-2005 11:21 PM:

was gonna wait for dvdr but no the wife had to watch it tonight played fine on my stand alone dvd player no problems at all enjoyed the film to.

v\8
a\8
m\8


Posted by krakraille on 08-21-2005 11:37 PM:

Not so good quality on this, would have been ok for a TS.
Pic is grainy, and a bit dark on some places. After some adjustment, it went fine.
Movie was entertaining.

7/8/7


Posted by protekt0r on 08-22-2005 12:42 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by trenty
why is it nuked? 9800 k bitrate is heaps good. so why nuke it?


There are scene rules on what the max bit rate for a SVCD should be. A high bit rate SVCD may have touble playing in stand alone DVD players like mine. Artifacting is a symptom of a SVCD w/ a high bit rate. The DVD player simply cannot keep up w/ the high bit rate cause DVD players rotate the disc much slower than a PC CD/DVD rom drive. However, if you're watching this on ur PC, it doesn't matter and you won't see the difference.

Anyways, quality wise, 8/8/? Worth the download if ur gonna watch it on ur PC er newer stand alone.

-protekt0r

__________________
"Signatures Suck"


Posted by _jadakiss on 08-22-2005 02:24 AM:

bitch bitch bitch


thats all you people do


you people are NEVER happy wit the releases those group brings us

do you people ever realize they DONT have to do shit

lets see YOU do a better job



Q-8

A-9

M-7

this sounds great on my DVD ... people find any excuse to nuke something :SMH:


Posted by Stonington on 08-22-2005 02:27 AM:

Video is dark, but watchable. Sound is a bit low but decent as well. Movie is great, kidna lingers at the beginning at bit too long, but the ending is well worth the wait. I re-encoded the video and authored it to dvd, played in the good ol' standalone dvd player with no problems!

8/8/8


Posted by Airhead on 08-22-2005 03:15 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by trenty
why is it nuked? 9800 k bitrate is heaps good. so why nuke it?


LOL ..

In the newbie section i believe on VCDQuality.com's forum they have the "TDX" rules ... might be good to read them over.

From the SVCD Rules: Must be at least 1750kbit average, with a maximum of 2450kbit.

These rules werent put into place to nuke groups just for the fun of it, these rules were put into place as errors made by the group make the quality lesser then watchable , or unwatchable to some extent.

The Bitrate rule take for example , way back when this rule was made , if any SVCD burnt to CDR exceeded 2450kbit bitrate it caused the movie on standalone players to crash ... hence making it unwatchable.

Lots of people nowadays still got old standalone players which in this case 9800kbit bitrate is hella high and will cause the movie to crash on their standalones.

9800kbit is even high for DVDR standards lol ...


Posted by protekt0r on 08-22-2005 04:07 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by _jadakiss
this sounds great on my DVD ... people find any excuse to nuke something :SMH:


Nuking a release for having a bit rate of 9800KB/s is not "any excuse." Almost all DVD's aren't even at 9800KB/s! There's simply no reason to have a bit rate that high- hence it was nuked. Go try to play this release on a standalone DVD player and see what happens. SVCD was meant for DVD players- not WinDVD or PowerDVD. Until scene rules change, the nuke is valid and done w/ good reason.

-protekt0r

__________________
"Signatures Suck"


Posted by fluffinator on 08-22-2005 05:59 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by _jadakiss
bitch bitch bitch


thats all you people do


you people are NEVER happy wit the releases those group brings us

do you people ever realize they DONT have to do shit

lets see YOU do a better job



People like you should be banned, out right, and you are also half the problem in these threads.

Lets get a few things straight jackass. These groups , most of the time, buy fucking silvers off the street.

Now that's outta the way, these threads are to rate the release, not to be thankful we have one, not to ass kiss and suck off the groups, to RATE THE RELEASE.

This is a slightly below average TC, simple as that, let alone the rediculously high bitrate.

Rating shit high just cause it's there defeats the purpose of this thread.
(maybe we should add that to the x.69 autopost.)

As for doing a better job, send me the source and I will, I KNOW WHAT I'm DOING WHEN I ENCODE, You neeed to shutup and rate the release or leave. people are entitled to their opinions, and this site is specifically for rating releases.

This release is sub par for a TC, simple as that.

Bah

Shitty TC for a shitty movie. UBER dark is all I can say, amazingly dark and slihgtly blurred, seems like the ruskies broke out that red telecine machine again, but that can be dealt with by changing your tv tint to green.

Sound was great, movie was pathetic.

7/9/3

Not even 1 titty shot to tie the movie together, and this one really needed it.

Wait for a repack or grab the xvid, cause most people aint gonna be able to watch this on their standalone.

Thos it is fine on the PC, after a brighten filter or two..... did i mention UBERDARK for a TC?

__________________
And it appears Burt Reynolds has changed his name to Turd Furgeson.

That's right, it's a funny name


Posted by Doomsdayer on 08-22-2005 06:20 AM:

fluffinator.. I have to agree with Jadakiss. The complaining is annoying... if your job is to rate the video, just rate it... it doesnt say "please rate it and in the process complain and cry". They release this stuff, but no where does it say you HAVE to watch it....they dont force you to! anyhow, i'm thankful i was able to save the money and watch it and heres my review:

Audio was average - 7

Video was decent, very much watchable - 7

Movie was pretty good - 8.5


Posted by 4NAK8TR on 08-22-2005 06:25 AM:

Pretty decent release. It' does suffer a little from the darkness that seems to be commom for many TC. Thanks for the release NBT. 7-8-8


Posted by nozafc on 08-22-2005 06:26 AM:

BUNCH OF WHINEY FUCKING ARSEHOLES

YES IM TALKING IN CAPS

THE REASON WHY IS BECAUSE IF UR READING THIS UR A FUCKING WANKER

YES IT HAS A HIGH BIT RATE, NO IT PROBABLY WONT PLAY IN UR DVD PLAYER. FUCK U AND UR FUCKING CHEAP ASSHOLE PLAYER. USE SOMETHING LIKE WINAVI 2 CONVERT 2 DVD!!!

AFTERALL IF U HAVE A DVD THEN U CAN GET TEH SEX!!!

http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=65497

:: You're a faggot, banned.


Posted by protekt0r on 08-22-2005 07:10 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by nozafc
BUNCH OF WHINEY FUCKING ARSEHOLES

YES IM TALKING IN CAPS

THE REASON WHY IS BECAUSE IF UR READING THIS UR A FUCKING WANKER

YES IT HAS A HIGH BIT RATE, NO IT PROBABLY WONT PLAY IN UR DVD PLAYER. FUCK U AND UR FUCKING CHEAP ASSHOLE PLAYER. USE SOMETHING LIKE WINAVI 2 CONVERT DVD!!!

AFTERALL IF U HAVE A DVD THEN U CAN GET TEH SEX!!!

http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=65497




This post belongs on The Register's FoTW™

__________________
"Signatures Suck"


Posted by dw33p on 08-22-2005 02:54 PM:

Its not that the entire movie is 9800 kbit. Its ripped in Average bitrate, meaning there are spikes to 9800. Why the fuck they did it ... i dont know, but that many nukes in such a short time does tell allot about the ripping skills of there ripper .... he sux .

And why complain? Scene is no p2p crap, high standards are expected. If someone cant reach these standards, its not meanth for scene.

Now for movie:

7/7/X ... not that great quality for a TC.


Posted by Neversoft on 08-22-2005 03:58 PM:

You fuckers can't even rate the quality of a bootleg movie without getting all bent out of shape? Fine, fuck you...

Thread closed!

Several of you have just found your way onto the Moderator Shit-list, well done. I would throw some bans around but where the fuck would I start? It amazes me that even though the rules are posted in every comments thread AND I posted a "warning" earlier, you people just continue. FUCK OFF AND DIE!


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:07 AM.
Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.