VCDQuality Forums
Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Bloodrayne - CAM - HYdRO (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=68148)


Posted by X69 on 01-10-2006 03:38 AM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by whofarted on 01-10-2006 04:46 AM:

Video is decent. Not Hydros Best, but defnitely watchable.
Audio is same old cam quality.
Movie is a good piece of entertainment to waste some time.

V/7
A/5
M/3


Posted by keam on 01-10-2006 05:26 AM:

mm...........well not to bad watchable 7/5/8 ..................................well you hav to judge for your self

Kristanna Loken eff hot......


Posted by chiv on 01-10-2006 05:42 AM:

an 8 out of 10?! each to their own, everyone has their own opinion, but holy crap man, come on...3 tops, just because lokens in it.


Posted by David Cameron on 01-10-2006 07:27 AM:

Uwe Boll Rules !!!!!!!!!!11111111


Posted by vipper1oo7 on 01-10-2006 09:49 AM:

for a cam its pretty good quality good video and good audio but for a movie come on read the nfo it explains it these type of movies are the reason hollywood is losing money not piracy hell the mario bros movie was better then this and it was based off a game as well

i gave the video a 5
i gave the audio a 5
the movie gets a -10

props out for quick release and to help all of us save our money


Posted by Trismogestos on 01-10-2006 10:17 AM:

Boll is da shit!

5/6/1 (for Locken in it)


Posted by deano21 on 01-10-2006 10:51 AM:

finished watching great release better than the other shit they been putting out lately


7/7/7

im a UK person so i like it hehe

__________________


Posted by big_masta_g on 01-10-2006 11:25 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by vipper1oo7
for a cam its pretty good quality good video and good audio but for a movie come on read the nfo it explains it these type of movies are the reason hollywood is losing money not piracy hell the mario bros movie was better then this and it was based off a game as well

i gave the video a 5
i gave the audio a 5
the movie gets a -10

props out for quick release and to help all of us save our money



He talk good! Give him a beer!


Posted by Dwaggy on 01-10-2006 11:49 AM:

Anyone voting this movie above a 2 is mentally retarded or maybe a genius i dont know

__________________



i have sigs off


Posted by Striped on 01-10-2006 12:17 PM:

decent cam

7/7/? movie looks like shit though


Posted by manal on 01-10-2006 01:32 PM:

croped on the left. cam is tilted
audio is cam audio. fairly hallow



video-4

audio-6

movie-10 ((because oen min shes doing her usual thing and the next shes mounting this guy for no reason))


Posted by immun3 on 01-10-2006 02:45 PM:

Not a bad first release, watchable if you must see what is almost certianly going to be a crap fest.

Video - Cropped a fair amount on the left, screen tilts from right to left slightly. Pixellation however, is what really detrement's the video, its heavy and the dark edges to the screen don't help. On the plus side colours aren't too bad.

Audio - typical CAM to be honest, you can make out what is being said without too much difficulty, but the Camera itself is emitting some noise. After a little movement........and some guys hand appearing......in the first .rar, all seems to have settled.

Movie - i don't think i'll be bothering, unless by some miracle Uwe Boll has been to directing school since Alone In The Dark.

6/4.5/*


Posted by meltingsmoke on 01-10-2006 04:52 PM:

The video was good, the audio was good for a cam, the movie however needed work.

7/7/2


Posted by SpinsCds on 01-10-2006 08:55 PM:

7/7/8


Not bad for a cam even tho its a dark movie to begin with.

Video is good and sound isnt bad.. Very Watchable

Spins


Posted by tpw2k on 01-10-2006 10:47 PM:

gotta love the nfo

but seriously anyone who will watch this in theatres should be shot and close range. Don't let Uwe Boll think he has talent, your just gonna make him do more movies, and the world doesn't want that. If there is an alien invasion, it will be because they hate our movies


Posted by HBx2000 on 01-11-2006 12:20 AM:

V-8: Nice, bright picture in the dark scenes.
A-4: Could barely hear all dialog, lot of static.
M-7: Great, only the ending sucked a little bit.


Posted by Mr_Grinch on 01-11-2006 01:29 AM:

Uwe Boll for the win!

Pretty poor cam. Overly cropped and awful audio.

I'm still going to watch it though.


Posted by H8MACHINE on 01-11-2006 02:43 AM:

Video: 5
Audio: 4
Movie: 2

Uwe Boll deserve to die from an extremely painfull death for porting great games into shitty and pointless movie...Lets see if he will put zombies in FarCry


Posted by bernashmat on 01-11-2006 07:10 AM:

Pic quality 4, Just about watchable, Sound is hissy, The film its self would'nt bother watching it twice, Crap


Posted by trenchant on 01-11-2006 09:16 AM:

Video: 7 - Not horrible for a cam release
Audio: 5 - Worst thing about this release
Movie: 7 - Not exactly a cinematic masterpeice, but then again, what is? All you people rating it anything under 5 clearly haven't seen the movie and are just doing the everyday douchebag BS and jumping on the "Uwe Boll Sucks!" bandwagon. STFU and watch the movie, and then rate it accordingly.


Posted by dontgiveafuck on 01-11-2006 02:36 PM:

stupid movie

and they didn't make loken look hot. she looks chunky.
she looked better in T3


Posted by bigdaddyhorse on 01-11-2006 03:09 PM:

A nice new helping of cheese curtisy of the good Doctor Boll!
Anyone expecting anything else shouldn't waste their time, this dude gets financed to LOSE money.
I'm hoping this is as bad as House Of The Dead, although reviews I've read say otherwise.


Posted by David Cameron on 01-11-2006 07:13 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by trenchant
Video: 7 - Not horrible for a cam release
Audio: 5 - Worst thing about this release
Movie: 7 - Not exactly a cinematic masterpeice, but then again, what is? All you people rating it anything under 5 clearly haven't seen the movie and are just doing the everyday douchebag BS and jumping on the "Uwe Boll Sucks!" bandwagon. STFU and watch the movie, and then rate it accordingly.



You are cool and you are the good at movies. Uwe Boll rules!!!!!!111


Posted by Uwe_Boll on 01-11-2006 08:15 PM:

:: Worthless gimmick

__________________
I am the making films of Germany Best.
Suck my Oscar.


Posted by Cinder on 01-11-2006 10:52 PM:

Video: 7 Not too bad for a cam, a little pixelated at times... but definitely watchable.

Audio: 5 A bit less than your typical CAM. There's obvious feedback from the camera, but the sound is still somewhat clear.

Movie: ? Haven't seen the whole thing yet, so I'll let you know after.


Posted by mickymaster on 01-11-2006 11:45 PM:

6/6/- i havent watched it... from all the reviews i really dont feel like wasting my time, when i heard about bloodrayne i was so excited til i saw who the director was, such a great potential no doubt destroyed by such a poor director, why do ppl constantly give this man money, then in an interview he stated "the internet community give me a hard time because i am german and pay for my movies with nazi money" DUDE NO ITS CAUSE YOU SUCK


Posted by goman on 01-12-2006 09:47 AM:

not a bad release, watchable I suppose

7, 5, ? but supposed to be crap


Posted by stumblingblock on 01-15-2006 08:33 PM:

as a CAM or more broadly?

Well, do we evaluate the quality of the release as a CAM, or more generally the quality regardless of format? As a CAM this is amusing, a good way to illustrate what a CAM is, with all the flaws vividly apparent. But generally speaking it is watchable, but let's not kid ourselves about the quality.

Video 5

Audio 4

how good the movie is is up to how you like it, neutral observation=5


Posted by jacktheripper on 01-16-2006 06:10 PM:

Well I was going to watch the Movie but from all the review and what people in this forum are saying I really don't want to.

Video = 5

Audio = 4

Movie = 5 I thought it was going to be better.


Posted by maideneurope on 01-21-2006 10:40 PM:

I aint seen this version yet but the prevail release gave me a headache 20mins in. Pretty poor really


Posted by funeralfoguk on 01-27-2006 12:32 PM:

5/4/1
movie sucks


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:22 AM.
Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.