VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Signs *PROPER* - SCREENER - EWS (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=8862)

awesome!

Awesome! Another new group that re-encodes! We can never have too many

Hint: notice the sarcasm

6/6/6

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.

just wondering, how do you know it's a re-encode??

__________________
http://www.eternalbeats.net

How do you not know? Look at EM's version and then take a look at this. Doesn't take a genius to figure that out, maybe you haven't checked the signs.vcd-sample.ews.mpg.

How does he know???

Because hes a not jackass and knows what the sample looks like... It looks like the same source but its okay quality...

Forgot my Rating... 6/6/8

__________________

..::HiGHONASCii::..

I saw sample, but I dont have them side-by-side for detail comparison and analysis. Thank you for your wise wisdom in detecting re-encodes though, ob-one !

__________________
http://www.eternalbeats.net

Next time, may the force be with you! As for the release, still kinda blurry and motion scenes are not so good and please EWS, next time make a sample longer than 20 seconds!

yeah why should we have 10 different movies in 2weeks when we can have 20 different re-encodes from the same movie and same source in just one week (btw 80% would be from new groups *caugh-caugh*).... so let us go praise for them

TEG or TCF will bring the *REAL PROPER* (Hopefully)

__________________

..::HiGHONASCii::..

6/7/8
good job!

you dumbasses...they already said it was from the same source...
they said in the nfo that the last rls was too dark, a little too much background noise, etc...they're not claiming to have a different source.

Well its good... i think..lol ... 7/7/7

__________________
Kill the FUCKIN RHINO.

this is realy getting out of haND now.

so what the hell is *PROPER* about it and which version is it more proper than ??

those f** new groups should stay by the rules and write down in their nfo what they have done better. cause thats what nfo's are for

quote:

---

Originally posted by spectra
so what the hell is *PROPER* about it and which version is it more proper than ??

those f** new groups should stay by the rules and write down in their nfo what they have done better. cause thats what nfo's are for

---

__________________

..::HiGHONASCii::..

What fucking rules? The getting movies for free rules? Oh last time i checked the rules were YOUR GETTING MOVIES FOR FREE SO PLEASE DON'T SAY WE SUCK, CAUSE YOU CANT DO BETTER. Is that the rule?

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by The Booker Man
What fucking rules? The getting movies for free rules? Oh last time i checked the rules were YOUR GETTING MOVIES FOR FREE SO PLEASE DON'T SAY WE SUCK, CAUSE YOU CANT DO BETTER. Is that the rule?

---

then don't get it. I actually do see a point for this release. I hate movie releases that have a hiss in the audio. This one doesn't and is a better encode of the same source. THat to me is worth a proper.

quote:

---

Originally posted by ebeats
just wondering, how do you know it's a re-encode??

---

hrm

the video is not clear, and the audio is fine on my pc, but skips like a mofo on my dvd player

hopefully somebody will release a real proper, with a clear picture, and proper sound

get a better ripper/encoder

quote:

---

Originally posted by CharlyTuna



nothings free . unless you dont value your time on earth, my time is priceless. maybe your's isnt

this release is pointless, probably a-team at it again with a new name, who knows

this group is pointless

---

U idiots must enjoy downloading the same movie 20x... Oh OK.. its free.. so let me waste my time downloading the same crap as the last release, but reencoded because it was 'too dark'.

Oh, it's OK because that was included in the nfo as the reason for a proper.

Get a life.. A group should be laughed out of the scene with releases like that.. But you idiots stick up for them with your 'Its free' BS..

Page 2 and still waiting for a review of the actual release, and how the pic/audio quality compares to the Workprint. sigh.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.

I can't even find this muffucka.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sy12uP
I can't even find this muffucka.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by CharlyTuna



nothings free . unless you dont value your time on earth, my time is priceless. maybe your's isnt

this release is pointless, probably a-team at it again with a new name, who knows

this group is pointless

---

oh, HAHAHAHA damn

quote:

---

Originally posted by a1catraz


hey charlytuna, don't tell anyone this!! *shessh*.. tcf, and esoteric are also known as.. A-team.. SHESH!! C.t.P was also named A-team before!!, even better, FTF is ALSO A-team.!!! DON'T TELL ANYONE!!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by CharlyTuna


shadup

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by a1catraz


funny how somebody else posted the same thing about KAV, and u said!! OOOOO THEY ARE A-TEAM...

you are really stupid.. really..

damn fruit

---

For fucks sake you guys are all dumb, READ THE GODDAMN NFO AND THEN POST A REPLY YOU FUCKIN MORONS!