VCDQuality Forums - Half Past Dead *Proper* - TELESYNC

Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Half Past Dead *Proper* - TELESYNC - ESOTERiC (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=11031)

Posted by aXs-SVCD on 11-15-2002 01:37 PM:

Just got the Sample for this movie, it looks dark but its not bad movie, couldn't wait for a Better Quality. Oh ya it is a little bit better then FTF

Keep up the good work and bring out more Good Pre Movies

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.

Posted by Swimj on 11-15-2002 01:51 PM:

Please dont ever proper again Esoteric, other release was fine........

Posted by Neversoft on 11-15-2002 01:55 PM:

RE: My post in the FTF thread...

Esoteric... You need a kicking!

There's nothing wrong with the FTF release, it's more than adequate until a screener comes out.

__________________
Statistically... 9 out of 10 people actually enjoy gang rape.

Posted by jaoal on 11-15-2002 02:05 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Swimj
Please dont ever proper again Esoteric, other release was fine........

yeah, but u gotta admit this release is a little better then FTF?, so "propering" wasn't totally taken out of the blue imho..

6 / 5 / ?

Posted by Trenton_1 on 11-15-2002 02:42 PM:

I only have the samples of both FTF's and Esoteric's and they had every right to Proper the release. Good job on FTF for the faster release but the Picture and sound are better on the Esoteric release.

Thanks to all you guys for giving us the movies, and all your hard work!

Posted by THE_DREAM on 11-15-2002 03:38 PM:

u guys go and do this after i voted u guys number 2 when it comes to quality. the video is much to dark, the ftf rls was fine. if u going to proper make it better than the previous one.

Posted by crapper on 11-15-2002 04:16 PM:

same source same rip..
only darker..

eso this is lame and u know it.. call it an internal.. that would be nice..

but proper.. MY ASS!
u cant proper from the same source.. unless the previouse ripper sucks ass.. (which in the case of ftf could have been true but wasnt)

Posted by KaMa on 11-15-2002 04:18 PM:

ESO....... I guess i mean its darker witch is KInda Gay i dont see any difference except for its darker . heh

Posted by nicci on 11-15-2002 04:38 PM:

lol, the lamest group around make a proper.......
go away, ftf is allways best, look at ur latest releases, when u have nothing to do make propers of ur own crappy shit...

Posted by BridgeLife on 11-15-2002 05:04 PM:

no need for a proper

Posted by jammi® on 11-15-2002 05:46 PM:

i have to say FTF version looks better and the ESO should have labled theres Half.Past.Dead.CRAPPPER.TS-ESOTERiC realy no need for a proper

Posted by BladeX on 11-15-2002 07:21 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by jammi®
i have to say FTF version looks better and the ESO should have labled theres Half.Past.Dead.CRAPPPER.TS-ESOTERiC realy no need for a proper

you're a fucking moron. everyone else who posted that ftf's looked better is a moron.

I downloaded this soon as it was released this morning, and picture and the sound are better. I'm not going to say way better, but eso's picture is not grainy, and the sound is not sizzly. what i have found out is, the shit is out of sync. i don't know how the fuck you could release a proper and it be out of sync. but, as far as the picture/sound go, it is better, and definitely propered. i played both, you can see a difference. almost all you idiots that posted had to have posted based on a fucking jpeg. fuck all of you idiots.

Posted by Outrage_Display on 11-15-2002 07:54 PM:

Lame

Good old lame ESOTERiC rlsing this under the asumed *PROPER* when there is ocviously no need for a proper on FTFs rip. The only reason thay rlsed it as *PROPER* is cuz they were late on distro and didnt feel thye would be 'leet' if they were to rls it as *iNTERNAL* like they should have.

U dont like this post or me, I dont give a fuck!

Posted by SneakySix on 11-15-2002 09:10 PM:

Omg.. There was no need for a proper, the FTF was fine, stupid eso just wanted a rls

should be nuked

Posted by Levangles on 11-15-2002 09:17 PM:

i haven't seen eiter of these rls's yet... but are they better than uti's cam?

Posted by scousethief on 11-15-2002 09:20 PM:

hmmm all the ass suckers from ftf are around again i see

If you think Ftf's version of this is better then you really are blind deaf and extremely dumb please ,, stop sucking groups dicks and give opinions that are at least 50 % right instead of giving the crap FTF turn out anything over a 5 . Ill give them 10/10 for their speady output of these movies but in 99 put of a 100 cases the audio is shite and the pic is shagged if they could up there quality by 50% i too would worship at the alter of the outcast

Posted by DaveMode on 11-15-2002 09:49 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by scousethief
hmmm all the ass suckers from ftf are around again i see

If you think Ftf's version of this is better then you really are blind deaf and extremely dumb please ,, stop sucking groups dicks and give opinions that are at least 50 % right instead of giving the crap FTF turn out anything over a 5 . Ill give them 10/10 for their speady output of these movies but in 99 put of a 100 cases the audio is shite and the pic is shagged if they could up there quality by 50% i too would worship at the alter of the outcast

I don't think that people siding with particular groups is the number one problem.. the problem is that a large number of people post here without downloading or watching the movie.. or even the sample at all.. it's pretty obvious sometimes.

Posted by lowrida0000 on 11-15-2002 10:17 PM:

Em, im really wondering about the fact, that all of u claim to have the proper already.... but NO ONE mentions the fact, that this version is async and therefore a NUKE...

Bad luck Esoteric....

Posted by nokia on 11-15-2002 10:40 PM:

Yea, most are jpeg judges. If they saw the actual sample it looks MUCH better than FTF's (picture is sharper and less pixelated, colors are more vibrant... if eso chose a brighter scene as a sample you'd see the difference easier) and also sounds MUCH better (less hiss and clicks) but too bad it is out of sync by a second or something. nice try eso...

Posted by Fire_Sokar on 11-15-2002 11:17 PM:

STFU

ALL OF YOU STFU.

Ok 1, this is worth a proper, 2 this is not the same source.
3, ftf was more faded. they have little ticks in each copy. This seems to be the best. Looks like a DV TS. SO STFU props to eso. FTF You are improving but get your suckers off the boards please.

Posted by ultrakiller on 11-16-2002 12:09 AM:

Is this out of sync?

Posted by nokia on 11-16-2002 12:33 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by ultrakiller
Is this out of sync?

it might be minorly out of sync but it's damn hard to tell in the sample.

Posted by Comedy on 11-16-2002 02:09 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by BladeX
you're a fucking moron. everyone else who posted that ftf's looked better is a moron.

I downloaded this soon as it was released this morning, and picture and the sound are better. I'm not going to say way better, but eso's picture is not grainy, and the sound is not sizzly. what i have found out is, the shit is out of sync. i don't know how the fuck you could release a proper and it be out of sync. but, as far as the picture/sound go, it is better, and definitely propered. i played both, you can see a difference. almost all you idiots that posted had to have posted based on a fucking jpeg. fuck all of you idiots.

Whoa BladeX joins VCDQ!

Posted by Cory on 11-16-2002 02:31 PM:

Just got this release...haven't grabbed the FTF release so I can't compare the 2...
Video is dark...but it is very clear in my opinion in the lighter scenes, kind of hard on the eyes in the scenes that are dark like in the beginning
Audio is very good I think, I haven't heard a scratch yet on CD1 or any problems, but then again I only watched the first 7 minutes then I just skimmed through the rest.
Only downsides that I see are: It's full screen and you are missing part of the picture, and it's dark.
(I'm not judging on the FTF one, just this release alone by itself so I can't really compare the two together.)

Posted by syxx2001 on 11-16-2002 03:38 PM:

what if you download both, and take one's video, and the others audio? doesn't make much sense, but it could help with the out of sync problem. or you could just reencode it

__________________
going by the jpg, i will take a little dull video over the last release anyday.

Posted by MacMall88 on 11-17-2002 01:34 AM:

I'm sick of all u FTF cocksuckers. This rls is GREAT, it reminds me of the old CTP stuff (Blade II, Not Another Teen Movie), and FTFs rls was SHIT as usual. I don't hate FTF, im not a member of ESO, but FTF rlses SHIT for the most part ( the only rls ive ever watched from them was Van Wilder). Aside from the slight sync problem, this is a very fine rls, as was ESOs Rules Of attraction which was also underrated.

8.5/6(outta sync slighty. otherwise good)/?

Posted by OzZyOz on 11-17-2002 05:23 AM:

MacMall u must be a crack smoker. This is a tad a so little fucking tad better. FTF's release is prob the best release they ever did and it looks fine and dandy on my TV. Only the dark scenes are a lil hard to watch. As to compare this to C_T_P I think u need some serious help. And no I'm not an FTF dicksucker or and FTF member for fuck sake. I'm sick of all u idoits saying FTF is total shit yes they have been known for shit hell still do but this release was fine!

Posted by Cory on 11-17-2002 05:29 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by MacMall88
I'm sick of all u FTF cocksuckers. This rls is GREAT, it reminds me of the old CTP stuff (Blade II, Not Another Teen Movie), and FTFs rls was SHIT as usual. I don't hate FTF, im not a member of ESO, but FTF rlses SHIT for the most part ( the only rls ive ever watched from them was Van Wilder). Aside from the slight sync problem, this is a very fine rls, as was ESOs Rules Of attraction which was also underrated.

8.5/6(outta sync slighty. otherwise good)/?

How can you judge FTF releases when you just said that the only release that you've ever watched from them was Van Wilder? You must be one of those people who judge from the pictures.

Posted by ddmf on 11-17-2002 08:01 PM:

video was great, maybe a little dark... audio was ok, but well out of sync near the end of cd1 and for the first 10 mins of cd2...

-D

Posted by JoshNya on 11-19-2002 04:53 PM:

CD1 a-ok
CD2 all out of sync (fixed it for myself)

Im coooo

Posted by shadyrapper2 on 11-21-2002 02:21 AM:

good quality copy. i wonder what cam they used?

Posted by shadyrapper2 on 11-21-2002 02:21 AM:

good quality copy. i wonder what cam they used?

Posted by bdimag on 11-22-2002 08:49 PM:

is it just my copy.. or is CD2's audio about 1-2 seconds late?

i guess ill go get it again, but..

~bd

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:35 PM.

Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page