VCDQuality Forums
Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- A Man Apart - CAM - UTi (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=17500)


Posted by Leigh^ on 04-05-2003 04:08 PM:

A Man Apart - CAM - UTi

The usual consistant cam quality from UTi; guess we've come to think of these as standard now

Slighty grainy as with other releases, will be interesting to compare this with the workprint from VideoCD, either way, nasty bad film
Mad props to UTi for bringing another good quality cam

7/8/6


Posted by Rep- on 04-05-2003 04:19 PM:

very grainy, good sound too. props to uti
6/7/x


Posted by Mystic Slippers on 04-05-2003 04:20 PM:

This movie sucks old women's tits. El Diablo was piss poor (even though it's Diesel's best work lol).

CAM is nice, usual UTi standard. Decent enough sound too.

8/7/2


Posted by SycoCowz on 04-05-2003 04:34 PM:

Marfdom

very nice for a CAM

8/7/X

__________________
?sdrawkcab ffuts gnidaer etah uoy t'noD


Posted by iopf on 04-05-2003 05:08 PM:

el diablo was so bad but i heard they reshot/rewrote a bunch of scenes, so who knows...still probably trash tho...


Posted by MoNoXiDe on 04-05-2003 05:15 PM:

7/7/7... Thanks For The Wonderful CAM!

__________________

..::HiGHONASCii::..


Posted by CcZ on 04-05-2003 05:24 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Mystic Slippers
This movie sucks old women's tits. El Diablo was piss poor (even though it's Diesel's best work lol).

CAM is nice, usual UTi standard. Decent enough sound too.

8/7/2


Mystic got it right. Movie sucks, good cam, just a lil' grainy.


Posted by X400 on 04-05-2003 05:26 PM:

There was a workprint version of this released by another group
but it never got posted up here guess they didnt want an official release but it looked better then this

:: the movie WAS posted here, under El Diablo. do some research -M$


Posted by backoff on 04-05-2003 05:35 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by iopf
el diablo was so bad but i heard they reshot/rewrote a bunch of scenes, so who knows...still probably trash tho...

Nothing re done cept the intro and 1 extra 30 second long scene at the end. And the date on the grave says 2003 instead of 2002 like in the WP. Nothing else different... I saw the WP last year and thought it was ok. I would recommend getting this instead of the WP though because it had blurs all over it


Posted by webqaz on 04-05-2003 05:49 PM:

I think this movie was posted here before, but it was under the name it had when the Work pint was made and that was "El Diablo" it came out last year I think.


Posted by Crinus19m on 04-05-2003 06:06 PM:

Not a bad release from UTi. a bit on the grainy side but the sound is good and as well as the video. Its well worth watching.


Posted by Smurf Boy on 04-05-2003 06:34 PM:

Video is pretty good, just like UTI's others, sound is a bit hollow and cammy but good for what it is. Movie blows though, 6/7/2


Posted by X400 on 04-05-2003 06:49 PM:

oh no wonder hehe my bad


Posted by ARSoNiC on 04-05-2003 06:56 PM:

shit movie.. good release. im glad UTi is still around. i think they are one of the most respectable groups around, i was woundering where the hell they where. i saw the workprint about a year ago, Vin Desil is a homo ;/ i think it would have been a good movie if he didnt fuck it up


Posted by flex0r on 04-05-2003 06:58 PM:

Cool

well for a CAM release it looks quite good and the sound is alrighty too so...
7/8/?


Posted by LiL PaPPy on 04-05-2003 09:01 PM:

once again nice cam from UTi.... movie looks horrible though.... 7/6/2?.... nebody seen this?


Posted by lucium on 04-05-2003 10:23 PM:

Uti Cam

8/6/?

Good Job Uti, as good as Expected.

Oh and Congratz on being one of the few groups out there to admit they have done a cam, when they have done one.... (Y)


Posted by bryehn on 04-05-2003 10:52 PM:

copy's better than the workprint, too bad they diddn't rewrite the movie :P

everyone should do cams as well as uti..

8/7/2.5


Posted by KrackZaa on 04-05-2003 10:56 PM:

saw the sample, usual uti cam like 8 mile, but please look at bubbi's votes, hes been doing it for a long time.

8/7/


Posted by B16A2 on 04-05-2003 11:14 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by KrackZaa
saw the sample, usual uti cam like 8 mile, but please look at bubbi's votes, hes been doing it for a long time.

8/7/



[ you should know why im removing what you said, because its fucking stupid to say shit like that on a public board. -pHo ]


Posted by LiQuIdMuNkY on 04-05-2003 11:40 PM:

[2003-04-05/16:55] A.Man.Apart.CAM-UTi (PRE 7hrs 42mins ago)
[2003-04-05/17:04] A.Man.Apart.SCREENER-UTi (PRE 7hrs 33mins ago)

Im confused

is there a screener or not?

__________________
I dont know, whats a good sig?


Posted by Dune on 04-06-2003 01:02 AM:

posted by LiQuIdMuNkY

[2003-04-05/16:55] A.Man.Apart.CAM-UTi (PRE 7hrs 42mins ago)
[2003-04-05/17:04] A.Man.Apart.SCREENER-UTi (PRE 7hrs 33mins ago)

Im confused

is there a screener or not?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

from my top site friends they say there is a screener why its not offcially released yet i dont know but we should expect it soon

__________________
Children Of Dune RULED


Posted by hadu on 04-06-2003 05:10 AM:

decent quality for a cam but still not worthwhile to d/l for me..

crappy movie anyway.. man wtf happened to big Vin from Fast and the Furious? and he's not even in the second one so now u know something is up


6/7/3


Posted by faYth on 04-06-2003 09:01 AM:

vin wasnt in fatf2 because he had run away to mexico in the end. i think vin is just on a trip down hill. fatf was great. xxx was a little less but still great. and this movie was ok.

as for the quality. props to UTi, they're great and all. but i cant stand the way the video looks. it looks like thoes old black and white videos that have been colorized. the sound was good tho. 4/7/7


Posted by B16A2 on 04-06-2003 10:26 AM:

He's not in Fast and the Furious 2 because he wanted too much money for appearing in the sequel. The producers had to change the script a little to make the story flow properly. It's still gonna be a great sequel imo since the production company was able to dish out a bigger budget than they had to work with in the first film. Vin Diesel fans don't even get started with that bull crap about Vin Deisel putting that movie in the spotlight, etc. That movie MADE Vin Deisel before many people even knew who he was, before that he was a giant in some cartoon


Posted by choder-boy on 04-06-2003 12:31 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by faYth
vin wasnt in fatf2 because he had run away to mexico in the end. i think vin is just on a trip down hill. fatf was great. xxx was a little less but still great. and this movie was ok.

as for the quality. props to UTi, they're great and all. but i cant stand the way the video looks. it looks like thoes old black and white videos that have been colorized. the sound was good tho. 4/7/7



He was best in Pitch Black

6/6/?


Posted by Wesb0b on 04-06-2003 07:56 PM:

...Saw this one in the theaters friday and was to busy doing other shit to catch on to the whole thing, but a tip for vin would be done ever shoot a m-16 like that again (he really didnt know how to hold it and it just wasent his type) he schould have killed them bitches hand to hand (would have made the movie a hella lot more intresting) as for the quality of this rls its typical uti, sounds is alright and video is decent as well....

__________________
How bout a choclate coverd pretzel


Posted by Kanabis on 04-07-2003 07:48 AM:

I know ppl vote relative to the source but I still think this could have looked better. I thought a LITTLE progress had been made in the cam area but this looks as bad as I remember cams a couple years ago. And is there a scene missing in this? Towards the end they are getting into a car in the day time then it switches to night, raining, somewhere in the city. Any way whatever. Vin Diesel is gay and movie might not have been that bad with a better actor. 5/6/6


Posted by mceckounltd on 04-07-2003 09:56 PM:

heres what i think

Video: The video quality is good but a lil grainy. When the text comes up can see shiny lines going on it like a really high or low quality tape. Video is excellent though.

Audio: You can hear a echo but thats what u get for a cam. Good sound.

Movie: Havent seen it yet


Posted by kranky on 04-08-2003 01:53 PM:

not bad for a CAM

I say if you really want to see this movie, d/l the cam. I thought it was watchable. Video was very dark in some spots. Audio was good. U get what u pay for. 4/7/8.


Posted by torxxx on 04-09-2003 09:54 AM:

Great Cam rls.. Best cam I've seen in a while. The colors are off, but if you tweak the video settings in power dvd, you can make it look pretty bright with colors.
Audio is decent for a cam. No audience sounds

V- 8 (for a cam)
A - 8
M - half way through the movie 6


Posted by |V|USTANG_FAN on 04-10-2003 06:56 PM:

watchable release, typical UTi, great sound though

7/7/4

__________________


Posted by Movforme on 04-13-2003 04:58 PM:

nice job uti.. video good .. audio good... movie sucked bad


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:30 AM.
Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.