VCDQuality Forums
Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Without a Paddle - TELESYNC - TUN (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=46012)


Posted by Da Postman on 08-29-2004 01:37 AM:

Their CAM was a good cam and it was very watchable. I've already looked at the sample for this version. It's improved in many ways. I will keep it for sure.

V 7.5 good colors
A 7.0 no tin sound
M 7.0


Posted by I am X on 08-29-2004 01:38 AM:

The flicker on the sample was ATROCIOUS. I would rather not watch it at all than to watch it in this condition.

__________________
It is purpose that created us

Purpose that connects us

Purpose that pulls us

that guides us,

that DRIVES us,

It is purpose that defines

PURPOSE........that BINDS us

"Agent Smith" (and cloned virii cohorts)

"The Matrix Reloaded"


Posted by Debo on 08-29-2004 01:40 AM:

ya the flickering is gona kill ur eyes
sound is alright tho
4/8

__________________


Posted by lozman on 08-29-2004 01:40 AM:

Tun have alreay done a cam version of this movie that is better than there own tc


Posted by jniemiec on 08-29-2004 01:45 AM:

looks like the same flicker that was in the cam release.

6/8/8


Posted by vip3r on 08-29-2004 02:16 AM:

English please.

Anyways, this is the CAM with direct audio.

4.5/8/8 - Rated as a TELESYNC. Sure i gave the CAM a 7, but it was a 1 week + theater pre at the time, and TELESYNC's are generally better quality than this. Thanks but i'll pass TUN


Posted by Redemption1980 on 08-29-2004 02:58 AM:

Pic is sure to bring on bouts of epilepsy, pity as it is quite clear.

Sound is nice enough though.

Movie looks OK.

6/8/?


Posted by frak on 08-29-2004 03:02 AM:

same source as their cam.

which was neat for a pre. Not anymore - that flicker will give
you a instant headache.


Posted by nakid on 08-29-2004 03:48 AM:

Dup source of their CAM but seems like better audio and picture seem to have the special TUN TC encoding too it.. kinda blurry and fuzzzy


video: 5.5 -- if you didn't SEIZURE-UP on the CAM this one will do u in!!
audio: 6.0 -- acceptable
movie: 7.0 kinda funny flix



P.S. good try TUN but this one i'll pass on


Posted by geltoob4000 on 08-29-2004 04:19 AM:

MaVen , VideoCD where art thou?

__________________

Who cares what I say. But what about gay Spiderman up there?


Posted by mooseman2070 on 08-29-2004 05:24 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by vip3r
English please.

Anyways, this is the CAM with direct audio.

4.5/8/8 - Rated as a TELESYNC. Sure i gave the CAM a 7, but it was a 1 week + theater pre at the time, and TELESYNC's are generally better quality than this. Thanks but i'll pass TUN



pretty much what i was gonna say, cept i havent seen movie :\

4.5/8/?

and this is extremeley offtopic and against rules, but i must comment on what geltoob4000 said; stfu about maven/videocd FFS, people are fucking spoiled by them, about time other groups do telesyncs, maven does a great job on their SVCD TS's, but cmon, try and take a chance with other groups



__________________
I AM USING THE INTRANET!


Posted by HELLiON on 08-29-2004 05:58 AM:

4/6/??

looks just like their cam with better audio to me


Posted by geltoob4000 on 08-29-2004 07:45 AM:

Im sorry I only prefer what looks good by the JPGs sorry I don't like the small pictures I like the large ones that look good on my TV sorry for saying what I said I just really don't wanna waste a CD-R on what I know I am not gonna be satisfaied with. ( sorry I can't spell that word but you get what im saying )

__________________

Who cares what I say. But what about gay Spiderman up there?


Posted by NewbieSnipa on 08-29-2004 08:01 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by HELLiON
4/4/??

looks just like their cam with better audio to me



Wow you are a smart one, 4 for sound???

Anyway, 3-4/8.5/?


Posted by vip3r on 08-29-2004 08:46 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by HELLiON
4/4/??

looks just like their cam with better audio to me



LMFAO! Does this forum have an ignore feature? HAHAHA! This guy needs to be booted .. sorry, but correct me if im wrong.


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 08-29-2004 08:48 AM:

first off right when I want to give TUN some credit, they go and do something stupid. you release your f..ked up cam video with the eye aching flicker and blur with better audio. I would have taken a more clear pic with the cam audio over this toilet flush picture. Nice try TUN but what a f..king waste..

3/8/7

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by frak on 08-29-2004 09:01 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by mooseman2070
pretty much what i was gonna say, cept i havent seen movie :\

4.5/8/?

and this is extremeley offtopic and against rules, but i must comment on what geltoob4000 said; stfu about maven/videocd FFS, people are fucking spoiled by them, about time other groups do telesyncs, maven does a great job on their SVCD TS's, but cmon, try and take a chance with other groups



wtf are we the make a wish foundation?

I support maven and videocd, etc because they release
TOP QUALITY STUFF.

If another group wants the same kind of respect? like TUN
for example? try releasing a TS that doesn't look like it was
filmed under a strobe light.

Respect is earned.


Posted by Gujuunit on 08-29-2004 09:29 AM:

yes flicker is horible, but since no one else wants to do anything about it they have to re-release there CAM with better audio and it's TeleSync.


Posted by vip3r on 08-29-2004 11:14 AM:

Bullshit. Fucking bullshit.

If you don't like these groups, keep quiet about them, and don't post on threads about them. If you can do better, go ahead .. and prove it to me. TUN is a good group, they just need to work some shit out, same with POT - great CAM group. Errr wait, POT doesn't need to work anything out, they're top notch. But if these new groups are too shitty for you, i guess you'd still be happy with FTF or ESO. (no i'm not flaming them but see how much better these groups are? - be happy with what you have and can have)


Posted by xXx Trader on 08-29-2004 12:03 PM:

DIDO


Posted by RockmanEXE on 08-29-2004 12:21 PM:

new to this forum but been coming to vcdquality a long time now.

as for this movie, i really want a better version, i know every movie has to have a few cams and tc's but i have been waiting patitenly to see a QUALITY release like a svcd maven or videocd release whould rock, not saying other groups suck, its just i guess we've been spoiled by the quality releases lately and when a movie that i really want to see takes forever to get a good release to it, it drives me crazy with anticipation.

I STILL havent gotten anchorman lol

i am all for cams, they may be blah to most, some like them but i enjoy seeing the release groups fighting over who releases what and when, i enjoy just the whole scene as a whole, its sorta addicting.

when i started in the movie scene the quality of releases were so horrible, i remember cams and tc's like freddy vs jason and i was like blehh

but lately in last few months releases have gotten a LOT better and i continue to get better, which is pretty cool considering people are aucutally putting out quality work rather than just rushing out a cam so millions can watch a movie that usually isnt worth paying 5$ for (some movies are...)


Posted by HELLiON on 08-29-2004 01:06 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by vip3r
LMFAO! Does this forum have an ignore feature? HAHAHA! This guy needs to be booted .. sorry, but correct me if im wrong.


first of all it was a typo second sounds like shit but maybe its my speakers wanna buy me some new ones? and third people shouldnt be " booted " for rating a movie lower then someone else


Posted by pabelo on 08-29-2004 02:07 PM:

:/

Realy... they dont have anny dts source...
The sound is not so good .. its ok . but noting better than DD.
5/7/? DOnt watched the whole movie.. need a beter rel!


Posted by Redemption1980 on 08-29-2004 02:13 PM:

quote:
first off right when I want to give TUN some credit, they go and do something stupid. you release your f..ked up cam video with the eye aching flicker and blur with better audio. I would have taken a more clear pic with the cam audio over this toilet flush picture. Nice try TUN but what a f..king waste..


Anyone else think that this has got to stop, yes TUN have they're faults, but they are trying, and considering no-one else is bothering releasing this, I think we should be grateful.
Do you want to buy them a Pal DV Cam so they can go do it again and put it with the new audio, i doubt anyone on here would.

Why is this a waste, thats what samples are for, doesn't take much to download 9mb.


Posted by Miller on 08-29-2004 04:00 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by vip3r
Bullshit. Fucking bullshit.

If you don't like these groups, keep quiet about them, and don't post on threads about them. If you can do better, go ahead .. and prove it to me. TUN is a good group, they just need to work some shit out, same with POT - great CAM group. Errr wait, POT doesn't need to work anything out, they're top notch. But if these new groups are too shitty for you, i guess you'd still be happy with FTF or ESO. (no i'm not flaming them but see how much better these groups are? - be happy with what you have and can have)



couldne't have been said better.

anyway this is not good. as some one has already said " the video in this may cause epilepsey" flicker just like the original cam rls. audio is nice no problems, only watched a few rar's. anyway this ts could have been alot better but the video just ruins it

6/8/8

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!


Posted by Mezt^Up on 08-29-2004 04:35 PM:

Before you guys post i would really suggest that u read the nfo's. u dont have to question if its the same video as their cam they just re-encoded it with dts audio, because thats what was said in the nfo...and yep i agree with vip3r and miller, i think TUN is a good grp, just need to work some shit out as vip3r said.


::edit woops after all that jabberin i did i forgot to rate this, lol

6\8\7.5

__________________


Posted by firefighter on 08-29-2004 09:09 PM:

Finally watched this movie last night. Has some good funny parts in it. As for the copy it was very watchable, not clear as a telesync can get but props to TUN for releasing a VCD TS to tide the leechers over and leaving the option for an SVCD TS to still be released. This has been in theaters now for well over a week now and still no copy from VideoCD/Ctp/maVen so i doubt we will see one from them ... but never know. Untill then or TC/Scr this was a good , watchable copy.

Video as i stated wasnt as clear as it could be , flickery and bit pixelated , no glitching, colors seemed ok besides the picture being bright overall. Sound was pretty good also.

6/8/6

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!


Posted by geltoob4000 on 08-29-2004 11:22 PM:

I think their first release of the movie was better but thats just me.

Never give up TUN.

__________________

Who cares what I say. But what about gay Spiderman up there?


Posted by Jassll on 08-30-2004 03:59 AM:

Video - 5/10 - small enough? Flicker way to bad
Audio - 6/10 - you can hear it
Movie - ?/10

Sorry TUN but this release sucks. To bad it wasnt nuked for something then a good PROPER could be released. Thanks anyway.


Posted by corvex on 08-30-2004 08:55 PM:

Well as stated in there nfo, same video as their cam..audio is a bit better but hissy at times...good choice making this vcd, we could definetly use a better rls, nice effort thow

TS Rating : 3/6/9 (movie is quite good)

__________________
eat, live , breathe : VCD


Posted by bleemster on 08-31-2004 03:26 PM:

sound issue

VIDEO
Good editing on the cam, only a minimal flicker in the pic not noticable after a few mins of watchin...

AUDIO
bad bad bad... sounds like it was recorded in a bathroom

over all 5/10


Posted by AvaLoN on 09-01-2004 03:02 AM:

Talking

Originally posted by bleemster
AUDIO
bad bad bad... sounds like it was recorded in a bathroom



RoFL, Try watch the Telesync insted of the cam The Telesync has perfectly masterd dts decoded sound... (no bathroom sex on that one)

Just my 2 cent


Posted by jibi on 09-02-2004 04:42 AM:

maybe it was me, but in the bedroom scene at the beginning, did anyone happen to notice motion blur (not flickering) with the girl when she was swaying all around? it was as if she had a ghosting effect on her body (maybe she was moving fast?)

anyhow, 4/8/6

*edit: this lasted throughout the movie...

also, the moving rating of a 6 is good for a "dumb" comedy. there were some scenes that you just couldn't help from laughing from. definitly a movie for the 15-25 crowd though.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:22 AM.
Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.